Post Archive

Region: Libertatem

History

Rotgeheim wrote:The Spider and the Fly was a better love story than Twilight.

True.

Capitalistland wrote:Hello

Hey, I know you! I think. A Fedislander?

Also, get a room, guys.

I h

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:Hey, I know you! I think. A Fedislander?

Also, get a room, guys.

I have a puppet there.

muh roads and humpy is a better love story then Twilight.

NP, it isn't an expansion becaus ehe doesn't actually have any power. I could call you King of the World but that wouldn't be an expansion of International Power.

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:Also, get a room, guys.

Yeah! No Public Affection!

The Amarican Empire wrote:muh roads and humpy is a better love story then Twilight.

Aww how sweet. We're online soul mates, ya know.

MARSCH

COME, JOIN US IN CRUSHING OUR INFERIORZ.....

Wait a minute

*reads notepad*

Sorry, folks. Wrong raiding region!

Come join the Libertatem Army! Sign up today!

Humpheria wrote:Aww how sweet. We're online soul mates, ya know.

Awwwwww

Ipian wrote:Yeah! No Public Affection!

Says the guy with anarchy A. =)

I love public affection. It's the best affection.

Republic Of Minerva wrote:Come join the Libertatem Army! Sign up today!

How?

Muh Roads wrote:Says the guy with anarchy A. =)

I love public affection. It's the best affection.

Yep.

The Amarican Empire wrote:muh roads and humpy is a better love story then Twilight.

D'awwwwww

Humpheria wrote:Aww how sweet. We're online soul mates, ya know.

=D <3

Ipian wrote:How?

Telegram me saying you'd like to join, and then you'll become a private and eligible to CRUSH OUR INFERIORZ. Yeah.

Muh Roads wrote:<3

It's true love! xoxoxoxoxoxoxo

Republic Of Minerva wrote:Telegram me saying you'd like to join

Ok. What do I do if I join?

Republic Of Minerva wrote:CRUSH OUR INFERIORZ

YEAH WOOOOOOOOOOO

Ipian wrote:Ok. What do I do if I join?

YEAH WOOOOOOOOOOO

I'll respond via telegram. Our enemies might be watching our RMB...

Republic Of Minerva wrote:I'll respond via telegram. Our enemies might be watching our RMB...

Ok.

This is the same as the Vice Delegate, which was removed.

Check out this topic I made:

http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=292435

How is everyone?

Humpheria wrote:How is everyone?

Not bad.. and you?

Couldn't be better first day back at university. Thank god for Redbull.

Humpheria wrote:How is everyone?

Well, I woke up and my foot instantly fell asleep, so there's that, but other than that it's a nice day.

Humpheria wrote:Couldn't be better first day back at university. Thank god for Redbull.

I used to drink a lot of energy drinks.. then they started making me ill, doc said I was getting to many vitamins. So now it's just black coffee for me. Couldn't work without it =P

Glad to hear your doing well though. Feeling better I assume? How's your girl holding up?

Muh Roads wrote:I used to drink a lot of energy drinks.. then they started making me ill, doc said I was getting to many vitamins. So now it's just black coffee for me.

I love black coffee. Black coffee is life. I bleed black coffee.

Godisdead wrote:I love black coffee. Black coffee is life. I bleed black coffee.
Sounds delicious

Muh Roads wrote:I used to drink a lot of energy drinks.. then they started making me ill, doc said I was getting to many vitamins. So now it's just black coffee for me. Couldn't work without it =P

Glad to hear your doing well though. Feeling better I assume? How's your girl holding up?

Cannot stand coffee. Coffee is the bane of my existence. I don't care if Redbull kills me. I'd rather live a short happy life then a long coffee filled life.

She's doing alright. Her rehab is going interestingly. I go take the 30 min drive everyday to see her. Now, it's less the medical than the legal side. The *insert derogatory word for a male reproductive organ* is claiming that we ran a red light. No cameras. He wants me to pay for his pretty little car.

Post self-deleted by Muh Roads.

I wonder if he made that claim to the police? All the evidence you'll get will be on the police report... did anyone get ticketed?

I don't know. I was out for an hour after the crash. Everything "I" know for the case is known by my lawyer. I'm getting briefed tomorrow. I really don't know anything involving the actual crash except that it happened and I got hurt. More should expected of a law student.

Humpheria wrote:How is everyone?

Great.

Ipian wrote:So quiet.

LOUD NOISES

[quote=lack_there_of;6030546]LOUD NOISES[/quote

:)

A mock trial was established as a project in my AP gov class under an interesting principle. If a reporter goes and slanders some intentionally, should they receive jail time?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVKyesBzDAs :) This makes me happy!

Lack There Of wrote:A mock trial was established as a project in my AP gov class under an interesting principle. If a reporter goes and slanders some intentionally, should they receive jail time?

frreeeeeeeeeeee spppppeeeeeecchhhhhhhh

Lack There Of wrote:A mock trial was established as a project in my AP gov class under an interesting principle. If a reporter goes and slanders some intentionally, should they receive jail time?

Nope.

Regarding VEEP. I did some exploration. It would seem that we already have a contingency plan.. see the president's amendment.

In the event that the President is removed from office mid-term, the Chairman of the Board is to be appointed President to serve the rest of their predecessor's term.

In the event that the President has corrupted the office, abused their power or otherwise broken the laws of the region, an impeachment vote may be called by the approval of half of the House, needing a unanimous vote to secure an impeachment.

That's how it is now, but the line of succession isn't the only thing accomplished. And in that regard, it is an improvement upon the contingency and furthermore enhances the ability of the region to recover from an event. Furthermore, the people don't decide the Chairman, but they would have to approve of the VP, so if he takes over, he would be Citizen approved, not just Board approved. And it wouldn't be a big change if he had to. In the sense of his rule vs. the President's. Yes, they would probably be in the same party, but if the people elected say the LOP, then they would also have elected that Vice President.

Humpheria wrote:That's how it is now, but the line of succession isn't the only thing accomplished. And in that regard, it is an improvement upon the contingency and furthermore enhances the ability of the region to recover from an event. Furthermore, the people don't decide the Chairman, but they would have to approve of the VP, so if he takes over, he would be Citizen approved, not just Board approved. And it wouldn't be a big change if he had to. In the sense of his rule vs. the President's. Yes, they would probably be in the same party, but if the people elected say the LOP, then they would also have elected that Vice President.

Apologies, I should have clarified in my original post. The reason I bring that up is to help you out with your draft. Along with the amendment Pev suggested, something would have to be done with this amendment aswell. Was not sure if you were aware of it's existence given the original draft.

A. Law and freedom without force (anarchy).

B. Law and force without freedom (despotism).

C. Force without freedom and law (barbarism).

D. Force with freedom and law (republic).

Which one do you believe in?

Hey guys, sorry I haven't been here. I've been in a nearby seaside town all day. Muh Roads raises a good point, the Fourth Amendment already guarantees a line of succession. I'll have to think this over.

Ipian wrote:A. Law and freedom without force (anarchy).

B. Law and force without freedom (despotism).

C. Force without freedom and law (barbarism).

D. Force with freedom and law (republic).

Which one do you believe in?

Right now I'd have to say republic leaning on voluntaryism. A government that does not have a monopoly on force would be great.

Pevvania wrote:Right now I'd have to say republic leaning on voluntaryism. A government that does not have a monopoly on force would be great.

I have to say i'm leaning towards A.

Ipian wrote:A. Law and freedom without force (anarchy).

B. Law and force without freedom (despotism).

C. Force without freedom and law (barbarism).

D. Force with freedom and law (republic).

Which one do you believe in?

Can I choose A & D? Lol

Muh Roads wrote:Can I choose A & D? Lol

Sure :)

Ipian wrote:A. Law and freedom without force (anarchy).

B. Law and force without freedom (despotism).

C. Force without freedom and law (barbarism).

D. Force with freedom and law (republic).

Which one do you believe in?

Is it ok to believe in freedom and force?

Ipian wrote:A. Law and freedom without force (anarchy).

B. Law and force without freedom (despotism).

C. Force without freedom and law (barbarism).

D. Force with freedom and law (republic).

Which one do you believe in?

I choose republic.

Godisdead wrote:Is it ok to believe in freedom and force?

Yes. Option D.

Post self-deleted by Ipian.

You can use a puppet..., or an alternative nation to take your place...

Humpheria wrote:1. Definitions are for the final copy, this just an overview

2. I am okay with the foreign bit

3. They would approve the President's pick of Vice President when the President is elected. Let's say Hallo wins and CI is his VP. The Board would vote on whether or not to approve CI.

Does the board also approve of the President after he is voted? Because that is what I'm comprehending in the case of the VP.

In order to run for President, you would need to choose a VP. Then, at the finial election, people would vote for President, taking into account the VP he chose. The VP of the President who won the election would thus become the VP.

I don't see why the board would need to approve of the VP again, after the people just voted him in.

Republic Of Minerva wrote:You can use a puppet..., or an alternative nation to take your place...

I forgot. Now I did though

Godisdead wrote:Is it ok to believe in freedom and force?

These are inherently incompatible

August 6th is hereby Libertatem Day, the third official public holiday of the year.

Pevvania wrote:August 6th is hereby Libertatem Day, the third official public holiday of the year.

What are the others?

Ipian wrote:What are the others?

Ronald Reagan Day, and the Christmas period.

Pevvania wrote:Ronald Reagan Day, and the Christmas period.

Ronald Reagan Day :)

Lack There Of wrote:These are inherently incompatible

Not if the only force is used to keep people free.

Post self-deleted by Ipian.

Godisdead wrote:Not if the only force is used to keep people free.

That cracked me up. I see what you mean, but that sounds disturbingly similar to a lot of neo-con/Keynesian/Hobbesian arguments I've heard.

Post self-deleted by Republic Of Minerva.

Ostenburg wrote:Does the board also approve of the President after he is voted? Because that is what I'm comprehending in the case of the VP.

In order to run for President, you would need to choose a VP. Then, at the finial election, people would vote for President, taking into account the VP he chose. The VP of the President who won the election would thus become the VP.

I don't see why the board would need to approve of the VP again, after the people just voted him in.

No, the people vote for him.

He doesn't have to. The Board should approve the VP pick just like in real life with the Senate.

http://www.nationstates.net/region=antista#pollid_6771

The Neo-Confederate States Of America wrote:http://www.nationstates.net/region=antista#pollid_6771

It should be

THIS IS GOING TO BE ATLANTIS!!!!

Godisdead wrote:Not if the only force is used to keep people free.

The lols are numerable with this one

It really disappoints me to see so many conservatives and libertarians ignoring science. Global warming is real, guys.

Post self-deleted by Ipian.

Pevvania wrote:It really disappoints me to see so many conservatives and libertarians ignoring science. Global warming is real, guys.

The Amarican Empire wrote:Meh

We should raid Antista. Lol

I love crushing people in debates that I absolutely know I'm going to win.

Pevvania wrote:I love crushing people in debates that I absolutely know I'm going to win.

Hmmm

Will hallo be on to even debate with you?

Pevvania wrote:It really disappoints me to see so many conservatives and libertarians ignoring science. Global warming is real, guys.

It's not so much that I don't buy climate change, I just disagree with a governing apparatus using as an excuse to force certain choices on consumers

Pevvania wrote:It really disappoints me to see so many conservatives and libertarians ignoring science. Global warming is real, guys.

Are you super cereal?

The Presidential Debate is this Saturday, please send questions to myself via telegram. Anything said will go in the report.

I don't disagree with global warming, I disagree with the methods to force individuals to adapt useless policies that do nothing to help fight global warming.

Muh Roads wrote:Are you super cereal?

AGENDA TWENTY-ONE!!!! IT'S HAPPENING!!!!

Please welcome America In Space and Danilcz!

Lack There Of wrote:AGENDA TWENTY-ONE!!!! IT'S HAPPENING!!!!

Lawl

Pevvania wrote:It really disappoints me to see so many conservatives and libertarians ignoring science. Global warming is real, guys.

I don't disagree, I just disagree with most people as to what's causing it.

I also don't agree with most people as to what we can do to stop it. As far as I'm concerned, the Earth is heating up and we can't do anything to stop it short of completely obliterating the planet and Sol.

Sun spots, yo.

Ipian wrote:Hmmm

I'm not referring to you guys; that would be extremely arrogant if I referred to Libertatemites when saying that. You're all very intelligent. I was just in a debate with a forum liberal, and I basically crushed them with facts.

And regarding the environmental thing, a free market would probably make more progress towards a sustainable environment than regulations.

Pevvania wrote:I'm not referring to you guys; that would be extremely arrogant if I referred to Libertatemites when saying that. You're all very intelligent. I was just in a debate with a forum liberal, and I basically crushed them with facts.

Ahh Ok.

Pevvania wrote: And regarding the environmental thing, a free market would probably make more progress towards a sustainable environment than regulations.

Yes, Very true.

I was out with my mom just now, and she called me and her "Hippies" I am scarred for life.

Ipian wrote:I was out with my mom just now, and she called me and her "Hippies" I am scarred for life.

Uh, okay...

Everyone needs to telegram me questions. No questions = no debate. Anyone can do it, Citizen or not.

Humpheria wrote:Uh, okay...

:)

Humpheria wrote:

Sorry, Who's debating?

Ipian wrote:
Humpheria wrote:

President Pev and Challenger Hallo Island. This is a Presidential Debate.

[quote=humpheria;6034810]Sorry, Who's debating?[/quote]

President Pev and Challenger Hallo Island. This is a Presidential Debate.[/quote]

Ahh ok

Hallo Island wrote:Woah debate what

This Saturday there will be a public RMB debate. This was approved by the Board March 7, 2014.

Humpheria wrote:This Saturday there will be a public RMB debate. This was approved by the Board March 7, 2014.

Where will this debate be?

On the debate: we're in different time zones, and I've got a lot going on this weekend, so we should have the debate when Hallo and I are both on.

I better start campaigning!

RE-ELECT PEVVANIA 2014. LEADERSHIP THAT'S WORKING.

Glory to the Eternal Leader !

Pevvania wrote:I better start campaigning!

RE-ELECT PEVVANIA 2014. LEADERSHIP THAT'S WORKING.

:) When is the next election?

Assembled with Dot's Region Saver.
Written by Refuge Isle.