Post Archive

Region: Libertatem

History

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:We're currently trying to get all of our allies to lend some support to an endangered region so we can get them to refound. And then we'll have to do it all over again for a different ally. Long story.

Ill help. Why not?

Pevvania wrote:Welcome, Ankha.

TG me about this.

Thanks for the welcome.

If anyone wants to read the issue I wrote, great!

http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=295404

Humpheria wrote:Operation Open House (sending aid to NBE) has been scrapped.

I consider this action to be unfaithful to our allies, regardless of how you may think of them. I had already discussed what I would like to see what happen to make the venture a bit quicker and easier, but have not heard back any response.

Please do not talk of this topic on the RMB any further.

Ankhora wrote:Ill help. Why not?Thanks for the welcome.

If anyone wants to read the issue I wrote, great!

http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=295404

ehhhhh I don't know if I can trust you 100% yet, and I'd suggest telegraming the president or board first. Generally only Libertatem citizens enlisted in the military can help, as well as trusted allies abroad. I think we could let it slide provided you can bring something more of value to the table, but check in with the higher powers first.

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:I'm talking with the Executive Council in the FFS right now. Even if they do accept your proposal to defend NBE, they won't have very much manpower to spare, and any aid they do provide would be insignificant in the long run, most likely. I'll give you an update if something happens, but give them time for their deliberation.

Just saw this. Swell.

Republic Of Minerva wrote:I consider this action to be unfaithful to our allies, regardless of how you may think of them. I had already discussed what I would like to see what happen to make the venture a bit quicker and easier, but have not heard back any response.

Please do not talk of this topic on the RMB any further.

ehhhhh I don't know if I can trust you 100% yet, and I'd suggest telegraming the president or board first. Generally only Libertatem citizens enlisted in the military can help, as well as trusted allies abroad. I think we could let it slide provided you can bring something more of value to the table, but check in with the higher powers first.

Im offering help, and Im offering my experience and Im offering my databases. You guys have a bad history when I offer my help...

Ankhora wrote:Im offering help, and Im offering my experience and Im offering my databases. You guys have a bad history when I offer my help...

Very well. As per ARMA, Ill give you my recommendation, but let me first talk to a couple other people before we spill any beans. After that I'll telegram you.

Ok, cool. Also, have you guys seen UCR lately....*smiles*

Republic Of Minerva wrote:I compare the situation in UCR to a zoo with two exhibits of monkeys flinging feces at each other.

And the "dred" people just bring to mind a bunch of trolls who conquer regions through their incredible tactics at trolling and dividing people (which seem to be highly successful). Either that or bored Rastafarians. You decide.

The Dreds are morons.

We saw. The only reason I revived Lawless, in fact.

Ankhora wrote:The Dreds are morons.

this gives me an idea...

Yes, and I got to talk to the non-jerk Lawless...XD

Republic Of Minerva wrote:this gives me an idea...

Perhaps the idea I had 3 months ago, knowing you...it is the idea you warmongeror...

http://img2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20110805230705/nazizombiesplus/images/e/e6/UMAD_DOG.png

Id appreciate it if you guys had time to read this..If you do:

http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=295404

Post self-deleted by Ankhora.

Dred Destroyer Model 2 wrote:guess i'm all along :(

You should go.

Ankhora wrote:Dred.

why does this always happen to me. I'm NOT I REPEAT NOT ASSOCIATED WITH DRED!!!

Shot in the dark: your name is DRED destroyer. Which implies that you are a destroyer for the Dreds.

Humpy speaks the truth.

Humpheria wrote:Shot in the dark: your name is DRED destroyer. Which implies that you are a destroyer for the Dreds.

NO...I named my self that because I dedicated myself to getting rid of the little buggers.

look if it makes you guess happy I will come here wit a diffrent named puppet.

Good morning, Libertatem! The radio is back on the air, and playing today is Livin' On a Prayer by Bon Jovi.

Pevvania wrote:Good morning, Libertatem! The radio is back on the air, and playing today is Livin' On a Prayer by Bon Jovi.

Take my hand, and we'll make it I swear! Woah-oh! Living on a prayer!

Now playing - Land of Confusion, by Genesis. Very good song.

Pevvania wrote:Now playing - Land of Confusion, by Genesis. Very good song.

I'm caring so much for the environment right now.

I think that a Draft should be in the bill just in case we get in a big war.

I am opposed to the idea of a draft (plus, it really isn't feasible the way our region is organized), but you could count on everyone in the active forces to mobilize for war.

Speaking of which, I will no longer have a WA nation, for various reasons. (I'm better at strategy than I am at timing, anyway.)

I don't think a draft is needed right now.

I would think that a draft contradicts the values that the region was founded upon, anyway.

Would there be any objections to Lesbia joining this region

The more the merrier.

Northern Prussia wrote:Would there be any objections to Lesbia joining this region

None at all.

May I inquire into to the Nay votes, Rot and NP. I know Hallo voted against because he'll vote against anything written by a member of the RLP.

Ill give my rants when I have a computer, Mr. Vice President.

Alright. See you then. I hope we can have a civil debate though, I don't feel like character attacks today.

The New United States wrote:I would think that a draft contradicts the values that the region was founded upon, anyway.

Indeed. Libertarians have ALWAYS been anti-draft.

http://archives.library.wisc.edu/uw-archives/exhibits/protests/draftcardburning.jpg

None at all. There are just too many flaws in the act for me to vote for. Like I said once I get on a computer

Humpheria wrote:May I inquire into to the Nay votes, Rot and NP. I know Hallo voted against because he'll vote against anything written by a member of the RLP.

I believe I already stated my position on this bill.

Yeah you hate it because you hate anything that is conceived by someone who is a part of that big mean RLP, and then you covered your motives by claiming it was a power expansion. Because everything is a power expansion. This post is a power expansion. I'm a power expansion, you're a power expansion, we're all power expansions. Yay!

Calm down there, Oprah. There might be more to his reasoning than merely petty hatred of a party, but I still feel it pales in comparison to the good that this bill could do.

Humpheria wrote:Yeah you hate it because you hate anything that is conceived by someone who is a part of that big mean RLP, and then you covered your motives by claiming it was a power expansion. Because everything is a power expansion. This post is a power expansion. I'm a power expansion, you're a power expansion, we're all power expansions. Yay!

Excuse me, I believe that I have the right to vote on bill without being ridiculed for my vote, and I would like it if you would please respect that right.

Humpheria wrote:Yeah you hate it because you hate anything that is conceived by someone who is a part of that big mean RLP, and then you covered your motives by claiming it was a power expansion. Because everything is a power expansion. This post is a power expansion. I'm a power expansion, you're a power expansion, we're all power expansions. Yay!

He whines about power expansions while he accepts a new position that muh roads created for him.

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:Calm down there, Oprah. There might be more to his reasoning than merely petty hatred of a party, but I still feel it pales in comparison to the good that this bill could do.
There really isn't any more reasoning.

Hallo Island wrote:Excuse me, I believe that I have the right to vote on bill without being ridiculed for my vote, and I would like it if you would please respect that right.

No, you don't. Freedom of speech.

Hallo Island wrote:Excuse me, I believe that I have the right to vote on bill without being ridiculed for my vote, and I would like it if you would please respect that right.

Right? Not in this instance; we practice free speech here, and entitlement is for liberals.

Expectation? Yeah, probably - sorry for giving you a hard time.

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:Right? Not in this instance; we practice free speech here, and entitlement is for liberals.

Expectation? Yeah, probably - sorry for giving you a hard time.

You would expect more from the vice president...

http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=6268101

Hallo Island wrote:You would expect more from the vice president...

Didn't I say no character attacks today? You are using a weapon of a losing argument that is commonly used by those who have no where else to go.

Hallo Island wrote:You would expect more from the vice president...

Indeed. There is no rationale for this petty assault.

Even if he has a misconceived hatred towards our party, attacking him just lowers you to the same level.

Godisdead wrote:He whines about power expansions while he accepts a new position that muh roads created for him. There really isn't any more reasoning.

What position did Muh give him?

The New United States wrote:Indeed. There is no rationale for this petty assault.

Even if he has a misconceived hatred towards our party, attacking him just lowers you to the same level.

Attacking him is different than pointing out the flaws in his position. If I was attacking him, it would be much different. The post you replied to, however, was an example of a veiled attack.

The New United States wrote:Indeed. There is no rationale for this petty assault.

Even if he has a misconceived hatred towards our party, attacking him just lowers you to the same level.

As I said, that form of argumentum ad hominem is commonly used as a last resort in an argument by someone who seeks to maintain a higher station than his opponent. It is also commonly used to quickly end an argument so that the fallacious side may quote "end on a high note".

As for the rationale:

http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=6268101

Humpheria wrote:What position did Muh give him?

Deputy of internal affairs.

Apparently I can't vote nay on anything without being harassed by the vice president.

Didn't harass you, addressed your argument. The argument that can be found here: http://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=6268101

Godisdead wrote:Deputy of internal affairs.

But expansion is bad.

Humpheria wrote:But expansion is bad.

I know.

Humpheria wrote:But expansion is bad.

Only unnecessary expansion.

Hallo Island wrote:Only unnecessary expansion.

Oh, so it's different as long as it's Hallo who gets more power. Good that got cleared up.

Hallo Island wrote:Only unnecessary expansion.

Please, tell me how your position is necessary.

The position was created for a contingency as an adviser and possible successor for the Manager. It is necessary, but so is the others.

Godisdead wrote:Please, tell me how your position is necessary.

Because Muh has a very difficult job, and needs help.

the real question is; would you still think the position was necessary if you were replaced?

So, the decision has already been made, on who takes the Deputy position(s)?

As far as I know, Muh was the only one getting a deputy. CI has his Diplomatic Corps. And Minerva's staff would be established with GMR.

Humpheria wrote:As far as I know, Muh was the only one getting a deputy. CI has his Diplomatic Corps. And Minerva's staff would be established with GMR.

Oh, I was referring just to Muh's Deputy. He had said that he might choose two, and I hadn't heard anything about his decision, until now.

It is miencraft and I.

Hallo Island wrote:It is miencraft and I.

Yup.

Sowwy TNUS. Wish you well in other ventures.

Northern Prussia wrote:Bureaucracy!!!

burucrucy

So I really can't wait for the congressional baseball game.

Post by Repsac Ii suppressed by a moderator.

Repsac Ii wrote:YOU ARE ABOUT TO BE RAIDED BY COALITION OF DEMOCRATIC NATIONS!! JUST A WARNING!!!

It's six hours from the update, but whatever.

3 minutes ago: Repsac II relocated from Libertatem to Black Mesa Islands.

3 minutes ago: Repsac II lodged a message on the Libertatem Regional Message Board.

3 minutes ago: Repsac II relocated from Imperium of the Wolf to Libertatem.

4 minutes ago: Repsac II lodged a message on the Imperium of the Wolf Regional Message Board.

4 minutes ago: Repsac II relocated from Equilism to Imperium of the Wolf.

4 minutes ago: Repsac II lodged a message on the Equilism Regional Message Board.

4 minutes ago: Repsac II relocated from Hellenic Civilization to Equilism.

5 minutes ago: Repsac II lodged a message on the Hellenic Civilization Regional Message Board.

5 minutes ago: Repsac II relocated from The Communist Region to Hellenic Civilization.

5 minutes ago: Repsac II lodged a message on the The Communist Region Regional Message Board.

suuure we are. Just like everyone else.

I'd advise somebody to go over to The Coalition of Democratic Nations and sort whatever this is out, as I am sure it is fake but just in case.

Repsac Ii wrote:YOU ARE ABOUT TO BE RAIDED BY COALITION OF DEMOCRATIC NATIONS!! JUST A WARNING!!!

I am [nation=short]Quevola[/nation], founder of The Coalition Of Democratic Nations.

We are very sorry about this. This is a lie. Repsac II has been causing problems and spreading misinformation to other regions.

Please disregard Repsac's message and resume your normal day.

Thank you,

[nation=short]Quevola[/nation], founder of The Coalition Of Democratic Nations

Repsac Ii wrote:YOU ARE ABOUT TO BE RAIDED BY COALITION OF DEMOCRATIC NATIONS!! JUST A WARNING!!!

What did that guy think he would accomplish.

Sorry for the inactivity today. Been fighting with trailer lights for quite awhile.

Deputys, I will have the information I promised out to you soon.

I chose two deputies for a few reasons.

1. Three heads are better than one

2. Chances are better for one of us to be active throughout the day

3. So there is no one replacement in emergency situations, the two can act together accordingly.

Muh Roads wrote:3. So there is no one replacement in emergency situations, the two can act together accordingly.

Or they could duke it our Mortal Kombat style and one of them will become king.

I've been gone so long. Somebody tell me what the hell happened.

Miencraft wrote:Yup.

Sowwy TNUS. Wish you well in other ventures.

It's quite alright, friend. I suppose I was the least qualified applicant, or I just did poorly on the application.

Either way, congratulations to you and Hallo!

The New United States wrote:Why're we at DEFCON 3?

threats, suspicious puppets, nothing imminent but we are just on edge regardless.

The New United States wrote:It's quite alright, friend. I suppose I was the least qualified applicant, or I just did poorly on the application.

Either way, congratulations to you and Hallo!

Actually you all did quite well. The decision was a hard one.

Einsiev wrote:I've been gone so long. Somebody tell me what the hell happened.

Einsiev!

Einsiev wrote:I've been gone so long. Somebody tell me what the hell happened.

Stahp it just stay here ples.

Seriously, nice to see you're back.

WHY SO INACTIVE M8's?

People are realizing they have mothers.

Assembled with Dot's Region Saver.
Written by Refuge Isle.