Post Archive

Region: Libertatem

History

How old are you guys ??

My birthday is in three days

Burnhamia

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen wrote:How old are you guys ??

My birthday is in three days

24

Happy early birthday!

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen wrote:How old are you guys ??

My birthday is in three days

20 years of age.

And you?

I do not like Ike. He was a reactionary statist and a reckless interventionist that expanded the New Deal, raised taxes, increased social spending and embarked on numerous nation-building projects around the world that actually strengthened the military-industrial complex. Passing over Taft for this guy ruined the GOP for decades, and threw away its role as the shrinker of government.

Hansingien

I have a question for everyone. Do you guys have hobbies or pass times not regarding politics or economic ideals?

Newcomers are encouraged to familiarize themselves with our laws and become full citizens when they get the ability to do so.

Northern Prussia wrote:I have a question for everyone. Do you guys have hobbies or pass times not regarding politics or economic ideals?

Age of Empires/Team Fortress/Minecraft/whatever else on the internet

I also draw things sometimes and I'm currently trying to write a big long thing that hopefully I can sell. Even if I can't, I've got friends who will read it so whatever.

Northern Prussia wrote:I have a question for everyone. Do you guys have hobbies or pass times not regarding politics or economic ideals?

I'm an automotive technician by trade, so I am often working on my own cars and others even after work.

Northern Prussia wrote:I have a question for everyone. Do you guys have hobbies or pass times not regarding politics or economic ideals?

Eternally trying to fix my computer.

Hansingien

this summers gonna hurt like a motha uh huh

Finishing last bits of school and I play Xbox and hang with my friends.

Republic Of Minerva wrote:this summers gonna hurt like a motha uh huh

Why?

Miencraft wrote:a big long thing that hopefully I can sell.

Let the record state that, as a member of the House, I vote in favor of the REDS Amendment.

Pevvania

Muh Roads wrote:

I was hoping nobody would find out that I was secretly referring to my penis farm.

And sheesh, someone make a copy of my old puppet's important factbooks, notably the radio stations one. It'll CTE in another couple of weeks, you know.

Conservative Idealism wrote:And sheesh, someone make a copy of my old puppet's important factbooks, notably the radio stations one. It'll CTE in another couple of weeks, you know.

I have a copy of the radio stations.

Ugggghhhh I'm getting real sick of brainwashed neocons. :P

Hallo Island

The voting on the REDS amendment in the House currently stands at 1:1.

New Sloveniakia wrote:Hello. Quick question, which I just posted on the CSA board but is probably more appropriate here. What is this region's stance on fascism? Clearly you think communism is worth fighting against (and I partially agree, depending on the definition of communism), but what about fascism?

Was this the first ever message on the Board, or is this just the first one shown?

At a ratio of 1 Aye: 1 Nay in the House, the REDS amendment fails.

It is a sad day in Libertatem.

Why would this be voted down? The REDS Amendment is a bipartisan proposal that not only reaffirms our commitment to the War and creates a mechanism to deal with enemy spies, but strikes several of the pro-fascist and authoritarian sentiments from Article VIII. This is a pro-civil liberties constitutional amendment. And it has been voted down.

The New United States, Muh Roads, United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen, Hansingien

Federal register pages over time: https://mises.org/sites/default/files/styles/full_width/public/stonge2.png?itok=gqmYRho8

Hansingien

LOS ANGELES PUMMELS THE POOR

A $15 an hour wage floor is a cruel and stupid policy

http://fee.org/anythingpeaceful/detail/los-angeles-pummels-the-poor

Hansingien

Hi guys,im new! Can somebody help me?

Pevvania

Pevvania wrote:Why would this be voted down? The REDS Amendment is a bipartisan proposal that not only reaffirms our commitment to the War and creates a mechanism to deal with enemy spies, but strikes several of the pro-fascist and authoritarian sentiments from Article VIII. This is a pro-civil liberties constitutional amendment. And it has been voted down.

Trying to ban ideologies does not qualify as pro civil liberty.

Oh, and by the way, when someone isn't supportive of legislation you write, you and your cronies shouldn't pummel that person with telegrams trying to make them vote "aye". That seems to be a common thing here.

Hallo Island wrote:Trying to ban ideologies does not qualify as pro civil liberty.

We tried to "ban ideologies?"

*looks through Amendment*

Are we talking about the same piece of legislation?

Pevvania wrote:Why would this be voted down? The REDS Amendment is a bipartisan proposal that not only reaffirms our commitment to the War and creates a mechanism to deal with enemy spies, but strikes several of the pro-fascist and authoritarian sentiments from Article VIII. This is a pro-civil liberties constitutional amendment. And it has been voted down.

Why is that??

You're in your twenties???

Is it true ???

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen wrote:How old are you guys ??

My birthday is in three days

Hi I am 10

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

Humpheria In Libertatem wrote:At a ratio of 1 Aye: 1 Nay in the House, the REDS amendment fails.

It is a sad day in Libertatem.

Wait, did you count my vote?

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

Hansingien wrote:Hi guys,im new! Can somebody help me?

Sure, what can I help you with?

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen wrote:You're in your twenties???

Is it true ???

Yes?

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

Conservative Idealism wrote:Wait, did you count my vote?

You were the one in favor. The rest were executives or non-citizens.

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

Well, I'd sure like to here from Amarican as to what he would change.

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

Humpheria In Libertatem wrote:You were the one in favor. The rest were executives or non-citizens.

Does NP's vote not count? I believe he resigned his Board Seat.

Northern Prussia wrote:Well, I am resigning my seat within the Board.

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

The New United States wrote:Does NP's vote not count? I believe he resigned his Board Seat.

You're right it was 2 aye: q nay. But that is still not 2/3 of the House of Representatives.

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

Humpheria In Libertatem wrote:You're right it was 2 aye: q nay. But that is still not 2/3 of the House of Representatives.

Do we need 2/3 of the entire House to vote For? That would be impossible.

The Constitution says we need "2/3 of the Representatives voting." That's worded a little funky, but it appears to me that we only need 2/3 of voting Representatives, which we have.

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

Post self-deleted by Burnhamia.

How do you get more population

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

Burnhamia wrote:How do you get more population

Population comes with time; you'll gain a few million in population per day.

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen, Burnhamia

Post self-deleted by Burnhamia.

The New United States wrote:Population comes with time; you'll gain a few million in population per day.

Ok thx

Muh Roads wrote:Well, I'd sure like to here from Amarican as to what he would change.

As I telegramed pev,

i could support the Red Amendment if all infiltrators be given a right to a fair trial. Should these infiltrators refuse to show up to the trial then the Founder or President can annul their citizenship and ban them. If the Judge of the trial chooses he can annul the citizenship and order the ban of an infiltrator

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

The New United States wrote:Do we need 2/3 of the entire House to vote For? That would be impossible.

The Constitution says we need "2/3 of the Representatives voting." That's worded a little funky, but it appears to me that we only need 2/3 of voting Representatives, which we have.

By golly, you're right!

It appears that we do have a passed constitutional amendment.

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

The American Empire In Libertatem wrote:As I telegramed pev,

i could support the Red Amendment if all infiltrators be given a right to a fair trial. Should these infiltrators refuse to show up to the trial then the Founder or President can annul their citizenship and ban them. If the Judge of the trial chooses he can annul the citizenship and order the ban of an infiltrator

The urgency of ridding ourselves of infiltrators necessitates executive discretion. Threats to regional security must be extinguished as soon as their presence is brought to the attention of the executive, and a drawn-out trial for every infiltrator would hamper our abilities to ensure that our region remains unmolested.

The Board is given the ability to conduct inquiries and reverse such executive decisions, when necessary.

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

The New United States wrote:The urgency of ridding ourselves of infiltrators necessitates executive discretion. Threats to regional security must be extinguished as soon as their presence is brought to the attention of the executive, and a drawn-out trial for every infiltrator would hamper our abilities to ensure that our region remains unmolested.

The Board is given the ability to conduct inquiries and reverse such executive decisions, when necessary.

So we must deny citizens the freedom of a fair trial for security? You must support the Patriot Act.

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

Yo

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

The American Empire In Libertatem wrote:So we must deny citizens the freedom of a fair trial for security? You must support the Patriot Act.

Honestly, this is basically a game about authoritarianism. We're never going to be able to have a libertarian paradise, and quite honestly booting potential invaders as soon as we find them is much better than having a trial for every individual one, giving the rest the chance to shut up and get out on their own without punishment.

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

Humpheria In Libertatem wrote:By golly, you're right!

It appears that we do have a passed constitutional amendment.

Hell yes!

The American Empire In Libertatem wrote:So we must deny citizens the freedom of a fair trial for security? You must support the Patriot Act.

To answer your question, no, just infiltrators - and TNUS is right, the Board can overturn any unfair executive decisions in this area should they ever occur. To answer your strawman, lmao.

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

Hi

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

Ylvenguud wrote:hello

Sup

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

We're approaching our record population.

Roads has saved the day once again.

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

Hail Roads!

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

Haha thanks. I'm aiming for 200 at least, and it's good to see some new faces on the RMB. I hope you all will find a great home in Libertatem. We're good company, I assure you all. You've picked a great place to be, and I certainly hope we are looking at the future of our great region.

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen, Ylvenguud

Huh. Seems like the RMB exploded while I slept. Now what's this amendment that's being pushed through?

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

Tyrinth wrote:Huh. Seems like the RMB exploded while I slept. Now what's this amendment that's being pushed through?

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=the_new_united_states/detail=factbook/id=414770

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

Muh Roads wrote:http://www.nationstates.net/nation=the_new_united_states/detail=factbook/id=414770

Danke schön.

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

Tyrinth wrote:Danke schön.

Bitte

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

Good work to everyone involved in the passage of REDS, and congratulations to The New United States. It's a damn fine bill. Also, good work to Muh Roads on recruitment. We're experiencing something of a population boom! This could go in the regional newspaper. Anyone want to write about it?

Also, I have an amendment of my own that I'd like to propose: the TOTAL RECALL Amendment. It gives the region the power to initiate a recall election of a Board Member. I proposed it a month ago. Who here supports this, aside from me? http://www.nationstates.net/nation=pevvania/detail=factbook/id=412482

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

Pevvania wrote:Good work to everyone involved in the passage of REDS, and congratulations to The New United States. It's a damn fine bill. Also, good work to Muh Roads on recruitment. We're experiencing something of a population boom! This could go in the regional newspaper. Anyone want to write about it?

Also, I have an amendment of my own that I'd like to propose: the TOTAL RECALL Amendment. It gives the region the power to initiate a recall election of a Board Member. I proposed it a month ago. Who here supports this, aside from me? http://www.nationstates.net/nation=pevvania/detail=factbook/id=412482

See, my problem with this is that it gives, say, a certain majority party too much power. If a person not in the that party somehow gets on the board, that majority party can easily take that person out of power.

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

Pevvania wrote:Good work to everyone involved in the passage of REDS, and congratulations to The New United States. It's a damn fine bill. Also, good work to Muh Roads on recruitment. We're experiencing something of a population boom! This could go in the regional newspaper. Anyone want to write about it?

Also, I have an amendment of my own that I'd like to propose: the TOTAL RECALL Amendment. It gives the region the power to initiate a recall election of a Board Member. I proposed it a month ago. Who here supports this, aside from me? http://www.nationstates.net/nation=pevvania/detail=factbook/id=412482

What does "For against" mean?

Also, I suppose I could write an article.

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

Miencraft wrote:What does "For against" mean?

Also, I suppose I could write an article.

I believe it's supposed to say "for or against," as in all individuals that participated in the election.

Hallo Island wrote:See, my problem with this is that it gives, say, a certain majority party too much power. If a person not in the that party somehow gets on the board, that majority party can easily take that person out of power.

That's not how it works. Someone has to screw up pretty bad to have two-thirds of the House recall a person that they just voted into office. The same goes for situations in which half of the folks that voted in the election decide to recall that individual.

If the majority were that opposed to someone getting on the Board, they wouldn't have gotten on the first place.

Pevvania wrote:Good work to everyone involved in the passage of REDS, and congratulations to The New United States. It's a damn fine bill. Also, good work to Muh Roads on recruitment. We're experiencing something of a population boom! This could go in the regional newspaper. Anyone want to write about it?

Also, I have an amendment of my own that I'd like to propose: the TOTAL RECALL Amendment. It gives the region the power to initiate a recall election of a Board Member. I proposed it a month ago. Who here supports this, aside from me? http://www.nationstates.net/nation=pevvania/detail=factbook/id=412482

I'm for this amendment. (Oh, God, but that title)

Pevvania, United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

The Board can do that amendment later. I've waited my turn. We're voting on MEDAL now.

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=humpheria/detail=factbook/id=353421

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

The New United States wrote:I'm for this amendment. (Oh, God, but that title)

Doug, honey... you wouldn't hurt me, would you, sweetheart? Sweetheart, be reasonable. After all, we're married!

bang!

Consider that a divorce!

Hallo Island, United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

Hallo Island wrote:See, my problem with this is that it gives, say, a certain majority party too much power. If a person not in the that party somehow gets on the board, that majority party can easily take that person out of power.

I thought you supported democracy?

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

Pevvania wrote:I thought you supported democracy?

Only if it ensures the ascendency of The Cult of Hallo.

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

Glory to Hallo and Muh Roads!

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

It's me Time, I'm back for the Summer...

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

Philosophical Anarchism wrote:It's me Time, I'm back for the Summer...

Oh lord. Here we go.

Welcome back!

How do I do this, well, this thing?

Stanford Island wrote:How do I do this, well, this thing?

Like that

No, how do I play, how do I improve my nation?

Stanford Island wrote:No, how do I play, how do I improve my nation?

Pretty simple really, just answer the issues as they arise. However most of us get a lot more out of nationstates than the actual "game" if you will. We wage war on other regions using the world assembly system and of course there is all the diplomacy that comes along with that. We have a regional government that you can partake in, and otherwise you can talk here on our message board or there's always the forums.

Humpheria In Libertatem wrote:Oh lord. Here we go.

Welcome back!

Thanks Humph...did you move to CFN?

Muh Roads wrote:Pretty simple really, just answer the issues as they arise. However most of us get a lot more out of nationstates than the actual "game" if you will. We wage war on other regions using the world assembly system and of course there is all the diplomacy that comes along with that. We have a regional government that you can partake in, and otherwise you can talk here on our message board or there's always the forums.

Can single nations wage war on other single nations, a few of my friends all made nations and want to try that. I'm trying just to figure out the basics here, any help is appreciated.

Spoletia

Philosophical Anarchism wrote:It's me Time, I'm back for the Summer...

Welcome back!

So any candidates you guys are seeing that you like for 2016?

Anti-Feminists wrote:Sup

Really not feeling the name of this guy's nation.

Pevvania wrote:I thought you supported democracy?

The New United States wrote:Only if it ensures the ascendency of The Cult of Hallo.

Cult's dead.

Midland County wrote:Really not feeling the name of this guy's nation.

Anti feminist=bigot

Hallo Island wrote:Cult's dead.

Philosophical Anarchism wrote:It's me Time, I'm back for the Summer...

Well, now, wait a minute.

Philosophical Anarchism wrote:So any candidates you guys are seeing that you like for 2016?

Gary Johnson

Republic Of Minerva wrote:Gary Johnson

He can't win.

I'm supporting Rand/Bernie until they get kicked out (which they more than likely will), then I'll move on to a third party candidate.

No good 3rd party candidates have currently filed though.

I'm new to the game anyone got any tips

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen wrote:Yeah third party America

Current Third Party Standings.

Roseanne Barr- Pro-Israeli Socialist and Comedian

Zoltan Isvtan- Transhuamnist who puts way too much science into government.

Terry Jones- Kill MUSLIMS! BURN MOSQUES! TORCH THE QURAN!

Vermin Supreme- Everyone gets a free pony! I'm a literal joke!

Waka Flocka- Ineligible rapper.

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

Philosophical Anarchism wrote:

Vermin Supreme- Everyone gets a free pony! I'm a literal joke!

Wait, what? I have some research to do. . .

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

Stanford Island wrote:Can single nations wage war on other single nations, a few of my friends all made nations and want to try that. I'm trying just to figure out the basics here, any help is appreciated.

Technically? No. Not using any game mechanics, but you can roleplay all you want. There are forums and all sorts of cool stuff around this website to play with.

Tyrinth wrote:Wait, what? I have some research to do. . .

He's an anarchist who runs for the Democrats in joke campaigns for presidency.

United Environmentalist States Of Mhomen

Philosophical Anarchism wrote:So any candidates you guys are seeing that you like for 2016?

I like Rand Paul and Ted Cruz.

The Grand Leader wrote:I'm new to the game anyone got any tips

Here is a tip you gain population by time and you can challenge other nations and gain championship points and level up you can also talk here

Remember when Hallo used to be the hero of the opposition and I was Humpy's bi**h who caucused with the RLP?

The American Empire In Libertatem wrote:Remember when Hallo used to be the hero of the opposition and I was Humpy's bi**h who caucused with the RLP?

Hey language! I'm 10

The American Empire In Libertatem wrote:Remember when Hallo used to be the hero of the opposition and I was Humpy's bi**h who caucused with the RLP?

...Yeah I remember when I gave the Opposition stuff to Hallo after I left...and he made that idiotic Mr. T his B**** and I came back and the guy thought I always sided with Pev and Humpy.

The New United States wrote:I like Rand Paul and Ted Cruz.

I love both of them.

Them and Sanders are the three only good candidates who have confirmed they are running. Really liking the Possible Libertarian and constitutional Party candidates though, but they haven't confirmed. Scott Walker might be somewhat good as well.

Assembled with Dot's Region Saver.
Written by Refuge Isle.