Post Archive
Region: Federation of Conservative Nations
Nope. I like abortion.
I just don't want abortion when the baby is about to be born. Otherwise, I like abortion. I support gay rights. I also support less economic regulations and more economic freedoms. I also support having a good family life and raising children correctly, and getting them a proper education and healthy lifestyles.
As of right now, the modern Left in the US wants to literally corrupt family life. They support letting 7 year olds transition from male to female, or female to male. That's too far, man. Way too far. Hence why I support the Republicans because they're still (somewhat) center-right and not far off to the extremist.
Ulrech, Gagium, Missourj
You're being sarcastic here, right?
Gagium
So you're basically a neo-liberal Democrat, except when it comes to transgender rights. Uhm. Okay then. How ideologically consistent of you.
I mean, at least you sort of acknowledged how neo-liberal Democrats aren't all that different from center-right--libertarian (fusionist)--Republicans.
New Waldensia, Gagium, Greater Bastion
Theodore's big-stick foreign policy is a bit much for me. Additionally, his successor--also a Yalie, unfortunately--effectively sold the country of my blood out to the Japanese and didn't even blink while doing it. (Theodore had much to do with what would become the Taft-Katsura Agreement.)
Gagium
Let's just all become post-modernists and consider spelling subjective.
(Butactuallyno.)
Gagium
Consenting adults in a homosexual relationship is very different than transgender children.
Gagium
What did I miss?
Gagium
You aren't suggesting that consent should be the only factor in a relationship, right? Consent, alone, is a horrible standard.
In any case, I just find his reasoning against transgender rights strange. He takes progressive positions on numerous social positions, except when it comes to transgender rights, going so far as to state, "As of right now, the modern Left in the U.S. wants to literally corrupt family life." That line is an argument that you only really hear from some of the more right-wing of conservatives. Conservatives literally used--and some still use--that very line to argue the immorality of homosexuality, etc. I'm curious to know why you--and indeed, even him--think that transgender rights are separate from every other recent social issue regarding people's sexuality. I get the sense, based on his comments, that he has some innate disdain--a guttural distaste--for children self-identifying as the opposite sex. Wouldn't those who identify with the ideological left consider that bigotry? The same kind of purported bigotry that Christians displayed towards gays and lesbians when those people of faith described homosexuality as abnormal?
By the way, I'm pretty sure that if you publicly expressed his views on social issues regarding gender, you probably would piss off both conservatives and liberals. Both ends of the political spectrum would find the comments somewhat contradictory.
Liberated American Provinces, Gagium
:)(((((((
I have many chins
Viridus, Gagium, Ibenta
Furbish Islands. I like how my political compass result on the Conservative Party page got lost. It probably would have skewed the results some lmao.
Viridus, Gagium
No disrespect meant. But it's true. Jesus did not force anybody. And to be a communist you must force.
Viridus, Gagium, Missourj
Just emphasizeing something.
Gagium, Missourj
Post by Furbish Islands suppressed by a moderator.
I mean sure. If you wanna look at it that way.
Neo-liberalism came about from classical liberal thought and ideas anyways, so you're not far off I suppose.
Also, I do support transgender rights, I just don't want little kids to be able to be pressured into transitioning. I don't want to have to expose little kids to the concept of being gay or lesbian or bisexual, nor do I want to expose them to the concept of being straight. Kids should be kids, without all these political, or LGBT, agendas.
Gagium, Missourj
The application wasn't perfect but the idea itself was sound.
Gagium, Greater Bastion, Missourj
Random imperial interjection.
Im looking for any feedback on my Factbook. Still a work in progress but Its starting to look like something.
Thanks!
Gagium
Logical. My thing said when I made gun ownership mandatory it was putting up athortaianism.
Gagium
I think it looks good so far!
Huvakia, Gagium
Teenage Theodore Roosevelt be like:
"Uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuh I have a big................................................................stick."
Liberated American Provinces, Furbish Islands, Gagium, Greater Bastion, Baltimare State, Theodore Roosevelt The Ghost
We also would have accepted an "UwU" in that statement
Liberated American Provinces, Viridus, Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost, Greater Bastion
Speak a big stick and carry it softly.
Wait
Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost
As far as the law is concerned, I think consent should be the only factor considered. Do you find that reasonable? If not, why?
I cannot speak for him, but my reason for not supporting children transitioning lies in the same area as consent. I do not think a child has the mental capacity to make a life altering decision at such a young age. I am aware that this issue falls in the same area as gay marriage, but that doesn't mean that there isn't a large difference between the two.
Gagium, Greater Bastion, Missourj
Seconds ago: Following new legislation in Liberated American Provinces, The President sports gold-plated grillz to promote the government's hard money policy.
Very cool, Mr. President!
Viridus, Gagium
That's exactly the point I was making. I don't care if someone decides to transition when they're 20, or become gay or something. Whatever, it's their choice.
But allowing a little kid to go through the same things is horrendous. Kids are our future, I don't want the next generation to grow up completely messed up mentally from hormone injections, from being told that sexual exploration is fine at the age of 7.
Like I said, by the age of 20, hell, even 15, people could be more responsible and handle it. But young kids should not be exposed to this stuff at all.
Liberated American Provinces, Gagium
Are you guys pro-life or pro-choice?
Viridus, Gagium, Barry Goldwater The Ghost, Juventini
From a personal perspective I support pro-life, however having said that I don't think that it should be the governments place to make that decision for someone. So ultimately I'm pro-choice.
Gagium, Missourj
I'm pro life. I am agenst abortion under any circumstances. And I do not back down from that.
New Waldensia, Viridus, Gagium, Juventini, Missourj
Im pro-life too
New Waldensia, Viridus, Gagium, Juventini
Consent on its own is not a perfect standard, and I don't think we're having enough of a public conversation about the limits of consent from a legal perspective. I also don't think that we're having enough of a discussion regarding the values consent instills within a society. Let me start by asking you this, "What is consent?" Generally, the basic answer goes something like, "When both partners explicitly agree to a practice or certain arrangement." However, consider this, two American college students--John and Jane--meet at a party and agree to fornicate--the standard hookup, as you probably know it as. Both make explicitly clear that they agree to the arrangement and have sexual intercourse. The next day, however, Jane does not feel as though she has been romantically satisfied. Why should she after all? In treating sex as the product of consent--a mere commodity, of sorts, to satisfy base desires--both John and Jane have stripped any kind of romantic or psychological meaning from their relationship. The sexual relations they had became devoid of any emotional or psychological intimacy as soon as they viewed the act in transactional terms--purely the language of consent. But alas, Jane is now sitting at home, feeling as though she has been used. She feels cheated. According to most feminists, her dissatisfaction is evidence that she did not fully consent to the fornication with John. To a degree, they're right. Clearly, Jane did not fully think out the consequences of her action. Like most college students, she thought of what would satisfy her passion in the spur of a moment. She did not consider whether she could come to live with her decision. So, she decides to report John to the campus Title IX office or whichever other group includes mandatory reporters. I will let you consider how this story ends.
If you think that my hypothetical example can't happen in real life, I urge you to do some research. There have been numerous legal cases heard that are similar, if not identical, to the situation I just described. And my argument here is just one of many points raised to identify the limits of consent. I highly recommend viewing academic discussions about consent from both a legal and philosophical standpoint. It is an incredibly tricky matter.
---
On your point about transgender rights, I don't necessarily disagree with that argument. But if that's your only problem with the Democratic Party, why leave? Perhaps this is a question more suited to Bastion.
Liberated American Provinces, Gagium
Consent is vital. If one does something x happens. Pure and simple. Can go and go to the wambulence.
Gagium, Missourj
I blew my chance at slaying the Borlandian Reich.
Gagium, Emerisis
Post by Furbish Islands suppressed by a moderator.
That's not true!
Huvakia, Liberated American Provinces, Gagium
I won't deny the validity of any of the points you have made; they are all very important to consider. That being said, people should be free to consent, as you have defined - "when both partners explicitly agree to a practice or certain arrangement," even if they have not considered the potential outcomes of their actions. And if they end up regretting their actions, then that is their problem. It is not the role of the government to prevent individuals from taking actions that will ultimately only affect themselves.
Yes, I was never a Democrat. Greater Bastion it's all yours.
Gagium, Ibenta, Greater Bastion
It comes from a point of practicality. As you stated in the poll, 2 billion people already speak English, so why have another language overtake that when literally billions already speak English?
And I don't only speak English, so you're wrong again :)
Viridus, Gagium
>logs onto NS
> sees legit philosophical debate on FCN RMB
> is impressed
Wait, are we talking FCN or LCN? 😜
Liberated American Provinces, Furbish Islands, Viridus, Gagium, Libervalley, Ibenta
Again. I don't know if you're joking here, but I stated that we should not view consent as the only standard worth considering. Consent alone is insufficient.
Gagium
> Implying that I don't speak Korean and Spanish.
YEEET.
Liberated American Provinces, Viridus, Gagium
Going to take a hard pass on that last line of the first paragraph. I clearly have a different view of government intervention.
Liberated American Provinces, Viridus, Gagium, Greater Bastion
Indeed. I figured that was where our disagreement was.
Gagium
I can't agree. And no I'm very serious. Consent is the cornerstone. Without it it is forced (like government). If one does x then consequences happen. It's only fair. I. My world view you do x, y happens we help you but you too also pay a bit.
https://youtu.be/kVpYvV0O7uI
We all consent all the time. I can't take out a 80,000 dollar loan and then the next day feel bad about it, but I HAVE to pay it back.
Gagium, Missourj
If Esperanto was more successfull then it would be neat. I say Middel English mixed Jamican would be the clearest choice.
Real Question Though If all primary english speaking places call it soccer besides the england do the english have property rights or is it a voting matter? If its your 2nd language do you get to vote is based on people or are the people represented by the nation in such vote. If soccer is football then what is american football not just americans play it .
Washingtonian Republic, Gagium
Many people find the principle of economic freedom and social conservatism contradict each other but I find they play complimentary roles. Capitalism & economic freedom are merely the tools we use to exchange resources and services in the most efficient way. Everything has a market but just because something can be reduced to supply and demand curves doesn't mean it should be legal. The social fabric of families is scientifically tied to economic success and is one example of how social conservatism is complimentary. How do we then determine what markets should be illegal? I always refer back to the founding principles and unalienable rights. According to the constitution it is part of the governments responsibility to protect our unalienable rights which include life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. If you believe life starts at conception then under this philosophy the government has every right to make abortion illegal.
New Waldensia, Viridus, Gagium
Post by Furbish Islands suppressed by a moderator.
Harsh words for a liberal in a conservative region.
Viridus, Gagium
I'm just hoping that Thegoldcoast puts the Red Plus Party in the 12th FCN times.
Thegoldcoast, Viridus, Gagium
I have been recording the results from my issues and have now recorded over 50 different issues which can all be found here.
https://www.nationstates.net/nation=libervalley/detail=factbook/id=1087250
Furbish Islands, New Waldensia, Viridus, Gagium
Noice
Viridus, Gagium
Again, you misinterpreted what I said. I did not say that we should get rid of consent. All I said was that consent alone is not enough. To use a term Viridus loves, I have a more nuanced view than you think.
Also, you linked a video to Sargon of Akkad... LMAO.
Viridus, Gagium, Juventini
I make The Handmaid's Tale look like Barney and Friends.
Jkjk. But in all seriousness, I'm pro-life
Washingtonian Republic, Viridus, Gagium, Juventini
How very not conceited of you.
Viridus, Gagium, Greater Bastion
The spotlight on political parties will return in the 13th Issue, as we have an anonymous piece in our political section this week.
Ulrech, Viridus, Gagium
lol ik, i view consent alone as enough. its a long vid but it really is well put in general. i view if you agree to something its in the contract. no pull backs. its not fair, but its very realistic.
Gagium
I'm pro-life.
Furbish Islands, Viridus, Gagium, Ibenta, Kleveria, Juventini
You know I do!
Gagium
Me after the presidential elections :sadcowboydabs:
[spoiler]Jk[/spoiler]
New Waldensia, Viridus
Post by Furbish Islands suppressed by a moderator.
I see how it is
Viridus, Kleveria
Late to the party but hey.
Pro-life under all circumstances. I'm not a fan of murdering things with a heartbeat unless you're going to eat it (I.E. animals.) and even then it should be done with respect. Ending an innocent life before it's even born (and then treating the remains as "medical waste") is horrid on another level. Life is a gift and I believe we're born with "Propósito divino," divine purpose (what that purpose is can be debated, but at the end of the day thats why we're given free will) and to take that away in such a manner utterly spits in the face of God and shows absolute disregard and ungratefulness towards the value of life.
As a bit of an aside: I'm very aware I'm more or less preaching to the choir here and don't "need" to elaborate my reasoning, however among anyone who take any position, there's bound to be differing opinions, and I find figuring out the mindset behind why to be beneficial to gaining knowledge and perspective, as well as encourage a good discussion. It can be religious, personal, moral, scientific or more logical based reasoning, but everyones going to be different, so I'd curiously ask with that in mind to anyone, pro-life or not.
Why do you take the stance you do in regards to abortion?
New Waldensia, Viridus, Gagium, Ibenta, Kleveria, Barbak
Post by Furbish Islands suppressed by a moderator.
Post self-deleted by Gagium.
Assuming you're being serious:
I put (I.E. Animals) there for a reason
I assumed it was obvious I wasn't implying that.
I don't believe some of the crazy things I've heard about people "eating fetuses"
But no, I'd never intentionally imply such a disgusting thing.
Assuming this is a joke:
Yes as long as its straight white men /s
Furbish Islands, New Waldensia, Viridus, Gagium
While it is a bit morbid it remains a medical necessity. Chances are persons undergoing such a procedure either lack the means or motivation to conduct a proper burial, as such it becomes the unfortunate responsibility of the state. It isn't pretty in anyway but it prevents the spread of disease.
Removing the ability to choose whether or not to carry a pregnancy to term is also an infringement on the idea of free will.
Ultimately my thinking originates from the fact that not all abortions are the result of a life free of inhibitions. Perhaps the parent or parents in questions are categorically unable to properly care for the child. Not to mention cases of sexual assault, incest, or medial complications none of which are exclusive to one another. There simply exists to many opportunities for pregnancy to result from unsanctioned actions, or to represent a significant medical threat to continuation of the mothers life to outlaw abortion in my opinion.
Gagium, Juventini
Washingtonian Republic implements a cultural lingual transition program when the annexation clause is used. This primary concerns non-English speaking populations, the objective is the displacement of the native tongue in favor of the American or Yankee dialect. The process takes usually a generation to compete, some results have been mixed dialects.
Viridus, Gagium
Post by Furbish Islands suppressed by a moderator.
Well I overestimated Furby's intelligence, looking at his reaction to the results of the poll
Liberated American Provinces, New Waldensia, Gagium, Ibenta
Those are all beyond understandable points. I respect the position, and to a degree, I will admit the case can be made to allow abortions in extreme situations in which it is needed, I understand every one is not like the other. However
I think throwing in the whole "being too poor to provide" reason with legitimate medical and circumstantial issues is a bit of an odd one? If a child is conceived out of horrid sex crimes then yes, I'm a lot more on the fence than I am solidly on one side of it, but simply on that point, isn't that one far more based on ones own actions? Not things beyond control.
If you're understandably too poor to have a child from the outset, don't have one.
While I don't believe in abortion I will say the "no abortions, no birth control" stance is absolutely ridiculous. I believe fully in spreading education on these sorts of things across the world over, and giving easier, cheapier, and better access to birth control and other products of the like is absolutely crucial.
And in the majority of cases? That would dramatically reduce accidental pregnancy, being too poor to provide isn't really a great excuse excluding it's in addition to things you previously mentioned, sex crime and the like. A lot of that comes down more to individual choices or lack of choices in terms of birth control. Thats a far more solvable issue.
But, besides that, yes you raise good points, and many soon boil down to the base fundamentals of ones morals at a core level. In the context of extreme cases via medical or criminal, I can't really give you a "yes I agree" or a "no I disagree" simply because, well as you sort of implied it's never a black and white issue
I appreciate the response!
Gagium, Barbak
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=crOTKWLtjlY
R E K T .
Viridus
My point in highlighting lack of financial stability was not to imply that this was as serious as some of the other examples. Responsibility does rest with the parents in these cases (an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure) and this is exactly why I believe this decision should remain in their hands. The question at hand isn't the morality, or responsibility involved with getting pregnant. Regardless of how the pregnancy occurred if the parent recognizes that they're incapable of providing and has the child anyway, they are knowingly condemning the child to potential lifelong suffering. Situations can change and improve or they can get worse, meaningful movement in the real world is incredibly difficult. If you're a person who can barely take care of themselves is it morally responsible to bring a child into the world knowing that they will likely spend their days destitute and hungry?
Consequences aren't solely the burden of the child either, further economic detriment by carrying the child to term can occur as the mother looses productivity and mobility in the workplace, employment may become jeopardized. If it is maintained, once the child is born a further time requirement is placed on the parent for years until the child can reach some level of self sufficiency. Failure to provide sufficient resources and time to your child is also a crime in most developed nations and can result in fines, loss of custody, jail time, or commonly a combination.
It's a slippery slope of an issue and the realities of it all tend to send everyone home with a phyrrich victory XD
You're welcome! Nice to have civil discussions even if the topic is anything but...
Juventini
Post self-deleted by Barbak.
Government should help financially the parent if the parent isn't financially stable to be able to feed their child
Huvakia, Gagium, Ibenta, Juventini
Okay, thanks for the trailer.
Thegoldcoast, Gagium
Wrong, the community and charities should. The government should help only as a last resort.
Huvakia, New Waldensia, Gagium, Kleveria, Juventini
Certificate Of Need (CON) laws are so 1970's. They provide little to no benefit for anyone accept the already established companies.
New Waldensia, Gagium
Lmao. Do I even have to point out how unreasonable this policy subscription is? It's ideologically consistent with your beliefs, sure, but it's also insane.
Liberated American Provinces, Greater Bastion
Post by Furbish Islands suppressed by a moderator.
Shhh, he's busy flexing on the poor.
Gagium, Greater Bastion
Yes. He's dunking on me. I should at least be able to holler, though. What? Did the corporations buy the rights to that as well?
Liberated American Provinces, Gagium, Greater Bastion
Post by Furbish Islands suppressed by a moderator.
Guys, there was a girl fight at mda! Melissa chipped off Jennifer's nail!
Viridus, Gagium
What if the community chooses to elect a government that will help?
Gagium, New Inglaterra
Then the government should jelp
Gagium
Of course they have. Why would corporations allow you to do anything freely? Silly peasant.
What do you in your infinite wisdom think of the poll since apparently everyone else is an imbecile?
Gagium
Hello there! I'm late to the party but I enjoy civil discussions too. So I would like to civily disagree with you. "It is better to have loved and lost than to never have loved at all," well, replace one vowel and you get something perhaps even more true, it is better to have lived and lost than to never have lived at all. Even if the child is born to low-income and in hardship, they still get the little pleasures of life. The sunshine, the taste of food, perhaps love of a parent or someone else, the ability to choose and have their own free-will. The free-will of the parent or woman is often talked of, but what about the free will of the baby being aborted? They don't get to choose. They have no choice in the matter, because they aren't even at the negotiating table, even though it's their life in question. They cannot speak for themselves, they are the ultimate helpless being. I've heard cries of "speak for the animals because they can't speak for themselves" and "speak for the trees, they can't speak for themselves" but what about the human babies who can't speak for themselves? And don't even try and convince me it's not a human baby, it's certainly not a carrot! If you simply let it be and grow it would come out of the womb as a human, there is no chance it would come out as something else. Now, true, miscarraige is a thing, but it's a tragedy that modern medicine should be seeking to prevent, not cause! Also, from the moment the egg and sperm meet the 23 pairs of chromomes are there, all the genetic information is there. It just copies itself. Have a heart, and a mind! Think of all the millions who have been aborted? Perhaps one of them would've been the one to find the cure for cancer, or help to find it. The next Issac Newton of our time, a brilliant scientist. Not everyone who is brilliant and special came from the right family, not everyone came from a sinless background. Jessee Jackson and Eartha Kitt were products of rape. You can overcome that, and everyone should have a chance. As for genetic birth defects, everyone is special and should be loved anyways, and besides, the doctors aren't always right. My mother was told by the doctors I would have Down Syndrome, they were wrong. Had my mother taken their comments seriously and had me aborted simply for that, I wouldn't be here today. I'm so glad she didn't. I was born in low income and had a struggling child-hood. I wasn't taken care of properly, but I've made it through, and I became a stronger and better person because of it. As for the mother's health, if they can lie about genetic defects, why not about that? And even if so, with today's medical miracles and C-Sections available, women don't die in child-birth as often as they used to, and the child is worth it. How selfish of a person to kill their own spawn simply because it would mean causing themself harm and risking their life. The greatest love a man can give is laying down his life for his friend, how different destroying your own flesh and blood before they've come out of the womb! As Juventini pointed out, birth control is always an option. I believe the day after stuff is just as wrong as abortion, (because you are killing the cell after the egg and spem have already met), but other types of birth control aren't morally wrong and should be readily available and legal. Thank you for reading my response, (if you've gotten this far). I should be getting to bed now XD
New Waldensia, Gagium, Ibenta, Barbak
Following new legislation in Gagium, the government has embraced apartheid.
Segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever-
What, why are you all looking at me like Im a lunatic? Should we not segregate the boomers from us zoomers?
Liberated American Provinces, Viridus, Enclave Patriots, New Inglaterra, Baltimare State
Cabinet Secretary: "Uhm, sir... You're a boomer. COUGH."
Liberated American Provinces, New Waldensia, Gagium, Baltimare State, Kleveria
You make some valid points and some that I dont entirely agree with. In my initial post I acknowledge that hardship can be overcome. Im glad to hear you were able to surmount the hand you wear dealt.
Despite the disparity of viewpoints across the region Im happy to have discussed it without devolving into
GLOBAL THERMONUCLEAR WARFARE
Also bonus points for caring at all one way or the other.
Washingtonian Republic, Gagium, Kleveria
One of my dearest friends may not have been born to this world. His mother, a prostitute, could not afford to raise him. And his father? God can only tell where that piece of scum is. But his mother, for whatever reason, miraculously decided to give birth to my friend. And even though his early years on this Earth were marked by poverty, neglect, and abuse--even though the state took custody of him and delivered him into the hands of abusive foster parents--he fought his way through every conceivable form of disadvantage. He struggled, and now he is with me at Yale.
Make no mistake. His suffering has not ended just because he made it to the gates of power. He still copes with some emotional disorders, and as recently as this month, he learned that his mother passed--murdered by some criminal still unknown to the law. But he still struggles through, thankful that he can live a life that could have well been cut short within the confines of a small clinic in South Carolina. If there is any reason, beyond logic, that I consider myself pro-life, it is because of him.
"It is better to have lived and lost than to never have lived at all."
My friend is living proof of that.
Ecalpa, New Waldensia, Viridus, Gagium, Kleveria
Lay off the tide pods
https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/431/785/087.gif
Viridus, Gagium, Kleveria
New poll in Zentari. Come and vote!
Liberated American Provinces, Viridus, Gagium
In my 4-5 years of being on NS, a majority of created nations are typically authoritarian administrative states (the objective of the admin state is control and directing the masses through networks of government agencies/programs, read Democracy and Education by John Dewey).
Often this type progress is seen as unorthodoxy scientific by the division of society, behaviors, events (historicism, materialism, postmaterialism, etc.) but has no actual empirical evidence to support their claims. Cultures that value the concepts of liberty and the civil society are a rarity in history alone, and among individuals that champion it themselves.
Gagium, Greater Bastion
I've been here way too long
Huvakia, Washingtonian Republic, Viridus, Gagium, Greater Bastion
You and me both.
Otira, Viridus, Gagium, Greater Bastion
I see the thicc bois are having a get together...Im not quite as big as you two but Im quite hefty myself
Huvakia, Otira, Liberated American Provinces, Viridus, Gagium, Greater Bastion
LOL everybody in the SCA are triggered that the Nazi was banned and his party was destroyed LOL
Washingtonian Republic, New Waldensia, Viridus, Gagium, Ibenta
Post by Furbish Islands suppressed by a moderator.
who cares
Ulrech, Viridus, Gagium
In the words of the great Zlatan Ibrahimovic lions do not concern themselves with the actions of sheep
Liberated American Provinces, Viridus, Gagium
Yes, yes. And now the rains weep o'er their halls.
Huvakia, Ulrech, Viridus, Gagium
> Pete Buttigieg announcing the Douglass Plan for racial justice.
> Claiming that over 400 organizations and prominent people back his plan.
> Literally just included the names of organizations and people that neither explicitly endorsed nor rejected the idea.
> Most of the people included--over half of the names on the list--are white because "racial equality is a universal issue."
Pete Buttigieg: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_Nc1zkiTvw&fbclid=IwAR35DumJYNV0v5Pw7o_fEoxYFMB6NCyF4ORjB9UFLMMHQTk3JYPRS85n-Ps
Washingtonian Republic, Gagium
Assembled with Dot's Region Saver.
Written by Refuge Isle.