Post Archive

Region: Friendly Pacifists

History

Post self-deleted by Thal Dorthat.

Post self-deleted by Brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxv.

oh Thal, when will you learn?

IÂ’ll be the champion

Wait, no, no NO NO NO NO NO NONONONONONONONONONONO THIS CNAT BE HAPPEN8NG

Here ye, here ye

A decree from the Prime MinisterÂ’s office

North Freachikion by no means can be the 1st on Page 200.

North Freachikion wrote:Wait, no, no NO NO NO NO NO NONONONONONONONONONONO THIS CNAT BE HAPPEN8NG

CNAT XD

Brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxv wrote:CNAT XD

Thal Dorthat wrote:Here ye, here ye

A decree from the Prime MinisterÂ’s office

North Freachikion by no means can be the 1st on Page 200.

I used to ruleeeee FP

Nations would rise when I gave the word

Now in the morning they mockkk mee

Sweep rmb pages I used to own

Post self-deleted by Brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxv.

Brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxv wrote:Thal Dorthat: 'YouÂ’re lucky that you found an active region, but greetings! IÂ’m Thal Dorthat, Prime Minister, and I wish you a nice thanksgiving, if you are a country that celebrates it near this day, of course."

theres no more messages u scammer >:(

What

Brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxv wrote:?

Wdym by thereÂ’s no more messages you scammer.

North Freachikion wrote:Wdym by thereÂ’s no more messages you scammer.

never said that.

Brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxv wrote:never said that.

You did, but now you deleted it

North Freachikion wrote:You did, but now you deleted it

i didnt said that smh

North Freachikion wrote:Fine

why u accusing me? i never said that

Brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxv wrote:why u accusing me? i never said that

Thal Dorthat brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxv said that you were a scammer

North Freachikion wrote:Thal Dorthat brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxv said that you were a scammer

no i didnt

North Freachikion wrote:Thal Dorthat brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxv said that you were a scammer

Okay people have freedom of speech

And idrc

Proof:

https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=54011837

Thal Dorthat wrote:Okay people have freedom of speecg

I said mostly.

Not outright calling someone a scammer without context

North Freachikion wrote:Proof:

https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=54011837

I said mostly.

Not outright calling someone a scammer without context

bruh stop accusing me

Brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxv wrote:bruh stop accusing me

Wdym?

I gave proof

BrfxxccxxxÂ

If you really said that please donÂ’t its not nice

But idrc.

Post self-deleted by Brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxv.

Thal Dorthat wrote:BrfxxccxxxÂ

If you really said that please donÂ’t its not nice

But idrc.

>:)

North Freachikion wrote:I used to ruleeeee FP

Nations would rise when I gave the word

Now in the morning they mockkk mee

Sweep rmb pages I used to own

I used to roll the dice

Feel the fear in my enemy's eyes

Listened as the crowd would sing

Now the old king is dead, long live the Freach

One minute, I held the key

Next, Thal Dorthat sh1tted on me

And I discovered that my castles stand

Upon pillars of salt and pillars of sand

something that i learned from these couple of minutes is that North Freachikion is a snitch.

Thal Dorthat

Help my °s are d°ing really weird things.

Old Godzilla was hoppinÂ’ around

ToÂ’yo city like a big playgrÂ’nd

Brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxv wrote:something that i learned from these couple of minutes is that North Freachikion is a snitch.

So?

You called someone a scammer without context, think ima let that slide?

Brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxv wrote:what does that mean?

I have permanent Satire Status lol (NOT SATIRE)

Brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxv

North Freachikion wrote:So?

You called someone a scammer without context, think ima let that slide?

bruh Thal Dorthat said that he doesnt really care

The Rickpublic

The Rickpublic wrote:I have permanent Satire Status lol (NOT SATIRE)

Just remember if you want to repeal it just tel me via TG

The Rickpublic

The Rickpublic wrote:I have permanent Satire Status lol (NOT SATIRE)

Unless repealed.

In that case, I vote for the repeal of RickÂ’s permanent satire status

The Rickpublic

Brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxv wrote:bruh Thal Dorthat said that he doesnt really care

so?

The Rickpublic

North Freachikion wrote:so?

stop saying "so?" lol

The Rickpublic

North Freachikion wrote:Old Godzilla was hoppinÂ’ around

ToÂ’yo city like a big playgrÂ’nd

When suddenly Batman burst from the shade

And hit Godzilla with a Batgrenade

The Rickpublic

I do want it to be known i am personally in support of the satire status lol thxs tho (NOT SATIRE)

Brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxv wrote:stop saying "so?" lol

why?

give me a full essay

North Freachikion wrote:When suddenly Batman burst from the shade

And hit Godzilla with a Batgrenade

Godzilla got pissed and began to attack

But didn't expect to be blocked by Shaq

North Freachikion wrote:Godzilla got pissed and began to attack

But didn't expect to be blocked by Shaq

Who proceeded to open up a can of Shaq-Fu

When Aaron Carter came out of the blue

North Freachikion wrote:why?

give me a full essay

alr bet:

Hello! In the game NationsStates, your friend North Freachikion keeps saying "so?" and you find it annoying. Here's an essay explaining why it can be irritating when someone says "so?" repeatedly:

1. Lack of engagement: When someone responds with just "so?" after you share something, it can feel like they're not actively listening or showing interest in what you're saying. It can make you feel like they're not fully engaged in the conversation.

2. Dismissive attitude: Saying "so?" can come across as dismissive or indifferent. It may give the impression that the person doesn't value your input or doesn't think your thoughts or opinions are important.

3. Lack of contribution: By responding with "so?", your friend is not adding anything substantial to the conversation. It can make the interaction one-sided and leave you feeling like there's no genuine exchange of ideas.

4. Communication barrier: When someone repeatedly uses "so?" as a response, it can create a communication barrier. It may discourage you from sharing further or expressing yourself fully, as you may anticipate a similar dismissive response.

5. Missed opportunity for meaningful conversation: By using "so?" as a default response, your friend might miss the chance to delve deeper into the topic you're discussing. Meaningful conversations thrive on active listening, empathy, and building upon each other's ideas.

It's important to communicate your feelings with your friend, expressing how their repetitive use of "so?" makes you feel. By discussing it openly, you can work towards finding a more engaging and fulfilling way to communicate with each other.

Remember, effective communication involves active listening, empathy, and contributing meaningfully to conversations.

The Rickpublic, Thal Dorthat

North Freachikion wrote:Who proceeded to open up a can of Shaq-Fu

When Aaron Carter came out of the blue

And he started beating up Shaquille O'Neal

Then they both got flattened by the Batmobile

BTW. This totally isnÂ’t a page 200 rush in disguise

North Freachikion wrote:And he started beating up Shaquille O'Neal

Then they both got flattened by the Batmobile

BTW. This totally isnÂ’t a page 200 rush in disguise

But before he could make it back to the Batcave

Abraham Lincoln popped out of his grave

I declare Neutrality in the current argument that is ongoing (NOT SATIRE)

The Rickpublic wrote:I declare Neutrality in the current argument that is ongoing (NOT SATIRE)
I too declare neutrality

The Rickpublic

Brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxv wrote:alr bet:

Hello! In the game NationsStates, your friend North Freachikion keeps saying "so?" and you find it annoying. Here's an essay explaining why it can be irritating when someone says "so?" repeatedly:

1. Lack of engagement: When someone responds with just "so?" after you share something, it can feel like they're not actively listening or showing interest in what you're saying. It can make you feel like they're not fully engaged in the conversation.

2. Dismissive attitude: Saying "so?" can come across as dismissive or indifferent. It may give the impression that the person doesn't value your input or doesn't think your thoughts or opinions are important.

3. Lack of contribution: By responding with "so?", your friend is not adding anything substantial to the conversation. It can make the interaction one-sided and leave you feeling like there's no genuine exchange of ideas.

4. Communication barrier: When someone repeatedly uses "so?" as a response, it can create a communication barrier. It may discourage you from sharing further or expressing yourself fully, as you may anticipate a similar dismissive response.

5. Missed opportunity for meaningful conversation: By using "so?" as a default response, your friend might miss the chance to delve deeper into the topic you're discussing. Meaningful conversations thrive on active listening, empathy, and building upon each other's ideas.

It's important to communicate your feelings with your friend, expressing how their repetitive use of "so?" makes you feel. By discussing it openly, you can work towards finding a more engaging and fulfilling way to communicate with each other.

Remember, effective communication involves active listening, empathy, and contributing meaningfully to conversations.

Alr bet:

1. ItÂ’s simple

Saying ‘so?’ keeps your conversation nice and colloquial. It lets people know that:

1. Your point isnÂ’t helpful. ItÂ’s either:

>Supported by circular evidence.

>Downright bad.

2. You do not care.

3. TheyÂ’ve lost the argument.

2. ItÂ’s fast

This combination of 3 characters is extremely easy to type and is understood across the globe, and it also has many meanings that people understand given the context.

3. It doesnÂ’t do much harm

Think about it. Has others typing these three characters ever affected you in a way that hurt you? It doesnÂ’t.

4. It lets others know youÂ’re pissed

ItÂ’s also used in the case against dummies, that theyÂ’re straight losing or just bad at arguing. It also lets them know in a argument that youÂ’re really pissed off and they should just zip it.

The Rickpublic

North Freachikion wrote:Alr bet:

1. ItÂ’s simple

Saying ‘so?’ keeps your conversation nice and colloquial. It lets people know that:

1. Your point isnÂ’t helpful. ItÂ’s either:

>Supported by circular evidence.

>Downright bad.

2. You do not care.

3. TheyÂ’ve lost the argument.

2. ItÂ’s fast

This combination of 3 characters is extremely easy to type and is understood across the globe, and it also has many meanings that people understand given the context.

3. It doesnÂ’t do much harm

Think about it. Has others typing these three characters ever affected you in a way that hurt you? It doesnÂ’t.

4. It lets others know youÂ’re pissed

ItÂ’s also used in the case against dummies, that theyÂ’re straight losing or just bad at arguing. It also lets them know in a argument that youÂ’re really pissed off and they should just zip it.

wtf XD

The Rickpublic

Friendly Pacifists should be both friendly and pacifist.

The Rickpublic

Thal Dorthat wrote:Friendly Pacifists should be both friendly and pacifist.

Fax (NOT SATIRE)

Thal Dorthat wrote:Friendly Pacifists should be both friendly and communist.

Shocking!

Thal Dorthat wrote:Friendly Pacifists should be both friendly and pacifist.

I am D:

Brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxv wrote:wtf XD

5. ItÂ’s nice

‘So?’ is much nicer than other colloquial ways of expressing impatience or frustration in a argument such as:

‘your mom/dad’

‘who asked’

‘I really don’t care/give a f’

much more.

6. It lets the other person know to give more evidence

‘So?’ let’s others know that their argument is redundant and they need to try smarter, not harder. This enables more talking, less fighting, and prime debate.

7. It cancels out any bad debate

‘So?’ also cancels out any bad debate. It does this by clearing any circular evidence/error and leaves a strong sense of chagrin in your opponent. It lets them know ‘hey, don’t use this sissy sh1t and don’t use that sissy sh1t’.

The Rickpublic

Why Are You In Here wrote:you can change what people say -The Rickpublic

Dont let any bad guys figure this one out! (NOT SATIRE)

North Freachikion wrote:5. ItÂ’s nice

‘So?’ is much nicer than other colloquial ways of expressing impatience or frustration in a argument such as:

‘your mom/dad’

‘who asked’

‘I really don’t care/give a f’

much more.

6. It lets the other person know to give more evidence

‘So?’ let’s others know that their argument is redundant and they need to try smarter, not harder. This enables more talking, less fighting, and prime debate.

7. It cancels out any bad debate

‘So?’ also cancels out any bad debate. It does this by clearing any circular evidence/error and leaves a strong sense of chagrin in your opponent. It lets them know ‘hey, don’t use this sissy sh1t and don’t use that sissy sh1t’.

So?

The Rickpublic

The Rickpublic wrote:Dont let any bad guys figure this one out! (NOT SATIRE)

No misquoting >:(

The Rickpublic

Why Are You In Here wrote:IM THE DING DONG DITCH HEHEHEHEHEHEHE MY NEXT TARGET IS THAL DORTHAT (NOT MISQUOTE)

WEÂ’VE EXPOSED HIM!

EJECT HIM GUYS!

Why Are You In Here wrote:No misquoting >:(

okie dokie (NOT SATIRE)

North Freachikion wrote:5. ItÂ’s nice

‘So?’ is much nicer than other colloquial ways of expressing impatience or frustration in a argument such as:

‘your mom/dad’

‘who asked’

‘I really don’t care/give a f’

much more.

6. It lets the other person know to give more evidence

‘So?’ let’s others know that their argument is redundant and they need to try smarter, not harder. This enables more talking, less fighting, and prime debate.

7. It cancels out any bad debate

‘So?’ also cancels out any bad debate. It does this by clearing any circular evidence/error and leaves a strong sense of chagrin in your opponent. It lets them know ‘hey, don’t use this sissy sh1t and don’t use that sissy sh1t’.

ok cool? didnt really ask for more context

North Freachikion wrote:WEÂ’VE EXPOSED HIM!

EJECT HIM GUYS!

NOOOOO

Brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxv wrote:ok cool? didnt really ask for more context

I can go on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on

Why are North Freachikion and Brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxv even arguing *I dont know how to like link nations or whatever* (NOT SATIRE)

Post self-deleted by Brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxv.

Why Are You In Here wrote:iÂ’ve committed arson

OHHH

TAKE HIM AWAY

The Rickpublic wrote:Why are North Freachikion and Brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxv even arguing *I dont know how to like link nations or whatever* (NOT SATIRE)

just do a at. sign (@) and then your nation name you want to link. So it should be like

[pre]@[NATIONNAME][/pre]

Why Are You In Here wrote:I support the actions that took place on 6/6/44

Also freach you're f*cking annoying sometimes with your messages lol

Why Are You In Here wrote:I have a death wish

So be it

Why Are You In Here wrote:omg complaint

Yeah yeah whatever

I almost forgot, ELEVEN PAGES UNTIL 200!

that means, 9 pages (225 posts) in two hours

That mean 1.875 posts per minute from the last 9 pages

Friendly Pacifists should be both friendly and pacifist.

Post self-deleted by Brfxxccxxmnpcccclllmmnprxv.

Thal Dorthat wrote:[IMPOSSIBLE DREAM]

itÂ’s never happening

https://imgflip.com/gif/86xiwf

Ok can we stop misquoting please

North Freachikion wrote:itÂ’s never happening

With my leadership, it will.

Why Are You In Here

Why Are You In Here wrote:OK can we stop misquoting please

OkIe DoKiE (Not satirical)

The Rickpublic wrote:OkIe DoKiE (Not satirical)

oh nah

The Rickpublic wrote:OkIe DoKiE (Not satirical)

Bro WAYIH you donÂ’t want the steam from him

https://imgflip.com/gif/86xj9z

Friendly Pacifists should be both friendly and pacifist.

Assembled with Dot's Region Saver.
Written by Refuge Isle.