Post Archive

Region: Federation of Conservative Nations

History

New Avalon wrote:Dude stop saying racist stuff or bluefarst or someone will report you and get you deleted.

Just say you were drunk and let's all move past this /pol/ moment

What on earth did I post last night I’m seeing this and already deleted the post. No I’m not a troller my buddies would vouch for me If I was drunk 😵 last night Or had a bit too much last night 🍺🍻🥂🍸🍹🍾🥃 I will plead the 5th ADMENDMENNT to that answer and silent on that issue

Washingtonian Republic, Viridus, Gagium, Paleoconservative Citizens

So a Mississippi venue just refused to marry an interracial couple citing religious belief. Opinions?

Personally I feel that people have a right to sell their products to whoever they want to sell to, and if a venue gets protested or it refuses to marry homosexual or interracial couples then it will likely suffer from loss of business and either be forced to open its doors to those couples or go out of business.

Capitalism is the greatest equalizer.

Liberated American Provinces, Confederate Farmers, Viridus, Gagium

Post by Blueflarst suppressed by a moderator.

Greetings. I am a new member here and got a question.

How do I join one of the political parties here? If I do so, do I need to join the WA?

Viridus, Gagium, Libervalley

Volberg wrote:Greetings. I am a new member here and got a question.

How do I join one of the political parties here? If I do so, do I need to join the WA?

Hey welcome! You don’t need to join the WA to join a party; All you have to do is telegram the party leader.

A lot of political party stuff occurs on discord, so it’d be cool if you could join our discord server (If you haven’t already). Once you do that, you can become a citizen and senator after a week - Becoming a senator does require WA membership.

The Rouge Christmas State, Liberated American Provinces, Viridus

New Inglaterra wrote:So a Mississippi venue just refused to marry an interracial couple citing religious belief. Opinions?

Personally I feel that people have a right to sell their products to whoever they want to sell to, and if a venue gets protested or it refuses to marry homosexual or interracial couples then it will likely suffer from loss of business and either be forced to open its doors to those couples or go out of business.

Capitalism is the greatest equalizer.

I believe this is the same incident:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2019/09/03/us/mississippi-interracial-couple-wedding.amp.html

I personally think that it's dumb to deny to host a wedding because of the race of a person on the basis of religion (in this case Christianity). No where in the Bible does it forbid interracial marriages. I think this is just a case of the event hosts having deep seeded racial issues.

Confederate Farmers, New Waldensia, Gagium

Liberated American Provinces wrote:I feel like you would really have to try to have spelling and grammar as bad as him, and he has tons of factbooks. No troll would've put in that much effort

https://www.nationstates.net/nation=confederate_farmers/detail=factbook

Should I delete the slave collar with bells? https://www.nationstates.net/page=dispatch/id=1037507

Viridus, Gagium

The Rouge Christmas State wrote:I believe this is the same incident:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2019/09/03/us/mississippi-interracial-couple-wedding.amp.html

I personally think that it's dumb to deny to host a wedding because of the race of a person on the basis of religion (in this case Christianity). No where in the Bible does it forbid interracial marriages. I think this is just a case of the event hosts having deep seeded racial issues.

What is the basis of racism with regards to the Bible?

Gagium

Markev wrote:What is the basis of racism with regards to the Bible?

There are two instances in the old testament where race is even an issue or mentioned. The first is when the Israelites are conquering the land of Canaan. It mentions in Deuteronomy that they must not marry the people there, presumably because of the sin that had overcome their lands. The second is the tale of Sampson. Sampson is a mighty warrior and eventually falls in love with a (Canaanite?) woman. Her people hate Israel and want to find the key to his strength. She eventually betrays Sampson and cuts his hair making him normal, so that they could kill him. In the new testament though, Jesus is traveling along and comes to a well where a Gentile woman was. He shows mercy and compassion for the woman and forgives her of her sinful ways even though she wasn't Jewish. So, I guess it goes both ways but as Christian we're to show compassion and love for others not hate.

Paleoconservative Citizens

Bro some scientist just named a new organism after a JoJo stand

The Rouge Christmas State, Viridus, Gagium, Paleoconservative Citizens

Yo the Confederate guy left

Viridus, Gagium

New Inglaterra wrote:Yo the Confederate guy left

Left or clinton'd?

Viridus, Gagium

Granluras wrote:Left or clinton'd?

He still exists so yeah idk

Gagium

Markev wrote:Does my new flag look too socialist?

Ja

Gagium

All who like this RMB post are gay.

Viridus, Gagium, The Legion Of Mankind, Dragons Of Power

All who don't like this RMB post are gay.

The Rouge Christmas State, Viridus, Gagium, Dragons Of Power, New Inglaterra, Paleoconservative Citizens

San Carlos Islands wrote:All who like this RMB post are gay.

San Carlos Islands wrote:All who don't like this RMB post are gay.

The ability to speak doesn't make one intelligent.

Liberated American Provinces, Viridus, Dragons Of Power

San Carlos Islands wrote:All who don't like this RMB post are gay.

San Carlos Islands wrote:All who like this RMB post are gay.

Gagium liked both, and is therefore neither heterosexual or homosexual. They cancel each other out, and therefore Gagium simply... exists.

Viridus, Gagium, Dragons Of Power, Paleoconservative Citizens

Post by Blueflarst suppressed by a moderator.

Post by Blueflarst suppressed by a moderator.

New Inglaterra wrote:Gagium liked both, and is therefore neither heterosexual or homosexual. They cancel each other out, and therefore Gagium simply... exists.

This

Gagium, New Inglaterra

Marvinton wrote:Vote Vens Verbum for president!

E

Viridus, Gagium

San Carlos Islands wrote:All who like this RMB post are gay.

Yes I am a very happy individual.

Viridus, Gagium

We need to have a Wholesome Wednesday type thing cause being continuously shrouded in a cloak of edge is not cash money and having nothing but political conversations is wack. We should open up sometimes and realize, “Hey we’re humans...we got Russians and scientists amongst our ranks...we should be emotional!” Right guys? Like, right? Yeah?

Viridus, Gagium, Dragons Of Power

Granluras wrote:We should open up sometimes and realize, “Hey we’re humans...

FCN: Become Human

Eldrado, Dragons Of Power, Paleoconservative Citizens

Gagium wrote:FCN: Become Human

lol

Gagium, Eldrado, Dragons Of Power

but 4 real tho, i feel like it'd be a nice thing. what's really wrong with personal conversation? c:

Gagium, Eldrado, Dragons Of Power

and even if not strictly wholesome, then something outside the standard political or edgy bs :(

Gagium, Eldrado, Dragons Of Power

Granluras wrote:but 4 real tho, i feel like it'd be a nice thing. what's really wrong with personal conversation? c:

Granluras wrote:and even if not strictly wholesome, then something outside the standard political or edgy bs :(

I think discord is a better place for stuff like that, but yknow...

Licavoliton, Viridus, Eldrado, Dragons Of Power

Gagium wrote:I think discord is a better place for stuff like that, but yknow...

y e a h g a g i u m , d i s c o r d

Gagium, Eldrado, Dragons Of Power, Paleoconservative Citizens

Granluras wrote:y e a h g a g i u m , d i s c o r d

Yes, which you’re for some reason reluctant to create another account for... :/

Viridus, Eldrado, Dragons Of Power, Paleoconservative Citizens

Gagium wrote:Yes, which you’re for some reason reluctant to create another account for... :/

omg stop being so mean to me :((

Gagium, Eldrado, Dragons Of Power, Paleoconservative Citizens

Granluras wrote:omg stop being so mean to me :((

wholesome

Dragons Of Power, Paleoconservative Citizens

Oh fick I just remembered school starts tomorrow. i'm hAVing a panic attack eeeeee

The Rouge Christmas State, Gagium, Dragons Of Power, Paleoconservative Citizens

Granluras wrote:Oh fick I just remembered school starts tomorrow. i'm hAVing a panic attack eeeeee

Eh, it's not that big of a deal is it?

The Rouge Christmas State, Gagium, Dragons Of Power

Viridus wrote:Eh, it's not that big of a deal is it?

No I’m having anxiety cause it’s not a big deal.

The Rouge Christmas State, Gagium, Dragons Of Power

Granluras wrote:No I’m having anxiety cause it’s not a big deal.

Oh, that's good then

Gagium, Dragons Of Power

Granluras wrote:y e a h g a g i u m , d i s c o r d

Make a new account you dumbo

Viridus, Gagium, Granluras, Dragons Of Power

nearing 20 billion people....

Viridus, Gagium, Dragons Of Power

Otira wrote:nearing 20 billion people....

Fire the Death Star!

Kills 19 Billion people.

Viridus, Gagium, Dragons Of Power, Pere Housh Alpha

Oof. What have I missed the last couple of days?

We had an accident at the park Monday, ended up with our 2yo riding to the hospital in an ambulance and having surgery on a to-the-skull gash on his forehead. I tore my leg up with the same incident (thought I might have fractured my shin but x-rays were good) and have been hobbling around like a cripple.

The Rouge Christmas State, Viridus, Gagium, Libervalley, The Legion Of Mankind, Dragons Of Power, San Carlos Islands, Paleoconservative Citizens

Hey the Confederate guy is back

Viridus, Gagium, Paleoconservative Citizens

(https://news.google.com/articles/CAIiEM2vWY2zibfVR2ICLYcSpCMqFwgEKg8IACoHCAowjuuKAzCWrzww9oEY?hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen)

https://giphy.com/gifs/awkward-zach-galifianakis-dinner-for-schmucks-C7JVldsoKokBq

Gagium

Post by Furbish Islands suppressed by a moderator.

New Waldensia wrote:Oof. What have I missed the last couple of days?

We had an accident at the park Monday, ended up with our 2yo riding to the hospital in an ambulance and having surgery on a to-the-skull gash on his forehead. I tore my leg up with the same incident (thought I might have fractured my shin but x-rays were good) and have been hobbling around like a cripple.

Hope that you both recover quickly. Just glad you're both ok (I hope).

Viridus, Gagium, Libervalley

Following new legislation in Gagium, '.lib' or '.con' domains indicate whether Gagiumish websites are meant for liberals or conservatives

Oh yeah

Liberated American Provinces, New Waldensia, Viridus, Granluras, Paleoconservative Citizens

First day of school: complete

😎

Licavoliton, Liberated American Provinces, Gagium, Libervalley

https://qr.ae/TWyzZJ

My science teacher already brought this [the Amazon "fire"] up today, and said we will have in-class discussions about a variety of topics, current events and relevant to lessons. When this comes up I will make sure I have memorized all the key points and own the libtards again 😎

Gagium, Libervalley

Granluras wrote:https://qr.ae/TWyzZJ

My science teacher already brought this [the Amazon "fire"] up today, and said we will have in-class discussions about a variety of topics, current events and relevant to lessons. When this comes up I will make sure I have memorized all the key points and own the libtards again 😎

Can't help but be reminded of this:

https://imgur.com/r/energy/up6yu

Gagium

New Waldensia wrote:Oof. What have I missed the last couple of days?

We had an accident at the park Monday, ended up with our 2yo riding to the hospital in an ambulance and having surgery on a to-the-skull gash on his forehead. I tore my leg up with the same incident (thought I might have fractured my shin but x-rays were good) and have been hobbling around like a cripple.

Oof, get better!

Gagium, Libervalley, Paleoconservative Citizens

New Waldensia wrote:Oof. What have I missed the last couple of days?

We had an accident at the park Monday, ended up with our 2yo riding to the hospital in an ambulance and having surgery on a to-the-skull gash on his forehead. I tore my leg up with the same incident (thought I might have fractured my shin but x-rays were good) and have been hobbling around like a cripple.

I'm sorry, hope things get better

Gagium

Gagium wrote: Following new legislation in Gagium, '.lib' or '.con' domains indicate whether Gagiumish websites are meant for liberals or conservatives

Oh yeah

.con will be the at the end of the government's website.

New Waldensia, Viridus, Gagium

Paleoconservative Citizens wrote:.con will be the at the end of the government's website.

More like .com haha right comrade

Liberated American Provinces, Viridus, Dragons Of Power, Paleoconservative Citizens

Gagium wrote:More like .com haha right comrade

Kein, Kommunismus ist nicht gut.

Gagium, Dragons Of Power

Paleoconservative Citizens wrote:Kein, Kommunismus ist nicht gut.

Maybe .fac, Brother? dIe fAhNe hOch!

Liberated American Provinces, Viridus, The Legion Of Mankind, Dragons Of Power, Paleoconservative Citizens

Gagium wrote:Maybe .fac, Brother? dIe fAhNe hOch!

No I'll do

.pcn

PalEoCoNsErVatIve

Viridus, Gagium, Dragons Of Power

Post by Furbish Islands suppressed by a moderator.

Furbish Islands wrote:Speaking of internet TLDs, my country is FE because Finland took FI even though I would be realistically getting it Dutch.

And my calling code is +69, partly because of my lack of maturity, and partly because due to my location that would actually be my code.

You’re a funny man

Viridus, Dragons Of Power, Paleoconservative Citizens

Gagium wrote:Maybe .fac, Brother? dIe fAhNe hOch!

This but unironically

Viridus, Gagium, Dragons Of Power, Paleoconservative Citizens

https://ifunny.co/fun/3dUfJ8vT6?s=cl

h m m

Gagium, Dragons Of Power

Don’t fückin comment on it being from iFunny I just found the clip there and wanted to share it so shut up. SHUT UP.

Liberated American Provinces, Viridus, Gagium, Dragons Of Power, Paleoconservative Citizens

Post by Furbish Islands suppressed by a moderator.

Gagium wrote:Maybe .fac, Brother? dIe fAhNe hOch!

HEIL oh I.... I don’t let that side out often.

Gagium, Dragons Of Power, Paleoconservative Citizens

Granluras wrote:https://ifunny.co/fun/3dUfJ8vT6?s=cl

h m m

OMFG

Also, make a new discord account....

Furbish Islands, Viridus, Gagium, Paleoconservative Citizens

Furbish Islands wrote:ifunny what a normie

:(

Viridus, Gagium, Dragons Of Power, Paleoconservative Citizens

Also, I have a great interest in character development. E.g., whenever it comes to character roleplays on NS I might create multiple characters in multiple roleplays, with the intention of only playing some of them. The only reason why I create more than I can handle is because I like the process of inventing a person, a biography, a life. Ergo, I wanna develop a sort of...cathartic application for this little quirk and just create an ever-expanding character development.

I think I’m stating this publicly with the hopes of maybe drawing inspirations and ideas. If y’all reckon ye can provide give it a shot. K thx,

Gagium, Dragons Of Power, Paleoconservative Citizens

How would you have a workers and peasants revolution but keep it conservative?

Gagium, Paleoconservative Citizens

Granluras wrote:Also, I have a great interest in character development. E.g., whenever it comes to character roleplays on NS I might create multiple characters in multiple roleplays, with the intention of only playing some of them. The only reason why I create more than I can handle is because I like the process of inventing a person, a biography, a life. Ergo, I wanna develop a sort of...cathartic application for this little quirk and just create an ever-expanding character development.

I think I’m stating this publicly with the hopes of maybe drawing inspirations and ideas. If y’all reckon ye can provide give it a shot. K thx,

That sounds cool...If you end up not using a character in a roleplay or story or anything, you could always just keep their info or development in a google doc - Or dispatch if you’re really feeling flashy.

Viridus, Dragons Of Power

Gagium wrote:That sounds cool...If you end up not using a character in a roleplay or story or anything, you could always just keep their info or development in a google doc - Or dispatch if you’re really feeling flashy.

Exactly. I had thoughts like that.

Gagium, Dragons Of Power

Markev wrote:How would you have a workers and peasants revolution but keep it conservative?

By keeping it conservative.

IQ +200

Viridus, Gagium

Granluras wrote:Exactly. I had thoughts like that.

Or you can make another discord account

Viridus, Gagium, Dragons Of Power

Paleoconservative Citizens wrote:By keeping it conservative.

IQ +200

BTW I'm talking about my IQ, not being sarcastic about your comment

Gagium

Markev wrote:How would you have a workers and peasants revolution but keep it conservative?

Just have it be in, like, the Middle Ages or something. Everyone were ‘conservatives’ and there were enough peasant revolts....I see this as an absolute win

Liberated American Provinces, Viridus

Paleoconservative Citizens wrote:BTW I'm talking about my IQ, not being sarcastic about your comment

Negative IQ

Viridus, Gagium, Paleoconservative Citizens

Paleoconservative Citizens wrote:By keeping it conservative.

IQ +200

It's hard to when everyone here has a different definition of conservative. For the most part I interpret it to be socially conservative and protectionist with trade.

Gagium, Paleoconservative Citizens

Gagium wrote:Just have it be in, like, the Middle Ages or something. Everyone were ‘conservatives’ and there were enough peasant revolts....I see this as an absolute win

I've actually been considering that. Even finding a way to work a continuance of nobility into the culture.

Here's what I've drafted:

"Unlike their counterparts in other realms, the Markevan nobility is composed of two types: the Bolyar and the Kopye. The Bolyar are hereditary nobles descended from the landed gentry of the original five Markevan states. Though most of these titles were carried over from previous allegiances, the Chancellor has been known to ennoble additional members of the Bolyar nobility for valuable civilian service to the state. The Kopye—or lance—nobility hold titles that originate in their military service (or sometimes outright bribes).

"The Bolyar are what most of the world consider normal nobles—great families that pass their titles by heredity to their children and keep their landholds in perpetuity unless the land is seized by the state or lost in conflict to the Confederation's enemies.

Kopye titles are not normally hereditary, though they can be if the Chancellor granting the title so wishes. These patents of nobility are often used as rewards for outstanding service. By making the titles apply only to the person holding them, the Chancellor allows the Kopye to stay the domain of the military elite. For example, should a person chosen as Marshal of the Confederation be a member of the Bolyar, he or she must renounce all noble titles before accepting the position, with the understanding that he or she will receive a rank in the Kopye, but that person can never reclaim those displaced titles even after retirement."

Gagium

Markev wrote:It's hard to when everyone here has a different definition of conservative. For the most part I interpret it to be socially conservative and protectionist with trade.

I'm Paleoconservative so I am a bit protectionist and very socially conservative.

Gagium

The Rouge Christmas State wrote:Hope that you both recover quickly. Just glad you're both ok (I hope).

Thanks. Other than constantly pointing to his forehead and saying "I gotta booboo. You gotta booboo?" he's pretty much back to normal, lol. My leg is scabbed over (finally quit oozing) and most of the swelling is down, so walking today was almost back to normal.

The Rouge Christmas State, Viridus, Gagium, Paleoconservative Citizens

https://www.nationstates.net/nation=paleoconservative_citizens/detail=factbook/id=1255866

Upvote because Patriotism

Viridus, Gagium

Well this isn't fun...

One of my friends on that other website said they were gonna... kill themselves, and then proceeded to deactivate their account...

I don't know what to do

Gagium

Paleoconservative Citizens wrote:Well this isn't fun...

One of my friends on that other website said they were gonna... kill themselves, and then proceeded to deactivate their account...

I don't know what to do

Do you know them offline?

The Rouge Christmas State, Viridus, Gagium

The Legion Of Mankind wrote:Or you can make another discord account

shut up you asshole

Gagium

"The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one."

Spock, the logical Vulcan character in Star Trek, used this phrase numerous times throughout the television series. But is it true? Should this maxim guide individuals, should it guide governmental policy?

I was reminded of the phrase when I saw the following post on Facebook from the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum [https://facebook.com/holocaustmuseum/photos/a.423860602676/10156712169337677/]:

“Fathers and mothers, give me your children.” With these words, #OnThisDay in 1942, the Jewish council chairman in the Lodz ghetto asked parents to surrender all children under age ten. He believed that sacrificing those who could not work would save the other ghetto inhabitants. Children, the elderly, and the sick were sent to their deaths at Chelmno killing center to meet a quota of 20,000 set by the Nazis. But about two years later, the Nazis sent all those remaining in the Lodz ghetto, the last large ghetto in German-occupied Poland, to Chelmno and Auschwitz-Birkenau.

http://bit.ly/2lyfZK6GiveMeYourChildren

The Judenrat chairman followed similar logic to Spock. He felt sacrificing "the few" would save "the many". This is illustrated throughout history as well; Lot is an example in the Bible, when he offers his virgin daughters to the Sodomite mob in exchange for them not raping his angelic guest (they refused the alternate victim as the account goes on to tell).

While "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one" might be worthy motivation for the individual, it should not be what government uses as a guideline. Government ought to preserve the rights of the few, or the one, in order to preserve the rights of the many. If the rights of the few are not preserved, then neither will the rights of the many.

Discuss.

Liberated American Provinces, Viridus, Gagium, Libervalley

also watch jojo

Viridus, Gagium

New Waldensia wrote:"The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one."

Spock, the logical Vulcan character in Star Trek, used this phrase numerous times throughout the television series. But is it true? Should this maxim guide individuals, should it guide governmental policy?

I was reminded of the phrase when I saw the following post on Facebook from the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum [https://facebook.com/holocaustmuseum/photos/a.423860602676/10156712169337677/]:

“Fathers and mothers, give me your children.” With these words, #OnThisDay in 1942, the Jewish council chairman in the Lodz ghetto asked parents to surrender all children under age ten. He believed that sacrificing those who could not work would save the other ghetto inhabitants. Children, the elderly, and the sick were sent to their deaths at Chelmno killing center to meet a quota of 20,000 set by the Nazis. But about two years later, the Nazis sent all those remaining in the Lodz ghetto, the last large ghetto in German-occupied Poland, to Chelmno and Auschwitz-Birkenau.

http://bit.ly/2lyfZK6GiveMeYourChildren

The Judenrat chairman followed similar logic to Spock. He felt sacrificing "the few" would save "the many". This is illustrated throughout history as well; Lot is an example in the Bible, when he offers his virgin daughters to the Sodomite mob in exchange for them not raping his angelic guest (they refused the alternate victim as the account goes on to tell).

While "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one" might be worthy motivation for the individual, it should not be what government uses as a guideline. Government ought to preserve the rights of the few, or the one, in order to preserve the rights of the many. If the rights of the few are not preserved, then neither will the rights of the many.

Discuss.

A nation's government should serve the people, or the 'needs of the many'. And yet, a nation's government governs over the many and the few - And the individual. Every individual in the nation, in fact. So while a nation's government serves the many, it also must govern over and serve the few and the one, as the many are simply those 'one's who align with others like themselves who happen to compose the majority in the nation. While forming policy for the many or few, it is integral to acknowledge the individual. While a government exists to govern over the many (Or the few, in some cases..), it is a government's duty to ensure that every individual has the right to live out a successful life with liberty. Every man created equal... But how can you successfully accomplish service to the many or majority whilst protecting the few? Is it necessary to prioritize the 'many' and protect them from future harm at the expense of the few? Or, rather than its necessity, is it morally right?

I believe not. A government cannot rely on hypotheticals or rather threats made against a 'many' when the apparent way to stop this hypothetical or apparent threat is to persecute the few - Whether it means enslavement or jailing, execution, or simply persecuting them in their lives. Let's use the example Waldy provided us - The Jewish council in Lodz, when forced at gunpoint effectively, sacrificed children in order to save the many. But here's the thing with this example - The many in this instance were the few, and this few never stood a chance. They were under a government that wished for nothing short of their extermination, or at least enslavement, under the Aryan "master race".

In a situation such as themselves, there's no way to morally win while preserving your population. But what about when you can choose? Waldensia later mentions government - Let's assume this government is a national entity with full jurisdiction over its people through whatever means, democratic or non-democratic. Let's use an example we can all relate to - The regular trade-offs that occur between elections here in America in which XX president prioritizes whatever and then YY president of the opposite party disagrees with this and switches. We'll say the majority is their party for every election - There's a few that's always at a disadvantage or their needs typically completely ignored in favor of the many, or those who support the current President. Bush, Obama, Trump, we may like or dislike their policies depending on the President (Or believe that they're right/wrong), though they always will support the many over the few in a majority of instances.

How is it possible to prioritize the few and yet the many at the same time though? The solution to ensure this is to not. You can't prioritize the many or the few for whatever national program if it doesn't exist at a disadvantage for others - In other words, you'd need to decrease (National? subnational? Whatever) government size and let people control their lives based on their merit rather than the policy change of a president you disagree with. Let's go with Obamacare for an example..Government policy that was supported by "the many" - Obama's supporters during his term as president - And yet put plenty of people at a disadvantage and was opposed by "the few". While government is necessary to preserve a state and the many and few's collective rights and liberties, no amount of federal/national regulation meant to benefit a temporary leader's supporters nearly exclusively while putting others at a sometimes permanent disadvantage is necessary or wanted. The problem with America as observed by several others is an increasingly belligerent government that increases taxes and expenditure literally every year in order to fund more programs supported by exclusively the 'many' - Leading to people increasingly liking Presidents who agree with them - their supporters (sometimes exclusively) and increasingly disliking Presidents who disagree with them (likewise). This like/disliking further extends to national government as a whole.. We're living in a time when the US government is increasingly prioritizing the many over the few, and the only way to stop this is to deregulate.I don't see us stopping down this path any time soon, unfortunately.

Just finished this up as lunch ended, rip

New Waldensia, Viridus

gagium can i plagiarize that response if it helps me in the future in like debate club or a school essay?

New Waldensia, Viridus, Gagium

Gagium wrote:Yeah sure

Oh thanks

New Waldensia, Viridus, Gagium

Granluras wrote:gagium can i plagiarize that response if it helps me in the future in like debate club or a school essay?

Yes, and though the American government system that's been developing in recent years increasingly is belligerent in prioritizing the 'many' over the 'few', the alternate solution I've described isn't necessarily a solution to produce a better life, rather than one where the few/one isn't put down to satisfy the wants (I'll say wants instead of needs, because to be fair people don't *need* a lot from a government) of the many. The American election and governing system of prioritizing the majority at any point has its ups and downs, but I suppose supporting the majority's wants is the objective of a democracy for the people - Or, at least, for the majority of the people. Then again, perhaps it would be best to return to a time when a President's job is to simply preside rather than regulate every other aspect of our lives - Though this regulation may not be perceived as authoritarian or even negative, that doesn't mean it isn't regulation. And it quite frankly is simply regulation - Just regulation that we accept. Or, rather than "we", the majority at any given point.

New Waldensia

Gagium wrote:Yes, and though the American government system that's been developing in recent years increasingly is belligerent in prioritizing the 'many' over the 'few', the alternate solution I've described isn't necessarily a solution to produce a better life, rather than one where the few/one isn't put down to satisfy the wants (I'll say wants instead of needs, because to be fair people don't *need* a lot from a government) of the many. The American election and governing system of prioritizing the majority at any point has its ups and downs, but I suppose supporting the majority's wants is the objective of a democracy for the people - Or, at least, for the majority of the people. Then again, perhaps it would be best to return to a time when a President's job is to simply preside rather than regulate every other aspect of our lives - Though this regulation may not be perceived as authoritarian or even negative, that doesn't mean it isn't regulation. And it quite frankly is simply regulation - Just regulation that we accept. Or, rather than "we", the majority at any given point.

But - But - is what I've laid out - A national entity that prioritizes the collective individuals of a nation rather than simply the collective *majority* -realistic or even possible in the modern age, where technology continually intertwines in our lives, allowing for people to be more connected and in return dependent upon others for more and more things? And allowing for national government to better and better regulate and govern over larger swaths of people and territory...I don't know. What'd you guys think?

bro my damn cat keeps rubbing his face into my laptop so hard he's knocking it over like stop damn

Viridus, Gagium

Paleoconservative Citizens wrote:Well this isn't fun...

One of my friends on that other website said they were gonna... kill themselves, and then proceeded to deactivate their account...

I don't know what to do

[Insert joke about Darwinism]

Gagium, Paleoconservative Citizens

New Waldensia wrote:Do you know them offline?

Unfortunately not

Gagium

Okay well thank God he came back

Tesyky, Gagium

https://whyy.org/articles/walmart-ammunition-cutbacks-will-have-little-effect-gun-enthusiasts-say/

My dad's real close friends with these guys. Cool to see they got interviewed. Wonder what my dad'll have to say about it.

Gagium, Paleoconservative Citizens

OH MY G-

Someone called me a "Sister in Christ"

*Cries manly tears*

Viridus, Gagium, Granluras

Paleoconservative Citizens wrote:OH MY G-

Someone called me a "Sister in Christ"

*Cries manly tears*

Never mind they were talking to me and someone else.

Gagium

Paleoconservative Citizens wrote:OH MY G-

Someone called me a "Sister in Christ"

*Cries manly tears*

Hi sister

Viridus, Gagium, Paleoconservative Citizens

Assembled with Dot's Region Saver.
Written by Refuge Isle.