Post Archive

Region: Libertatem

History

Jordsindia wrote:Why?

Not to rash either way. Didn't really grant citizenship.

The Warring States Of The Mediterranean wrote:Not to rash either way. Didn't really grant citizenship.

He's protecting them. So, obviously he wants them to stay around.

Jordsindia wrote:Opinions on Obama's executive action?

eweweeweweweeeweweweweweeweweweweweweweweweweweweweweewwewnewewewewewewewewewwewewewewewewewewewewewewewewewewewewwww

Miencraft wrote:Fine.

You're going in the hole, RRRG gets the pit.

That better not be a ball pit....

I will run for Seat One of the Board under the RLP. Disregard my previous announcement.

So Renegalis, Funkytopia and Right-winged Nation will fight for the control of the third seat ?

I think that it will be better to dispatch your candidacies on other seats like seat 4 which is actually non-occupied.

Yrellian Confederacy wrote:So Renegalis, Funkytopia and Right-winged Nation will fight for the control of the third seat ?

I think that it will be better to dispatch your candidacies on other seats like seat 4 which is actually non-occupied.

I thought so too.

Yrellian Confederacy wrote:So Renegalis, Funkytopia and Right-winged Nation will fight for the control of the third seat ?

I think that it will be better to dispatch your candidacies on other seats like seat 4 which is actually non-occupied.

Amarican is running for Seat #4.

The Amarican Empire wrote:I will run for seat 4. Under the cum party.

Cum party...???

Pfffffftttt...... XD

Funkytopia wrote:Amarican is running for Seat #4.

Ok, great news. I didn't see that.

Actually, Amarican's announcement can't be thought about until he returns. He's left the region.

The beauty of helping people is strong. Helping a Feed the City project to package food for poor people in my city.

The Warring States Of The Mediterranean wrote:The beauty of helping people is strong. Helping a Feed the City project to package food for poor people in my city.

That's the way to do it!

The Warring States Of The Mediterranean wrote:The beauty of helping people is strong. Helping a Feed the City project to package food for poor people in my city.

We don't have that program here but I do that with a business. It really is a great thing to do. I used to do it all the time, but now I only do it about once a month. It feels great helping people.

If everyone pitched in and helped the helpless, we wouldn't need half of the current government.

Humpheria wrote:If everyone pitched in and helped the helpless, we wouldn't need half of the current government.

If half of the government was gone then people would have more money to help the helpless. People also sometimes think that they have done their part by paying taxes.

Humpheria wrote:We don't have that program here but I do that with a business. It really is a great thing to do. I used to do it all the time, but now I only do it about once a month. It feels great helping people.

This is my first opportunity. I of course try to do this stuff frequently.

Lets see we've got over 400 people and we're packaging 2,100 boxes.

The Warring States Of The Mediterranean wrote:Lets see we've got over 400 people and we're packaging 2,100 boxes.

Damn. Great job, guys!

The Warring States Of The Mediterranean wrote:Lets see we've got over 400 people and we're packaging 2,100 boxes.

#privatesectorefficancy

The Amarican Empire wrote:#privatesectorefficancy

#privatesectorefficiency

Humpheria wrote:#privatesectorefficiency

#publicsectorinnefficiency

Jordsindia wrote:#publicsectorinnefficiency

#libertatemcansavetheworld

Humpheria wrote:#privatesectorefficiency

Lol I love you.

Y'all this isn't Private Sector or Public sector debate.

This is simply people helping other people.

The Warring States Of The Mediterranean wrote:Y'all this isn't Private Sector or Public sector debate.

This is simply people helping other people.

It is, though. You have proven that you can help other people out without wastefully shelling out other people's tax dollars.

The Warring States Of The Mediterranean wrote:Y'all this isn't Private Sector or Public sector debate.

This is simply people helping other people.

And you are doing it more efficiently in the private sector then the public sector could ever do it.

Humpheria wrote:It is, though. You have proven that you can help other people out without wastefully shelling out other people's tax dollars.

He's leaaarniiing!~

Humpheria wrote:It is, though. You have proven that you can help other people out without wastefully shelling out other people's tax dollars.

Not to mention socialism destroys the concept of giving and charity....

Fair points all around.

Humpheria wrote:It is, though. You have proven that you can help other people out without wastefully shelling out other people's tax dollars.

I have indeed.

The Warring States Of The Mediterranean wrote:Fair points all around. I have indeed.

#TTA4PrezzyPrezofAmerica

Humpheria wrote:#TTA4PrezzyPrezofAmerica

That brings up a good question. Although I am a Libertarian, if I ran for President tomorrow, it would be as a Republican.

TTA, would you run as Republican or Democrat because I feel like you are a little bit both ways.

Humpheria wrote:That brings up a good question. Although I am a Libertarian, if I ran for President tomorrow, it would be as a Republican.

TTA, would you run as Republican or Democrat because I feel like you are a little bit both ways.

You'll be treated as Ron Paul was treated...

Humpheria wrote:That brings up a good question. Although I am a Libertarian, if I ran for President tomorrow, it would be as a Republican.

TTA, would you run as Republican or Democrat because I feel like you are a little bit both ways.

That is a tough question...

Republicans are obviously more sensible, but Democrats incorporate more of my policies.

I'd say....Democrat Party as a more Moderate candidate.

Tta is more of a democrat.

Hopefully, by the time I run for President (roughly 2040), Libertarians are a majority party.

The Amarican Empire wrote:Tta is more of a democrat.

Shame most Democratic candidates are idiots.

I support a more moderate welfare, moderate immigration reform, Guns and most of their social policies besides abortions.

The Warring States Of The Mediterranean wrote:Shame most Democratic candidates are idiots.

I support a more moderate welfare, moderate immigration reform, Guns and most of their social policies besides abortions.

And when I was just starting to think that there was hope for you.

Humpheria wrote:Hopefully, by the time I run for President (roughly 2040), Libertarians are a majority party.

I don't actually know if I'd really vote Libertarian....depends on the candidate.

They are my closest leaning party though.

Then Democrats

Humpheria wrote:Hopefully, by the time I run for President (roughly 2040), Libertarians are a majority party.

I'm just waiting for the day one of the states near here (because obviously it'll never happen in NY) turns yellow.

O and I am running for 4 as an independent. CHUM is a really inappropriate name for a party and it was really immature of me to even call the party that.

The Amarican Empire wrote:O and I am running for 4 as an independent. CHUM is a really inappropriate name for a party and it was really immature of me to even call the party that.

Miencraft wrote:He's leaaarniiing!~

The Amarican Empire wrote:O and I am running for 4 as an independent. CHUM is a really inappropriate name for a party and it was really immature of me to even call the party that.

You were under Hallo's influence and he was mad at Pev, no worries.

Do you think Rand Paul has his chance for 2016 ?

I heard that Bush was a serious competitor, and Clinton seems unfortunately on the mood for the presidency.

Humpheria wrote:You were under Hallo's influence and he was mad at Pev, no worries.

Hallo....ruined the MPA. ...dang him and his cult.

Yrellian Confederacy wrote:Do you think Rand Paul has his chance for 2016 ?

I heard that Bush was a serious competitor, and Clinton seems unfortunately on the mood for the presidency.

Remember when people were worried there'd be a Kennedy dynasty?

You know how nobody's worried about the Bush or Clinton ones?

I'd be.

Yrellian Confederacy wrote:Do you think Rand Paul has his chance for 2016 ?

I heard that Bush was a serious competitor, and Clinton seems unfortunately on the mood for the presidency.

I think he has as good a chance as anybody. Hillary, Bush, and Paul decided they were going to try to be President a long time ago. They will run.

Yrellian Confederacy wrote:Do you think Rand Paul has his chance for 2016 ?

I heard that Bush was a serious competitor, and Clinton seems unfortunately on the mood for the presidency.

He does have a chance. But he should really get a better hair cut.

The Warring States Of The Mediterranean wrote:Hallo....ruined the MPA. ...dang him and his cult.

He was great for RLP business, tho.

Yrellian Confederacy wrote:Do you think Rand Paul has his chance for 2016 ?

I heard that Bush was a serious competitor, and Clinton seems unfortunately on the mood for the presidency.

He has a chance. He is making buddies in the Senate with the establishment.

Bush has a chance, but unfortunately, his last name will affect his chances. Clinton only has steam because she can be a potential first woman president, people don't care for more than that. I also heard many Democrats are backing Elizabeth Warren.

The Amarican Empire wrote:He does have a chance. But he should really get a better hair cut.

Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaas

And after aboutb1 and a half hours we've finished.

Jordsindia wrote:Clinton only has steam because she can be a potential first woman president, people don't care for more than that.

But don't we already have a woman in office?

Jordsindia wrote:He has a chance. He is making buddies in the Senate with the establishment.

Bush has a chance, but unfortunately, his last name will affect his chances. Clinton only has steam because she can be a potential first woman president, people don't care for more than that. I also heard many Democrats are backing Elizabeth Warren.

A LOT of Dems are backing Warren.

Miencraft wrote:But don't we already have a woman in office?

Lol o mein.

Miencraft wrote:But don't we already have a woman in office?

Gender identity issues don't count.

Humpheria wrote:A LOT of Dems are backing Warren.

Oh, God...please no...

Who is better Warren or Clinton? Hmmm

The Amarican Empire wrote:Who is better Warren or Clinton? Hmmm

Magnum.

I mean the Democrats aren't that bad.... it's the people that end up running or the face of the democratic party that's bad.

The Amarican Empire wrote:Who is better Warren or Clinton? Hmmm

Warren is a renown socialist. Clinton, although probably a socialist deep down, hasn't admitted it. I'd rather have Clinton.

The Amarican Empire wrote:Who is better Warren or Clinton? Hmmm

When faced with that question the answer is:

A plane ticket to New Zealand.

Humpheria wrote:A LOT of Dems are backing Warren.

It's doubtful she'll run, especially against Clinton. The good news is that by the next time the chance comes around, Warren will be far too old to run again.

In all likelihood, Clinton will win the presidency and pursue the third-way economic policy of her husband's second term (loosen regulation on business while at the time increasing funding of the welfare state). Overall, Clinton be an improvement over Obama, since it's in the interest of the Clinton legacy to leave a strong economy.

Pets been slacking. The party registry still says president pev is leader of rlp.

The Amarican Empire wrote:Pets been slacking. The party registry still says president pev is leader of rlp.

Manager Pev still is. He just needs to change the one word.

Humpheria wrote:When faced with that question the answer is:

A plane ticket to New Zealand.

Why not your precious france?

The Amarican Empire wrote:Pets been slacking. The party registry still says president pev is leader of rlp.

I have not been slac-

*Sees Pev towards end*

Nevermind.

The Amarican Empire wrote:Why not your precious france?

Politically, France is not the place to go for economic freedom. New Zealand is. France is still my 2nd favorite country.

Humpheria wrote:Politically, France is not the place to go for economic freedom. New Zealand is. France is still my 2nd favorite country.

Honhonhon, baguette-paree land baguette non pour tou baguette paree honhonhon

Miencraft wrote:Honhonhon, baguette-paree land baguette non pour tou baguette paree honhonhon

Tread lightly, Mr. President.

Humpheria wrote:Politically, France is not the place to go for economic freedom. New Zealand is. France is still my 2nd favorite country.

How is it even possible ?

I'm french and France is not even in my top 20 favorite countries.

This country is completely fuc*ed up. I'm happy to be away now.

Yrellian Confederacy wrote:How is it even possible ?

I'm french and France is not even in my top 20 favorite countries.

This country is completely fuc*ed up. I'm happy to be away now.

It is beautiful, and I've only had positive experiences.

Yrellian Confederacy wrote:How is it even possible ?

I'm french and France is not even in my top 20 favorite countries.

This country is completely fuc*ed up. I'm happy to be away now.

I thought you were from Northern Europe. Netherlands or something.

I'm not allowed to be in NK. :'(

Communal Coat wrote:I'm not allowed to be in NK. :'(

They allowed me in NK....that's the funny part.

The Warring States Of The Mediterranean wrote:They allowed me in NK....that's the funny part.

Well, I was kicked out after Bloodia said: "I don't think Tsar should be here."

[Even though we were all in peaceful debate]

I can't give an oppinion, because Bloodia reports me when I do... Funny because it's never against site-rules.

Humpheria wrote:It is beautiful, and I've only had positive experiences.

I can't deny that. That's the only positive thing about France.

But there are plenty beautiful countries in Europe, even if France is probably one of the most diversified.

Tsar don't blame Bloodia, you were ejected because the head of the military suggested it. Your undemocratic anti-communist actions in UCR are well known. Shame.

O ya the times where tsar becomes totalitarian for a few weeks then goes back to normal in a cycle.

Good thing us Anti-Imperialists...are united.

all hail the head of military

you know what that's called? junta

Yeah, the time Tsar gave the commies a taste of their own medicine... it was glorious.

That's okay Tsar, you're welcome here, as far as I'm concerned! :)

Btw/ I saw your back and forth on DK's RMB- you made a very good case contrasting statist-leftism and left-libertarianism. I recommend anyone curious about Bookchin's communalism to take a peek.

Why'd he have to leave?

Humpheria wrote:Why'd he have to leave?

Some past issues id what I saw.

I have extended a private hand of debate to North Korea. I'm not interested in submitting to them like TTA, but we need a good, healthy debate. So if any of them come over here, please be civil and try to prove them wrong, not childishness.

The Warring States Of The Mediterranean wrote:Some past issues id what I saw.

No, the North Korea dude.

Did somebody call THE MINISTER OF PROPAGANDA?

whoop whoop

Humpheria wrote:No, the North Korea dude.

I don't know then.

Humpheria wrote:I have extended a private hand of debate to North Korea. I'm not interested in submitting to them like TTA, but we need a good, healthy debate. So if any of them come over here, please be civil and try to prove them wrong, not childishness.

This is a great idea. If we open both borders up for discussion!

The Warring States Of The Mediterranean wrote:I don't know then. This is a great idea. If we open both borders up for discussion!

We've never been against discussion. Liberosia used to debate V Ming and other Communists all the time. Additionally, there has never been any laws against Commies debating us, I was just informing them. The War on Communism is still a thing.

So, I'm watching Dr. Phil (I have middle-aged, stay at home wife phases sometimes) and they're talking about Honey Boo Boo. And two thoughts run through my head. 1. Why was this ever a thing.

2. Why did it take this long to stop it from being a thing.

Humpheria wrote:So, I'm watching Dr. Phil (I have middle-aged, stay at home wife phases sometimes) and they're talking about Honey Boo Boo. And two thoughts run through my head. 1. Why was this ever a thing.

2. Why did it take this long to stop it from being a thing.

1) I have no idea, it is like they wanted some stupid pageant reality show, and then, after seeing the success of Duck Dynasty, decided to bring some 'redneck' into it.

2) Honestly, we have to ask the networks. It is mysterious too me. I think it ran on the 'shock factor' of the show and people just watched it because it was just....THAT bad.

Humpheria wrote:So, I'm watching Dr. Phil (I have middle-aged, stay at home wife phases sometimes) and they're talking about Honey Boo Boo. And two thoughts run through my head. 1. Why was this ever a thing.

2. Why did it take this long to stop it from being a thing.

I to sometimes end up watching Dr. Phil. We should form a support group.

Did you see the one with the Narcasists? The most egotistical of them all called herself "Ghandi"... *facepalm*

Funkytopia wrote:Yeah, the time Tsar gave the commies a taste of their own medicine... it was glorious.

That's okay Tsar, you're welcome here, as far as I'm concerned! :)

Btw/ I saw your back and forth on DK's RMB- you made a very good case contrasting statist-leftism and left-libertarianism. I recommend anyone curious about Bookchin's communalism to take a peek.

Thank you.

Unfortunatly, 4years hasn't had the time to reply my last arguement. Hopefully he does sometime so we could get back into it.

State Socialism wrote:Tsar don't blame Bloodia, you were ejected because the head of the military suggested it. Your undemocratic anti-communist actions in UCR are well known. Shame.

Actually, I was ridding the region of a truely hypocritical undemocratic and coercive regime that I let slip through my fingers. Shame should rather be put on Marxist-Leninist statist and bourgeois tactics, in their abandoning of the revolutionary movement as a movement by the working class to destroy Capitalism AND (ML's seem to forget this) Hierarchal social relations.

Funkytopia wrote:Yeah, the time Tsar gave the commies a taste of their own medicine... it was glorious.

That's okay Tsar, you're welcome here, as far as I'm concerned! :)

Btw/ I saw your back and forth on DK's RMB- you made a very good case contrasting statist-leftism and left-libertarianism. I recommend anyone curious about Bookchin's communalism to take a peek.

Even if you guys wouldn't agree with Bookchin economically, I would recomend "Listen, Marxist!" It's a great read.

Post self-deleted by Humpheria.

Attorney General's Act

Section I

Purpose of the Act

Subsection I

Reform the Office of the Attorney General

Subsection II

Establish Attorney General elections

Subsection III

Clarify Attorney General's Duties

Section II

Reform the Office of the Attorney General

Subsection I

The Office of the Attorney General will be henceforth referenced as the OAG in this legislation, not on an official capacity

Subsection II

The OAG shall be consist of the Attorney General, Deputy Prosecutor, and Deputy Policy Attorney

Subsection III

The Deputy Prosecutor shall be appointed by the AG and shall assist them in civil trials and suits, they can hold any other office

Subsection IV

The Deputy Policy Attorney shall be appointed by the AG and shall assist them in defending existing, passed legislation, thay can hold any other office

Subsection V

In the case of a Conflict of Interest for either Deputies, they will be put on leave for the trial or case in which they are conflicted by interest

Section III

Establish Attorney General elections

Subsection I

The AG shall henceforth be an elected non-partisan official, they can hold a legislative Board position only

Subsection II

The election shall be held in the period of two days before the first of every three months

Subsection III

The third election months shall fall on the second month of the Presidential term (ie. Presidential Term: Sept, Oct, Nov - AG Term: Oct, Nov, Dec)

Subsection IV

The AG shall be term limited to three consecutive terms

Section IV

Clarify Attorney General's Duties

Subsection I

The AG shall defend all existing, passed legislation except in the case of the President directly ordering them otherwise

Subsection II

The AG shall rule on the legality of proposed legislation

Subsection III

When an existing piece of legislation's legality is challenged, the AG shall defend it, unless otherwise directed (see S. IV SS. I)

Subsection IV

The OAG shall report to the Office of the President, the President is the executive supervisor of the OAG

Subsection V

The AG shall be responsible for structuring and prosecuting all civil suits and trials

Subsection VI

In the case of a conflict of interest, the Deputy Prosecutor shall serve as the Prosecutor

Authored By: Humpheria

I motion that the House vote on the Attorney General's Act. Do I hear a second?

Assembled with Dot's Region Saver.
Written by Refuge Isle.