Post Archive

Region: Libertatem

History

So as it turns out I am not bisexual. (I don't think)

Pevvania wrote:*Kramer voice* "Oooh, it's coming, Jerry, it's coming!"

I don't think british accents mesh to well with Kramer's voice.

Albenia wrote:So as it turns out I am not bisexual. (I don't think)

When are you going to get your sh*t together?

Albenia wrote:So as it turns out I am not bisexual. (I don't think)

https://imgflip.com/i/an7sl

Pevvania wrote:I'm also happy to announce that [nation=short]The New United States[/nation] has come around to being appointed Manager of State. I consider his foreign policy experience, diplomatic tact and humility assets to the Department of State. We've already begun working on new ways to strengthen Libertatem and its position abroad.

I'm pleased to hear that he's accepted the position after all. I think he'll do a great job as Manager.

Albenia wrote:So as it turns out I am not bisexual. (I don't think)

You are obviously just hallosexual.

Godisdead wrote:I don't think british accents mesh to well with Kramer's voice.

Trust me, I do a killer impression of Kramer. And since I'm a former resident, American accents come quite easy to me.

Humpheria wrote:https://imgflip.com/i/an7sl

You're on fire with all these memes, aren't you?

Humpheria wrote:https://imgflip.com/i/an7sl

No. I trying to fix myself to put me more in line with my religion. So I simply went. "Hey. I'm straight. Not bi."

Albenia wrote:So as it turns out I am not bisexual. (I don't think)

And here's an accurate representation of my feelings regarding this statement

http://www.fugly.com/media/IMAGES/Random/literally_no_one_cares.jpg

Baphometus wrote:You are obviously just hallosexual.

...

...I can live with this. Hetero-Hallosexual

Albenia wrote:No. I trying to fix myself to put me more in line with my religion. So I simply went. "Hey. I'm straight. Not bi."

Cause that is exactly how it works.

Pevvania wrote:Trust me, I do a killer impression of Kramer. And since I'm a former resident, American accents come quite easy to me.

I demand you find some way to prove this. Also, we want to hear your accent.

Humpheria wrote:Cause that is exactly how it works.

...Yep. That's how I'm gonna do it.

Baphometus wrote:You are obviously just hallosexual.

Or tatemsexual - in other words, you have the hots for pretty much everyone here and want to be a part of Humphy's harem.

Lack There Of wrote:And here's an accurate representation of my feelings regarding this statement

http://www.fugly.com/media/IMAGES/Random/literally_no_one_cares.jpg

I spit out my Dr. Pepper.

Godisdead wrote:When are you going to get your sh*t together?

Lmao... It's part of his personality, politically and sexually he changes every other week ;P

Albenia wrote:No. I trying to fix myself to put me more in line with my religion. So I simply went. "Hey. I'm straight. Not bi."

AHHHHHHHHHHH THAT ISN'T HOW IT F*CKING WORKS

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:Or tatemsexual - in other words, you have the hots for pretty much everyone here and want to be a part of Humphy's harem.

...

Hetero-Tatemsexual?

Albenia wrote:No. I trying to fix myself to put me more in line with my religion. So I simply went. "Hey. I'm straight. Not bi."

That doesn't work that way, like at all.

Godisdead wrote:I demand you find some way to prove this. Also, we want to hear your accent.

Pev, make a youtube video. But, don't show your face. That makes it weird.

The Silver Bloods wrote:Lmao... It's part of his personality, politically and sexually he changes every other week ;P

SILVER DIE IN A HOLE!

Baphometus wrote:AHHHHHHHHHHH THAT ISN'T HOW IT F*CKING WORKS

I know. But if I lie to myself enough It will.

The Silver Bloods wrote:Lmao... It's part of his personality, politically and sexually he changes every other week ;P

True dat

Humpheria wrote:I spit out my Dr. Pepper.

You have committed heresy; how could anyone spit out the greatest beverage in existence?

Godisdead wrote:That doesn't work that way, like at all.

I'm straight.

Humpheria wrote:I spit out my Dr. Pepper.

Welcome to the internet

Lack There Of wrote:And here's an accurate representation of my feelings regarding this statement

http://www.fugly.com/media/IMAGES/Random/literally_no_one_cares.jpg

oh my god

Albenia wrote:SILVER DIE IN A HOLE!

*lives on hill* ._. Take that...

Albenia wrote:I'm straight.

Let me get this straight - you're straight?

Godisdead wrote:That doesn't work that way, like at all.

Why not?

The Silver Bloods wrote:*lives on hill* ._. Take that...

SILVER. IF YOU DON'T SHUT UP. I SWEAR I WILL SWITCH ACCOUNTS AND GET YOU IN CFN.

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:True dat

You have committed heresy; how could anyone spit out the greatest beverage in existence?

I FREACKING LOVE DR.PEPPER. And, now apparently, I love CI too.

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:Let me get this straight - you're straight?

Nah, that's not in his blood XP He's bi-something or other

Humpheria wrote:Pev, make a youtube video. But, don't show your face. That makes it weird.

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:Let me get this straight - you're straight?

Yes. And actually. I'm going to eat some food then take a nap. So goodnight.

Humpheria wrote:I FREACKING LOVE DR.PEPPER. And, now apparently, I love CI too.

I need to grab myself another can. Just finished one a few minutes ago.

The Silver Bloods wrote:Nah, that's not in his blood XP He's bi-something or other

....Hetero-CFNTatemsexual

Albenia wrote:SILVER DIE IN A HOLE!

I know. But if I lie to myself enough It will.

NO NO NO YOU ARE INCORRECT

The Silver Bloods wrote:Nah, that's not in his blood XP He's bi-something or other

Wait. Waitaiwaitwait.

1. Bisexual, horse attraction

2. Bisexual, no horse attraction

3. Straight, no horse attraction

Albenia wrote:Yes. And actually. I'm going to eat some food then take a nap. So goodnight.

It's 1:32pm Time, this is why you shouldn't pull all-nighters ;P

Humpheria wrote:Wait. Waitaiwaitwait.

1. Bisexual, horse attraction

2. Bisexual, no horse attraction

3. Straight, no horse attraction

Albenia wrote:

I know. But if I lie to myself enough It will.

No, then you will be sexually repressed and like kill yourself or something.

Humpheria wrote:Pev, make a youtube video. But, don't show your face. That makes it weird.

Maybe I'll use an online voice recorder or something. We'll see :)

Baphometus wrote:NO NO NO YOU ARE INCORRECT

Y-

Humpheria wrote:Wait. Waitaiwaitwait.

1. Bisexual, horse attraction

2. Bisexual, no horse attraction

3. Straight, no horse attraction

Yeah. Im still attracted to a certain horse....Silver can tell you about that as I must sleep.

The Silver Bloods wrote:It's 1:32pm Time, this is why you shouldn't pull all-nighters ;P

Shut up.

Goodnight

Albenia wrote:Yes. And actually. I'm going to eat some food then take a nap. So goodnight.

Surely you can't be serious?

You're not straight, just delirious

At the least you're bi-curious

With horses, you're experienced

https://imgflip.com/i/an808

Pevvania wrote:Maybe I'll use an online voice recorder or something. We'll see :)

Ooooooooh.

Baphometus wrote:NO NO NO YOU ARE INCORRECT

Prove it

Godisdead wrote:No, then you will be sexually repressed and like kill yourself or something.

No, no... You see you have to make sense out of his weird fetishes. He will try to "self-hypnotize" or convince himself that he doesn't like certain things but he likes this weird fake rape thing where he is on the receiving end... So no matter what he always likes them. True Fact. ;P Lol

Pevvania wrote:Maybe I'll use an online voice recorder or something. We'll see :)

CFN uses Skype :p

Works pretty good for us.

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:Surely you can't be serious?

You're not straight, just delirious

At the least you're bi-curious

With horses, you're very experienced in your dreams

The Silver Bloods wrote:CFN uses Skype :p

Works pretty good for us.

You guys only get like three percent of my wisecracks here. On skype you get the full package.

Post self-deleted by Baphometus.

Lack There Of wrote:Prove it

Lack...

I have wasted a good 3 years trying to not be homosexual.

https://imgflip.com/i/an86p

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:You just broke the cadence

;P Well he had numerous adventures with horses in his dreams

The Silver Bloods wrote:;P Well he had numerous adventures with horses in his dreams

NOWHERE NEAR MY HORSES!

Godisdead wrote:You guys only get like three percent of my wisecracks here. On skype you get the full package.

You guys only get like 3 percent of my sexual harassment here. On skype you would get the whole package...

If you know what I mean

Distraction!

http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=304475

Humpheria wrote:NOWHERE NEAR MY HORSES!

He doesn't respect the law ._. He wants to strike down consensual sex laws

Baphometus wrote:Lack...

I have wasted a good 3 years trying to not be homosexual.

"Wasted" is a subjective term. I fail to see how I could not choose to be gay if I so desired, nor how you could choose to be straight if you so desired. We're humans blessed with the ability to make our own choices based on whatever reasoning we can come up with. If one individual is attracted to another then what's the issue of gender. Honestly the whole labels of "straight" and "gay" are really just restraints used by militant factions of both groups to polarize themselves and ignore the reality of the matter.

Who are you going to vote for this August? A man of morals and convictions, like Humpheria? Or someone who changes his ideologies and sexualities like his laundry?

I'm Humpheria, and I approve this message.

*This message was paid for and approved by [B]Humpheria 2014*[/B]*

Support Humpheria 2014*, the only campaign that bothered making an RP.

Humpheria wrote:Who are you going to vote for this August? A man of morals and convictions, like Humpheria? Or someone who changes his ideologies and sexualities like his laundry?

I'm Humpheria, and I approve this message.

*This message was paid for and approved by [B]Humpheria 2014*[/B]*

Wait, I thought our President was supposed to handle regional laundry duty.

Miencraft wrote:Support Humpheria 2014*, the only campaign that bothered making an RP.

Lack There Of wrote:"Wasted" is a subjective term. I fail to see how I could not choose to be gay if I so desired, nor how you could choose to be straight if you so desired. We're humans blessed with the ability to make our own choices based on whatever reasoning we can come up with. If one individual is attracted to another then what's the issue of gender. Honestly the whole labels of "straight" and "gay" are really just restraints used by militant factions of both groups to polarize themselves and ignore the reality of the matter.

This is the most ignorant thing anyone has ever said to me.

Lack There Of wrote:"Wasted" is a subjective term. I fail to see how I could not choose to be gay if I so desired, nor how you could choose to be straight if you so desired. We're humans blessed with the ability to make our own choices based on whatever reasoning we can come up with. If one individual is attracted to another then what's the issue of gender. Honestly the whole labels of "straight" and "gay" are really just restraints used by militant factions of both groups to polarize themselves and ignore the reality of the matter.

Have you ever seen a gay person say it was a choice? No? There's your proof.

Lack, do me a favor and drink this mug full of shut up. Desire has nothing to do with it; take it from an uneasy asexual.

Gay people can't be attracted to women like you can't be attracted to a grody fat chick with leprosy and an Iq of 54.

I'm....................... gonna go get some Dr. Pepper.

Humpheria wrote:I'm....................... gonna go get some Dr. Pepper.

Cheers! *holds up can of Dr P*

...Heh. DRP.

Godisdead wrote:Gay people can't be attracted to women like you can't be attracted to a grody fat chick with leprosy and an Iq of 54.

Well if your attraction is based off a persons physical entity then we are basing our definitions of attraction on different premises.

Lack There Of wrote:Well if your attraction is based off a persons physical entity then we are basing our definitions of attraction on different premises.

Because the premises do vary due to individual perception. That's something you're failing to understand here.

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:Because the premises do vary due to individual perception. That's something you're failing to understand here.

That's what I'm saying, sorry if I didn't get that out there properly. My issue was hallo saying TTA can't just choose who he's attracted to. To just say well I'm only attracted to a certain group so everyone can only be attracted to a certain group is rather silly. TTA can choose to be attracted to what ever he wants, just like anyone else

Lack There Of wrote:Well if your attraction is based off a persons physical entity then we are basing our definitions of attraction on different premises.

So, you are saying you could be attracted to anyone in the whole world? Because I couldn't .

Godisdead wrote:So, you are saying you could be attracted to anyone in the whole world? Because I couldn't .

Nor could I.

Godisdead wrote:So, you are saying you could be attracted to anyone in the whole world? Because I couldn't .

In a way. I'm saying as a sentiment individual who can make choices for yourself you have the ability to decide what you are or are not attracted to.

Lack There Of wrote:In a way. I'm saying as a sentiment individual who can make choices for yourself you have the ability to decide what you are or are not attracted to.

Well, I don't. And I am straight.

What's the next Board Race?

Pevvania wrote:What's the next Board Race?

3 RWN vs. CI

Y'know, I just noticed that CI isn't on the map.

Lack There Of wrote:In a way. I'm saying as a sentiment individual who can make choices for yourself you have the ability to decide what you are or are not attracted to.

Tell me, Lack.Can you tell me what you were doing when you had the conscience thought "I like women. I'm straight." When did you make that choice. Because I can't tell you when I did.

Another argument against communism.

According to Nozick's theory of demoktesis, democracy effectively makes each man a partial shareholder to everyone else, whereas the stockbroker is the people as the collective.

Communism, which seeks to establish workplace democracy, doesn't give the worker the full value of his labor back, since his labor is subject to vote (he in effect becomes a company share). Therefore, despite becoming a partial owner of property, man still doesn't own his labor, and thus taxation is replaced by the ownership of labor-shares.

Collective ownership of labor-shares, that is.

Humpheria wrote:Tell me, Lack.Can you tell me what you were doing when you had the conscience thought "I like women. I'm straight." When did you make that choice. Because I can't tell you when I did.

You would be correct to assume I never had a realization that i was straight. It never occurred to me to think in such a manner. When I happened upon one of the most intriguing individuals I have ever met I made it a goal to spend time with this individual. It so happens she is female. I'm not really one to get into sexual attraction to be honest. So perhaps I was dropped on my head as a kid, but I just can't seem to fathom wanting to base a meaningful relationship on physical characteristics.

Republic Of Minerva wrote:Another argument against communism.

According to Nozick's theory of demoktesis, democracy effectively makes each man a partial shareholder to everyone else, whereas the stockbroker is the people as the collective.

Communism, which seeks to establish workplace democracy, doesn't give the worker the full value of his labor back, since his labor is subject to vote (he in effect becomes a company share). Therefore, despite becoming a partial owner of property, man still doesn't own his labor, and thus taxation is replaced by the ownership of labor-shares.

That's more of an indictment against socialism, but damning nevertheless.

Lack There Of wrote:You would be correct to assume I never had a realization that i was straight. It never occurred to me to think in such a manner. When I happened upon one of the most intriguing individuals I have ever met I made it a goal to spend time with this individual. It so happens she is female. I'm not really one to get into sexual attraction to be honest. So perhaps I was dropped on my head as a kid, but I just can't seem to fathom wanting to base a meaningful relationship on physical characteristics.

So....... you didn't choose to be straight. So, how would it be fair to assume that Hallo and TTA chose to be gay?

Pevvania wrote:That's more of an indictment against socialism, but damning nevertheless.

Good point

Humpheria wrote:So....... you didn't choose to be straight. So, how would it be fair to assume that Hallo and TTA chose to be gay?

I apologize if it wasn't clear before, I maintain the position that individuals have the capability to choose who they are attracted to. Wether that be male or female is irrelevant.

Pevvania wrote:That's more of an indictment against socialism, but damning nevertheless.

You can't really indict fiction

I prefer to look at that Cap. vs. Soc. argument as when a Capitalist fails in the sale of a product, they improve it. When a Socialist fails in the sale of a product, they force the populace to buy it through passing laws.

Liberosia wrote:You can't really indict fiction

DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN

Humpheria wrote:I prefer to look at that Cap. vs. Soc. argument as when a Capitalist fails in the sale of a product, they improve it. When a Socialist fails in the sale of a product, they force the populace to buy it through passing laws.

That's a rather simplistic view, and pretty much only applies to "market socialists," imo.

Republic Of Minerva wrote:That's a rather simplistic view, and pretty much only applies to "market socialists," imo.

I enjoy simplicity. Complexity is a waste of time.

Humpheria wrote:I prefer to look at that Cap. vs. Soc. argument as when a Capitalist fails in the sale of a product, they improve it. When a Socialist fails in the sale of a product, they force the populace to buy it through passing laws.

Ie bailing out a failing auto company only to see them produce a miserably inadequate product in the years after the prop up.

Republic Of Minerva wrote:That's a rather simplistic view, and pretty much only applies to "market socialists," imo.

It's also a metaphor. Capitalists improve (anything, market or otherwise), socialists force themselves.

Assembled with Dot's Region Saver.
Written by Refuge Isle.