Post Archive

Region: Libertatem

History

Republic Of Minerva wrote:Although in reality I'll be voting for Gary Johnson, as I do not need a false dilemma to hold me back from voting who I really want in.

To be honest Gary Johnson was relatively weak in the last Libertarian Debate. McAfee, Petersen and surprisingly Darryl Perry were strong. I wouldn't mind voting for McAfee. He would get the most media attention if he was the nominee.

Republic Of Minerva wrote:Apparently, increasing freedom of speech decreases civil rights, according to the outcome of this one Nationstates issue I got.

what kind of issue was it and what did you select??

Quarantinia wrote:what kind of issue was it and what did you select??

"10 minutes ago: Following new legislation in Republic of Minerva, pro-life activists often lecture pregnant women undergoing routine prenatal screening."

San Andrias wrote:To be honest Gary Johnson was relatively weak in the last Libertarian Debate. McAfee, Petersen and surprisingly Darryl Perry were strong. I wouldn't mind voting for McAfee. He would get the most media attention if he was the nominee.

On the other hand a McAfee nomination would solidify the Libertarians as the loony conspiracy party, if Sol Invictus didn't already do that.

New Jaslandia

Republic Of Minerva wrote:if Sol Invictus didn't already do that.

I find it appalling that they are letting him run.

New Jaslandia

> bottom 2% of world for most eco-friendly government policies

> top 12% of world for most beautiful environments

Rateria, Parvimperia, Las-Vegas

What if Bernie Sanders is selected as the favorite in the Democratic Party primaries???

Would the unelected super delegates Hilary Clinton has move to Bernie Sanders ?

Would it present a problem

If the voters selected someone for the

Nomination, but the electors voted for someone else, especially since the electors

are supposed to go to whoever gets the most popular votes.

In the polls Hilary is beating Trump by a 10% lead of all Americans favoring Hillary over Trump, but in the polls Bernie by a 20% lead of all Americans favoring Bernie over Trump. Who would the most logical person select to run for Democrat nominee?

20% lead or 10% lead,

I would say I would run the 20% lead because they have a better chance at winning.

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen wrote:Who would you vote for Donald Trump or Bernie Sanders ?

Because I pretty much know it is going to be those two

It's gonna be Trump and Hillary, dunno where you got that idea from.

And I'd vote Trump, because he might fix a few problems.

San Andrias

"Damn right we're not!" exclaims Barack Gutenberg, one of many citizens protesting in front of your office. "Your oppressively high taxes are picking our pockets and robbing us of our livelihood. No more, we say! The government may call us tax cheats, but that's just because it's afraid to call us the PATRIOTS that we are! Cut the tax rate, and we'll think about paying again."

Lol, people are rioting over my oppressively high tax rate of 4.1% XD

Quarantinia, San Andrias, New Jaslandia, Rateria, Parvimperia

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen wrote:In the polls Hilary is beating Trump by a 10% lead of all Americans favoring Hillary over Trump, but in the polls Bernie by a 20% lead of all Americans favoring Bernie over Trump. Who would the most logical person select to run for Democrat nominee?

20% lead or 10% lead,

I would say I would run the 20% lead because they have a better chance at winning.

Here's the scenarios:

Trump vs Clinton: Clinton wins due to the majority of Republicans disliking Trump.

Cruz vs Clinton/Sanders: Not sure, but probably Cruz will win.

Trump vs Sanders: Sanders wins, but a very low voter turnout due to both parties having a big amount that don't like these candidates.

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

Las-Vegas wrote:"Damn right we're not!" exclaims Barack Gutenberg, one of many citizens protesting in front of your office. "Your oppressively high taxes are picking our pockets and robbing us of our livelihood. No more, we say! The government may call us tax cheats, but that's just because it's afraid to call us the PATRIOTS that we are! Cut the tax rate, and we'll think about paying again."

Lol, people are rioting over my oppressively high tax rate of 4.1% XD

But that is oppressive...

The Aradites wrote:Here's the scenarios:

Trump vs Clinton: Clinton wins due to the majority of Republicans disliking Trump.

Cruz vs Clinton/Sanders: Not sure, but probably Cruz will win.

Trump vs Sanders: Sanders wins, but a very low voter turnout due to both parties having a big amount that don't like these candidates.

Trump would beat Sanders. And Cruz would be destroyed by Clinton or Sanders.

Patvarus Ii wrote:But that is oppressive...

Then go live in Denmark :D

But I did lower it though, as it is WAY too high in my opinion. And that option brought it only from 4.1% to 3.8%...

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen, Rateria

Republic Of Minerva wrote:This seems most likely. The Establishment wants an Establishment candidate.

That doesn't seem to be working out for the Republicans, though, unless Rubio can somehow rise to the top.

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen wrote:What if Bernie Sanders is selected as the favorite in the Democratic Party primaries???

Would the unelected super delegates Hilary Clinton has move to Bernie Sanders ?

Would it present a problem

If the voters selected someone for the

Nomination, but the electors voted for someone else, especially since the electors

are supposed to go to whoever gets the most popular votes.

If Sanders wins a bunch of victories and scores a whole bunch of states, super-delegates would likely switch their support to Sanders to avoid appearing undemocratic. However, Sanders' disappointing showing on Super Tuesday means it's very unlikely he'll win the nomination.

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/hillary-clintons-got-this/

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen, Rateria

Republic Of Minerva wrote:Apparently, increasing freedom of speech decreases civil rights, according to the outcome of this one Nationstates issue I got.

If you have NS++ it'll point this out. The reason is because the issue hints a far right party will gain power of you choose the ironically freer option.

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

Idk if Kim Jong Un is trying to be intimidating, but this NK missile thing might be problem now that he ordered his nukes to be ready to use at anytime

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen, Teuberland

CNN's match up polls are hilariously erroneous. Sanders beating Trump by 19 points?!

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen, Las-Vegas

Kim Jong in ordered nukes to be ready at any time. Gentleman we are one step closer to nuclear apocalypse.

The Aradites wrote:Here's the scenarios:

Trump vs Clinton: Clinton wins due to the majority of Republicans disliking Trump.

Cruz vs Clinton/Sanders: Not sure, but probably Cruz will win.

Trump vs Sanders: Sanders wins, but a very low voter turnout due to both parties having a big amount that don't like these candidates.

Yes.

No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I like Bernie Sanders, I don't agree with everything he says however I would like him the most as our president. He is definitely better than a President Trump.

If China threatened him, he would be like I'm going to nuke you China and then do it starting a nuclear world war 3.

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen wrote:No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I like Bernie Sanders, I don't agree with everything he says however I would like him the most as our president. He is definitely better than a President Trump.

If China threatened him, he would be like I'm going to nuke you China and then do it starting a nuclear world war 3.

He would never nuke China, they make all our stuff for us!

Rateria, Teuberland

Wow, I haven't been on in six days and I'm just getting used to the new format.

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen wrote:No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I like Bernie Sanders, I don't agree with everything he says however I would like him the most as our president. He is definitely better than a President Trump.

If China threatened him, he would be like I'm going to nuke you China and then do it starting a nuclear world war 3.

I think you are in the wrong region...

TBH, Trump is a lot smarter than he portrays himself as being. Whether he loses the election or not, he has already taken out a huge loan from The Trump Organization and will write off all of the campaign money he has as a tax deduction by taking advantage of the bureaucratic mess the tax code is. I don't like Trump, but if you thought Obama was bad, Bernie is 10x worse.

The New United States, Rateria, Las-Vegas

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen wrote:No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I like Bernie Sanders, I don't agree with everything he says however I would like him the most as our president. He is definitely better than a President Trump.

If China threatened him, he would be like I'm going to nuke you China and then do it starting a nuclear world war 3.

I would choose any other candidate before Sanders. Even Clinton.

San Andrias, The United States Of Patriots

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen wrote:No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I like Bernie Sanders, I don't agree with everything he says however I would like him the most as our president. He is definitely better than a President Trump.

If China threatened him, he would be like I'm going to nuke you China and then do it starting a nuclear world war 3.

Do you know who would pay for all of Sanders' Socialist programs? The answer to that question is: THE TAXPAYERS! I will legally become an adult during the 2016-2020 presidential term, and I don't want to pay out of my rear end for inefficient government programs! We do that enough already!

The United States Of Patriots, Las-Vegas

Rateria wrote:Do you know who would pay for all of Sanders' Socialist programs? The answer to that question is: THE TAXPAYERS! I will legally become an adult during the 2016-2020 presidential term, and I don't want to pay out of my rear end for inefficient government programs! We do that enough already!

I see now, you just hate poor people and want them to DIE! I bet that you would just love having no government and have all the roads paved with CHILDREN. You probably hate all minorities too you fascist scum!!1!!!!!!1

San Andrias, Rateria

Rateria wrote:Do you know who would pay for all of Sanders' Socialist programs? The answer to that question is: THE TAXPAYERS! I will legally become an adult during the 2016-2020 presidential term, and I don't want to pay out of my rear end for inefficient government programs! We do that enough already!

YOU EVIL FASCIST PIECE OF SH*T

Republic Of Minerva, Rateria

Regional Community News: Issue #18 Coup d'états and Revolutions!

https://www.nationstates.net/page=dispatch/id=578372

Archive: https://www.nationstates.net/page=dispatch/id=505134

Las-Vegas wrote:YOU EVIL FASCIST PIECE OF SH*T

Communist detected *Initiates Liberty Prime Combat Mode*

Rateria, The United States Of Patriots

San Andrias wrote:Communist detected *Initiates Liberty Prime Combat Mode*

*Initiates a motherfuucking revolution*

Rateria

Las-Vegas wrote:*Initiates a motherfuucking revolution*

*sabotage the revolution with the S.T.A.L.I.N-Protocol*

Rateria, Las-Vegas

Reformed Venice wrote:*sabotage the revolution with the S.T.A.L.I.N-Protocol*

*prepare B-ERN bank seeking missiles*

Rateria, Las-Vegas

Kasich is the only good Republican candidate left.

New Jaslandia, Plusiocratic Federation Of Monetia, Las-Vegas

San Andrias wrote:Kasich is the only good Republican candidate left.

Cruz 2016, bruv.

The New United States wrote:Cruz 2016, bruv.

Pretending to be Anti-Establishment Bigoted Goldman Sachs' Bitch 2016, bruv.

Las-Vegas

Rateria wrote:Do you know who would pay for all of Sanders' Socialist programs? The answer to that question is: THE TAXPAYERS! I will legally become an adult during the 2016-2020 presidential term, and I don't want to pay out of my rear end for inefficient government programs! We do that enough already!

Yup. I'm not American but I wouldn't vote for a candidate who advocates irresponible spending (like Sanders).

Although you should be careful not to use "socialism" in the same way SJWs use "Fascism" (i.e. for everyone on ther other and of the political spectrum). Real socialism is a horrible thing the Soviet Union was known for and that in many ways was pretty similar to the German version of Fascism. The American version of liberalism has as much to do with socialism as Trump has to do with fascism: Absolutely nothing.

I find this is pretty common among Americans: To use socialism and fascism as political buzzwords to describe the other party. To a European it seems a bit ridiculous sometimes. We actually have both socialist and fascist parties in many European nations and they're fundamenally different from both Republicans and Democrats in America. For example they want to deport Jews (fascists) or "kill the bourgeoisie" (socialists).

Rateria

Plusiocratic Federation Of Monetia wrote:Yup. I'm not American but I wouldn't vote for a candidate who advocates irresponible spending (like Sanders).

Although you should be careful not to use "socialism" in the same way SJWs use "Fascism" (i.e. for everyone on ther other and of the political spectrum). Real socialism is a horrible thing the Soviet Union was known for and that in many ways was pretty similar to the German version of Fascism. The American version of liberalism has as much to do with socialism as Trump has to do with fascism: Absolutely nothing.

I find this is pretty common among Americans: To use socialism and fascism as political buzzwords to describe the other party. To a European it seems a bit ridiculous sometimes. We actually have both socialist and fascist parties in many European nations and they're fundamenally different from both Republicans and Democrats in America. For example they want to deport Jews (fascists) or "kill the bourgeoisie" (socialists).

You call their definition of socialism wrong and supplement it with another erroneous one.

San Andrias wrote:Pretending to be Anti-Establishment Bigoted Goldman Sachs' Bitch 2016, bruv.

That was unnecessarily vulgar, and not a particularly substantive attack on Sen. Cruz.

His policy positions are, at the very least, better than those of the overly interventionist, pro-drug-war, Medicaid-expanding, pro-Common Core, and anti-religious liberties Gov. John "Philosophy Doesn't Work When You Run Something" Kasich.

The United States Of Patriots

San Andrias wrote:You call their definition of socialism wrong and supplement it with another erroneous one.

"Socialism is a range of economic and social systems characterised by social ownership and democratic control of the means of production;[7] as well as the political ideologies, theories, and movements that aim at their establishment.[8] Social ownership may refer to forms of public, cooperative, or collective ownership; to citizen ownership of equity; or to any combination of these.[9] Although there are many varieties of socialism and there is no single definition encapsulating all of them,[10] social ownership is the common element shared by its various forms.[5][11][12]"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism

Rateria

Wow.. this region shrank a lot..

The New United States wrote:That was unnecessarily vulgar, and not a particularly substantive attack on Sen. Cruz.

His policy positions are, at the very least, better than those of the overly interventionist, pro-drug-war, Medicaid-expanding, pro-Common Core, and anti-religious liberties Gov. John "Philosophy Doesn't Work When You Run Something" Kasich.

Kasich is pro-Common Core???

:O

The New United States

Reformed Venice wrote:*sabotage the revolution with the S.T.A.L.I.N-Protocol*

*revolution fails due to state-owned economy*

Rateria

Bridge To Terabithia wrote:Wow.. this region shrank a lot..

It has a history of going from 200 people to 50 to 150 and back to 200 every few months. Military puppets moving around I think.

The New United States, Las-Vegas

San Andrias wrote:It has a history of going from 200 people to 50 to 150 and back to 200 every few months. Military puppets moving around I think.

Sooo this region is a transitregion.

Reformed Venice wrote:Sooo this region is a transitregion.

No, not at all. The population shifts probably have more to do with government activity and recruitment efforts (or lack thereof). We had a large population because of the stellar recruiting efforts of Muh Roads and others, and because of an active and engaged military/gubmint. Now, we lack both of those things.

Miencraft, San Andrias

Our President is inactive, our Board is basically non-existent (last election was half a year ago), as is our military, and our population has declined significantly as a result of our stagnation. Regional law is being neglected and passively disobeyed.

Our lack of a regional organization will destroy us, if we don't reform. We need new leaders, and we need a new, active board.

I say we dissolve the current Board and have snap elections, both for the Board and for President.

Rateria, The Aradites, The United States Of Patriots, Reformed Venice

The New United States wrote:Our President is inactive, our Board is basically non-existent (last election was half a year ago), as is our military, and our population has declined significantly as a result of our stagnation. Regional law is being neglected and passively disobeyed.

Our lack of a regional organization will destroy us, if we don't reform. We need new leaders, and we need a new, active board.

I say we dissolve the current Board and have snap elections, both for the Board and for President.

Agreed. I have already stated I will run for Seat 2.

Rateria, The United States Of Patriots

Post self-deleted by Reformed Venice.

The New United States wrote:Our President is inactive, our Board is basically non-existent (last election was half a year ago), as is our military, and our population has declined significantly as a result of our stagnation. Regional law is being neglected and passively disobeyed.

Our lack of a regional organization will destroy us, if we don't reform. We need new leaders, and we need a new, active board.

I say we dissolve the current Board and have snap elections, both for the Board and for President.

Agreed, I announced previously I would be defending my seat.

Additionally, an appellate justice needs to be appointed as well by the president.

The New United States wrote:Our President is inactive, our Board is basically non-existent (last election was half a year ago), as is our military, and our population has declined significantly as a result of our stagnation. Regional law is being neglected and passively disobeyed.

Our lack of a regional organization will destroy us, if we don't reform. We need new leaders, and we need a new, active board.

I say we dissolve the current Board and have snap elections, both for the Board and for President.

Agreed I have been quite busy of late and can no longer give the attention to the position it deserves

The New United States wrote:Our President is inactive, our Board is basically non-existent (last election was half a year ago), as is our military, and our population has declined significantly as a result of our stagnation. Regional law is being neglected and passively disobeyed.

Our lack of a regional organization will destroy us, if we don't reform. We need new leaders, and we need a new, active board.

I say we dissolve the current Board and have snap elections, both for the Board and for President.

Soo when are we going to do this?

The United States Of Patriots

The New United States wrote:I say we dissolve the current Board and have snap elections, both for the Board and for President.

I agree 100%

The United States Of Patriots

I'll run for board if that's allowed.

The New United States

Patvarus Ii wrote:I'll run for board if that's allowed.

How exactly does that work, what are the positions offered?

Las-Vegas wrote:How exactly does that work, what are the positions offered?

Read this.

Right-Winged Nation wrote:Agreed I have been quite busy of late and can no longer give the attention to the position it deserves

Completely understandable. Real life comes first.

Thank you for your service, Mr. President.

The United States Of Patriots, Las-Vegas

Reformed Venice wrote:Soo when are we going to do this?

It depends - in order to hold elections, we require somebody with the appropriate regional powers to open up elections.

It would be wise to elect a President before electing the Board. The only person to announce their candidacy, thus far, is [nation=short]Republic_of_Minerva[/nation], I believe.

Patvarus Ii wrote:Read this.

Interesting... I might consider running for a position on the board myself.

I know i'm a newbie but i'm also running for a board.

Las-Vegas

The New United States wrote:It depends - in order to hold elections, we require somebody with the appropriate regional powers to open up elections.

It would be wise to elect a President before electing the Board. The only person to announce their candidacy, thus far, is [nation=short]Republic_of_Minerva[/nation], I believe.

1. When does the next term start? Because if it's not close then doesn't the vice president take office?

2. I'm pretty sure Minerva lost his citizenship, unless he got it back.

Reformed Venice wrote:I know i'm a newbie but i'm also running for a board.

Please don't run into boards. You might hurt yourself.

New Jaslandia, Muh Roads, Rateria, Plusiocratic Federation Of Monetia, The United States Of Patriots, Reformed Venice

Whomever is next president as a result of all this needs to message me. Ill tell ya how to breath some life into this ol girl.

The Hyatt Islands is back and needs help rebuilding. If you want to send over a puppet for friendly debate and curated wine, feel free to do so.

Las-Vegas

Hm... Whenever you all handle whatever issues in leadership you seem to be having, I would like to request a conversation with whoever ends up in charge.

I've already sent a TG to RWN about my issue, but if what I'm reading here is to be believed, I may not be able to solve my issue that way.

Muh Roads wrote:Whomever is next president as a result of all this needs to message me. Ill tell ya how to breath some life into this ol girl.

http://gpaspectrum.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/1370547029.jpg

New Jaslandia

So when are we going to schedule elections?

Top 101% for biggest government... I'm such a statist.

San Andrias, New Jaslandia, Rateria, Teuberland, The United States Of Patriots, Las-Vegas

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mN3z3eSVG7A

New Jaslandia

Patvarus Ii wrote:I'll run for board if that's allowed.

You are a citizen, mein freund.

The United States Of Patriots

San Andrias wrote:So when are we going to schedule elections?

Would anybody object to holding a Presidential elections, perhaps, this Saturday, and then Board elections on Sunday? It will give us a bit of time to get candidates for every elected position.

I'll run for President, so long as nobody who holds more experience and who pledges to be active announces their candidacy. If I am elected, I vow to restore military activity, reestablish foreign relations with key allies, and help to reactivate both the Board and the Cabinet. I'm loyal to Libertatem, having resided here for over two years, and I have held various positions in the regional government and authored several pieces of passed legislation.

This is the list of announced candidates, then:

President

[nation=short]The_New_United_States[/nation]

Board

Seat 1: [nation=short]The_Aradites[/nation]

Seat 2: [nation=short]San_Andrias[/nation]

Seat 3: [nation=short]Patvarus[/nation]

Seat 4:

Seat 5:

There need to be three more citizens willing to actively serve in the Board.

The Aradites wrote:1. When does the next term start? Because if it's not close then doesn't the vice president take office?

Apparently, President RWN has served approximately two to two-and-a-half months of his four-month term. The VP is, indeed, the rightful successor to the President - though it's not evident that he is particularly active, either. It's not really clear how active anybody in the line of succession is (as it is in the VEEP Amendment). Tell me if I'm out of line, but it appears to me that the best way to revive the regional government is to dissolve it and refill it with individuals that want to be active in reviving the region.

The Aradites wrote:2. I'm pretty sure Minerva lost his citizenship, unless he got it back.

Ah, you are correct.

New Jaslandia, Plusiocratic Federation Of Monetia

The New United States wrote:The VP is, indeed, the rightful successor to the President - though it's not evident that he is particularly active, either.

I volunteered for the Vice Presidency after the original VP was deleted. This is not my primary account, so I will happily cede my position if need be.

Hey, everyone. I'm an ex-citizen, and I just got a 'sure' out of RWN saying I could leave a nation here for the sake of conversation.

I'm actually still listed as an active citizen, though. Not sure if you all want to get around to changing that.

The New United States

The Dark Lieutenant wrote:I volunteered for the Vice Presidency after the original VP was deleted. This is not my primary account, so I will happily cede my position if need be.

In the line of succession, after VP is Board Chairman. [nation=short]Miencraft[/nation], would you be willing to serve as President, again?

As a result of the issue here, let me lend some advice. I am still retired, but I checked to see this was happening, so let me aid you all.

Most of the laws of the old Libertatem have been lost, but there are still those that know the history, so we must ensure it is preserved. The law archive on the forums will help you.

I would have President RWN issue an executive order dissolving the current administration and Board once replacements are elected and serve a tertiary term until the next mandated election day per our laws and amendments.

TNUS, if you want to do this, you have to be all in. I, as a former President, am willing to endorse TNUS for the presidency because I believe he would have the energy and experience to get us back on track. However, the best way to increase activity is to have contested elections. Other people should run passionately, campaign. The days of Time and Ankha were our most active days.

I trust you all to keep Libertatem strong.

Miencraft, The New United States, San Andrias, New Jaslandia, Rateria, Plusiocratic Federation Of Monetia

Im willing to candidate, however im not a citizen and my English can suck (third language)

The New United States wrote:In the line of succession, after VP is Board Chairman. [nation=short]Miencraft[/nation], would you be willing to serve as President, again?

I'll fight you for it.

The New United States, San Andrias, Muh Roads, Plusiocratic Federation Of Monetia, The Victorium Republic, Reformed Venice

Miencraft wrote:I'll fight you for it.

Great. Hopefully it's not RLP vs RLP though.

San Andrias wrote:It has a history of going from 200 people to 50 to 150 and back to 200 every few months. Military puppets moving around I think.

Oh.. still fighting The Red Dragon?

Hey, the offer to be dictator still stands. Ill pass ROADS. lol

The New United States, Rateria, Shirayuki Mizore

That moment when Ron Paul was apparently once considered "too conservative" for the Libertarian Party.

"When Ron Paul sought the 1988 Libertarian Party nomination for president, many saw him as too conservative and supported American Indian activist Russell Means to run against him.[6][7][8]"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Factions_in_the_Libertarian_Party_(United_States)

San Andrias

Muh Roads wrote:Hey, the offer to be dictator still stands. Ill pass ROADS. lol

You mean y'all didn't ever get around to passing the ROADS amendment while I was gone?

Shame on y'all.

The New United States, Muh Roads

I haven't been active, my bad.

The New United States

Muh Roads wrote:Hey, the offer to be dictator still stands. Ill pass ROADS. lol

Hey, well, passing ROADS and anointing you King is the central plank of my candidacy.

Miencraft, San Andrias, New Jaslandia, Muh Roads, Rateria, The Victorium Republic

The New United States wrote:Hey, well, passing ROADS and anointing you King is the central plank of my candidacy.

Damn. I can't compete with that.

I... I've got cookies! ???

The New United States, New Jaslandia, Muh Roads, Rateria, The United States Of Patriots

Oh god when did this happen how long has this been a thing why didn't I notice it before what

My civil rights are above 90.

That's...

That's amazing.

Rateria, The United States Of Patriots

Post self-deleted by Muh Roads.

Condealism wrote:Hail Roads

Pevvania wrote:Roads is Love, Roads is Life

The American Empire In Libertatem wrote:Hail Roads!

The New United States wrote:The ROADS Amendment

The Religious Overture to the Accession of the Deity Superhero - Roads Amendment

Section I

Purpose of the act

Subsection I

Establish the state religion of Libertatem

Section II

Establish the state religion of Libertatem

Subsection II

The state religion of Libertatem, henceforth, is the Holy Church of Roads

Subsection III

The Holy Church of Roads, as the infallible institution of our Supreme-Overlord Roads, shall have ultimate say over public policy

Subsection IV

Heretics shall be excommunicated from Libertatem

Subsection V

We reaffirm our commitment to Roads' righteous jihad against communism

Authored by [nation=short]The New United States[/nation]

New Jaslandia

Muh Roads wrote:

I seem to remember something along the lines of daily readings of the teachings of Lord Roads being in there at some point.

Shirayuki Mizore wrote:I seem to remember something along the lines of daily readings of the teachings of Lord Roads being in there at some point.

[Nation=the_american_empire_in_libertatem] get in hurr

McAfee: Great candidate or just plain nuts?

Parvimperia wrote:McAfee: Great candidate or just plain nuts?

latter, ofc

News flash, ive had the ability to do this the entire time <3 Roads

Muh Roads wrote:[Nation=the_american_empire_in_libertatem] get in hurr

I already have a nation in here.

Muh Roads

Post self-deleted by The Victorium Republic.

Long live his most Holy and Imperial Majesty, Muh Roads!

Muh Roads

I support the Roads Amendment and would like to add a new part of it.

Section III

The New Libertatem Government

Subsection I

Muh Roads is recognized as Emperor and Eternal President of Libertatem

Subsection II

The will of Roads is law, He may make any law or Amendment at will.

New Jaslandia

The Victorium Republic wrote:I support the Roads Amendment and would like to add a new part of it.

Section III

The New Libertatem Government

Subsection I

Muh Roads is recognized as Emperor and Eternal President of Libertatem

Subsection II

The will of Roads is law, He may make any law or Amendment at will.

I approve

New Jaslandia

Right-Winged Nation wrote:I approve

#ronpaulitshappeningmeme

The United States Of Patriots

Muh Roads wrote:#ronpaulitshappeningmeme

Here we go.

Muh Roads

Miencraft wrote:Here we go.

#Thingsmiensays

I propose that The Board votes on the passage of the Roads Amendment or that we have a Referendum. Long live Emperor Roads!

Muh Roads

Assembled with Dot's Region Saver.
Written by Refuge Isle.