Post Archive

Region: Libertatem

History

Pangaean Debating Emissary wrote:Lol, that wasn't Marx who wrote that.

Oh, right! It was only Engels who called for the wholesale slaughter of entire "reactionary peoples."

Engels wasn't that important in developing Marxist theory, amirite?

Miencraft, Kings Island, Pevvania

The New United States wrote:Oh, right! It was only Engels who called for the wholesale slaughter of entire "reactionary peoples."

Engels wasn't that important in developing Marxist theory, amirite?

I'm uncertain about the role of Engels in the creation of Marxism, but I know that he financially helped Marx.

The American Empire In Libertatem wrote:I love Washington DC. I would move there if it were not so expensive.

Meh. The Mall is nice, but the rest of the city seems rather dull. Too many tightly compressed office buildings for my tastes. The awful gun laws and high murder rates aren't too appealing either.

The New United States wrote:Oh, right! It was only Engels who called for the wholesale slaughter of entire "reactionary peoples."

Engels wasn't that important in developing Marxist theory, amirite?

I am going to try to word my response carefully so you don't misunderstand me, I will just tell you one thing first, parts of that are taken out of context and are also translated badly (original was in German).

Pangaean Debating Emissary wrote:I am going to try to word my response carefully so you don't misunderstand me, I will just tell you one thing first, parts of that are taken out of context and are also translated badly (original was in German).

Both Marx and Engels looked down upon Jews, Poles and Eastern Europeans as inferior races.

Pevvania wrote:Both Marx and Engels looked down upon Jews, Poles and Eastern Europeans as inferior races.

I think that Marx had a Jewish father who converted to Christianity. (I think he was forced to)

Rateria wrote:I think that Marx had a Jewish father who converted to Christianity. (I think he was forced to)

Which made it all the more strange. Marx was embarrassed of his heritage, and viewed Jews as ruthless capitalists whose real god was money. An early work of his, On the Jewish Question, is considered to be one of the "classic early works of antisemitic propaganda" by scholars.

Proudhon was such a great anarchist, he tried to set up a national bank that would've created baseless fiat money, and would have been funded by an income tax on businessmen and bankers! Boy, he really fought against the state!

Kings Island, The New United States, Hallo Island

Pevvania wrote:Meh. The Mall is nice, but the rest of the city seems rather dull. Too many tightly compressed office buildings for my tastes. The awful gun laws and high murder rates aren't too appealing either.

Yeah, the ghetto part is pretty unpleasant. When Midland and I marched in a parade there on Memorial Day, while driving in, we saw a homeless man urinate into a cup and then proceed to drink his own urine.

Pevvania, Humpheria

Woah, NS++ has been fixed.

Looking at other "anarchists" on the internet makes me very thankful and grateful that Murray Rothbard came onto the scene when he did. If he had not, virtually the entire "anarchist" community would be populated by anarcho-statists that vilify free expression and voluntary interactions.

What are your opinions on Noam Chomsky and anarcho-syndicism?

Miencraft wrote:Woah, NS++ has been fixed.

Just a month after it broke. How efficient.

Pevvania wrote:Just a month after it broke. How efficient.

One of these days I'm gonna learn how to code and just fix NS++ for myself whenever it breaks.

Oh, but this is a thing: "Seconds ago:46:50+0000" data-epoch="1438192010" title="7/29/2015, 1:46:50 PM">Seconds ago:"

Fejanstein wrote:What are your opinions on Noam Chomsky and anarcho-syndicism?

Communes are a type of state.

Kings Island wrote:Communes are a type of state.

I'm not entirely sure I agree.... theres no centralised government, everyone can participate in decision making?

Fejanstein wrote:What are your opinions on Noam Chomsky and anarcho-syndicism?

I know little about anarcho-syndicalism, but Chomsky is a fraud who advocates violently banning porn, trade and guns, along with everything else he doesn't like. He's your typical anarcho-statist.

Kings Island wrote:Communes are a type of state.

Depends on the commune, to be honest. But I reject the idea that the institutionalised use of force, no matter how localised or decentralised, is anything less than coercion. Feudalism was decentralised, after all.

Fejanstein wrote:I'm not entirely sure I agree.... theres no centralised government, everyone can participate in decision making?

The fact that there is a decision which is being inforced makes it a state.

For example, Robb is a candlemaker who lives in Snallton. Smallton decides to hold their yearly smallfest, and they decide that they want some commemorative candles.

Upon hearing Robb's price, they say that the candles will be for the good of the town and vote to make him give free candles. "This is illegal seizure!", Robb says. And everyone cries; "There's no centralised government, you all have a vote".

Pevvania, Rateria

Personally, I believe anarcho-communism would also quickly degenerate to mob rule. A small, night watchman state is necessary for the protection of life, liberty, and property.

The New United States, Republic Of Minerva

Kings Island wrote:Personally, I believe anarcho-communism would also quickly degenerate to mob rule. A small, night watchman state is necessary for the protection of life, liberty, and property.

*anarcho-capitalism

I think communes are the best way to ensure democracy, a night-watchman state could easily be dictatorial, and without more involvement from the public, resources can be siphoned off to leadership.

Post by Pheeblan suppressed by a moderator.

Pheeblan wrote:This whole region is disgusting. Don't call yourselves "Liberty" if you are just a bunch of capitalist sh!t-for-brains

A Free Market combined with a democratic small government allows maximum individual freedom of people....

Rateria

Fejanstein wrote:I think communes are the best way to ensure democracy, a night-watchman state could easily be dictatorial, and without more involvement from the public, resources can be siphoned off to leadership.

A night watchman state with that kind of money is not a night watchman state.

Frankly, the public has a history of repressing individual liberties. Democracy only serves to suppress minority rights. Republicanism or strictly limited monarchy is the way. To quote Ron Swanson;

"To me, the ideal government is one guy sitting in a room, who has no power other than deciding when to launch the nukes. He would be chosen by some kind of IQ test. Women would be brought to him, sometimes."

I love Ron Swanson.

Post by Pheeblan suppressed by a moderator.

Pheeblan wrote:This whole region is disgusting. Don't call yourselves "Liberty" if you are just a bunch of capitalist sh!t-for-brains

Property is an essential liberty, and your comment is disgusting. We don't tolerate ad homenum attacks.

Is there some way to send a formal complaint to his government?

Rateria

Pheeblan wrote:And businesses failing everywhere, Low quality food and corruption

Corruption requires a state. The larger the state, the more corrupt.

Low quality food is due to government corn subsidies, which makes the meat and sweet diet unnaturally cheaper than healthy food.

Businesses are destroyed by regulation and taxes.

Post by Pheeblan suppressed by a moderator.

Post by Pheeblan suppressed by a moderator.

If you're going to come here just to insult people, you can move right along.

Pheeblan wrote:We need to make a sequel to ATLA where there are truth benders. (You would be the strongest one) and thanks for bombarding me like fox news.

Fox News is horribly biased. I watch BBC World News and Al Jazeera.

Everything I listed is true. You talk about poor diets. In the US, the government subsidizes big agriculture. Hence why corn and beef are unnaturally cheap. Why do you think a hamburger is cheaper than a raddish? Because the market is awful and we have to blame it for everything?

Explain to me how corruption can exist without government. Please.

Small business fails and multinational companies succeed because of government intervention. Walmart has consistently lobbied for the minimum wage to be increased, because they know it would drive local stores into the ground.

Multinational corporations evade corporate taxes or can afford to pay them. Small, mom and pop establishments can not.

Pheeblan wrote:This whole region is disgusting. Don't call yourselves "Liberty" if you are just a bunch of capitalist sh!t-for-brains

Did you come here to debate with us or to spew verbal-feces at us through our RMB?

If the former, then it's evident that you lost the argument before you even decided to post here, based on the fact you've failed to do anything but throw vitriol at us.

If the latter, then I'd suggest to you that you'd be spending your time more wisely if you were to begin reading a book, instead of unintelligently vomiting your rhetoric all over our RMB.

Miencraft, Rateria

Pheeblan wrote:This whole region is disgusting. Don't call yourselves "Liberty" if you are just a bunch of capitalist sh!t-for-brains

At least capitalism has more freedoms than communism.

Pevvania, Rateria, The American Empire In Libertatem, Wovenland

Pheeblan wrote:This whole region is disgusting. Don't call yourselves "Liberty" if you are just a bunch of capitalist sh!t-for-brains

Pheeblan wrote:And businesses failing everywhere, Low quality food and corruption

Those are the two dumbest posts I've read all week, particularly the second one. How does it feel being economically illiterate?

Miencraft, Rateria

Pevvania wrote:Those are the two dumbest posts I've read all week, particularly the second one. How does it feel being economically illiterate?

i'm guessing you're not including your own posts, in which you unironically use the term "anarcho-statist" like that means anything, at all, in reality

Yelsim wrote:i'm guessing you're not including your own posts, in which you unironically use the term "anarcho-statist" like that means anything, at all, in reality

Listen man, if you believe in the uninitiated use of force in society, then you're a pretty awful anarchist. I use "anarcho-statist" for people who claim to be anarchists but support state programs like national banks and welfare programs. You either support the rollback of the state or you don't. I concede that some anarchists can be anti-capitalist, such as left-wing market anarchists, but for many anti-cap anarchists, they are blinded by their hatred of capitalism to believe in any meaningful reductions in government. Zeouria, for example, is one of the many "anarchists" who wishes the US would prefer nationalisation of the healthcare industry to Obamacare. That is not an anarchist position whatsoever.

Yelsim wrote:i'm guessing you're not including your own posts, in which you unironically use the term "anarcho-statist" like that means anything, at all, in reality

Misley, I know you don't like us but that guy was being incredibly rude. His first comment was an insult, and he responded to our points with more insults.

Kings Island wrote:Misley, I know you don't like us but that guy was being incredibly rude. His first comment was an insult, and he responded to our points with more insults.

Many leftists think that capitalism would somehow collapse without the state. This couldn't be further from the truth. Perhaps the greatest evidence that capitalism is inherently anti-statist is the fact that it rose as a reaction to feudalism, the monarchy and coercive taxation (if you consider the western world after the crisis of the 14th Century to be capitalism).

Miencraft, Rateria

Pevvania wrote:Many leftists think that capitalism would somehow collapse without the state. This couldn't be further from the truth. Perhaps the greatest evidence that capitalism is inherently anti-statist is the fact that it rose as a reaction to feudalism, the monarchy and coercive taxation (if you consider the western world after the crisis of the 14th Century to be capitalism).

I'm no leftist, but I'm forced to agree. In my opinion, and stateless society would quickly degenerate to mob rule. That's why I'm a minarchist.

The American Empire In Libertatem

A US-based Vietnamese rapper is making waves for the single 'F**k Communism'. Comments in English are talking about how Communism is good, the Vietnamese comments are generally commending this rapper for his bravery and speaking out against their indoctrination.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnWxFIH4_dE

It's a catchy song.

Welcome back [nation=short]Kentuck[/nation]!

Post by Pheeblan suppressed by a moderator.

Pheeblan wrote:Well, here come the blind american patriots who think communism is always some kind of evil dictatorship.

Are you going to debate or just spout meaningless insults?

If it's the latter, you can leave.

Rateria

Post by Pheeblan suppressed by a moderator.

Pheeblan wrote:Well, here come the blind american patriots who think communism is always some kind of evil dictatorship.

Communism cannot be achieved via any other way. And we are neither blind, nor wholly American, nor necessarily patriots.

Rateria

I am an American patriot and communism is not always an evil dictatorship.

Condealism wrote:It's okay, we can escape to Gay Texas. :P

Seriously, though, welcome back.

Love you too bud.

Yrellian Confederacy wrote:I'll be in Boston for the next 3 weeks. Do you guys have any good address, place to visit etc ?

There's a steakhouse called Louie's that is amazing.

The American Empire In Libertatem wrote:I am an American patriot and communism is not always an evil dictatorship.

It is also the widespread fantasy of uneducated teens....I would know. But when it comes down to it, it's just not right.

Hallo Island

Pevvania wrote:Many leftists think that capitalism would somehow collapse without the state. This couldn't be further from the truth. Perhaps the greatest evidence that capitalism is inherently anti-statist is the fact that it rose as a reaction to feudalism, the monarchy and coercive taxation (if you consider the western world after the crisis of the 14th Century to be capitalism).

...capitalism's origins have really no influence on whether or not it can be practiced without a state. It originated as an anti-feudalist ideal, not an anti-statist one. Show me any early capitalist calling for the abolition of the state.

More importantly, how can you abolish the Weberian state (a monopoly on violence over a given area) and maintain private property? All anarcho-capitalism does is privatize or decentralize the state extremely. It does not abolish the use of force to defend private ownership of the means of production. This realization is what made me abandon anarcho-capitalism, because it would degenerate into cronyist statism or simply be overthrown by organized labor. The former is more likely.

One can salvage their free market and individualist values and still be an anarchist by supporting left-wing market anarchism (agorism or mutualism).

Pevvania wrote:Communism cannot be achieved via any other way. And we are neither blind, nor wholly American, nor necessarily patriots.

Except evil dictatorships have never achieved it, and all the times it has been practiced throughout history, it was by anarchists or Paleolithic tribes. So...

Rateria, The American Empire In Libertatem

Capitalist Democracy wrote:At least capitalism has more freedoms than communism.

Err...no. Communism is certainly a more free socioeconomic system than capitalism.

However, many of the Marxist attempts to create socialist states before transitioning into communism have been less free than capitalism. To quote Benjamin Tucker on State Socialism:

"Capitalism is at least tolerable, which cannot be said of [State] Socialism..."

The American Empire In Libertatem

The New Sea Territory wrote:...capitalism's origins have really no influence on whether or not it can be practiced without a state. It originated as an anti-feudalist ideal, not an anti-statist one. Show me any early capitalist calling for the abolition of the state.

More importantly, how can you abolish the Weberian state (a monopoly on violence over a given area) and maintain private property? All anarcho-capitalism does is privatize or decentralize the state extremely. It does not abolish the use of force to defend private ownership of the means of production. This realization is what made me abandon anarcho-capitalism, because it would degenerate into cronyist statism or simply be overthrown by organized labor. The former is more likely.

One can salvage their free market and individualist values and still be an anarchist by supporting left-wing market anarchism (agorism or mutualism).

Except evil dictatorships have never achieved it, and all the times it has been practiced throughout history, it was by anarchists or Paleolithic tribes. So...

The state maintains a monopoly of force, something that anarcho-capitalism eliminates entirely. There is no state when every man is able to defend his or her own means of production, and the only binding statue is the one that is commonly agreed on in an area.

Agorism is a tactic to achieve market anarchism, either left wing market anarchism or anarcho-capitalism. Ancap agorists exist, especially since they are the creators of agorism.

Tribes can be fairly authoritarian, contrary to the new age woo of the noble savage.

Miencraft, Rateria

Post by Pheeblan suppressed by a moderator.

Post by Pheeblan suppressed by a moderator.

Post by Pheeblan suppressed by a moderator.

Pheeblan wrote:shut up 1v1 me on farmville

I really don't want to have to report you. I really don't. Admin is busy enough as it is, but you've worn out your welcome.

If this continues, I will contact the government of your region. Hopefully that will resolve it. If not, than further action may be taken.

Rateria

Pheeblan wrote:shut up 1v1 me on farmville

I did laugh, but really please stop harassing the residents of this region.

If you want to engage in intellectual debate, your very much welcome to do so, but we don't appreciate the harassment.

thanks.

Rateria

Despite our new found friend, I am closing embassies with The Revolutionary Council. They share an embassy with GGR, which is NOT ok with me.

The New United States

Post by Pheeblan suppressed by a moderator.

Post by Pheeblan suppressed by a moderator.

Um.. shouldn't we actually be starting the vote? Or am i unclear on something?

Post by Pheeblan suppressed by a moderator.

Muh Roads wrote:Um.. shouldn't we actually be starting the vote? Or am i unclear on something?

Well, I think most of the board is asleep. I like the Revolutionary Council, since they're a firm and highly political region, but this is intolerable.

Perhaps, Mr. President, you can contact the government of their region regarding this harassment.

Rateria

Kings Island wrote:Well, I think most of the board is asleep. I like the Revolutionary Council, since they're a firm and highly political region, but this is intolerable.

Perhaps, Mr. President, you can contact the government of their region regarding this harassment.

I have, we will see what comes of it. They need to understand what a serious issue this is, and hopefully the process of closing embassies will be the wake up call.

For the past two weeks has it just been these communist/trolls bickering on our RMB?

The Aradites wrote:For the past two weeks has it just been these communist/trolls bickering on our RMB?

No, this is new.

The Aradites wrote:For the past two weeks has it just been these communist/trolls bickering on our RMB?

A couple trolls.

I actually don't mind the communists coming here for discussion myself. Sometimes it takes an opposing viewpoint to examine your position a little closer. To me, political stances or the lack there of (omg lack, why? =P) are fluid.

Rateria

I love a good debate! :D

Rateria

AAA really fell apart this week didn't it?

Fort Proudhon, Communist Republic, Ucr, and now Anti Authoritarian Alliance

Their relationship with you & REATO really didn't work out for them did it? I'm sure it doesn't bother you tho, like the last time we raided them (except this time we're keeping the region). But this time makes more sense I guess, since their new region Fort Chernyi took some worthless "trophy" regions you let CTE recently(Molokai & Territory Of Mexico). We considered taking them ourselves. But we felt they were too worthless for the trouble.

I guess AAA/Chernyi will take any scraps they can. Even creating fabricated victory regions, and taking fabricated victory regions you created yourselves lol.

Fun times.

The Monkey Brigades Ii wrote:AAA really fell apart this week didn't it?

Fort Proudhon, Communist Republic, Ucr, and now Anti Authoritarian Alliance

Their relationship with you & REATO really didn't work out for them did it? I'm sure it doesn't bother you tho, like the last time we raided them (except this time we're keeping the region). But this time makes more sense I guess, since their new region Fort Chernyi took some worthless "trophy" regions you let CTE recently(Molokai & Territory Of Mexico). We considered taking them ourselves. But we felt they were too worthless for the trouble.

I guess AAA/Chernyi will take any scraps they can. Even creating fabricated victory regions, and taking fabricated victory regions you created yourselves lol.

Fun times.

http://tinypic.com/r/xli8ab/8

What, do you expect us to thank you for invading A3, as though you've solved some sort of problem?

You haven't. They were retirees, not defectors - they only joined the fight because you lot had taken those regions from them once before. After they helped out with CAPS, they withdrew to pacifism because they felt that... what expression did you use? "Justice had been served"?

And it had. They were already three-time refugees, victims of your Fleet's imperialism, yet it took participation in just one operation to quench their thirst for vindication. They didn't even flinch on the multiple occasions you raided them or their territories - even now, they had to vacate their home, yet they still bear you no ill will.

They didn't owe REATO a damn thing. They no longer owe anything to the Fleet. I don't believe they ever did... but I do believe one thing: You owe them an apology.

Miencraft, The New United States, Ankha

Pevvania wrote:Which made it all the more strange. Marx was embarrassed of his heritage, and viewed Jews as ruthless capitalists whose real god was money. An early work of his, On the Jewish Question, is considered to be one of the "classic early works of antisemitic propaganda" by scholars.

Thank you for expanding onto my point.

Pevvania wrote:Which made it all the more strange. Marx was embarrassed of his heritage, and viewed Jews as ruthless capitalists whose real god was money. An early work of his, On the Jewish Question, is considered to be one of the "classic early works of antisemitic propaganda" by scholars.

Thank you for expanding onto my point.

Muh Roads wrote:Despite our new found friend, I am closing embassies with The Revolutionary Council. They share an embassy with GGR, which is NOT ok with me.

legitimately a good call. now it's going to be a game of "three degrees of fash embassies" from Libertatem instead of the two degrees it used to be.

Condealism wrote:What, do you expect us to thank you for invading A3, as though you've solved some sort of problem?

You haven't. They were retirees, not defectors - they only joined the fight because you lot had taken those regions from them once before. After they helped out with CAPS, they withdrew to pacifism because they felt that... what expression did you use? "Justice had been served"?

And it had. They were already three-time refugees, victims of your Fleet's imperialism, yet it took participation in just one operation to quench their thirst for vindication. They didn't even flinch on the multiple occasions you raided them or their territories - even now, they had to vacate their home, yet they still bear you no ill will.

They didn't owe REATO a damn thing. They no longer owe anything to the Fleet. I don't believe they ever did... but I do believe one thing: You owe them an apology.

do you actually read the bloviating turds you dump all over RMBs or just push them out and keep walking like a moo cow?

seriously y'all take this terrible internet text-based clicking-centric video game way too seriously sometimes. between Pevv calling our raids "terrorism" and you demanding an apology for raiding A3 like you're up on a soapbox, it's just absolutely absurd.

I was under the impression that TRF was a serious organization.

Kings Island wrote:I was under the impression that TRF was a serious organization.

TRF is a serious organization, yes, but we have never compared raids on a dumb online video game to acts of terrorism. That's patently ridiculous.

Yelsim wrote:legitimately a good call. now it's going to be a game of "three degrees of fash embassies" from Libertatem instead of the two degrees it used to be.

do you actually read the bloviating turds you dump all over RMBs or just push them out and keep walking like a moo cow?

seriously y'all take this terrible internet text-based clicking-centric video game way too seriously sometimes. between Pevv calling our raids "terrorism" and you demanding an apology for raiding A3 like you're up on a soapbox, it's just absolutely absurd.

Perhaps writing speeches, using dramatic language, etc is part of the game for some people. I don't think any of us are going around IRL hooting and hollering about the terroristic forces of the Red Fleet, nor do I think any of us are losing any real sleep whenever y'all attack an ally of ours.

Yelsim wrote:legitimately a good call. now it's going to be a game of "three degrees of fash embassies" from Libertatem instead of the two degrees it used to be.

Because you clearly cannot see the difference between fascist and a capitalist I've provided a political compass with funny cartoons!

http://www.slayerment.com/files/slayerment/styles/large/public/images/political_compass1%5B1%5D.png

Enjoy! Ghandi made me giggle.

Muh Roads wrote:Because you clearly cannot see the difference between fascist and a capitalist I've provided a political compass with funny cartoons!

http://www.slayerment.com/files/slayerment/styles/large/public/images/political_compass1%5B1%5D.png

Enjoy! Ghandi made me giggle.

Are you telling me that the Greater German Reich is a capitalist region, not fascist? Because if not, your post is complete nonsense.

Anti Authoritarian Alliance- plundered and stomped into dust on July 29, 2015.

participating militaries: The Red Fleet, Korean Peoples Army, Central Defence Agency (of The Democratic Socialist Union)

Yelsim wrote:Are you telling me that the Greater German Reich is a capitalist region, not fascist? Because if not, your post is complete nonsense.

Wassup, Misley! :) GM told me you taught him how to trigger. Apparently, you taught him well. :) He pulled off a 24 second one yesterday.

im da swagiest caeyeuo fan in al of da wurld bow down to mee or git noscoped

Pheeblan wrote:im da swagiest caeyeuo fan in al of da wurld bow down to mee or git noscoped

jfk got 360 noscopd amirite

The New United States wrote:Perhaps writing speeches, using dramatic language, etc is part of the game for some people. I don't think any of us are going around IRL hooting and hollering about the terroristic forces of the Red Fleet, nor do I think any of us are losing any real sleep whenever y'all attack an ally of ours.

Thank you. Someone gets it.

Yelsim wrote:do you actually read the bloviating turds you dump all over RMBs or just push them out and keep walking like a moo cow?

seriously y'all take this terrible internet text-based clicking-centric video game way too seriously sometimes. between Pevv calling our raids "terrorism" and you demanding an apology for raiding A3 like you're up on a soapbox, it's just absolutely absurd.

I can hardly believe I have to take this from you. For God's sake, Misley, show just a bit of dignity.

I've always disagreed with your ideology (and your methods even more so), but you've been absolutely ridiculous recently. You used to consider anti-fascism your first military priority, but now our freedom-loving region is your public enemy number one. Hey, all the better for us - the fact that The Internationale considers us an archenemy is a testament to the role we play in interregional politics - but that doesn't reflect near as well on your region as it does on ours.

Listen closely, because this is the most significant military advice I've ever given to anyone: If you don't change your strategy, you are never going to win. I don't mean to say that we'll be the ones to destroy you - I mean that you're hurting yourself more than you are us. You're trying to beat us at our own game - you're stooping to the level of a motley crew of capitalistic freedom fighters and spending your resources trying to supress our allies. And that suits us just fine - we're the ones who wanted to fight you.

Miencraft, Kings Island, The New United States, Muh Roads, Rateria

Muh roads explains how he got #15 in the largest furniture restoration industry in Libertatem:

"We don't like Ottomans, unlike the Germans."

Ankha

The word of Roads is sacred!

The New United States, Muh Roads, Ankha

The American Empire In Libertatem wrote:The word of Roads is sacred!

Why'd we never pass the ROADS Amendment, again?

The New United States wrote:The ROADS Amendment

The Religious Overture to the Accession of the Deity Superhero - Roads Amendment

Section I

Purpose of the act

Subsection I

Establish the state religion of Libertatem

Section II

Establish the state religion of Libertatem

Subsection II

The state religion of Libertatem, henceforth, is the Holy Church of Roads

Subsection III

The Holy Church of Roads, as the infallible institution of our Supreme-Overlord Roads, shall have ultimate say over public policy

Subsection IV

Heretics shall be excommunicated from Libertatem

Subsection V

We reaffirm our commitment to Roads' righteous jihad against communism

Subsection VI

The word of Roads shall henceforth be canonized as scripture - The Manager of Internal Affairs shall be tasked with compiling every word ever spoken by Roads into a Facebook titled "The Doctrine & Covenants of the Holy Church of Roads"

Authored by [nation=short]The New United States[/nation]

Just added Subsection VI. May I motion a Board vote?

Tyrinth, Kings Island, Muh Roads, Ankha

Darn you auto-correct! That's supposed to be "factbook" in Subsection VI, not "Facebook."

The New United States wrote:Why'd we never pass the ROADS Amendment, again?

Just added Subsection VI. May I motion a Board vote?

I call the House to Order.

In regards to the ROADS Amendment, I move the previous question. Is there a second?

The New United States

Do you want to just vote on it?

Hallo Island wrote:Do you want to just vote on it?

We should wait 24 hours, just so that the apostates can show themselves and that the Holy Church of Roads may exact punishment upon them.

I second the motion to vote on the ROADS Amendment!

Post by Pheeblan suppressed by a moderator.

The motion to move the previous question has received a second, and now stands.

Aye.

Pheeblan wrote:

1. Mcdonalds is disgusting

2. I don't drive

3. I am probably more of a wine kind of person.

Kings Island wrote:The motion to move the previous question has received a second, and now stands.

Aye.

AYE

Kings Island wrote:The motion to move the previous question has received a second, and now stands.

Aye.

Aye.

The American Empire In Libertatem wrote:1. Mcdonalds is disgusting

2. I don't drive

3. I am probably more of a wine kind of person.

It was an attack at the name "American Empire"

Pheeblan wrote:It was an attack at the name "American Empire"

You sure got him good.

Miencraft, Tyrinth

Huh, the leftists must love Authoritarianism.

The New United States, Ankha

Assembled with Dot's Region Saver.
Written by Refuge Isle.