Post Archive
Region: Libertatem
Why?
Not to rash either way. Didn't really grant citizenship.
He's protecting them. So, obviously he wants them to stay around.
eweweeweweweeeweweweweweeweweweweweweweweweweweweweweewwewnewewewewewewewewewwewewewewewewewewewewewewewewewewewewwww
That better not be a ball pit....
I will run for Seat One of the Board under the RLP. Disregard my previous announcement.
So Renegalis, Funkytopia and Right-winged Nation will fight for the control of the third seat ?
I think that it will be better to dispatch your candidacies on other seats like seat 4 which is actually non-occupied.
I thought so too.
Amarican is running for Seat #4.
Cum party...???
Pfffffftttt...... XD
Ok, great news. I didn't see that.
Actually, Amarican's announcement can't be thought about until he returns. He's left the region.
The beauty of helping people is strong. Helping a Feed the City project to package food for poor people in my city.
That's the way to do it!
We don't have that program here but I do that with a business. It really is a great thing to do. I used to do it all the time, but now I only do it about once a month. It feels great helping people.
If everyone pitched in and helped the helpless, we wouldn't need half of the current government.
If half of the government was gone then people would have more money to help the helpless. People also sometimes think that they have done their part by paying taxes.
This is my first opportunity. I of course try to do this stuff frequently.
Lets see we've got over 400 people and we're packaging 2,100 boxes.
Damn. Great job, guys!
#privatesectorefficancy
#privatesectorefficiency
#publicsectorinnefficiency
#libertatemcansavetheworld
Lol I love you.
Y'all this isn't Private Sector or Public sector debate.
This is simply people helping other people.
It is, though. You have proven that you can help other people out without wastefully shelling out other people's tax dollars.
And you are doing it more efficiently in the private sector then the public sector could ever do it.
He's leaaarniiing!~
Not to mention socialism destroys the concept of giving and charity....
Fair points all around.
I have indeed.
#TTA4PrezzyPrezofAmerica
That brings up a good question. Although I am a Libertarian, if I ran for President tomorrow, it would be as a Republican.
TTA, would you run as Republican or Democrat because I feel like you are a little bit both ways.
You'll be treated as Ron Paul was treated...
That is a tough question...
Republicans are obviously more sensible, but Democrats incorporate more of my policies.
I'd say....Democrat Party as a more Moderate candidate.
Tta is more of a democrat.
Hopefully, by the time I run for President (roughly 2040), Libertarians are a majority party.
Shame most Democratic candidates are idiots.
I support a more moderate welfare, moderate immigration reform, Guns and most of their social policies besides abortions.
And when I was just starting to think that there was hope for you.
I don't actually know if I'd really vote Libertarian....depends on the candidate.
They are my closest leaning party though.
Then Democrats
I'm just waiting for the day one of the states near here (because obviously it'll never happen in NY) turns yellow.
O and I am running for 4 as an independent. CHUM is a really inappropriate name for a party and it was really immature of me to even call the party that.
You were under Hallo's influence and he was mad at Pev, no worries.
Do you think Rand Paul has his chance for 2016 ?
I heard that Bush was a serious competitor, and Clinton seems unfortunately on the mood for the presidency.
Hallo....ruined the MPA. ...dang him and his cult.
Remember when people were worried there'd be a Kennedy dynasty?
You know how nobody's worried about the Bush or Clinton ones?
I'd be.
I think he has as good a chance as anybody. Hillary, Bush, and Paul decided they were going to try to be President a long time ago. They will run.
He does have a chance. But he should really get a better hair cut.
He was great for RLP business, tho.
He has a chance. He is making buddies in the Senate with the establishment.
Bush has a chance, but unfortunately, his last name will affect his chances. Clinton only has steam because she can be a potential first woman president, people don't care for more than that. I also heard many Democrats are backing Elizabeth Warren.
Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaas
And after aboutb1 and a half hours we've finished.
But don't we already have a woman in office?
A LOT of Dems are backing Warren.
Lol o mein.
Gender identity issues don't count.
Oh, God...please no...
Who is better Warren or Clinton? Hmmm
Magnum.
I mean the Democrats aren't that bad.... it's the people that end up running or the face of the democratic party that's bad.
Warren is a renown socialist. Clinton, although probably a socialist deep down, hasn't admitted it. I'd rather have Clinton.
When faced with that question the answer is:
A plane ticket to New Zealand.
It's doubtful she'll run, especially against Clinton. The good news is that by the next time the chance comes around, Warren will be far too old to run again.
In all likelihood, Clinton will win the presidency and pursue the third-way economic policy of her husband's second term (loosen regulation on business while at the time increasing funding of the welfare state). Overall, Clinton be an improvement over Obama, since it's in the interest of the Clinton legacy to leave a strong economy.
Pets been slacking. The party registry still says president pev is leader of rlp.
Manager Pev still is. He just needs to change the one word.
Why not your precious france?
I have not been slac-
*Sees Pev towards end*
Nevermind.
Politically, France is not the place to go for economic freedom. New Zealand is. France is still my 2nd favorite country.
Honhonhon, baguette-paree land baguette non pour tou baguette paree honhonhon
Tread lightly, Mr. President.
How is it even possible ?
I'm french and France is not even in my top 20 favorite countries.
This country is completely fuc*ed up. I'm happy to be away now.
It is beautiful, and I've only had positive experiences.
I thought you were from Northern Europe. Netherlands or something.
I'm not allowed to be in NK. :'(
They allowed me in NK....that's the funny part.
Well, I was kicked out after Bloodia said: "I don't think Tsar should be here."
[Even though we were all in peaceful debate]
I can't give an oppinion, because Bloodia reports me when I do... Funny because it's never against site-rules.
I can't deny that. That's the only positive thing about France.
But there are plenty beautiful countries in Europe, even if France is probably one of the most diversified.
Tsar don't blame Bloodia, you were ejected because the head of the military suggested it. Your undemocratic anti-communist actions in UCR are well known. Shame.
O ya the times where tsar becomes totalitarian for a few weeks then goes back to normal in a cycle.
NK drama....
^
Good thing us Anti-Imperialists...are united.
all hail the head of military
you know what that's called? junta
Yeah, the time Tsar gave the commies a taste of their own medicine... it was glorious.
That's okay Tsar, you're welcome here, as far as I'm concerned! :)
Btw/ I saw your back and forth on DK's RMB- you made a very good case contrasting statist-leftism and left-libertarianism. I recommend anyone curious about Bookchin's communalism to take a peek.
Why'd he have to leave?
Some past issues id what I saw.
I have extended a private hand of debate to North Korea. I'm not interested in submitting to them like TTA, but we need a good, healthy debate. So if any of them come over here, please be civil and try to prove them wrong, not childishness.
No, the North Korea dude.
Did somebody call THE MINISTER OF PROPAGANDA?
whoop whoop
I don't know then.
This is a great idea. If we open both borders up for discussion!
We've never been against discussion. Liberosia used to debate V Ming and other Communists all the time. Additionally, there has never been any laws against Commies debating us, I was just informing them. The War on Communism is still a thing.
So, I'm watching Dr. Phil (I have middle-aged, stay at home wife phases sometimes) and they're talking about Honey Boo Boo. And two thoughts run through my head. 1. Why was this ever a thing.
2. Why did it take this long to stop it from being a thing.
1) I have no idea, it is like they wanted some stupid pageant reality show, and then, after seeing the success of Duck Dynasty, decided to bring some 'redneck' into it.
2) Honestly, we have to ask the networks. It is mysterious too me. I think it ran on the 'shock factor' of the show and people just watched it because it was just....THAT bad.
I to sometimes end up watching Dr. Phil. We should form a support group.
Did you see the one with the Narcasists? The most egotistical of them all called herself "Ghandi"... *facepalm*
Thank you.
Unfortunatly, 4years hasn't had the time to reply my last arguement. Hopefully he does sometime so we could get back into it.
Actually, I was ridding the region of a truely hypocritical undemocratic and coercive regime that I let slip through my fingers. Shame should rather be put on Marxist-Leninist statist and bourgeois tactics, in their abandoning of the revolutionary movement as a movement by the working class to destroy Capitalism AND (ML's seem to forget this) Hierarchal social relations.
Even if you guys wouldn't agree with Bookchin economically, I would recomend "Listen, Marxist!" It's a great read.
Post self-deleted by Humpheria.
Attorney General's Act
Section I
Purpose of the Act
Subsection I
Reform the Office of the Attorney General
Subsection II
Establish Attorney General elections
Subsection III
Clarify Attorney General's Duties
Section II
Reform the Office of the Attorney General
Subsection I
The Office of the Attorney General will be henceforth referenced as the OAG in this legislation, not on an official capacity
Subsection II
The OAG shall be consist of the Attorney General, Deputy Prosecutor, and Deputy Policy Attorney
Subsection III
The Deputy Prosecutor shall be appointed by the AG and shall assist them in civil trials and suits, they can hold any other office
Subsection IV
The Deputy Policy Attorney shall be appointed by the AG and shall assist them in defending existing, passed legislation, thay can hold any other office
Subsection V
In the case of a Conflict of Interest for either Deputies, they will be put on leave for the trial or case in which they are conflicted by interest
Section III
Establish Attorney General elections
Subsection I
The AG shall henceforth be an elected non-partisan official, they can hold a legislative Board position only
Subsection II
The election shall be held in the period of two days before the first of every three months
Subsection III
The third election months shall fall on the second month of the Presidential term (ie. Presidential Term: Sept, Oct, Nov - AG Term: Oct, Nov, Dec)
Subsection IV
The AG shall be term limited to three consecutive terms
Section IV
Clarify Attorney General's Duties
Subsection I
The AG shall defend all existing, passed legislation except in the case of the President directly ordering them otherwise
Subsection II
The AG shall rule on the legality of proposed legislation
Subsection III
When an existing piece of legislation's legality is challenged, the AG shall defend it, unless otherwise directed (see S. IV SS. I)
Subsection IV
The OAG shall report to the Office of the President, the President is the executive supervisor of the OAG
Subsection V
The AG shall be responsible for structuring and prosecuting all civil suits and trials
Subsection VI
In the case of a conflict of interest, the Deputy Prosecutor shall serve as the Prosecutor
Authored By: Humpheria
I motion that the House vote on the Attorney General's Act. Do I hear a second?
Assembled with Dot's Region Saver.
Written by Refuge Isle.