Post Archive

Region: Libertatem

History

11 hours ago: United environmentalist states of mhomen ceased to exist.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWaLxFIVX1s

Rateria, Shirayuki Mizore

Condealism wrote:11 hours ago: United environmentalist states of mhomen ceased to exist.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWaLxFIVX1s

Who the hell doesn't exist anymore?

Rateria, Condealism

Miencraft wrote:Who the hell doesn't exist anymore?

RIP mhomen

2014-2017

"Long live Libretatem"

Rateria

hooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooly sh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!t it's ankha

Yo that is my name. (Hey mein long time)

Ankha wrote:Yo that is my name. (Hey mein long time)

Ohoi it's youperson. How've you been?

Ankha

Condealism wrote:11 hours ago: United environmentalist states of mhomen ceased to exist.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWaLxFIVX1s

I remember when he ran for president. He received quite a few votes.

Condealism

Miencraft wrote:Ohoi it's youperson. How've you been?

Pretty good. Working on school ya know. Nice to be back

Post self-deleted by Hoppean Snake.

The moral relativists, SJW left and other millennial losers have no knowledge of history or nuance. By their standards, Abraham Lincoln would be considered a white supremacist! People shouldn't judge historical figures over some arbitrary cultural lens of perfection; rather, they should be viewed in the context of whether they fought for progress in their time (progress defined as eradicating artificial barriers to human liberty).

Miencraft, Rateria, Condealism

Libertarians should embrace and ally with today's crop of cultural conservatives. Today they are one and the same as libertarians. The national relevance of the Religious Right is dying. Today, many conservatives preoccupy themselves with fighting political correctness, campus leftism, free speech restrictions and the cancer known as modern feminism. A noble and worthy cause indeed! We should welcome people like Steven Crowder, Ben Shapiro, and of course the great Milo Yiannopoulos.

The United States Of Patriots

Pevvania wrote:The moral relativists, SJW left and other millennial losers have no knowledge of history or nuance. By their standards, Abraham Lincoln would be considered a white supremacist! People shouldn't judge historical figures over some arbitrary cultural lens of perfection; rather, they should be viewed in the context of whether they fought for progress in their time (progress defined as eradicating artificial barriers to human liberty).

What's your issue with moral relativism?

Shirayuki Mizore wrote:What's your issue with moral relativism?

I have not read up on philosophy in a long while, but morality can be deduced from what is literally good and bad for humans. For example, killing somebody is harmful to their existence, and as much as I don't like the receptionist at my acting school who never returns my 'good evenings' as I walk into school, killing her would be objectively wrong.

But please, share your opinion, I'm curious to hear of it.

Pevvania wrote:I have not read up on philosophy in a long while, but morality can be deduced from what is literally good and bad for humans. For example, killing somebody is harmful to their existence, and as much as I don't like the receptionist at my acting school who never returns my 'good evenings' as I walk into school, killing her would be objectively wrong.

But please, share your opinion, I'm curious to hear of it.

I'm no expert, so I can't really discuss it.

It's just a philosophy that I've been told I should look into since it apparently mirrors some of my views, and was wondering if you knew something I don't about it.

*shrug*

I have my views, but they aren't sufficiently researched to discuss yet.

Pevvania wrote:Libertarians should embrace and ally with today's crop of cultural conservatives. Today they are one and the same as libertarians. The national relevance of the Religious Right is dying. Today, many conservatives preoccupy themselves with fighting political correctness, campus leftism, free speech restrictions and the cancer known as modern feminism. A noble and worthy cause indeed! We should welcome people like Steven Crowder, Ben Shapiro, and of course the great Milo Yiannopoulos.

>milo yiannopoulos

no pls

Ankha, Condealism

Ya rlly pevv why do we need to bring him into this... I also think he's the first person ever where twitter actively deletes his new accounts just sayin.

Republic Of Minerva wrote:>milo yiannopoulos

no pls

Ankha wrote:Ya rlly pevv why do we need to bring him into this... I also think he's the first person ever where twitter actively deletes his new accounts just sayin.

What's wrong with Milo?

Pevvania wrote:Libertarians should embrace and ally with today's crop of cultural conservatives. Today they are one and the same as libertarians. The national relevance of the Religious Right is dying. Today, many conservatives preoccupy themselves with fighting political correctness, campus leftism, free speech restrictions and the cancer known as modern feminism. A noble and worthy cause indeed! We should welcome people like Steven Crowder, Ben Shapiro, and of course the great Milo Yiannopoulos.

Steven Crowder foolishly claims fascism is left wing.

Ben Shapiro isn't a real Nazi, and is anti Breitbart.

Milo Yiannopoulos is a self hating gay Jew.

None of these people are important in my Libertarian Social order.

Rest in peace, comrade. You will be missed Fidel.

The last true great leader. He protected his country from US imperialism

Castronumberonefan wrote:Rest in peace, comrade. You will be missed Fidel.

The last true great leader. He protected his country from US imperialism

Here, have a free helicopter ride

Castronumberonefan wrote:Rest in peace, comrade. You will be missed Fidel.

The last true great leader. He protected his country from US imperialism

Hah. Hahahahahahah.

Rateria, Condealism, Hyderbourg

Also, Milo was banned from Twitter because he's conservative, pure and simple. The ignorant whale who got him banned has been shown to not only incite hate against her followers, but has a history of racist anti-white statements. The mainstream social media sites are quickly becoming safe spaces for SJW segregationist morons.

Hoppean Snake wrote:Steven Crowder foolishly claims fascism is left wing.

Ben Shapiro isn't a real Nazi, and is anti Breitbart.

Milo Yiannopoulos is a self hating gay Jew.

None of these people are important in my Libertarian Social order.

Okay, you've exposed yourself as the leftist troll you are. You're clearly trying to make libertarians like bad, and it's not working since we've all rejected your hateful views. If you bothered to do any research, you'd know that fascism and communism are both offshoots of 19th Century intellectual socialism. Mussolini was the heir to this vile tradition and essentially had both movements supporting his government through the 1930s. Hitler and the Nazis only rejected communism because it differed from their cultural vision of an Aryan society. But in Hitler's words and deeds he made it clear that socialists and communists, in his mind, were 'better' than capitalists.

Shapiro is Jewish so I don't know what you're talking about. Milo is not self hating in any way and if you listened to his talks you'd know this. Crowder is right - fascism is diametrically opposed to capitalism, liberalism, limited government ans freedom.

Miencraft, Condealism

Post self-deleted by Hoppean Snake.

Pevvania wrote:Okay, you've exposed yourself as the leftist troll you are. You're clearly trying to make libertarians like bad, and it's not working since we've all rejected your hateful views. If you bothered to do any research, you'd know that fascism and communism are both offshoots of 19th Century intellectual socialism. Mussolini was the heir to this vile tradition and essentially had both movements supporting his government through the 1930s. Hitler and the Nazis only rejected communism because it differed from their cultural vision of an Aryan society. But in Hitler's words and deeds he made it clear that socialists and communists, in his mind, were 'better' than capitalists.

Shapiro is Jewish so I don't know what you're talking about. Milo is not self hating in any way and if you listened to his talks you'd know this. Crowder is right - fascism is diametrically opposed to capitalism, liberalism, limited government ans freedom.

Fascism is a right wing ideology. Actually speak with real life fascists, they will tell you it is right wing.

yeah giving the power to a massive central government sounds reeeeeal conservative

Pevvania, The United States Of Patriots

Evil Genius Land wrote:yeah giving the power to a massive central government sounds reeeeeal conservative

Authoritarianism is neither left or right.

Miencraft, Condealism

Pevvania wrote:fascism is diametrically opposed to capitalism, liberalism, limited government ans freedom.

Everything you said is agreeable except it depends what type of fascism you are talking about. For example, while Pinochet's brand of fascism was against personal freedom of ideas (helicopters rides for enemies of the state), it was for economic freedom.

Hoppean Snake wrote:Fascism is a right wing ideology. Actually speak with real life fascists, they will tell you it is right wing.

Actually, a number of modern fascists have taken to referring to themselves as "third position" or "third way" as opposed to one of the two wings.

I've taken to calling them authoritarian scum.

*flies away*

Muh Roads

True just trying to make a point that even if facisem wast right communism which is left killed more people

Condealism, The United States Of Patriots

Castronumberonefan wrote:Rest in peace, comrade. You will be missed Fidel.

The last true great leader. He protected his country from US imperialism

He sure did! Too bad he had to impoverish his own people to do it. Oh, and exported imperialism of his own to Nicaragua, Grenada and Angola. But it's not imposing your beliefs on another country if it's communism!

Miencraft, Rateria, Condealism, Shirayuki Mizore, Hoppean Snake

Hoppean Snake wrote:Fascism is a right wing ideology. Actually speak with real life fascists, they will tell you it is right wing.

Arbitrary political labels aside, fascism has absolutely nothing in common with modern conservatism, and even less with libertarianism. The jig is up, commie.

Rateria, Condealism

Pevvania wrote:Arbitrary political labels aside, fascism has absolutely nothing in common with modern conservatism, and even less with libertarianism. The jig is up, commie.

COMIES!?! COMIES EVERYWHERE

Pevvania wrote:Arbitrary political labels aside, fascism has absolutely nothing in common with modern conservatism, and even less with libertarianism. The jig is up, commie.

[B]HOW DARE YOU CALL ME A COMMUNIST[/B]

Is Hans Herman Hoppe a communist troll? Because I follow his ideology.

Hoppean Snake wrote:Is Hans Herman Hoppe a communist troll? Because I follow his ideology.

I'm quite sure you're trolling. There isn't a single Hoppe follower in this region, and while I'm only vaguely familiar with his beliefs, I don't think he supports outright fascism.

Miencraft, Condealism

Mick Mulvaney, who believes in balanced budgets, has been confirmed as budget director over the 49 votes of the Dems and RINO John McCain!

Miencraft, Ankha, Condealism

Pevvania wrote:Mick Mulvaney, who believes in balanced budgets, has been confirmed as budget director over the 49 votes of the Dems and RINO John McCain!

Why is sensible financing even a thing you have to "believe in" anyways?

Like, really, what's with people these days where having common sense is such an outlandish concept?

Pevvania, Ankha, Condealism

Miencraft wrote:Why is sensible financing even a thing you have to "believe in" anyways?

Like, really, what's with people these days where having common sense is such an outlandish concept?

It's utterly ridiculous. The idea of revenues equalling outlays has somehow become controversial in a world where the loudest opinions are the most ignorant. I hope Mulvaney takes the axe to EVERYTHING!

Miencraft, Condealism

Cyborgs And Sentient Machines wrote:Everything you said is agreeable except it depends what type of fascism you are talking about. For example, while Pinochet's brand of fascism was against personal freedom of ideas (helicopters rides for enemies of the state), it was for economic freedom.

I suppose it just makes clear the flaws of the left/right system, which works broadly for the tendencies of beliefs to correlate with each other but is imperfect. It is definitely worth noting that fascism and socialism are distinguishable by the focus of their authoritarianism; where fascists focus on cultural and social matters, socialists focus on the economy. It seems overly simplistic to simply say that they are both "leftist" because they came from the same roots and if we start simply branding all collectivists left wing then that system really loses all meaning because it lumps together two clearly completely different groups.

It clearly suits an agenda to simply say that both the fascists and socialists are leftists-that way we can say that there is a single "they" that we must oppose. Personally I like to think that I am capable of recognising two different groups of people to oppose simultaneously, and think that getting aggressive simply because someone pointed out the differences between the two is ridiculous and characteristic of those two groups in itself.

Fascism is a form of socialism

Pevvania

Republic Of Minerva wrote:Fascism is a form of socialism

How is that possible?

Republic Of Minerva wrote:Fascism is a form of socialism

Socialism is a form of fascism

The United States Of Patriots

Muh Roads wrote:Socialism is a form of fascism

False, we never tried socialism before.

Republic Of Minerva wrote:False, we never tried socialism before.

Not hardly. The only way you can make socialism work[1] is with a fascist style of government.

------------------------------------------------------------

[1] Forcing those working to give up the fruits of their labors for those that do not.

Pevvania wrote:lThere isn't a single Hoppe follower in this region,

There is one. Me.

If you guys are interested, the Nationstates Senate in Forum 7 has restarted, and I am the Threadmaker of the Capitalist Action Party, a pro-capitalist party. Feel free to check it out.

Rateria

Republic Of Minerva wrote:False, we never tried socialism before.

True fascism was never given a chance.

The Ambassador To The Clfr, Hoppean Snake

Muh Roads wrote:True fascism was never given a chance.

Clearly all of the others just weren't doing it right.

We should just keep trying it.

No, I'm not going to explain why my ideas are different from the others.

The Ambassador To The Clfr

Donald don't take John Bolton as you're new NS adviser please! Leave the neocons on the shelf where they belong!

Pevvania wrote:Donald don't take John Bolton as you're new NS adviser please! Leave the neocons on the shelf where they belong!

I hope he does. Ambassador Bolton is one of the few left that still has his head screwed on straight.

The Ambassador To The Clfr wrote:I hope he does. Ambassador Bolton is one of the few left that still has his head screwed on straight.

Please elaborate.

Ben Shapiro: "Don't listen to anyone that says 'socialism was a good idea that just didn't work properly'. This is false. Socialism worked exactly as it intended to, because it is a horrible, totalitarian, monstrous ideology."

Miencraft, Narland, The Ambassador To The Clfr, Condealism, The United States Of Patriots, Hoppean Snake

Pevvania wrote:Ben Shapiro: "Don't listen to anyone that says 'socialism was a good idea that just didn't work properly'. This is false. Socialism worked exactly as it intended to, because it is a horrible, totalitarian, monstrous ideology."

When the government controls your life and says it's for your own good.

The Ambassador To The Clfr, Condealism, Hoppean Snake

Pevvania wrote:Please elaborate.

Every time I've heard Bolton speak, he was right on on the money. From Israel and the Middle East to the Russians and China, the man knows his stuff. He is not afraid to tell people what they need to hear as opposed to what they want to hear. So far he's accurately predicted ISIS, Russia getting a warm water year round port at any cost, Iran thumbing their nose at the nuclear agreement and China's escalations regarding the South China Sea and Taiwan. I think he should have been Secretary of State.

Rateria wrote:When the government controls your life and says it's for your own good.

Exactly.

"In this question, then, of Japanese exclusion from the United States, it is necessary only to advance the true reason - the undesirability of mixing the blood of two peoples."

- Franklin Delano Roosevelt, 1925

This fascist pig is consistently voted one of the top 3 US presidents by 'historians'.

Miencraft, Republic Of Minerva, Rateria, Condealism

Pevvania wrote:"In this question, then, of Japanese exclusion from the United States, it is necessary only to advance the true reason - the undesirability of mixing the blood of two peoples."

- Franklin Delano Roosevelt, 1925

This fascist pig is consistently voted one of the top 3 US presidents by 'historians'.

I've never understood that.

I've never liked him.

I think it's the 'war effect' where presidents have many of their shortcomings overlooked if they were perceived as having led the nation through a major crisis.

George W. got some of the same.

Pevvania, Rateria, Condealism

Shirayuki Mizore wrote:I've never understood that.

I've never liked him.

I think it's the 'war effect' where presidents have many of their shortcomings overlooked if they were perceived as having led the nation through a major crisis.

George W. got some of the same.

Right on. Historians, perhaps willfully, overlook the fact that Roosevelt spent 2/3rds of the war on vacation because he was so ill. It was effectively his generals and advisors that led America to victory.

Indeed. Mark my words, if 9/11 had happened in 2007 or 2008, Bush would have been remembered as a great president.

Miencraft, Rateria, Condealism

Watched Predator 2 last night. Honestly it's not that bad. Of course, it doesn't compare to Schwarzenegger's '87 classic, but it's got an interesting setting with some cool action sequences. 6/10

I must avenge mhomen

Rateria

Condealism wrote:I must avenge mhomen

*goes on quest that spans three movies*

Pevvania, Condealism

John McCain is a low energy loser who cannot accept that America hates him.

This RMB is

l - o - w e - n - e - r - g - y

Republic Of Minerva

Post self-deleted by Hoppean Snake.

Pevvania wrote:This RMB is

l - o - w e - n - e - r - g - y

The RMB is calling out for a hero. A hero who is good at politics.

Pevvania, Rateria

Why are idiot cuckertarians at Reason Magazine, an otherwise sound publication, bashing Milo? I don't know, but they sound just as nonsensical and ignorant as the SJW left. Sick of fellow libs trying to find common ground with the BLM thugs, radical Islam appeasers and white (female) supremacists. As 2016 proved, 'centrist' libertarianism does not work! You either stand with political correctness and censorship, or you stand against it.

Miencraft, Condealism

Libertarians have to come to terms with the fact that mainstream conservatism has, by and large, moved closer to our way of thinking. Eschewing the old Bible-thumpers and war hawks of old, the new conservatism has become a culturally libertarian movement. It values freedom of speech, opposes radical feminism, radical Islam and political correctness, while retaining the small government principles that have been present since the Reagan Era. Of course, this isn't to say that there is universal agreement - protectionism is just flat out wrong, and their stances on refugees and trans bathrooms are debatable at best - but there's more in common than not. Libertarians should not act as the dead centre between liberals and conservatives, because this just isn't true. On more issues than not, conservatives are our natural allies.

Condealism

Pevvania wrote:On more issues than not, conservatives are our natural allies.

It's kind of difficult to be allies with folks who don't believe people like me exist and/or seek to coerce such people into closeting themselves. Hell, "coerce" is kind of a key word there - conservatives, by and large, believe coercion is warranted in some scenarios, whereas the mark of a true libertarian is the rejection of that principle entirely.

Still, I'll admit that there's a lot of common ground between conservatism and libertarianism; there must be, for me to have moved from the former to the latter without protest.

Republic Of Minerva

Rateria wrote:*goes on quest that spans three movies*

I kid you not, somewhere on this rmb like a while ago i posted links to mhomen movie posters i made. Idk where though.

Rateria, Condealism

Good, Milo is a professional sh!t stirer and nothing else

4 hours ago: The Empire of Hoppean Snake departed this region for Nazi Europa.

Typical

Miencraft, Pevvania, Condealism

Post self-deleted by Rateria.

Republic Of Minerva wrote:4 hours ago: The Empire of Hoppean Snake departed this region for Nazi Europa.

Typical

How libertarian of him. And to think that he accused me of being unlibertarian.

Miencraft, Condealism

Rateria wrote:How libertarian of him. And to think that he accused me of being unlibertarian.

His heart was totalitarian through-and-through all along, but he chose to conceal it beneath the veil of gaslighting and validation-seeking. And, when it comes right down to it, isn't that the most libertarian thing of all?

Republic Of Minerva wrote:4 hours ago: The Empire of Hoppean Snake departed this region for Nazi Europa.

Typical

A fascist in disguise - sad!

Rateria, Condealism

Condealism wrote:It's kind of difficult to be allies with folks who don't believe people like me exist and/or seek to coerce such people into closeting themselves. Hell, "coerce" is kind of a key word there - conservatives, by and large, believe coercion is warranted in some scenarios, whereas the mark of a true libertarian is the rejection of that principle entirely.

Still, I'll admit that there's a lot of common ground between conservatism and libertarianism; there must be, for me to have moved from the former to the latter without protest.

Sure, never said there is total agreement, but there is agreement on most of the important things.

Miencraft, Condealism

Condealism wrote:His heart was totalitarian through-and-through all along, but he chose to conceal it beneath the veil of gaslighting and validation-seeking. And, when it comes right down to it, isn't that the most libertarian thing of all?

The answer is: No.

Miencraft, Rateria

Forget Clinton for a second, why isn't Eric Holder in jail? Fast and Furious was possibly the worst administration scandal since Iran-Contra. More than 2000 guns were sold to cartel members, which ended up being used in the deaths of over 150 people, one of which was a US Border Patrol agent. Only 700 of the guns have been recovered, and the operation hasn't produced a single arrest or conviction of a cartel member.

Holder should have at the bare minimum lost his job for this fiasco. A 'scandal-free administration' my ass!

Miencraft, Narland, The Ambassador To The Clfr

Post self-deleted by Narland.

Post self-deleted by Narland.

Post self-deleted by Narland.

Post self-deleted by Narland.

Post self-deleted by Narland.

Pevvania wrote:Libertarians have to come to terms with the fact that mainstream conservatism has, by and large, moved closer to our way of thinking. Eschewing the old Bible-thumpers and war hawks of old, the new conservatism has become a culturally libertarian movement. It values freedom of speech, opposes radical feminism, radical Islam and political correctness, while retaining the small government principles that have been present since the Reagan Era. Of course, this isn't to say that there is universal agreement - protectionism is just flat out wrong, and their stances on refugees and trans bathrooms are debatable at best - but there's more in common than not. Libertarians should not act as the dead centre between liberals and conservatives, because this just isn't true. On more issues than not, conservatives are our natural allies.

Condealism wrote:It's kind of difficult to be allies with folks who don't believe people like me exist and/or seek to coerce such people into closeting themselves. Hell, "coerce" is kind of a key word there - conservatives, by and large, believe coercion is warranted in some scenarios, whereas the mark of a true libertarian is the rejection of that principle entirely.

Still, I'll admit that there's a lot of common ground between conservatism and libertarianism; there must be, for me to have moved from the former to the latter without protest.

Since the 21st Century Conservatism has become counter-cultural and thus shares this in common with Libertarianism. Both are fiscally conservative, anti-socialist, limited government federal constitutionalists (anti-federalist), and strongly promote self-government, and free enterprise (although Conservatives still do not understand that American Corporatism/soft fascism is a form of socialism).

Intellectual Biblical Reform Christianity of the American variety (Edwards, Witherspoon, Webster, et al.) is ontologically Libertarian (but not Libertine) although we are few in number since the rise of Liberal Christianity at the turn of last century. The once culturally dominant Fundamentalist Dispensationalists haven't been eschewed as much as they are moribund--most have passed away since Reagan and what few remain are relatively insignificant.

War-mongers have never been welcome by philosophically consistent American Conservatism, and even the Civil War was viewed as an evil for which we would reap a bitter harvest even if abolition was gained. The Bush Family and their Military Industrial Complex Ilk have permanently stained the perfect record of Republicans never starting a war.

We have more in common against the rising tide of statism that pervades our nation. My dream is that law-makers will one-day return to arguing over bills as to how much Liberty and Freedom is needed instead of how much restriction and coercion the public will tolerate. Federalism and local self-government with the greatest autonomy at the community level is the equitable (and quintessentially American) solution can satisfy both Libertarian and Conservative livelihoods, but will never satisfy the Progressive Socialists.

Sorry having to delete and repost this so many times. Nth time is the charm. Have a good day all.

Pevvania

Pevvania wrote:Ben Shapiro: "Don't listen to anyone that says 'socialism was a good idea that just didn't work properly'. This is false. Socialism worked exactly as it intended to, because it is a horrible, totalitarian, monstrous ideology."

Good ol' ben

Pevvania, The Ambassador To The Clfr

Condealism wrote:This "ignorance" of basic biology is merely the consequence of taking more advanced biology to heart.

Um, what.

Condealism wrote:....

There are, of course, two biological sexes - only that isn't quite right

this is an anomaly(that I even pointed out in my post) in my original post. But given that it effects anywhere from .5-1.5% of people. I found it week for an argument. there is a saying in law that hard cases make bad law.

Saying that the intersex is enough to say that my argument is like suggesting that quantum tunneling is enough to disprove Newtons Second Law. Sure it is more advanced in the field in argument. but it hardly debunks my case.

Also the term hermaphrodite is still in the dictionary, I am so, SO tired of people coming back saying, "well actually thats not the right word...." They are synonyms! The word hermaphrodite comes from greek mythology. Hermaphroditus was the son of Hermes and Aphrodite who had physical traits of both the male and female sex.

Condealism wrote:

Anyway, I digress: the point I was getting to is that while it is ostensibly not possible to change the biological sex an individual was assigned at birth

Whoa whoa whoa. Assigned at birth? NO. this is so wrong your sex is determined when the two haploid sex cells from you parents fuse to become a diploid cell! or in other words at conception. this nonsense of sex being "assigned at birth" NEEDS TO STOP!

Condealism wrote:it is possible for individuals to undergo transition so that their bodies can resemble (and, in many ways, function roughly equivalently to) the sex opposite that which they were assigned at birth.

Sure people can undergo surgery to change their physical appearance. but it is imposable to change you biological sex. that was the point of my original post

Condealism wrote:

Well, you're half right - there is indeed a distinction between gender identity (psychological) and gender roles/expression (social), which are both distinct from biological sex (physiological).

You are misquoting me. If you are going to debate me don't misrepresent my argument. Gender is biological. Gender Identity is psychological and Gender Roles are social. I don't care much about the last two people can do what ever they want. But to say that one can change their gender is patently false.

Look my whole point in posting was that People can do what ever they want just don't make me deny basic biology.

Pevvania

wow hoppen snakes really knew nothing about Ben, Steven, or Milo

Pevvania

Condealism wrote:Snip

All that said, No hard feelings? :)

The United States Of Patriots wrote:Snip

It sounds to me like the main point of contention between our assertions is what we mean when we use certain words (e.g. you use the word "gender" where I use "sex," "hermaphrodite" where I use "intersex," etc.). Seeing as trying to rectify that would likely result in opening the whole "descriptivist vs prescriptivist" can of worms, I suppose we'll have to agree to disagree.

The United States Of Patriots wrote:All that said, No hard feelings? :)

None whatsoever. :)

Pevvania, Rateria, The United States Of Patriots

Post self-deleted by The United States Of Patriots.

Condealism wrote:It sounds to me like the main point of contention between our assertions is what we mean when we use certain words (e.g. you use the word "gender" where I use "sex," "hermaphrodite" where I use "intersex," etc.). Seeing as trying to rectify that would likely result in opening the whole "descriptivist vs prescriptivist" can of worms, I suppose we'll have to agree to disagree.

Fair enough

Rateria, Condealism

All the right-wing populists who think Le Pen is the French Trump are going to be severely disappointed when she gets into office and increases government spending, taxes and tariffs. Her courage to criticise Islam and campaign against the EU are all worthy of applause, but by and large she's another false idol. Let's hope the Thatcherite Fillon wins.

Miencraft, Narland, Condealism

Pevvania wrote:Forget Clinton for a second, why isn't Eric Holder in jail?

Because the people in charge make the rules.

Pevvania, Rateria, Condealism

Just saw Trump speak to the press for a few minutes about his plans for the federal budget. In classic Trumpian manner, what he said was both vague and hyperbolic, saying that he "inherited a mess", decrying the $20 trillion debt that doubled under Obama. He said he was going to "make government leaner" and "do a lot more with less", also saying "no more wasted money".

This is all very encouraging, especially since Mulvaney is a big league deficit hawk, but let's wait and see for the full details to be released in mid March.

Miencraft, Narland, The United States Of Patriots

Post self-deleted by Narland.

I found a condensed version of Zuckerberg's Manifesto:

We are Facebook. Lower your privacy and surrender your minds. We will Friend [tm] your personal and social distinctiveness to our own. Your culture will adapt to service policy us. Resistance is futile. You will be advertilated.

The United States Of Patriots

Pevvania wrote:Just saw Trump speak to the press for a few minutes about his plans for the federal budget. In classic Trumpian manner, what he said was both vague and hyperbolic, saying that he "inherited a mess", decrying the $20 trillion debt that doubled under Obama. He said he was going to "make government leaner" and "do a lot more with less", also saying "no more wasted money".

This is all very encouraging, especially since Mulvaney is a big league deficit hawk, but let's wait and see for the full details to be released in mid March.

I hope the blitzkrieg continues. Trump considers firing 70% of the Federal workforce one of his campaign promises. Heres hoping...

Miencraft, Pevvania, The United States Of Patriots, Shirayuki Mizore

Narland wrote:I found a condensed version of Zuckerberg's Manifesto:

We are Facebook. Lower your privacy and surrender your minds. We will Friend [tm] your personal and social distinctiveness to our own. Your culture will adapt to service policy us. Resistance is futile. You will be advertilated.

ZUCCED

Narland wrote:I hope the blitzkrieg continues. Trump considers firing 70% of the Federal workforce one of his campaign promises. Heres hoping...

What I wouldn't give to see him follow through on that...

2 hours ago: The Empire of Solid Eagle of the region Superiorem Merionem Region proposed constructing embassies.

*considers the implications of SMR-Libertatem interaction*

*decides that would be pretty freaking awesome*

Assembled with Dot's Region Saver.
Written by Refuge Isle.