Post Archive

Region: Federation of Conservative Nations

History

Knat wrote:Aye, most right-of-center voices only receive attention on small, third party sites like Youtube or Bitchute or some other inconspicuous site, if we want to project real influence outside of our ideology we have to gain some kind of radio/television standing.

That's what I'm supporting the idea we have alt media with more right wing/centrists views.

Gagium

The United American-Isreali Empire wrote:That's what I'm supporting the idea we have alt media with more right wing/centrists views.

Or we have media that actually does it’s job on reporting instead of more biased media intended to manipulate people’s thoughts and ideologies..

But if we can't do that then sure, we can have our "alt media" to make ourselves feel as happy as loyal CNN viewers do when they talk about orange man

Dragons Of Power, Greater Bastion

Gagium wrote:That movie was satire and I believe that whole part of it was based on hollywood stereotypes. :p

The book was based tho

Gagium

Gagium wrote:Or we have media that actually does it’s job on reporting instead of more biased media intended to manipulate people’s thoughts and ideologies..

But if we can't do that then sure, we can have our "alt media" to make ourselves feel as happy as loyal CNN viewers do when they talk about orange man

well what would we do to put a fair and non bised view on the news?

Gagium

Gagium wrote:Or we have media that actually does it’s job on reporting instead of more biased media intended to manipulate people’s thoughts and ideologies..

But if we can't do that then sure, we can have our "alt media" to make ourselves feel as happy as loyal CNN viewers do when they talk about orange man

But an unbiased news source would be a right-leaning new source!

Gagium, Fluvannia, Dragons Of Power

The United American-Isreali Empire wrote:well what would we do to put a fair and non bised view on the news?

We need the military to raid every news station, announce "This is not a coup", and then proceed to coup the media and ensure fair news coverage!

Viridus wrote:But an unbiased news source would be a right-leaning new source!

That's absolutely correct

Viridus, Dragons Of Power, Greater Bastion

The United American-Isreali Empire wrote:we just need to get our own media voice, we on the right/center differ greatly, but we need our own platforms.

And? We have voices, the pale in strength to the Hollywood brainwashing machine.

Gagium

San Carlos Islands wrote:And? We have voices, the pale in strength to the Hollywood brainwashing machine.

i agree we just need a place like a tv network,

Gagium

Gagium wrote:We need the military to raid every news station, announce "This is not a coup", and then proceed to coup the media and ensure fair news coverage!That's absolutely correct

i like that idea, big wig nwo folks would be tricky to counter, but not impossable.

Gagium

This is the political party I'm running fo BTW The Peremptory Party of The S.C.A.

Furbish Islands wrote:>Has Nazi in his name

>Expects support from a region tagged anti-fascist

>Resides in another region tagged anti-fascist

Gagium

The United American-Isreali Empire wrote:Yes I love the idea!

I unironically do as well

Gagium

Viridus wrote:Don't you mean BNHA?

Do not I?

Viridus, Gagium

Liberated American Provinces wrote:Meh

ironic or clever 🤔

Gagium

Otira wrote:I unironically do as well

Thank you it's very equal and I unironcly love the idea of earned citizenship but all get civil rights.

Otira, Gagium

Libervalley wrote:My favorite conservative is Mark Levin.

Very fair sir. I honestly think us on the right can be unified. We may like varying personlitys but in the end we all care FOR THE GREATER GOOD.

Gagium

The United American-Isreali Empire wrote:Thank you it's very equal and I unironcly love the idea of earned citizenship but all get civil rights.

Exactly. My idea (and by "my" I mean "Heinlein's") is voting being restricted to citizens, citizenship (and the vote) being earned through federal service - not necessarily military - but everyone still having full civil rights otherwise.

Unearned universal suffrage was a mistake, as many nations are learning now. The US is a prime example.

Gagium

Knat wrote:small, third party sites like Youtube

Uhhh

Gagium

Otira wrote:ironic or clever 🤔

Neither. I was just bored of arguing

Gagium

Liberated American Provinces wrote:Uhhh

You know what I mean, nobody typically goes to YouTube to get their news. I'm talking about Fox, CNN, NBC, etc. as opposed to YouTube/Bitchute

Liberated American Provinces, Gagium

Knat wrote:You know what I mean, nobody typically goes to YouTube to get their news. I'm talking about Fox, CNN, NBC, etc. as opposed to YouTube/Bitchute

Ok boomer

Viridus, Gagium, Knat

Gagium wrote:That movie was satire and I believe that whole part of it was based on hollywood stereotypes. :p

Just interjecting to say that the book and the movie are pretty different. From what I've heard, the movie is against citizenship earned through service, but the original novel was in support of it.

Gagium

*Space Link*®

Space Link is a network of low earth orbit satellites built for global communication and imaging. This satellite network provides real time communication for corporate, government entities and individuals. Imagery provides a wide array of services including intelligence, agriculture/nature, construction and more. The network will provide access to the internet. Space Link is joint funded by LASA, the Libervalley Republic Guard and various invested companies.

Viridus, Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Post self-deleted by Libervalley.

Otira wrote:Do not I?

You mean BNHA, do you not?*

Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Barry Goldwater The Ghost wrote:Just interjecting to say that the book and the movie are pretty different. From what I've heard, the movie is against citizenship earned through service, but the original novel was in support of it.

yes, there shouldn’t have even been the movie that absolutely butchered the book and flipped around it’s entire plot and themes

Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Barry Goldwater The Ghost wrote:Just interjecting to say that the book and the movie are pretty different. From what I've heard, the movie is against citizenship earned through service, but the original novel was in support of it.

The book is really good I've heard it's princeables. Not too shabby ideas.

Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Guys there is about to be a new president for the Social Conservative Axis it's probably going to be me

My opponent has 0 votes

I have 7 votes already and the election started 2 hours ago

Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

The United American-Isreali Empire wrote:i agree we just need a place like a tv network,

Yes we have one, and it's corrupted by neoliberals and war hawks.

Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

zoomer ethnostate when

Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Post by Furbish Islands suppressed by a moderator.

Furbish Islands wrote:Except a key part of authoritarianism is victimizing minorities. Authoritarians gain power by blaming all problems on a certain minority(whether it be a racial or ethnic group, certain religious group, immigrants, the mentally ill, all of above as in Hitler's case, or something else), and then they follow through on their promises of getting rid of said minority.

That is true but I choose the poor people not a race or ethnicity. The poor are sickening.

Viridus, Gagium, Polish Prussian Commonwealth, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

The Nazi States Of Europe wrote:That is true but I choose the poor people not a race or ethnicity. The poor are sickening.

Howso?

Furbish Islands, New Waldensia, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Gagium wrote:Howso?

They infest the streets of cities, they are lazy because they don’t try to get a job, and they bother the rich people by asking for money.

Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Post by Furbish Islands suppressed by a moderator.

The Nazi States Of Europe wrote:They infest the streets of cities, they are lazy because they don’t try to get a job, and they bother the rich people by asking for money.

1. Do you live in a city?

2. Have you actually talked to a poor person....?

Furbish Islands, New Waldensia, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Gagium wrote:1. Do you live in a city?

2. Have you actually talked to a poor person....?

1.I have talked to one(and they were rude)

2.I live in a city

Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Furbish Islands wrote:So just kill them all?

Well put them to labor for sure

Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Post by Furbish Islands suppressed by a moderator.

Post by Furbish Islands suppressed by a moderator.

The Nazi States Of Europe wrote:1.I have talked to one(and they were rude)

2.I live in a city

You’ve talked to one, thus you now have an irrational hatred of poor people for some reason and want to apply Nazi ideology to them...? Okay

Liberated American Provinces, Furbish Islands, New Waldensia, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Furbish Islands wrote:Hasty generalization fallacy I see. One homeless person does not represent all homeless people.

That is true but stories of them and how they don’t even try to get a job is aggravating enough

Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Post by Furbish Islands suppressed by a moderator.

Furbish Islands wrote:So you believe that all homeless people are lazy and thus want to live in the streets, vulnerable to freezing weather and precipitation, and possibly not even having food?

They wouldn’t be on the streets if they weren’t lazy and even planned their lives out

and got a job. Thus meaning that all homeless people are lazy disgusting parasites of society.

Viridus, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Gagium wrote:You’ve talked to one, thus you now have an irrational hatred of poor people for some reason and want to apply Nazi ideology to them...? Okay

Not necessarily. I just want them to get up and get jobs or else they will work in labor fields in my nation.

Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

The Nazi States Of Europe wrote:Not necessarily. I just want them to get up and get jobs or else they will work in labor fields in my nation.

gee it's almost as if increasing automation has thrown most of these people out of a job

I like you. You remind me of myself, back when I was an edgy fascist.

Viridus, Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Post by Furbish Islands suppressed by a moderator.

Furbish Islands wrote:So you believe that all homeless people are lazy and thus want to live in the streets, vulnerable to freezing weather and precipitation, and possibly not even having food?
No I don’t think they want to but if they don’t fix their problem I will intervene and fix it for them.

Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Post by Furbish Islands suppressed by a moderator.

Furbish Islands wrote:If homeless people fixing their own problems is as easy as you think then homelessness will not exist
That is correct but nobody thinks of it because people think more about the environment and politics and sexuality now days.

Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Furbish Islands wrote:If homeless people fixing their own problems is as easy as you think then homelessness will not exist

Just saying I like you, You have a different mind set than me which means we could learn from each other’s thoughts on our visions of society.

Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

San Carlos Islands wrote:Yes we have one, and it's corrupted by neoliberals and war hawks.

Ik what do we do to slove?

Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Furbish Islands wrote:If homeless people fixing their own problems is as easy as you think then homelessness will not exist

* This is probably going to sound cold *

Quite a few persons in society lack the motivation to improve their standards, or make excuses for why they cannot improve.

Impoverishment really falls onto the shoulders of the individual, and as a repercussion of all human mental constructs being diverse, poverty will exist.

This does not apply to all homeless, or that they shouldn’t receive charitable aid, as I mentioned before, it’s a case by case situation.

Viridus, Gagium, Polish Prussian Commonwealth, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Post by Furbish Islands suppressed by a moderator.

Furbish Islands wrote:Often times it's also because of a lack of access to jobs, which a good public transit system can fix.

Doesn’t have to be publicly owned (most transportation in Sweden and Japan is private), but the construction of projects such as the Keystone Pipeline would provide employment for depressed areas of the American heartland.

Viridus, Gagium, Polish Prussian Commonwealth, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Post by Furbish Islands suppressed by a moderator.

Problem: *exists*

Furby: It can be fixed by a public transit system

Washingtonian Republic, New Waldensia, Viridus, Gagium, Polish Prussian Commonwealth, Barry Goldwater The Ghost, Greater Bastion

Post by Furbish Islands suppressed by a moderator.

Gagium wrote:Yes!

Ja.

Viridus, Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Liberated American Provinces wrote:Problem: *exists*

Furby: It can be fixed by a public transit system

Yeah, he's really off the rails for trains

And incase you forgot who I am

Paleoconservative Citizens

New Waldensia, Viridus, Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Liberated American Provinces wrote:Problem: *exists*

Furby: It can be fixed by a public transit system

I like that Furby is proactive.

Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost, Greater Bastion

Furbish Islands wrote:>Has Nazi in his name

>Expects support from a region tagged anti-fascist

>Resides in another region tagged anti-fascist

The Nazi States Of Europe wrote:it's not what you think I am not "kill the jews","oh he's a racist" type of nazi I am more like authoritarian and my name is that way because I like to study them.

>Claims to not be that kind of Nazi

>Proceeds to talk like that kind of Nazi

Liberated American Provinces, Furbish Islands, Viridus, Gagium, Ibenta, Polish Prussian Commonwealth, Barry Goldwater The Ghost, Greater Bastion, Mietkael

Arrakis wrote:I like that Furby is proactive.

Uh huh

Furbish Islands wrote:*also cries in corner*

Seriously though I have nothing to do in my free time besides riding trains in Boston

Furbish Islands, Viridus, Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost, Greater Bastion

Fingers crossed to see if my mercs get hired for a conflict.

Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Post self-deleted by The United American-Isreali Empire.

Post by Furbish Islands suppressed by a moderator.

Arrakis wrote:I like that Furby is proactive.

Furby will make the trains run on time.

Ecalpa, Liberated American Provinces, New Waldensia, Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost, Greater Bastion, Mietkael

Ibenta wrote:Furby will make the trains run on time.

Thanks Furby, very cool!

Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Furbish Islands can we make up our differences? do we have peace, no conflicts etc. because I wish to not have arguments with a great allie of my region. I already talked with Gagium and he and I have peace, but do you and I.

Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Furbish Islands wrote:True

*throws him in front of a train*

Furby Underwood

Viridus, Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

LSU HAS BEATEN ALABAMA

New Waldensia, Viridus, Sergioso, San Carlos Islands, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Gagium wrote:LSU HAS BEATEN ALABAMA

WHAT DOES THIS MEAN

🤷‍♀️ 🤷‍♀️ 🤷‍♀️ 🤷‍♀️ 🤷‍♀️ 🤷‍♀️

Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost, Paleoconservative Citizens

man f-14s were pretty hot ngl

New Waldensia, Viridus, Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Ooo

Viridus, Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Eldrado wrote:Ooo

Eldrado, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

[pre]Extra! Extra! Its the 11th Edition of F.C.N. Times![/pre]

https://www.nationstates.net/page=dispatch/id=1281131

Liberated American Provinces, Washingtonian Republic, Viridus, Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost, Greater Bastion, Mietkael

Thegoldcoast wrote:[pre]Extra! Extra! Its the 11th Edition of F.C.N. Times![/pre]

https://www.nationstates.net/page=dispatch/id=1281131

sci didn't propose he rmb rules, he actually voted against it

Liberated American Provinces, Viridus, Barry Goldwater The Ghost, Paleoconservative Citizens

Thegoldcoast wrote:[pre]Extra! Extra! Its the 11th Edition of F.C.N. Times![/pre]

https://www.nationstates.net/page=dispatch/id=1281131

I've heard rumors that the notorious Bag Daddy is hiding out in our region

Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost, Paleoconservative Citizens

Gagium wrote:sci didn't propose he rmb rules, he actually voted against it

The debate channel is a mess, so I'll blame my mistakes on that.

Liberated American Provinces wrote:I've heard rumors that the notorious Bag Daddy is hiding out in our region

Bag, big, beg... whats the difference! He is 'dead', and that's all that matters.

Liberated American Provinces, Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Thegoldcoast wrote:The debate channel is a mess, so I'll blame my mistakes on that.

Why own up to the mistake?

Behave like MSNBC and blame him for attacking the free press!

;)

Thegoldcoast, New Waldensia, Viridus, Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Thegoldcoast wrote:[pre]Extra! Extra! Its the 11th Edition of F.C.N. Times![/pre]

https://www.nationstates.net/page=dispatch/id=1281131

The flag represented in the second half of the in-depth review of the ADP is the flag of West Phoenicia and not the flag of the ADP.

The ADP chairman is available for any future quotes the newspaper may want from the chair or a parties stance. Or in regards to why we have spoken out against the suggested senate reform. As this article came as a surprise to us. But well written.

If you liked what the article said, please don't hesitate to tg myself if you want to be part of the ADP family.

Viridus, Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Thegoldcoast wrote:Bag, big, beg... whats the difference! He is 'dead', and that's all that matters.

My source is Bag Daddy himself ;)

Thegoldcoast, Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Gagium wrote:

See... I really don't know why you and Viridus like things like that... I guess you are obsessed with me or something

Viridus, Gagium, Polish Prussian Commonwealth, Barry Goldwater The Ghost, Paleoconservative Citizens

Post self-deleted by Eldrado.

Hola! Figured I'd introduce myself. Wanted to seek out some like-minded groups and this one caught my eye by far. I'll try to be as active as I can be (which isn't as often as I like) but for now thought I'd simply say hello and buen dia! Look forward to making a home here.

Thegoldcoast, Viridus, Gagium, Eldrado, Polish Prussian Commonwealth, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Everybody, I'm thinking about a new party. Here's the dispatch. https://www.nationstates.net/nation=gladesville/detail=factbook/id=1281259

Markev, Viridus, Gagium, Eldrado, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Hola Juventini, are you Spanish?

Viridus, Gagium, Eldrado, Barry Goldwater The Ghost, Juventini

@The Republic of Knat

By descent and by birth but not by residence I'm afraid. Spanish mother, Portuguese-American father. Only partially fluent in Castillian, read it a lot better than I speak, try to use it when I can. I appreciate the welcome! God bless <3

Viridus, Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Gladesville wrote:Everybody, I'm thinking about a new party. Here's the dispatch. https://www.nationstates.net/nation=gladesville/detail=factbook/id=1281259

Sigh...

Viridus, Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

The Nazi States Of Europe wrote:Guys there is about to be a new president for the Social Conservative Axis it's probably going to be me

My opponent has 0 votes

I have 7 votes already and the election started 2 hours ago

On a side note, your region "promotes social conservatism and capitalism." That sounds highly contradictory. In what way has capitalism been especially conducive to socially conservative thoughts and principles? If capitalism has been so good to conservatives, would you then call today's society the pinnacle of social conservatism? I'm curious to hear your thoughts on this, because I have yet to meet one person who can adequately justify fusionism.

I have a strong hunch that you are confused. There is not a clean way of standing on both libertarian and conservative principles. You must choose. You can't have your cake and eat it, too.

Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Juventini wrote:&#64;The Republic of Knat

By descent and by birth but not by residence I'm afraid. Spanish mother, Portuguese-American father. Only partially fluent in Castillian, read it a lot better than I speak, try to use it when I can. I appreciate the welcome! God bless &lt;3

Nice, I was born in Cuba, Portuguese and Catalan descent from my Dad and Castilian from my mom, glad to have you here, and God bless you as well

Viridus, Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost, Juventini

Ibenta wrote:On a side note, your region "promotes social conservatism and capitalism." That sounds highly contradictory. In what way has capitalism been especially conducive to socially conservative thoughts and principles? If capitalism has been so good to conservatives, would you then call today's society the pinnacle of social conservatism? I'm curious to hear your thoughts on this, because I have yet to meet one person who can adequately justify fusionism.

I have a strong hunch that you are confused. There is not a clean way of standing on both libertarian and conservative principles. You must choose. You can't have your cake and eat it, too.

When I first joined my region I thought of the same thing. I tried to say that Conservatism especially Social Conservatism is not big supporters of fusionism. Plus I can clearly tell you this stuff which took me an hour of my day to research and study to give you the answer to your question. HOPE YOU ENJOY AND THINK OF MY ANSWER

"Fusionism,” the label that stuck to Frank Meyer’s conservative philosophy, is widely misunderstood. Poor Meyer has suffered the same fate as Richard Weaver, whose Ideas Have Consequences gets invoked all the time by people who haven’t read it to promote ideas Weaver would have found trivial or worse. What Weaver actually meant might have been clearer if he’d called the book Metaphysics Has Consequences, but even the University of Chicago Press didn’t want to market a title like that. (In fact, the publisher rejected Weaver’s preferred title, The Fearful Descent.)

Meyer’s In Defense of Freedom is if anything even less read than Weaver’s book. But that doesn’t stop “fusionism” from being used to describe GOP coalition-building and being likened, in Jonah Goldberg’s term, to an “alloy” of two distinct metals—libertarianism and “social conservatism.” The latter term is anachronistic: traditionalists like Russell Kirk and Brent Bozell Jr. were socially conservative, certainly, but quite philosophically different from today’s populist and primarily evangelical social cons. Kirk and Bozell emphatically rejected American exceptionalism, for example, for reasons central to their worldview.

The bigger problem with Goldberg’s description, however, is the idea—which he’s not alone in holding—that Meyer was trying to forge an alloy. That’s exactly what Meyer was not trying to do:rather, he believed that both libertarianism and traditionalism had a common source in the Western tradition. They were not distinct materials; they were the same thing in different shapes, with different emphases. The last essay in the Liberty Fund edition of In Defense of Freedom, “Western Civilization: The Problem of Political Freedom,” is Meyer’s deepest exploration of this idea.

Murray Rothbard once argued that at heart Meyer was just a libertarian, but I was struck the last time I read In Defense of Freedom by how much more strongly Meyer draws on Eric Voegelin than on Locke or John Stuart Mill. I’m tempted to say that at heart Meyer was a traditionalist, but one who saw the individual conscience as the supreme metaphysical tradition of the West. Meyer perceived this most of all in the Incarnation. Needless to say, this is a world away from some cheap handbook for coalition politics. It wasn’t even a rhetorical effort to bring clashing right-wing pundits together. It was an attempt at a philosophy of history and politics. There’s very little discussion of “issues” in In Defense of Freedom.

Meyer was not merely arguing that traditionalists and libertarians should tolerate one another and cooperate against a common enemy. His contention was that while they could differ in their emphases, a traditionalist had to be libertarian and a libertarian had to be traditionalist, or else each would be abandoning his own foundations. Meyer disliked the “fusionism” label precisely because it misrepresented his project as hammering together two different materials.Here’s the source of the confusion: conservative politics since the 1950s always has been coalition-based. It always has included people who care most about free-market economics or personal liberty alongside people who care most about religious tradition and values. Meyer’s project superficially had the same pattern as a movement itself—a pattern of contrast and combination alike—so it was easy to mistake Meyer’s philosophy for a “rationale” to underpin the coalition. But it was more than that.

The conservative movement had an operational coalition before Meyer set to work—he was already in a functional coalition with the thinkers he contended against, fellow early National Review contributors like Kirk, Bozell, and Whittaker Chambers. Anti-Communism was the coalition’s glue. Ideological anti-Communists were the coalition’s core; non-ideological anti-Communists were on its periphery; and philosophical conservatives or libertarians who came close to rejecting the Cold War outright—anti-anti-Communists, in other words—were not part of the coalition at all.

Anti-Communism and anti-liberalism, rather than philosophical fusionism, continued to be the coalition’s rationale from Meyer’s time until today. Meyer’s book goes unread because movement conservatives think they already know what is says and already have the coalition it prescribes. Meyer did a great deal to build the conservative movement, and he might very well still embrace that movement today—though most of the long-time fusionists I know are disgusted by the movement’s present state—but he was aiming higher than party politics. He’s worth reading for that reason.

Gagium, Polish Prussian Commonwealth, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Ibenta wrote:On a side note, your region "promotes social conservatism and capitalism." That sounds highly contradictory. In what way has capitalism been especially conducive to socially conservative thoughts and principles? If capitalism has been so good to conservatives, would you then call today's society the pinnacle of social conservatism? I'm curious to hear your thoughts on this, because I have yet to meet one person who can adequately justify fusionism.

I have a strong hunch that you are confused. There is not a clean way of standing on both libertarian and conservative principles. You must choose. You can't have your cake and eat it, too.

and plus I'm more neutral on that equation if that can be an answer

Gagium, Polish Prussian Commonwealth, Barry Goldwater The Ghost

Ibenta wrote:Sigh...

I've considered it about time that the FCN gets a green lung.

Gagium, Paleoconservative Citizens

Gladesville wrote:I've considered it about time that the FCN gets a green lung.

That sounds sort of unhealthy

New Waldensia, Viridus, Greater Bastion, Mietkael, Paleoconservative Citizens, Gladesville

The Nazi States Of Europe wrote:"Your" speech.

https://www.theamericanconservative.com/mccarthy/what-does-fusionism-really-mean/

You literally copy-pasted an article from The American Conservative and called it your answer. You just plagiarized an entire article. But in any case, this answer, in my view, gets a C.

There's an old satirical piece by Mark Twain about how no one forms their own opinions. People just regurgitate whatever they think sounds best. That's literally what you did here. You regurgitated something that you probably don't fully understand.

So I ask you. Beyond the philosophical nonsense of "your" response, please tell me--given today's conditions--how you can reconcile capitalism with social conservatism.

The Nazi States Of Europe wrote:and plus I'm more neutral on that equation if that can be an answer

What does that even mean? What do you mean "more neutral?"

Liberated American Provinces, Furbish Islands, New Waldensia, Viridus, Gagium, Polish Prussian Commonwealth, Greater Bastion, Mietkael

im gonna say the n word

Viridus, Gagium, Ibenta

Ibenta wrote:https://www.theamericanconservative.com/mccarthy/what-does-fusionism-really-mean/

You literally copy-pasted an article from The American Conservative and called it your answer. You just plagiarized an entire article. But in any case, this answer, in my view, gets a C.

There's an old satirical piece by Mark Twain about how no one forms their own opinions. People just regurgitate whatever they think sounds best. That's literally what you did here. You regurgitated something that you probably don't fully understand.

So I ask you. Beyond the philosophical nonsense of "your" response, please tell me--given today's conditions--how you can reconcile capitalism with social conservatism.

What does that even mean? What do you mean "more neutral?"

Ibenta DESTROYS and ANNIHALATES FASCISTS with FACTS and LOGIC

Liberated American Provinces, Furbish Islands, New Waldensia, Viridus, Gagium, Mietkael

Gladesville wrote:Everybody, I'm thinking about a new party. Here's the dispatch. https://www.nationstates.net/nation=gladesville/detail=factbook/id=1281259

It's good to see an interest in the environment!

Gagium, Gladesville

Post by Furbish Islands suppressed by a moderator.

Furbish Islands wrote:I do in fact know what I am talking about, Gagium

Hardly so!

Viridus

Assembled with Dot's Region Saver.
Written by Refuge Isle.