Post Archive

Region: Greater Sahara

History

Wert wrote:that us true but not everyone likes the WA, only around 15% of in game users have joined the WA.

Maybe we could put citizenship behind an application form which is run by the Delegate and their part of the government?

I was thinking we could have the delegate be the head of the executive branch and then we could also elect a legislative branch to keep the delegate in check as well as pass our own laws/resolutions. Though I wonder if the number for WA is lower because of puppets? From what I've read on the forums and FAQ using the WA is the only real unique identifier in the game natively and so total WA compared to total nations would always be low because of people who have more than their first nation.

Wert

Acornesia wrote:We’ll, it seems we all agree on citizenship

I was thinking something like:

All nations founded in Greater Sahara are automatically citizens

A nation that’s been a member of Greater Sahara for a week and has over 5 endorsements is eligible to receive citizenship

etc,.

5 endorsements seem a little too high rn as only around 7-8 people in the region are in the WA

Wert wrote:5 endorsements seem a little too high rn as only around 7-8 people in the region are in the WA

I think we shouldn't grant automatic citizenship at all to be honest, foreigners could still come in and just go through that process to effect our elections.

Wert

Lave Deldederady wrote:I think we shouldn't grant automatic citizenship at all to be honest, foreigners could still come in and just go through that process to effect our elections.

You were saying citizenship is granted if you endorse the delegate; since that’s albeit a bit impossible while simultaneously planning on having in-game built delegate elections, what if we had a council of trusted people, like 3, a committee of trusted people, as WA candidates, and you’d need to endorse at least one of them but which one and how many is up to you, to still give you a choice in which one to endorse?

Wert, Lave Deldederady

I don’t think citizenship shouldnt be too complicated though, and not locked too much behind WA

Wert

Acornesia wrote:You were saying citizenship is granted if you endorse the delegate; since that’s albeit a bit impossible while simultaneously planning on having in-game built delegate elections, what if we had a council of trusted people, like 3, a committee of trusted people, as WA candidates, and you’d need to endorse at least one of them but which one and how many is up to you, to still give you a choice in which one to endorse?

3 seems too much, maybe two but i do like that idea though

Acornesia

Acornesia wrote:You were saying citizenship is granted if you endorse the delegate; since that’s albeit a bit impossible while simultaneously planning on having in-game built delegate elections, what if we had a council of trusted people, like 3, a committee of trusted people, as WA candidates, and you’d need to endorse at least one of them but which one and how many is up to you, to still give you a choice in which one to endorse?

Maybe we can allow candidates to announce their campaign and then citizens endorse who they want to be the new delegate? To be able to campaign you have to already be a trusted citizen? or we can make candidates only from our government so we already know they are trusted?

Would we want the delegate to have full power in appointing some type of Minister or would we want them to be elected on their own? Appointed but confirmed by vote of the legislature - if we have one?

If you guys don't mind I could take a stab at writing out something in legal speak as a sort of constitution?

Acornesia, Wert

Also, I know this wouldn’t be the most democratic solution, and maybe not even most efficient solution, but I feel like it could be fun to have the other elected position other than delegate be elected by a two step process instead of one step. I don’t really have a reason for this, but it could be more secure.

For example, everyone gets to vote for a bunch of candidates who are running to be “Electors” (name just a concept). The top 5 people by votes, are added as Electors, and then they vote among themselves for the candidate of head of legislative branch.

Wert, Lave Deldederady

Acornesia wrote:I don’t think citizenship shouldnt be too complicated though, and not locked too much behind WA

Unless we have a better way to have a unique identifier for each nation I think the WA is our best bet to keep people from tricking us via more than one nation in the region or otherwise being a puppet state of another nation which intends to cause harm.

Wert

Lave Deldederady wrote:Maybe we can allow candidates to announce their campaign and then citizens endorse who they want to be the new delegate? To be able to campaign you have to already be a trusted citizen? or we can make candidates only from our government so we already know they are trusted?

Would we want the delegate to have full power in appointing some type of Minister or would we want them to be elected on their own? Appointed but confirmed by vote of the legislature - if we have one?

If you guys don't mind I could take a stab at writing out something in legal speak as a sort of constitution?

Sure, but let’s try and get the basics fleshed out first.

I would think instead of delegate appointing ministers, we would have the legislative branch appoint ministers. Or maybe the delegate gets to appoint 2 ministers, and the legislative appoints the other 2, or something

Wert

Acornesia wrote:Also, I know this wouldn’t be the most democratic solution, and maybe not even most efficient solution, but I feel like it could be fun to have the other elected position other than delegate be elected by a two step process instead of one step. I don’t really have a reason for this, but it could be more secure.

For example, everyone gets to vote for a bunch of candidates who are running to be “Electors” (name just a concept). The top 5 people by votes, are added as Electors, and then they vote among themselves for the candidate of head of legislative branch.

I don't hate that either, though we could easily just make it Parliament. So we have 3 or 5 (odd numbers) Members of Parliament and among themselves they elect our President/Delegate/Prime Minister as well as a Speaker to run Parliament. Then everything the President/Delegate/Prime Minister does can be voted on by Parliament or they can be impeached as needed. That type of stuff.

Lave Deldederady wrote:Unless we have a better way to have a unique identifier for each nation I think the WA is our best bet to keep people from tricking us via more than one nation in the region or otherwise being a puppet state of another nation which intends to cause harm.

There’s little difference between delegate elections and legislative elections aside from electoral process, if is the same people that are allowed to vote.

Acornesia wrote:Sure, but let’s try and get the basics fleshed out first.

I would think instead of delegate appointing ministers, we would have the legislative branch appoint ministers. Or maybe the delegate gets to appoint 2 ministers, and the legislative appoints the other 2, or something

I think we go with https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=51849075 this parliament idea, to be honest. Now that I am thinking it over I am liking it more and more as it allows us to have a trusted group controlling things which we can keep to unique citizens.

Acornesia

Lave Deldederady wrote:I don't hate that either, though we could easily just make it Parliament. So we have 3 or 5 (odd numbers) Members of Parliament and among themselves they elect our President/Delegate/Prime Minister as well as a Speaker to run Parliament. Then everything the President/Delegate/Prime Minister does can be voted on by Parliament or they can be impeached as needed. That type of stuff.

Honestly, due to the delegate being elected completely automatically by in game mechanics and not manually like other parts of the political system, I’d say we’d be a Presidential Republic, in that the legislative does not have the ability to impeach the delegate/executive branch.

Wert

Acornesia wrote:Sure, but let’s try and get the basics fleshed out first.

I would think instead of delegate appointing ministers, we would have the legislative branch appoint ministers. Or maybe the delegate gets to appoint 2 ministers, and the legislative appoints the other 2, or something

Lave Deldederady wrote:I don't hate that either, though we could easily just make it Parliament. So we have 3 or 5 (odd numbers) Members of Parliament and among themselves they elect our President/Delegate/Prime Minister as well as a Speaker to run Parliament. Then everything the President/Delegate/Prime Minister does can be voted on by Parliament or they can be impeached as needed. That type of stuff.

I think for now, the idea of a parlament is too much as most payers in the region are issues players. i think we could think to "ministers" for now

I am about to head to class in a few minutes, I'll mull over some of this and try writing something out to show what I am thinking. I'll post it when I get a chance. Think about the Parliament idea and using a discord though, I really think those are our better bets.

Wert

Wert wrote:I think for now, the idea of a parlament is too much as most payers in the region are issues players. i think we could think to "ministers" for now

Parliament will give them something to do

Acornesia wrote:Honestly, due to the delegate being elected completely automatically by in game mechanics and not manually like other parts of the political system, I’d say we’d be a Presidential Republic, in that the legislative does not have the ability to impeach the delegate/executive branch.

Presidential republic works for me, no impeachments would be fine as well though maybe we could allow Parliament to call an impeachment referendum and if the citizens pass it then the Vice President is in charge? (Vice President could also be the second place winner of the Presidential election?)

Wert

I dont think a parliment is right for this region, there is simply too many people in this region that do not care what region they are in and are just issues players, but i think a discord would be good

Lave Deldederady wrote:I am about to head to class in a few minutes, I'll mull over some of this and try writing something out to show what I am thinking. I'll post it when I get a chance. Think about the Parliament idea and using a discord though, I really think those are our better bets.

Okay, so here’s the idea that I’m getting right now, more or less:

Delegate - Head of State and the Executive Branch. Elected automatically by in game mechanics, barrin foreigners who will have an endorsement cap to try and prevent this.

Prime Minister/Chancellor (name pending) - Head of Government and Legislative Branch. Elected by the Electors/Parliament

Electors/Parliament - Legislative Branch, the top 3/5 electors with the most votes in the electoral campaign will become electors. The electors will then review the list of Prime Minister/Chancellor candidates and vote on which one.

Wert

Acornesia wrote:Okay, so here’s the idea that I’m getting right now, more or less:

Delegate - Head of State and the Executive Branch. Elected automatically by in game mechanics, barrin foreigners who will have an endorsement cap to try and prevent this.

Prime Minister/Chancellor (name pending) - Head of Government and Legislative Branch. Elected by the Electors/Parliament

Electors/Parliament - Legislative Branch, the top 3/5 electors with the most votes in the electoral campaign will become electors. The electors will then review the list of Prime Minister/Chancellor candidates and vote on which one.

i think instead of a parliament, it should be ministers chosen by the prime minister, who is chosen by the people. the delegate would have slightly more powers than a minister but not as much as the PM

Lave Deldederady wrote:I am about to head to class in a few minutes, I'll mull over some of this and try writing something out to show what I am thinking. I'll post it when I get a chance. Think about the Parliament idea and using a discord though, I really think those are our better bets.

I think elections should be done in the region. Even if they are riggable, slightly, I think strict citizenship programs, though not downright elitist, are enough to prevent mass rigging. And, as this is a Presidential Republic, the most secure position of Delegate will always have more power than the less secure position, so it is ultimately not the end of the world if we get some Electors and Chancellors who are foreign puppets or whatever

Wert wrote:i think instead of a parliament, it should be ministers chosen by the prime minister, who is chosen by the people

I disagree, I think it’d be fun and more secure to have it the other way around. Instead of the bottom electing the top which appoints the middle, the bottom elects the middle which appoints the top.

Wert

It doesn’t matter if we have tons of members who simply answer issues and couldn’t care less about our complicated government. They will always have that as an option, and it’s more for them to do

Lave Deldederady

Acornesia wrote:I disagree, I think it’d be fun and more secure to have it the other way around. Instead of the bottom electing the top which appoints the middle, the bottom elects the middle which appoints the top.

but that also makes it more confuseing, look at some regions like The North Pacific, and The Order Of The Grey Wardens TNP even has some of the highest WA activity becuase of it!

Wert wrote:but that also makes it more confuseing, look at some regions like The North Pacific, and The Order Of The Grey Wardens

It’s that confusing for the legislative to vote on the head of the legislative. It’s also more secure, in my opinion

Wert

https://www.nationstates.net/page=dispatch/id=1868933

I wrote this dispatch before leaving for class, I can get into more details of it on my lunch hour or when I get home. I am very excited to be able to be here and help begin this region with you guys, though. I hope I am able to help out and maybe even become delegate one day (if elected, of course!)

Acornesia, Wert

Acornesia wrote:It’s that confusing for the legislative to vote on the head of the legislative. It’s also more secure, in my opinion

a parliament can also be too chaotic, IF we do end up doing a legeslative branch it should be something more simpler

Wert wrote:a parliament can also be too chaotic, IF we do end up doing a legeslative branch it should be something more simpler

3 electors who pick a Chancellor from a bunch of candidates for Chancellor is pretty simple

Wert

Lave Deldederady wrote:https://www.nationstates.net/page=dispatch/id=1868933

I wrote this dispatch before leaving for class, I can get into more details of it on my lunch hour or when I get home. I am very excited to be able to be here and help begin this region with you guys, though. I hope I am able to help out and maybe even become delegate one day (if elected, of course!)

I do like the house of reps, or something like that being a legeslative branch, but i dont like the delegate being the president at the same time, that give the delegate too much power

Wert wrote:I do like the house of reps, or something like that being a legeslative branch, but i dont like the delegate being the president at the same time, that give the delegate too much power

The delegate is head of state

Wert

Acornesia wrote:3 electors who pick a Chancellor from a bunch of candidates for Chancellor is pretty simple

3?!? i swear you said more than that earlier, three seems fine, but i feel like we shouldn't change the electors too many time

Acornesia wrote:The delegate is head of state

true but it should not have so much power over the government itself! the delegate should choose the electors, while the president chooses ministers

Acornesia

also once a month is way too often

Lave Deldederady wrote:https://www.nationstates.net/page=dispatch/id=1868933

I wrote this dispatch before leaving for class, I can get into more details of it on my lunch hour or when I get home. I am very excited to be able to be here and help begin this region with you guys, though. I hope I am able to help out and maybe even become delegate one day (if elected, of course!)

and political parties.... I completely disagree with having them.

Acornesia

Wert wrote:I do like the house of reps, or something like that being a legeslative branch, but i dont like the delegate being the president at the same time, that give the delegate too much power

President is just the term I was calling for the Delegate, if the delegate has so much power already we elect them this way. President = Delegate. Delegate/President is Head of State and Head of Government (like in the USA).

Wert wrote:also once a month is way too often

and political parties.... I completely disagree with having them.

Once a month was just a random timeframe I pulled out of my behind since I don't know what would be good - maybe 3 months? Political parties aren't something I would want either but I think no matter what we are going to have political groups form, we might as well make sure they are treated fairly.

Acornesia, Wert

Wert wrote:also once a month is way too often

and political parties.... I completely disagree with having them.

https://www.nationstates.net/page=dispatch/id=1868935

This is my idea

Wert wrote:3?!? i swear you said more than that earlier, three seems fine, but i feel like we shouldn't change the electors too many time true but it should not have so much power over the government itself! the delegate should choose the electors, while the president chooses ministers

I said 5 earlier but that might be too much

Wert

Also we should open an embassy thread in the forums

Wert

Of the two suggestions, i do likeAcornesia's one more

Yall have sent 77 RMB messages, why dont you just have the delegate have all the power, it seems to work well in The Pacific and The West Pacific

Acornesia, Wert

Acornesia wrote:https://www.nationstates.net/page=dispatch/id=1868935

This is my idea

Since the delegate has so much power in the game they could just ignore the laws and the Head of Government - that is why I think the Delegate should be a regulated Head of State instead of being elected just whenever somebody gets the most endorsements. Part of the regulation is the endorsement caps.

Northern Wardorsinatinady wrote:Yall have sent 77 RMB messages, why dont you just have the delegate have all the power, it seems to work well in The Pacific and The West Pacific

that seems a bit too extreme

Northern Wardorsinatinady

I made us a discord group: https://discord.gg/US8h8RnH

Lave Deldederady wrote:Since the delegate has so much power in the game they could just ignore the laws and the Head of Government - that is why I think the Delegate should be a regulated Head of State instead of being elected just whenever somebody gets the most endorsements. Part of the regulation is the endorsement caps.

Endorsement caps only on foreigners. If the delegate ignores all the laws, then the Legislative will make an announcement to everyone to withdraw their endorsements, but if the people don’t withdraw their endorsements, ultimately it’s a de-facto dictatorship

Wert

Lave Deldederady wrote:Since the delegate has so much power in the game they could just ignore the laws and the Head of Government - that is why I think the Delegate should be a regulated Head of State instead of being elected just whenever somebody gets the most endorsements. Part of the regulation is the endorsement caps.

But its a frontier region, the delegate is the equivalent a

'founder' in stronghold regions

Acornesia

Lave Deldederady wrote:I made us a discord group: https://discord.gg/US8h8RnH

I don’t think elections should be held there, though.

I can’t use discord right now so I’ll get around to joining later.

Acornesia wrote:Endorsement caps only on foreigners. If the delegate ignores all the laws, then the Legislative will make an announcement to everyone to withdraw their endorsements, but if the people don’t withdraw their endorsements, ultimately it’s a de-facto dictatorship

I do like that idea quite a bit

Acornesia

Acornesia wrote:Endorsement caps only on foreigners. If the delegate ignores all the laws, then the Legislative will make an announcement to everyone to withdraw their endorsements, but if the people don’t withdraw their endorsements, ultimately it’s a de-facto dictatorship

Yeah so we should create the laws to try and not have that happen

Wert wrote:But its a frontier region, the delegate is the equivalent a

'founder' in stronghold regions

Okay so our laws should be mostly about how to stop that from happening

Acornesia, Wert

Lave Deldederady wrote:Yeah so we should create the laws to try and not have that happen

Okay so our laws should be mostly about how to stop that from happening

that limits the government's power too much

Acornesia wrote:Endorsement caps only on foreigners. If the delegate ignores all the laws, then the Legislative will make an announcement to everyone to withdraw their endorsements, but if the people don’t withdraw their endorsements, ultimately it’s a de-facto dictatorship

There is no way to fully enforce any constitution we make. The delegate has de-facto absolute power, even if they don’t de-Jure.

Lave Deldederady wrote:Yeah so we should create the laws to try and not have that happen

Okay so our laws should be mostly about how to stop that from happening

Yes like how endo caps on foreigners to prevent a raid from coup’ing us.

But ultimately a native coup is on the cards. And I don’t dislike the idea of occasional constitutional dictatorships forming that much anyway

Acornesia wrote:There is no way to fully enforce any constitution we make. The delegate has de-facto absolute power, even if they don’t de-Jure.

Right so we legislate and create systems around it like they do in larger frontiers like the North Pacific, they seem pretty democratic.

Wert wrote:that limits the government's power too much

It doesn't limit anything to create a law which elects the delegate through citizenship rather than allowing anybody to just become delegate and enforce their will upon the region.

I gotta do something rq irl ill brb in like 15 minutes

Acornesia wrote:Yes like how endo caps on foreigners to prevent a raid from coup’ing us.

But ultimately a native coup is on the cards. And I don’t dislike the idea of occasional constitutional dictatorships forming that much anyway

Sure but I feel like when creating our regional government we shouldn't have the aim of a dictatorship at the start, it can happen but if it happens it should be because of abuse of a legal system or something, I guess.

Wert wrote:I gotta do something rq irl ill brb in like 15 minutes

It's okay, my ride is here so I will be back later.

Lave Deldederady wrote:Sure but I feel like when creating our regional government we shouldn't have the aim of a dictatorship at the start, it can happen but if it happens it should be because of abuse of a legal system or something, I guess.

I don’t have the goal of a dictatorship, but I think the delegate should be elected via game mechanics, not by a different system.

Wert

Absolute Samiesser wrote:hi

Hello! Welcome!

Wert, Absolute Samiesser

Acornesia wrote:I don’t have the goal of a dictatorship, but I think the delegate should be elected via game mechanics, not by a different system.

that is a good idea. i think game mechanics would definitely be the best way to determine a delegate.

Acornesia

Wert wrote:that is a good idea. i think game mechanics would definitely be the best way to determine a delegate.

We can still restrict the election of foreign delegates with endorsement caps on non-citizens like I originally proposed

Wert

Acornesia wrote:We can still restrict the election of foreign delegates with endorsement caps on non-citizens like I originally proposed

your idea the more i think about it sounds like it would be the best fit for the region

Wert wrote:that seems a bit too extreme

Smh y'all missing out on a good idea fr fr. also you all have filled 2/3rds of the RMB with arguing THATS A LOT OF ARGUING . your region probably gonna get RAIDED!!! :P

WHY AM GETTING MANY TELEGRAM?

Laosball wrote:WHY AM GETTING MANY TELEGRAM?

It’s okay! Open telegrams, press preferences, and disable recruitment.

Northern Wardorsinatinady wrote:Smh y'all missing out on a good idea fr fr. also you all have filled 2/3rds of the RMB with arguing THATS A LOT OF ARGUING . your region probably gonna get RAIDED!!! :P

It’s not arguing it’s talking about our future

Wert, Laosball

Northern Wardorsinatinady wrote:Smh y'all missing out on a good idea fr fr. also you all have filled 2/3rds of the RMB with arguing THATS A LOT OF ARGUING . your region probably gonna get RAIDED!!! :P

we wont get raided. also we are getting closer to determining a government are we will continue to discuss about it in the RMB as long as needed

I’m going to already make a factbook list of citizens even if we haven’t sorted out the details of who gets it and who doesnt

Wert

Acornesia wrote:I’m going to already make a factbook list of citizens even if we haven’t sorted out the details of who gets it and who doesnt

Thats a good idea

The WA update is very soon. We need to watch very carefully for when the update arrives, because that’s when there’s gonna be raiders, if at all

Wert

Also, shouldn’t we maybe consider joining some alliances? I’m not sure exactly on the process of joining and the benefits, but we should look into it

Wert

Acornesia wrote:Also, shouldn’t we maybe consider joining some alliances? I’m not sure exactly on the process of joining and the benefits, but we should look into it

Getting embassies with other regions could be helpful as we could ask them for assistance if we ever get raided

We’re safe for the WA update!

Wert

Acornesia wrote:We’re safe for the WA update!

I managed to get one of my friends to make a NationStates account and join the region

Acornesia wrote:We’re safe for the WA update!

Hopefully we survive the next one as well

Acornesia wrote:It’s okay! Open telegrams, press preferences, and disable recruitment.It’s not arguing it’s talking about our future

THANK YOU

If I can't be WA Delegate can I at least get an officer role called "The Wall Builder" who stops raiders coming in

Wert

Astarter wrote:If I can't be WA Delegate can I at least get an officer role called "The Wall Builder" who stops raiders coming in

i can only give one border control power every 24 hours as this is a new region and the game wont let me :/

Astarter

Wert wrote:i can only give one border control power every 24 hours as this is a new region and the game wont let me :/

Bruh

Wert

Hello everyone!

Wert

Inner Kilvaka wrote:Hello everyone!

Hello! Welcome to Greater Sahara!

Inner Kilvaka

Hey I'm Astarter, since there's no other cool regions I decided to put this alt here, it's just gonna be for some alt history factbooking so I won't be a bother.

Wert

Well hello!

I'm back i hope i can contribute as much as i can in this region.

Sorry for leaving.

Wert

Rainbowstaria wrote:Well hello!

I'm back i hope i can contribute as much as i can in this region.

Sorry for leaving.

Welcome back! we're glad to have you back!

Rainbowstaria

Hello! I'm brand new to this. Am I stuck with a random country's flag or this default one?

Wert

Hey! Site was really slow for a while there. Made me think it was my internet.

Wert

Tyreum wrote:Hello! I'm brand new to this. Am I stuck with a random country's flag or this default one?

Check this page amigo

https://www.nationstates.net/page=upload_flag

upload it with saved images or downloaded ones only png, svg, jpeg and gif format is available

Wert, Inner Kilvaka

Oh wow! Thanks!

Wert, Rainbowstaria

what's good everyone

Wert

Wert wrote:Hello! Welcome to Greater Sahara!

Thanks for the warm welcome! How're you doing?

Wert, Rainbowstaria

Inner Kilvaka wrote:Thanks for the warm welcome! How're you doing?

Im doing fine could be better but for the moment everythings going how it should be

thanks for asking

Wert, Inner Kilvaka, Lave Deldederady

Trying to figure out how to make a flag somewhere

Rainbowstaria wrote:Im doing fine could be better but for the moment everythings going how it should be

thanks for asking

Sure thing :) glad you're doing alright

Rainbowstaria

Tyreum wrote:Trying to figure out how to make a flag somewhere

Go to an image right click and save it when you click the image it will be stored in archives or use a flag creator like these

https://flag-creator.com/

https://tennessine.co.uk/flags/

Wert, Lave Deldederady

Inner Kilvaka wrote:Thanks for the warm welcome! How're you doing?

im doing fine. hbu?

Rainbowstaria, Inner Kilvaka

I am back, how is everyone? Was a consensus reached in the issue of our governance?

Wert, Rainbowstaria

Wert wrote:im doing fine. hbu?

Doing pretty good, thanks for asking

Wert, Lave Deldederady

Lave Deldederady wrote:I am back, how is everyone? Was a consensus reached in the issue of our governance?

i ended up thinking that Acornesia's idea would be best for the region

Wert wrote:i ended up thinking that Acornesia's idea would be best for the region

Remind me what that was? I think I missed a lot of backstory

Wert, Lave Deldederady

Inner Kilvaka wrote:Remind me what that was? I think I missed a lot of backstory

https://www.nationstates.net/page=dispatch/id=1868935

https://imgur.com/a/gFtRYWx

heres my take on the flag i hope you like it

Wert, Test123334

Rainbowstaria wrote:https://imgur.com/a/gFtRYWx

heres my take on the flag i hope you like it

I like that flag design quite a bit!

Rainbowstaria

Wert wrote:I like that flag design quite a bit!

Its everything intended although i didnt want to go all out considering it would be a mess if i did

i mean just look at my flag

Wert

Wert wrote:https://www.nationstates.net/page=dispatch/id=1868935

I'm not sure about having two different election seasons - wouldn't it be simpler to hold a legislator vote whenever we get a new delegate?

Acornesia, Wert, Lave Deldederady

Assembled with Dot's Region Saver.
Written by Refuge Isle.