Post Archive

Region: Libertatem

History

Nowhere, Anticomint. Just a region that would prefer to be left alone.

Oh right. better not mention them again.

Mmhmm.

Anyway, there are still no affirmative results from the first stage of recruitment (although I did get a kind reply that I'd accidentally posted the anti-communist ad in a primarily socialist region). I'm planning on moving on to stage two, but unfortunately I'm not sure I can be on for a long enough amount of time to recruit nations as they're founded.

Due to increasing problems in the ISA, since a dead dude is our president, we've initiated John Boehner as the new president of the ISA. No negative comments neccisary.

I'm sure we've nothing to cry about, ISA.

Ich brauche Hilfe bei der Vernichtung all diesen Anarchisten, die versuchen, mich zu stürzen werden. 100 von ihnen sind außerhalb meines Parliment und ich warte auf ein offenes Feuer, um meine 300 Soldaten, die sie umgeben haben geben.

Here is my translation.

I need assistance with exterminating all of these Anarchist's that are trying to overthrow me. 100 of them are outside my Parliment and I am waiting to give an open fire order to my 300 troops that have surrounded them.

Sind diese Anarchisten linken Flügel oder libertären?

...Do they have artificial red scars on their right eyes? If so, they're my nation's largest group of radicals, and they might have slipped over the border. If you find any with the face paint logo I mentioned, do with them as you wish, but I'd prefer you return them.

linker Flügel.

Their not yours.

Okay, feel free to fire.

Anyway, it seems fascists in other regions are doing particularly well.

Senden Ihnen Unterstützung? Ich könnte legen Sie sie und führen 20 von ihnen, nachdem ich den Rest schießen in die Menge.

I will give the order at 8:20 if they don't calm down.

They have 1 minute.

Feuer!

(AK-47,Desert Eagle and, G-36 gunshots ring out.)

A sad day for freedom; a glorious day for Einsiev's military at the helm of the collective regional armed forces.

I will burn all 16 of the Anarchist flags i found.

http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=Anarchist+Flags&view=detail&id=49080960C3947EEA5DC7FB1B1BC1ABD8084768F8

Ich spreche auch Deutsch, aber nur ein wenig.

Bitte hör auf Deutsch zu sprechen.

Also, my ideal society always moves a bit further, closer to anarchy, although not the kind of anarchy leftists want but rather a private law society such as the one Hans-Hermann Hoppe described so eloquently.

Ich spreche ein wenig Deutsch zu. Auch ein wenig Spanisch und Russisch.

Ich spreche auch ein wenig Latein und offenbar meine spreche, Islandisch.

Minarchy appeals to me. I'd prefer the government to be the people's partner, only responsible for protecting them from criminals or foreign threats.

This is my puppet nation.

Well, I liked that concept for a long time, but I've recently concluded that the government can never be a partner because the government is always evil, there is no good government. The essence of government is one group governing another significantly larger group, and one's government over another can never be just unless subjected to by consent, and no, democracy does not, in my opinion, fulfill that consent. Bleugh. Where am I going. What was I talking about, again?

Alak-Kazanistahn is a Militia state. The government is lost due to a ongoing Civil War

State governments can be good governments. What if a federal government could wield LESS authority than the individual states? It would be incorruptible because taking control of it wouldn't be worth it. Corrupting the states wouldn't make much sense either, because all of the oppressed citizens would hop the border into a different state. Federalism can't work if the federal is way, way at the top.

I'm not used to this idea of a federal government and state government, my theory applies to a society governed by one government. I do see your point and it is good!

In a society governed by one government (as in, towns don't have their own, and federalism is completely nonexistent) that shares power evenly with the people, there'd be no distribution of power aside from people vs. government to protect either the people or the government. Depending on whether the people IN the government are intelligent or not, one of two things would happen:

1. The people would overthrow the government and establish anarchy.

2. (Most likely) the government would swindle the people into giving it more control.

Laissez-faire federalism would enable the individual towns, counties, or, more likely, provinces of a nation to have near-absolute control over their own borders, with the entire nation's federal government defending the rights of all of its people. That way, no government could be corrupted without another keeping it in check.

The United States I live in has a more statist outlook on federalism - federal at the top, law of the land, while states are weaker, counties are weaker still, and individual towns have almost no say whatsoever.

This is why my nation is a Confederacy.

My nation is a "Golden Nation " we just have a really nice name but are faced with a ton of problems.

ISA, that statement reminds me a lot of America's gilded age. Contrary to what the history books would tell you, it wasn't all that bad (economic surges, particularly in the private sector), but, yes, this side effect of the Industrial Revolution did introduce a lot of things associated with poverty even today.

Still, problems come with solutions! Just hope for your government to shrink a bit soon.

Some problems are never solved. Like Obama. Why is a Muslim our President?

Check out my trend, people, government, and expenses sometime CI you'll see we have a limited government and a great economy but I need to treat my people good too but some bills are always counterproductive.

Well ISA, I'd say your government needs to be scaled back a little bit...

Yeah, no kidding. It has detectable spending, an income tax, and a boosted public sector!

Also, you have nationalized health care...ergh, why do you have nationalized healthcare?

Why was your economy so low? That's quite a feat getting it that high after it dipped so low.

CI, I'm fine with a little income tax, but I'd prefer it be extremely low (under 5%).

I'm just happy I got my nation the way it is, and hope I don't screw it up.

Post by Beastialityland suppressed by Liberosia.

Beastialityland

I would like to f ucking announce that i am running for wa delly

Ejected and suppressed for first offence...leave my region out of this.

You should ban SNABAGAG WHO APPARENTLY HAS NO CLUE WHAT CONSERVATISM IS!

Oh, do I now? Learning about yourself is so fun!

I just want to make a statement, THAT NEEDS NO REPLY, and it is that I have worked with Snabagag many times and he is by far one, if not the most, conservative member here that always puts the region and the people before himself and it disgusts me that members here attack fellow members with lies.

I'm numbers 4, 5, and 6 when it comes to fast-growing economies.

I am proud to be first for fastest growing economies in the region.

CI, I'm not really new, I was back after a brief leave of absence.

I really need to work on my economic growth (I'm in 30th place).

It's hard being in the top for economic growth in a glorious capitalist region such as this.

Literally.

I've had some worries about my economy for some while now, since it has declined. I'm not absolutely sure what I'm doing wrong, but I will privatize harder!

You can't privatize more because there's no government in your region. Principles have take you this far, but to get the economy the best it can be, you're going to have to subsidize business (the auto industry).

Post self-deleted by Einsiev.

Oh no no, haha. I will never subsidize anything, that is one of the many paths to serfdom lying before us.

We have been sabotaged!

I lost 3 cargo ships the Hertzer, Hammen, and, Kolben. This is first priority for me.

Snabagag, you just lost 4 of your destroyers. One being the Kaiserliche Ram.

I don't even know how I got second place for fastest-growing economies, but whatever I'm doing, I'll just keep doing that.

I'm 43rd in fastest growing economies here, even though its "very strong". But we are a capitalist region, like Liberosia said, so I don't put too much thought in to my ranking.

All or most of our economies are strong...the challenge is just figuring who is best among the best (which is all of us).

I'm 52 on the most subsidiezed industry.

I don't think subsidization is a good thing if it's a type of welfare, if it's not good I'm ashamed to be #8.

Snabagag must be ejected because he is not conservative he is liberal, not conservative since he is OK with statism and hates fascism. Anybody else seen liberal behavior from Snabagag? He might be a communist. Unendorse Snabagag and get him out of the delegacy and elect a real conservative.

Subsidization in this game usually denotes a "pro-market" region.

Super Conservatism, if you are trying to get elected to WA Delegate, I suggest you avoid negative campaigning and focus on trying to promote yourself as a better candidate.

Also on the subsidized industry thing, the game calculates subsidization as being pro-market, so it will not usually boost your government spending. Take my nation. I have 0% public sector but yet I still manage to "subsidize" my business...what does this mean? It means I have chose options on all issues that would benefit corporation and business: a side benefit to this is also an increase economy.

The Early Learning Act on the floor of the WA is an outrage! This is socialism at its worst - just read it and see.

I beg all of you WA delegates to vote against on the Early Learning Act.

Super Conservatism I know for a fact that Snabagag is a very Conservative member who as I've said before cares more about the region and the people in it more than himself. Take a look at his record and question him on it and it will show the facts that he is a true conservative. You also should learn a little respect while your at it and that just because we have freedom of speech we must use it respectfully and wisely.

Ah, I'm glad I withdrew from the WA.

Post self-deleted by Einsiev.

Ich bin froh, dass ich bin nicht angemeldet.

Who likes my new flag. I think it looks good for a fascist.

I'm not a big fan of Facism but it is a nice looking flag.

Thanks. Well your pro democratic.

Let us pray for the innocent lives lost in Connecticut. Let us all come together in God’s grace to pray for the families of the victims.

There seems to be a lot of shootings happening now, together (at the same time)...

And all of these shootings are by people with psychological issues.

People that do these evil things deserve death and hell.

Death is an escape Liberosia, to live is the real pain.

Death in hell is not an escape.

Yesterday's shootings are terrible, and my heart goes out to each and every family, but my disgust lies in the people demanding less individual liberty by more gun control. The answer is not more gun control, it's less gun control.

As to what Super Conservatism said, I don't really care but I'd like to point out that I'm not a statist, lol, but on the contrary. I hate the state. So yeah.

I was watching FNC a second ago and Mike Huckabee was on there and he happened to mention two important things and they are as follows.

1: we don't need any gun control laws we already have one, Thou shalt not kill

2: Mike mentioned that when he was in school , he grew up in Arkansas, that they would bring guns to school but that was because they were hunters and they had no intention of killing their fellow classmates.

Exactly. Honest citizens owns gun for the sake of marksmanship, they enjoy going out into nature to hunt or to a field to practice. Other honest citizens use them to protect themselves. They should be allowed to without the government telling them they can't.

Besides that, more guns point to less crime.

Also if you outlaw, or regulate, guns then only the thugs and, lack of a better word, evil-doers will have them.

I want to keep all of my guns. OBAMA IS NOT GOING TO TAKE THEM.

Please do, Einsiev. If Obama tries to take your guns, tell him to go to h*ll. It's time for some Thoreau-ian revolt!

I agree! I'm thinking of starting a riot on him.

Did you hear that i lost 3 ships? They exploded on the horizon from my shore.

As I was strolling through capitalism and its antithesis, socialism, I realized that there is a core difference between the two. This core difference is even apparent between actual American liberals and conservatives. It is that, while the conservatives view material wealth/money as the belongings of the 300,000,000 people in the USA, liberals view the money/material wealth as all one part, owned by the government, and the federal government has the duty to "give" people what they deserve. I always here liberals complaining that "giving the rich" more money won't solve our economic problems. Well, they're wrong on both accounts (regarding economics, it is proven that the wealthy are the investors in this country), but they're also in the moral wrong. They need to understand that we don't "give the rich" more money...we simply steal, yes, I believe it is theft at our tax rates, less of their money for a short time. American liberals are, quite frankly, nuts.

It's funny how many people accuse the rich of stealing rather than earning/investing when they don't realize that the greatest debtor in history is filching from them.

I absolutely agree.

Assembled with Dot's Region Saver.
Written by Refuge Isle.