Post Archive

Region: Libertatem

History

Ambibia wrote:LETS GO TO WAR! LET'S DO IT! C'MON! LET'S GO! MNNAAAAAAAAAAHHHHH!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0Tf4GP330w

I swear if Libertatem and CFN go to war.....There is going to be a lot of Communist Beaches

The Dalek Paradigm wrote:Our MoFA candidate, everyone.

I question our embassy choice on this matter.

Humpheria wrote:I question our embassy choice on this matter.

Please don't.

We're a good region over in CFN....Once ya get to know us.

Ambibia wrote:LETS GO TO WAR! LET'S DO IT! C'MON! LET'S GO! MNNAAAAAAAAAAHHHHH!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0Tf4GP330w

Hahahaha xD

I can't be the only one who saw no hostility from Dalek, am I?

Muh Roads wrote:I can't be the only one who saw no hostility from Dalek, am I?

I didn't see anything hostile from him

Muh Roads wrote:I can't be the only one who saw no hostility from Dalek, am I?

I saw no hostility. I saw someone who comes from an allied region insult our past. I wasn't trying to be hostile either, just convey the message that I don't appreciate the implications.

Humpheria wrote:I ain't criticizin or nuttin, but the Coalition Of Independent Nations looks like a dual-shrine to Hallo and Anhka. Their music choices and their book choices. And hating on disabled people.

I've noticed.

Humpheria wrote:I question our embassy choice on this matter.

I'll handle this - foreign relations is my department.

The Dalek Paradigm wrote:But I didn't insult intentionally. I simply stated that it didn't look very libertarian. Did that hit a nerve?

I didn't expect a hero's welcome, I expected an answer/correction to my statement.

Hi Dalek. Sorry about the cold welcome.

Is there anything I can help you with?

Humpheria wrote:I saw no hostility. I saw someone who comes from an allied region insult our past. I wasn't trying to be hostile either, just convey the message that I don't appreciate the implications.

Never attribute to malice what can be more easily explained by ignorance; he made it quite clear that he was not aware of our traditions or goals aside from the true conception that we strive towards libertarianism, and the equally true observation that our community here tends to be on poor terms with communist nations.

The Coalition of Independent Nations as described by UCR

"The place where UCR and Libertatem's go to scheme against their old friends."

In reality it is an experimental region to fix mistakes UCR and Libertatem have made. Hallo However is already becoming a ranting dictator it seems though.

Albenia wrote:The Coalition of Independent Nations as described by UCR

"The place where UCR and Libertatem's go to scheme against their old friends."

In reality it is an experimental region to fix mistakes UCR and Libertatem have made. Hallo However is already becoming a ranting dictator it seems though.

What do you mean? A place for UCR to plot against us with people from our region?

Albenia wrote:The Coalition of Independent Nations as described by UCR

"The place where UCR and Libertatem's go to scheme against their old friends."

In reality it is an experimental region to fix mistakes UCR and Libertatem have made. Hallo However is already becoming a ranting dictator it seems though.

I happen to find their description quite apt, although they've misconstrued the nature of the scheming; they believe it is diabolical when in truth it is petty at best.

Still, I have hope that it can be turned into something greater, and less dictatorial.

Albenia wrote:The Coalition of Independent Nations as described by UCR

"The place where UCR and Libertatem's go to scheme against their old friends."

In reality it is an experimental region to fix mistakes UCR and Libertatem have made. Hallo However is already becoming a ranting dictator it seems though.

Hey hey hey now

Not ranting....

Humpheria wrote:What do you mean? A place for UCR to plot against us with people from our region?

No. UCR thinks it's a place for traitors of UCR and Traitors of Libertatem to get together and plot against both regions.

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:I happen to find their description quite apt, although they've misconstrued the nature of the scheming; they believe it is diabolical when in truth it is petty at best.

Still, I have hope that it can be turned into something greater, and less dictatorial.

It's a pretty good description but it's not scheming. Simply making sure we can decide for to fix mistakes.

Hallo Island wrote:Hey hey hey now

Not ranting....

It kind of is....

Albenia wrote:It kind of is....

No, some of the communists are just a tad immature.

Albenia wrote:No. UCR thinks it's a place for traitors of UCR and Traitors of Libertatem to get together and plot against both regions.

So, the truth? Okay.

I feel some sadness for Brazil. But Los gehts Deutschland!!!! KLOSE IST MEIN MANN!!!

Hallo Island wrote:No, some of the communists are just a tad immature.

Are you a communist then?

Because some of your arguments and reactions to people...

Humpheria wrote:So, the truth? Okay.

It's not the truth....I'm not there plotting against Libertatem or UCR...

If Hallo is a Dictator then he is a Benevolent one.

Hallo Island wrote:No, some of the communists are just a tad immature.

As though we haven't stooped to their level.

Northern Prussia wrote:I feel some sadness for Brazil. But Los gehts Deutschland!!!! KLOSE IST MEIN MANN!!!

Yeah, so many Holocaust jokes can be made in reference to the 7-1 slaughter today. Jokes I find distasteful to tell.

The Amarican Empire wrote:If Hallo is a Dictator then he is a Benevolent one.

Knowing many tyrants, I can safely say that such a statement is an oxymoron.

The Amarican Empire wrote:If Hallo is a Dictator then he is a Benevolent one.

Well......

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:As though we haven't stooped to their level.

Yeah, so many Holocaust jokes can be made in reference to the 7-1 slaughter today. Jokes I find distasteful to tell.

Hey how many jews were killed? Look at the Brazil v. Germany score.

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:Knowing many tyrants, I can safely say that such a statement is an oxymoron.

Yeah

Humpheria wrote:So, the truth? Okay.

Yes, we are obviously plotting against you. Seriously, why would I do that? What reason do I have to plot against Libertatem? You guys could learn from COIN. People from UCR and Libertatem are getting along there.

Hallo Island wrote:Yes, we are obviously plotting against you. Seriously, why would I do that? What reason do I have to plot against Libertatem? You guys could learn from COIN. People from UCR and Libertatem are getting along there.

Agreed.

Maybe we can unite UCR and Liberatetm Using COIN!

Albenia wrote:Maybe we can unite UCR and Liberatetm Using COIN!

Mhm.

Hallo Island wrote:Yes, we are obviously plotting against you. Seriously, why would I do that? What reason do I have to plot against Libertatem? You guys could learn from COIN. People from UCR and Libertatem are getting along there.

In a manner of speaking.

Albenia wrote:Maybe we can unite UCR and Liberatetm Using COIN!

Heh.

Hallo Island wrote:Mhm.

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:Heh.

And then once we are friends with UCR again...WE CAN BE FREINDS WITH THE INTERNATONALE

Albenia wrote:Maybe we can unite UCR and Liberatetm Using COIN!

Because that worked just so well the last time.

Albenia wrote:And then once we are friends with UCR again...WE CAN BE FREINDS WITH THE INTERNATONALE

NO

I'd start with being friends with at least one communist (without converting them) first.

Albenia wrote:And then once we are friends with UCR again...WE CAN BE FREINDS WITH THE INTERNATONALE

We could have one big pizza party! Only, Pizza comes from Italy, so since i suggested it they will scream fascists. Then the war would start all over again.

Hallo Island wrote:Yes, we are obviously plotting against you. Seriously, why would I do that? What reason do I have to plot against Libertatem? You guys could learn from COIN. People from UCR and Libertatem are getting along there.

I was obviously joking. You should remember that we tried to be nice to them. It didn't work. Also, we will never be able to rebuild or build a bridge to the UCR and Internationale, nor do I want to. They've both opened military hostilities to us.

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:I'd start with being friends with at least one communist (without converting them) first.

I'm friends with a lot of commies....so Yay!

Muh Roads wrote:Because that worked just so well the last time.

Maybe it could work if you guys didn't invade defenseless regions.

Hallo Island wrote:NO

Yah

Muh Roads wrote:We could have one big pizza party! Only, Pizza comes from Italy, so since i suggested it they will scream fascists. Then the war would start all over again.

see the Internationale isn't against Capitalism at all. Never have they raided a Capitalist region without good reason. They fight Fascists and thus I feel would be a good ally.

Humpheria wrote:I was obviously joking. You should remember that we tried to be nice to them. It didn't work. Also, we will never be able to rebuild or build a bridge to the UCR and Internationale, nor do I want to. They've both opened military hostilities to us.

....Darn it....Then lets break down the walls then build the bridges.

Albenia wrote:

Maybe it could work if you guys didn't invade defenseless regions.

We weren't exactly the best of friends even before communist beach.. oh and, that wasn't a 'Tatem op.

Albenia wrote:see the Internationale isn't against Capitalism at all. Never have they raided a Capitalist region without good reason. They fight Fascists and thus I feel would be a good ally.....Darn it....Then lets break down the walls then build the bridges.

Yea but they think were the fash. To which i LOL very hard at.

Albenia wrote:see the Internationale isn't against Capitalism at all. Never have they raided a Capitalist region[B] without good reason[/B].

How do you define good reason?

Muh Roads wrote:We weren't exactly the best of friends even before communist beach.. oh and, that wasn't a 'Tatem op.

...I KNOW IT WASN'T!

That was literally my whole defense. However everyone in UCR and Libertatem have argued my point saying it was members of our military.

Humpheria wrote:How do you define good reason?

Being attacked first or having an ally attacked. Not attacking an ally of your enemy if they aren't fighting.

Albenia wrote:Being attacked first or having an ally attacked. Not attacking an ally of your enemy if they aren't fighting.

Then if that is how you define it then you have no idea what you are talking about. The Red Fleet is arguably more militant than REATO and the Internationale is not open to even talking to someone from REATO that isn't a leftist in a right region. We are, we tried to be friends with the UCR, I remind you.

Humpheria wrote:Then if that is how you define it then you have no idea what you are talking about. The Red Fleet is arguably more militant than REATO and the Internationale is not open to even talking to someone from REATO that isn't a leftist in a right region. We are, we tried to be friends with the UCR, I remind you.

I never said anything about Mr. Red Fleet over there.

Not talking to someone from REATO isn't Militaristic at all.....and heck. They talk to me...I'm not a lefty.

Albenia wrote:I never said anything about Mr. Red Fleet over there.

Not talking to someone from REATO isn't Militaristic at all.....and heck. They talk to me...I'm not a lefty.

Stop. Right. There. Don't insult my intelligence. You are a self proclaimed "Social Democrat". You are a "lefty". And I'm not talking about the automatic ejection of REATO people. I'm talking about their military ops. Like taking over Benevolent Capitalism. Not a fair raid, but swooping in on defenders that did not even provoke them.

This is hardly something worth debate. It's not gonna happen.

Muh Roads wrote:This is hardly something worth debate. It's not gonna happen.

Besides, our Eternal Glorious Leader would be displeased. We don't want that.

Humpheria wrote:Stop. Right. There. Don't insult my intelligence. You are a self proclaimed "Social Democrat". You are a "lefty". And I'm not talking about the automatic ejection of REATO people. I'm talking about their military ops. Like taking over Benevolent Capitalism. Not a fair raid, but swooping in on defenders that did not even provoke them.

Okay....Let's calm down here. sensibly say this with no malice.

I am not insulting your intelligence. If you believe I am then I am sorry I have made you believe I am insulting your intellect. I was a self-proclaimed "Social democrat" until I admitted on this game that my original beliefs and policies were flawed and that Leftism wasn't good economically. I was unaware that the Internationale was behind that raid. I thought it was purely the region The Red Fleet.

Albenia wrote:Okay....Let's calm down here. sensibly say this with no malice.

I am not insulting your intelligence. If you believe I am then I am sorry I have made you believe I am insulting your intellect. I was a self-proclaimed "Social democrat" until I admitted on this game that my original beliefs and policies were flawed and that Leftism wasn't good economically. I was unaware that the Internationale was behind that raid. I thought it was purely the region The Red Fleet.

The Internationale is to The Red Fleet like 'Tatem is to REATO from what i understand. Not positive.

Albenia wrote:Okay....Let's calm down here. sensibly say this with no malice.

I am not insulting your intelligence. If you believe I am then I am sorry I have made you believe I am insulting your intellect. I was a self-proclaimed "Social democrat" until I admitted on this game that my original beliefs and policies were flawed and that Leftism wasn't good economically. I was unaware that the Internationale was behind that raid. I thought it was purely the region The Red Fleet.

The Red Fleet is an alliance similar to REATO which is led by, and mainly made up of, the Internationale.

Humpheria wrote:The Red Fleet is an alliance similar to REATO which is led by, and mainly made up of, the Internationale.

Muh Roads wrote:The Internationale is to The Red Fleet like 'Tatem is to REATO from what i understand. Not positive.

Oh....I was not aware the Red Fleet was an Alliance...

Humpheria wrote:The Red Fleet is an alliance similar to REATO which is led by, and mainly made up of, the Internationale.

Oh Humpy, I love it when you prove my point. <3

So radical Extremist time...

Then let's get REATO and The Red Fleet together!

Albenia wrote:So radical Extremist time...

Then let's get REATO and The Red Fleet together!

Why do you do this stuff? We have told you a thousand times that it is not happening and would not work. Just drop it.

Albenia wrote:So radical Extremist time...

Then let's get REATO and The Red Fleet together!

Or not.. ya know. That sounds better. Not. Knot. Tie. Business suit.

Muh Roads wrote:Besides, our Eternal Glorious Leader would be displeased. We don't want that.

Humpheria wrote:Why do you do this stuff? We have told you a thousand times that it is not happening and would not work. Just drop it.

I do it because it's an Ideal situation that we should try to make happen.

It's only not happening and wouldn't work because the regions won't sit down and try to get anything to happen.

Liberosia wrote:

Forget what Great Leader Kim Jong Lib wants.

Albenia wrote:Forget what Great Leader Kim Jong Lib wants.

B&

Albenia wrote:Forget what Great Leader Kim Jong Lib wants.

?!

Muh Roads wrote:B&

What does this mean?

Liberosia wrote:?!

What does this mean?

Kim Jong Lib....

I'm gonna start calling you that.

Or maybe Liberusolini

Albenia wrote:I do it because it's an Ideal situation that we should try to make happen.

It's only not happening and wouldn't work because the regions won't sit down and try to get anything to happen.

I'm sorry, but are you a complete idiot?

B AND B&

I've been on the internet too long..

Hallo Island wrote:I'm sorry, but are you a complete idiot?

....No. I'm a Radical Idealist at times.

Albenia wrote:....No. I'm a Radical Idealist at times.

.... so, an..... i-d-i-o-t....?

Albenia wrote:Kim Jong Lib....

I'm gonna start calling you that.

Or maybe Liberusolini

I am Italian

Albenia wrote:....No. I'm a Radical Idealist at times.

TTA, I'm sure you mean well. But besides the whole commie vs capi issue is that there is a long seated rivalry between the two. Setting aside our differences and making is not plausible, we don't have even the slightest bit of trust between us. I'm sure one would backstab the other, and by that i mean, they would backstab us.

Liberosia wrote:I am Italian

Liberusolinni it is then.

Albenia wrote:....No. I'm a Radical Idealist at times.

There is a difference between being a radical idealist and saying dumb things for attention.

Humpheria wrote:.... so, an..... i-d-i-o-t....?

No a Radical Idealist....

Muh Roads wrote:TTA, I'm sure you mean well. But besides the whole commie vs capi issue is that there is a long seated rivalry between the two. Setting aside our differences and making is not plausible, we don't have even the slightest bit of trust between us. I'm sure one would backstab the other, and by that i mean, they would backstab us.

I would never so anything I believed to be bad.....I guess I understand why you won't attenpt allying The Internationale.

Hallo Island wrote:There is a difference between being a radical idealist and saying dumb things for attention.

I don't say it for attention. I say it for reform.

Mr. Let's stop treating people with autism.

Albenia wrote:I don't say it for attention. I say it for reform.

Mr. Let's stop treating people with autism.

Shots fired.

The Chill Nation wrote:Join the Chill Nation today. We are your friends man, come on down and talk about how life is and lets enjoy this roller coaster together man!

Move to Somalia.

Albenia wrote:I don't say it for attention. I say it for reform.

Mr. Let's stop treating people with autism.

That isn't what I said. I said I don't see a point in wasting money schooling people who cannot use the education to give back to society.

Hallo Island wrote:That isn't what I said. I said I don't see a point in wasting money schooling people who cannot use the education to give back to society.

I said treating by accident....I apologize.

I meant to a ay paying money. I guess I thought Treating Autism and didn't re-read.

Hallo Island wrote:That isn't what I said. I said I don't see a point in wasting money schooling people who cannot use the education to give back to society.

Now there's radical idealism. But, I can't say I fully disagree. For a public school system that's a rather good point. But my Libertarian side says that the autistic students shouldn't be discriminated against. You made my head spin Hallo, gonna have to ponder this one.

By the by, I dislike public schools all together.

Muh Roads wrote:Now there's radical idealism. But, I can't say I fully disagree. For a public school system that's a rather good point. But my Libertarian side says that the autistic students shouldn't be discriminated against. You made my head spin Hallo, gonna have to ponder this one.

By the by, I dislike public schools all together.

We pay taxes so that what the government spends our money on will benefit the people in the future. If we are paying for humans to be educated so that they can use that education to give back to the community, how is educating people who cannot use that education not a waste of money?

Hallo Island wrote:We pay taxes so that what the government spends our money on will benefit the people in the future. If we are paying for humans to be educated so that they can use that education to give back to the community, how is educating people who cannot use that education not a waste of money?

That's not the only thing. We give tax dollars to them for the rest of their life. If not that then their families take care of them leaving less resources to go to the Children.

Hallo Island wrote:We pay taxes so that what the government spends our money on will benefit the people in the future. If we are paying for humans to be educated so that they can use that education to give back to the community, how is educating people who cannot use that education not a waste of money?

I wouldn't say that's entirely true though, seeing as public schools have special education classes where special needs students can learn some basic life skills that they might not get at home whilst parents are working.

Autism specifically, the kids need schooling. Infact, in rare cases autistic qualities have been reduced later in life, so that's not really wasted education.

Muh Roads wrote:I wouldn't say that's entirely true though, seeing as public schools have special education classes where special needs students can learn some basic life skills that they might not get at home whilst parents are working.

Autism specifically, the kids need schooling. Infact, in rare cases autistic qualities have been reduced later in life, so that's not really wasted education.

My school doesn't have special ed classes. ._.

Does anybody want to manage my regions that I have conquered for Libertatem?:

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=the_neo-confederate_states_of_america/detail=factbook/id=206268

What's worse for a economy taxes or regulations?

The Amarican Empire wrote:What's worse for a economy taxes or regulations?

Ooh, toughie. I would probably say regulations because taxes impact the general economic stance of a business, whilst regulations hurt a specific sale or product. In basic terms it's general or specific impact. Both are bad.

The Neo-Confederate States Of America wrote:Does anybody want to manage my regions that I have conquered for Libertatem?:

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=the_neo-confederate_states_of_america/detail=factbook/id=206268

WTF?

HOLY HELL THAT LIST!

HELL NO.....No no no no no!

I'd like to manage one?

Post self-deleted by Humpheria.

Methinks I may draft a "Commend REATO" resolution. I need points.

Humpheria wrote:Methinks I may draft a "Commend REATO" resolution. I need points.

I know it's been done, but I want to do it again.

Humpheria wrote:I know it's been done, but I want to do it again.

Are we speaking of a WA proposal, or for our own legislator to vote on

Security Council

Humpheria wrote:Security Council

Because the one world government, which is largely dominated by leftists, loves nothing more than celebrating the achievements of groups dedicated to eradicating communism.

Lack There Of wrote:Because the one world government, which is largely dominated by leftists, loves nothing more than celebrating the achievements of groups dedicated to eradicating communism.

The key to being a good annoying protester is consistency.

Humpheria wrote:The key to being a good annoying protester is consistency.

Well ya got me there

...I'd say no.

Mostly because I Don't see the good REATO has done. Maybe a Condemnation.

Lack There Of wrote:Because the one world government, which is largely dominated by leftists, loves nothing more than celebrating the achievements of groups dedicated to eradicating communism.

Albenia wrote:...I'd say no.

Mostly because I Don't see the good REATO has done. Maybe a Condemnation.

Case and point

Lack There Of wrote:Case and point

Well, I don't expect it to win. Of course our resident leftie wouldn't support it.

Humpheria wrote:Well, I don't expect it to win. Of course our resident leftie wouldn't support it.

...I admitted I was wrong about my Leftism..

Albenia wrote:...I admitted I was wrong about my Leftism..

But you are still the most liberal person here. And no matter how much you deny it, you may not be a comrade, but you are the closest thing we have to a Communist.

Humpheria wrote:But you are still the most liberal person here. And no matter how much you deny it, you may not be a comrade, but you are the closest thing we have to a Communist.

I thought we were all Classical Liberals?

Given I'm the only Centre-Left to Centrist to Centre-Right person in the region and everyone else here is economically Right-Wing I would be the most communist.

Assembled with Dot's Region Saver.
Written by Refuge Isle.