Post Archive

Region: Libertatem

History

Pevvania wrote:It's pretty awesome, isn't it? What season are you up to?

I have finished it.

Hallo Island wrote:I'll Connecti-cut you, you connecticunt.

lol

Humpheria wrote:I thought you guys lived in Georgia.

I do. I go to school in Atlanta and spend my breaks in Savannah (where I'm from).

Okay so the poll is over. In CFN:

4 People Support the RLP

1 Person supports the Libertarian Party

1 Person supports the Paul Party

1 person supports the Imperial Conservative Party

4 people support the Communist Party

2 People Support the National Liberal Party

2 people support the Libertarian Objectivist Party

and 1 supports the Anti-Communist Party

Makes sense since some are Communists. If that poll were here the CP wouldn't have so many.

Oh Pev that flag

Pevvania wrote:Anyone here watch Breaking Bad?

Literally the best tv made this century. Watched it all, now I'm researching it with my girlfriend

Albenia wrote:I have nothing to say with after reading the start of Economics in one lesson by Hazlitt....

I love that book.

Albenia wrote:Also after looking at Pev's new flag I must say I had quite a laugh.

Liberosia wrote:Oh Pev that flag

I'm very proud of my talent at making memes :)

Lack There Of wrote:Literally the best tv made this century. Watched it all, now I'm researching it with my girlfriend

I'm watching Season 3, Episode 6 right now.

Congratulations to RRRG!

Yes Pev. It's a very good flag/book.

The New United States wrote:Congratulations to RRRG!

Indeed, congratulations on getting your job back!

Hallo Island wrote:Meow

bark

Pevvania wrote:Indeed, congratulations on getting your job back!

bark

Quack

You should all read this article: http://reason.com/archives/2014/05/16/marco-rubio-gop-presidential-frontrunner

It sums up what I've been thinking for a while. In late 2012/early 2013 I was gunning for Rubio to be the next GOP nominee. But his political wow-factor has pretty much faded since his immigration reform proposal dropped out of the news. And nobody seems to be paying attention to his (mildly desperate) attempts to get back in the limelight, either.

Nevertheless, he's a top VP contender. He's a Floridian and a Hispanic. I think Rand will probably nominate him.

Can we try to build relations with gay regions?

Hallo Island wrote:Can we try to build relations with gay regions?

I've sent out at least two requests, to Gay and Gay Equality, but they were rejected because we are an "invader" region.

Pevvania wrote:Anyone here watch Breaking Bad?

I've watched it all, it's ok, it's not that great.

Lack There Of wrote:Literally the best tv made this century. Watched it all, now I'm researching it with my girlfriend

I'd disagree, I think AMC alone has far better shows than Breaking Bad, like The Walking Dead and Mad Men.

The New United States wrote:Congratulations to RRRG!

Thanks

Pevvania wrote:Indeed, congratulations on getting your job back!

bark

THEY TERK MA JERB

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=768h3Tz4Qik

Pevvania wrote:I've sent out at least two requests, to Gay and Gay Equality, but they were rejected because we are an "invader" region.

We should try to get those embassies again. When was the last time you sent the requests?

Ronald Reagan And Rick Grimes wrote:We should try to get those embassies again. When was the last time you sent the requests?

I'm sending diplomats.

Hallo Island wrote:I'm sending diplomats.

Talk to CI. He is the only one who has the official capacity.

Well my friend on this game now has a high possible chance of suicide.......

And of course according to him no one is helPing him. From what he's told me his life is crap. And no one has helped him. The police? Ignore him when he was a victim of crime. Child services? Refused his calls. The Government has done nothing. His daily has done nothing. What's the purpose of a government if it doesn't help it'd citizens. Is government even needed at tat point? Or should it be abolished.

I honestly don't know how to respond to that either.

Albenia wrote:And of course according to him no one is helPing him. From what he's told me his life is crap. And no one has helped him. The police? Ignore him when he was a victim of crime. Child services? Refused his calls. The Government has done nothing. His daily has done nothing. What's the purpose of a government if it doesn't help it'd citizens. Is government even needed at tat point? Or should it be abolished.

You must remember this IS the internet, so he could be lying and seeking attention.

Ronald Reagan And Rick Grimes wrote:You must remember this IS the internet, so he could be lying and seeking attention.

Or he could be telling the truth.

Not everyone spreading stuff is lying. Ever think of that? I've been accused of doing this in the past when I told the story of my depression when I almost killed myself.

Albenia wrote:Or he could be telling the truth.

Not everyone spreading stuff is lying. Ever think of that? I've been accused of doing this in the past when I told the story of my depression when I almost killed myself.

Yeah he could be, but you don't know.

I don't believe in killing yourself. It's stupid. I've had a an unfortunate life, but I wouldn't kill myself. It should never come to that, there's always something better coming. I don't believe in "depression" I just refuse to except that it's a disease that can be cured with medication. Like, your sad, it'll pass.

Or maybe if the world had more order things like this wouldn't happen. Maybe if we had more order and were able to listen to others things like this wouldn't happen. Maybe people are too free.

Or maybe it's the fault of groups set up to help us that we are destined to fall. Maybe there is too much order and not enough freedom.

Ronald Reagan And Rick Grimes wrote:Yeah he could be, but you don't know.

I don't believe in killing yourself. It's stupid. I've had a an unfortunate life, but I wouldn't kill myself. It should never come to that, there's always something better coming. I don't believe in "depression" I just refuse to except that it's a disease that can be cured with medication. Like, your sad, it'll pass.

Depression isn't a disease. It's a metal disability.

Albenia wrote:Or maybe if the world had more order things like this wouldn't happen. Maybe if we had more order and were able to listen to others things like this wouldn't happen. Maybe people are too free.

Or maybe it's the fault of groups set up to help us that we are destined to fall. Maybe there is too much order and not enough freedom.

Or maybe depression is a natural phenomenon...?

Post self-deleted by Conservative Apartheid.

Whoops! Apologies for the double post. Howzit, all.

Unfortunately, my WA delegate is no longer with me - so I'm actually leaving my region and coming here to talk this over with the good people here myself. The last time we had this discussion, it was far more civil than simply being told that A) the embassy is closing, and B) one is disgusted with the fact our region actually exists. No harm done; I'm accustomed to unilateral assumptions about Apartheid South Africa and am perfectly prepared to answer any questions as we have before, regarding our philosophy, goals, and community.

So here I am. The big monster from ASA. Ask me anything. Chances are, I've heard it before and am more than prepared to clear up any misconceptions one may have. All I ask is that we remain civil and keep an open-mind; I give you my utmost assurance I shall do the same.

Who has a problem with my region? What are the issues thereof? Do you feel as if we represent fascist or racialist interests? Hopefully we can both depart a little more enlightened than before.

Baie dankie!

Post self-deleted by The New United States.

Conservative Apartheid wrote:Whoops! Apologies for the double post. Howzit, all.

Unfortunately, my WA delegate is no longer with me - so I'm actually leaving my region and coming here to talk this over with the good people here myself. The last time we had this discussion, it was far more civil than simply being told that A) the embassy is closing, and B) one is disgusted with the fact our region actually exists. No harm done; I'm accustomed to unilateral assumptions about Apartheid South Africa and am perfectly prepared to answer any questions as we have before, regarding our philosophy, goals, and community.

So here I am. The big monster from ASA. Ask me anything. Chances are, I've heard it before and am more than prepared to clear up any misconceptions one may have. All I ask is that we remain civil and keep an open-mind; I give you my utmost assurance I shall do the same.

Who has a problem with my region? What are the issues thereof? Do you feel as if we represent fascist or racialist interests? Hopefully we can both depart a little more enlightened than before.

Baie dankie!

Your region is based upon South Africa under Apartheid. The system of Apartheid is fundamentally contrary to the principles of liberty, as espoused by our region. Because of this, in my opinion, having relations with your region was a serious mistake.

There is absolutely nothing you can say to convince me that a diplomatic reconciliation is in the interest of Libertatem.

Conservative Apartheid wrote:Whoops! Apologies for the double post. Howzit, all.

Unfortunately, my WA delegate is no longer with me - so I'm actually leaving my region and coming here to talk this over with the good people here myself. The last time we had this discussion, it was far more civil than simply being told that A) the embassy is closing, and B) one is disgusted with the fact our region actually exists. No harm done; I'm accustomed to unilateral assumptions about Apartheid South Africa and am perfectly prepared to answer any questions as we have before, regarding our philosophy, goals, and community.

So here I am. The big monster from ASA. Ask me anything. Chances are, I've heard it before and am more than prepared to clear up any misconceptions one may have. All I ask is that we remain civil and keep an open-mind; I give you my utmost assurance I shall do the same.

Who has a problem with my region? What are the issues thereof? Do you feel as if we represent fascist or racialist interests? Hopefully we can both depart a little more enlightened than before.

Baie dankie!

Hi there Conservative Apartheid. I saw that nation come here from your region, and I promise you he was not one of ours.

Your region has been quite a burden upon Libertatem's diplomatic standing for a while. It has been very difficult to advance relations with new regions when they see our embassies and ask why we have them. Although I don't believe the leaders of Apartheid South Africa are racist, that is how it appears outwardly and so our relationship seems not to yield any benefits.

Because of this, the Board voted 3-1 to close embassies with your region.

Freedom would bring chaos...and chaos kills humanity. If you bred more Order then we could control people's thoughts and stop them from killing themselves.

Conservative Apartheid wrote:-snip-

I know this closure of embassies isn't ideal. Indeed, I think the regions across NationStates are too worried about how they look to the interregional community to keep embassies they believe tarnish their reputation, regardless of the benefits posed or the reason others think this in the first place. We've seen this with Juche Union, who recently made the final decision not to continue relations with Libertatem after all, for fear of how the left would view them.

If this is the only way Libertatem can insist, without any measure of perceived hypocrisy, that we do not endorse or even condone institutionalized racism (or any racism, for that matter), so it must be.

If people are to ignorant to look into Asa and their views as a region and refuse to listen to reason why should we even associate with them? Asa reps have explained the reasoning of their name several times and I can find no reason to dissolving ties with political dissidents. These are the kind of people we should be reaching out to

Lack There Of wrote:If people are to ignorant to look into Asa and their views as a region and refuse to listen to reason why should we even associate with them? Asa reps have explained the reasoning of their name several times and I can find no reason to dissolving ties with political dissidents. These are the kind of people we should be reaching out to

We thought the same thing last time, and look where that's gotten us - if we'd finished off the embassy much sooner, our enemies would have less to mock us for, and the free regions of NationStates less to doubt us for. If you want to reach out to them, do it in your own capacity.

Pevvania wrote:Hi there Conservative Apartheid. I saw that nation come here from your region, and I promise you he was not one of ours.

Your region has been quite a burden upon Libertatem's diplomatic standing for a while. It has been very difficult to advance relations with new regions when they see our embassies and ask why we have them. Although I don't believe the leaders of Apartheid South Africa are racist, that is how it appears outwardly and so our relationship seems not to yield any benefits.

Because of this, the Board voted 3-1 to close embassies with your region.

I'm genuinely sorry to hear that. While it's understandable how some here may feel that Libertatem's standing has been eroded by the cordial relations we have enjoyed in the past, I feel I can safely say the opposite for Apartheid South Africa. By maintaining the embassy, we've been able to better convince other regions - such as the League Of Christian Nations, for instance, that we truly represent other intentions. Furthermore, in this manner we've abstained from an over-association with the extreme right on NS; as I've remarked on a previous occasion it's important for anticommunist regions in the more moderate sphere to remain together.

It's regrettable that too many people simply read the region name and assume the worst.

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:We thought the same thing last time, and look where that's gotten us - if we'd finished off the embassy much sooner, our enemies would have less to mock us for, and the free regions of NationStates less to doubt us for. If you want to reach out to them, do it in your own capacity.

I suppose if this poorly regarded association has been causing you all this undue trouble, it's really for the best. Can't apologise enough for any unforeseen repercussions we may have caused but at least now I know where things stand.

Albenia wrote:Freedom would bring chaos...and chaos kills humanity. If you bred more Order then we could control people's thoughts and stop them from killing themselves.

I'm about done with that.

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:We thought the same thing last time, and look where that's gotten us - if we'd finished off the embassy much sooner, our enemies would have less to mock us for, and the free regions of NationStates less to doubt us for. If you want to reach out to them, do it in your own capacity.

This is caving to ignorant interests abroad and an insult to one of our oldest embassy mates

We must focus on the best interest for the region. That is not what is best, Lack.

I say we invite em to breakfast haha

Albenia wrote:Freedom would bring chaos...and chaos kills humanity. If you bred more Order then we could control people's thoughts and stop them from killing themselves.

What in the literal nonsense does that even mean?

Humpheria wrote:We must focus on the best interest for the region. That is not what is best, Lack.

I hate politics

Lack There Of wrote:I hate politics

I'm with ya

Conservative, have you really become a social democrat?

Lack There Of wrote:This is caving to ignorant interests abroad and an insult to one of our oldest embassy mates

Interests abroad is the objective of my job.

I understand that we have had a lot to offer them, and I hope they can find another region that can do the same, perhaps with a thicker skin. But the fact of the matter is, our region is becoming too big to ignore, and we're running out of regions to have relations with that still exist within our sphere of influence. That's just the way it is. I'm sorry.

Pevvania wrote:Conservative, have you really become a social democrat?

What? Conservative of all people is a Social Democrat?

Second or First definition?

I think he's referring to Conservative Apartheid.

Albenia wrote:What? Conservative of all people is a Social Democrat?

Second or First definition?

Pangea Liberalis wrote:Hello, fellow regionmates.

I have at last decided to stop fighting the system and admit that I am, in fact, center wing. Perhaps I am a leftist in American Standards, but I am quite a moderate. If you think that cheap healthcare is communist, then you ought to go out and read a book on socialism, written by a socialist, then come back and tell me that it's a socialist ideal. I simply call it common sense. If you want to go out and shoot your M16 in the middle of a city, then be my guest. Don't be surprised if a majority of the people call you insane. Yes, I support gun control, but only to secure the rights of life for the many. Why would anyone need a semiautomatic assault rifle if it isn't to kill? No, we should restrict those sorts of guns to active military personnel. Civilians should be able to arm themselves with pistols and hunting rifles, nothing more. We should also register all guns that legally enter the country so that we can investigate which guns enter whose hands. If all this seems to restrictive, then you should grow up and see the world in which we live.

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:I think he's referring to Conservative Apartheid.

Nope, you.

........I can't even believe what I just read....I refuse to believe it..Like Holy crap

BUT PEV That is Liberal Socialism

Pevvania wrote:Nope, you.

Ooh burn

Albenia wrote:........I can't even believe what I just read....I refuse to believe it..Like Holy crap

BUT PEV That is Liberal Socialism

Socialism = collective control of the means of production.

State healthcare is a socialist idea, but simply believing in it does not make you a socialist.

Pevvania wrote:Socialism = collective control of the means of production.

State healthcare is a socialist idea, but simply believing in it does not make you a socialist.

That's not what Liberal Socialism is.....

Liberal socialism is a socialist political philosophy that includes liberal principles within it. Liberal socialism does not have the goal of abolishing capitalism with a socialist economy; instead, it supports a mixed economy that includes both public and private property in capital goods.

Well, unlike the guy with a similar flag to mine, I don't believe in state healthcare in any capacity, nor do I support gun control in the slightest. It is restrictive, and the very same reality dictates that this is a job for the private sector, as always.

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:Well, unlike the guy with a similar flag to mine, I don't believe in state healthcare in any capacity, nor do I support gun control in the slightest. It is restrictive, and the very same reality dictates that this is a job for the private sector, as always.

Oooooh crap, I just looked at the flag and thought that was you x) Thank the Lord, I thought you'd turned pinko.

Albenia wrote:That's not what Liberal Socialism is.....

Liberal socialism is a socialist political philosophy that includes liberal principles within it. Liberal socialism does not have the goal of abolishing capitalism with a socialist economy; instead, it supports a mixed economy that includes both public and private property in capital goods.

In other words, social democracy.

http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2014/05/poverty-makes-you-sick/371241/

So while minimum ages may bring the average wage down, they can also help to save peoples lives and make the populations as a whole healthier and more productive.

Discuss!

Pevvania wrote:Oooooh crap, I just looked at the flag and thought that was you x) Thank the Lord, I thought you'd turned pinko.

Hahaha

Pevvania wrote:In other words, social democracy.

Depends Which definition are you using?

The way everyone in this region originally described it as?

Or the way I described it?

First of all, do you know how many licenses and permits you need to obtain a semi-automatic? Second of all, what do you need it for? The answer is simple, when someone is trying to break into your house and steal your property or if you have a deranged lunatic come into your house and tries to cause bodily harm to your loved ones, you can use your gun. Restricting any type of gun will only cause a black market for guns in which will lead to more crime. When abortion was illegal, there were women who would go to ill practiced doctors and do it themselves. Even though I don't support abortion, it is the right of a woman to do what she wants with the child as long as she doesn't do it on the expense of the taxpayers. It's the same thing with guns, people have the right to defend their homes in an emergency situation or to hunt if that is what they desire. Banning guns is not the answer.

Pevvania wrote:In other words, social democracy.

From the great god wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_socialism

He's right you know!

Pax Osca wrote:From the great god wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_socialism

He's right you know!

*More a case of Tomato, Tomaaaaaahto

Okay...I am beginning to think waaaaayyy to much about using Control to create order.

I need to say a few words to myself. Libertarianism, Anti-Federalism, Leftism, Tolerance, Freedom....

Pax Osca wrote:http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2014/05/poverty-makes-you-sick/371241/

So while minimum ages may bring the average wage down, they can also help to save peoples lives and make the populations as a whole healthier and more productive.

Discuss!

Reading it now.

Right-Winged Nation wrote:First of all, do you know how many licenses and permits you need to obtain a semi-automatic? Second of all, what do you need it for? The answer is simple, when someone is trying to break into your house and steal your property or if you have a deranged lunatic come into your house and tries to cause bodily harm to your loved ones, you can use your gun. Restricting any type of gun will only cause a black market for guns in which will lead to more crime. When abortion was illegal, there were women who would go to ill practiced doctors and do it themselves. Even though I don't support abortion, it is the right of a woman to do what she wants with the child as long as she doesn't do it on the expense of the taxpayers. It's the same thing with guns, people have the right to defend their homes in an emergency situation or to hunt if that is what they desire. Banning guns is not the answer.

http://www.theonion.com/articles/no-way-to-prevent-this-says-only-nation-where-this,36131/

Ohey! The Onion comes to the rescue :3

Well - I'd like to say goodbye, but I'm afraid this is vaarwel. Some of you are quite happy to see me depart. Undoubtedly most of you feel that it was a level-headed tradeoff: allies come and go, and if your thinking is anything like mine you choose yours carefully.

Chaps, I still believe that making the decision to open ties with Libertatem is and was the right thing to do. If you're ever interested in opening an embassy again, you've got it. And if any of you ever find yourselves turned out on your tail, remember that you'll always have friends in Apartheid South Africa.

We've enjoyed the relationship. It's been nice. And I haven't forgotten the sticky wickets you've helped us with in odd little places like Afrikaans. Even if it's the embassy that goes, what stays with you are the memories. Anyway, wish you all the best with your expanding sphere. We'll forever be hamstrung by that association with apartheid: ASA isn't going anywhere in NS and doesn't really care to. Let's see how high Libertatem can rise.

Conservative Apartheid wrote:Well - I'd like to say goodbye, but I'm afraid this is vaarwel. Some of you are quite happy to see me depart. Undoubtedly most of you feel that it was a level-headed tradeoff: allies come and go, and if your thinking is anything like mine you choose yours carefully.

Chaps, I still believe that making the decision to open ties with Libertatem is and was the right thing to do. If you're ever interested in opening an embassy again, you've got it. And if any of you ever find yourselves turned out on your tail, remember that you'll always have friends in Apartheid South Africa.

We've enjoyed the relationship. It's been nice. And I haven't forgotten the sticky wickets you've helped us with in odd little places like Afrikaans. Even if it's the embassy that goes, what stays with you are the memories. Anyway, wish you all the best with your expanding sphere. We'll forever be hamstrung by that association with apartheid: ASA isn't going anywhere in NS and doesn't really care to. Let's see how high Libertatem can rise.

.السلام عليكم

The New United States wrote:.السلام عليكم

No

Humpheria wrote:No

Huh? I wished peace upon him.

Conservative Apartheid wrote:Well - I'd like to say goodbye, but I'm afraid this is vaarwel. Some of you are quite happy to see me depart. Undoubtedly most of you feel that it was a level-headed tradeoff: allies come and go, and if your thinking is anything like mine you choose yours carefully.

Chaps, I still believe that making the decision to open ties with Libertatem is and was the right thing to do. If you're ever interested in opening an embassy again, you've got it. And if any of you ever find yourselves turned out on your tail, remember that you'll always have friends in Apartheid South Africa.

We've enjoyed the relationship. It's been nice. And I haven't forgotten the sticky wickets you've helped us with in odd little places like Afrikaans. Even if it's the embassy that goes, what stays with you are the memories. Anyway, wish you all the best with your expanding sphere. We'll forever be hamstrung by that association with apartheid: ASA isn't going anywhere in NS and doesn't really care to. Let's see how high Libertatem can rise.

Thank you.

The New United States wrote:Huh? I wished peace upon him.

The most direct translation for that phrase is "Hello".

The New United States wrote:.السلام عليكم

Are you Muslim?

The New United States wrote:Huh? I wished peace upon him.

This... is.... murica....

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:The most direct translation for that phrase is "Hello".

True 'dat.

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:The most direct translation for that phrase is "Hello".

It can be used as both a greeting and a farewell.

The Neo-Confederate States Of America wrote:Are you Muslim?

Nope. I'm an Arabic student, though.

I work with a guy who lived in the Syrian capital during the conflict.

Humpheria wrote:I work with a guy who lived in the Syrian capital during the conflict.

That's rough. At least Damascus hasn't seen the same levels of violence as Aleppo and the entire North and East.

I don't like him cause he ain't murican

Can someone here help give me an Argument FOR Thoughtcrime and 2+2=5 actions?

Humpheria wrote:I don't like him cause he ain't murican

I was going to type something horrible, but the I realized that if you're not joking about this, people like you must live horrible, scary, silly pointless lives anyway :3

you tryna wrong muh kinfolk?

Pax Osca wrote:I was going to type something horrible, but the I realized that if you're not joking about this, people like you must live horrible, scary, silly pointless lives anyway :3

Vous insultez ma famille?

Pax Osca wrote: people like you must live horrible, scary, silly pointless lives anyway :3

[deep southern accent]That sounds like tha' life uh someone who ain't 'Murrican.[/deep southern accent]

Êtes-vous raciste? La plupart des Géorgiens sont.

Albenia wrote:Can someone here help give me an Argument FOR Thoughtcrime and 2+2=5 actions?

They promote productivity and obedience, allowing for rapid militarization of a nation in the case of war :3

In an authoritarian communist society, they dissuade slackers, enforce the demands to work with community and allow you to reduce quality of life for the general person without much retribution.

In most countries the education system is a form of 2+2=5. I've seen more than my fair share of crazy patriotic people, and they all have unwavering beliefs in things that 9/10 just aren't true...

Humpheria wrote:Vous insultez ma famille?

Non, je n'insulte pas ta famille, seulemente toi mon amie :3

Pax Osca wrote:Non, je n'insulte pas ta famille, seulemente toi mon amie :3

Comment osez-vous. Vous communiste putain de porc.

Humpheria wrote:Comment osez-vous. Vous communiste putain de porc.

Je suis pas communiste, capitaliste de la merde!

Congrats RRRG.

Pax Osca wrote:Je suis pas communiste, capitaliste de la merde!

Vous êtes plus d'un communiste de Staline lui-même. Je vous suggère de maintenir des relations sexuelles avec vous, monsieur.

Vous n'avez pas de réponse, imbécile?

This isn't Quebec or France, this is 'Tatem.

Pax Osca wrote:http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2014/05/poverty-makes-you-sick/371241/

So while minimum ages may bring the average wage down, they can also help to save peoples lives and make the populations as a whole healthier and more productive.

Discuss!

I read the article. I agree that raising workers' wages would combat poverty, and that something needs to be done. This is why I believe America/Britain/wherever should a) abolish fiat money and return to the gold standard, b) abolish corporation taxes (which would raise wages by 12-13%), c) abolish the minimum wage and d) end the subsidisation of single parenting. The American welfare state discourages marriage through a very poor system of means testing. You're extremely unlikely to fall below the poverty line if you have any kind of job, a spouse and a high school diploma.

Pax Osca wrote:http://www.theonion.com/articles/no-way-to-prevent-this-says-only-nation-where-this,36131/

Ohey! The Onion comes to the rescue :3

It's a funny article, but there is no link at all between the legality of firearms and high crime rates. Switzerland has the lowest crime and homicide rates in the world, even though it's literally mandatory for every household to own an assault rifle in case of conscription.

And the media massively overstates America's "gun problem". Gun murders have been cut in half in the past two decades and are continuing to fall, despite the widespread liberalisation of firearm laws.

More fun facts: of the 30,000 gun deaths in 2010, 19,392 were suicides. Only 11,100 were murders, of which 80% - 8,900 - are gang-related. I wonder what that number would look like if the War on Drugs ended.

Sauce: http://tinyurl.com/k2sd4d2

Assembled with Dot's Region Saver.
Written by Refuge Isle.