Post Archive

Region: Libertatem

History

Miencraft wrote:Also, guys, you were supposed to announce yourself for the Board before this stuff started, but I guess nobody thought that was a good idea, so now we've got to hurry up and get everything done:

Who is running for Board?

I will if possible

I'd like to run for a Board seat. Who else is running? I want to run against someone un-electable this time- that way I'll have a chance!

Miencraft wrote:Also, guys, you were supposed to announce yourself for the Board before this stuff started, but I guess nobody thought that was a good idea, so now we've got to hurry up and get everything done:

Who is running for Board?

I will run.

*cracks knuckles*

Pevvania wrote:I will run.

*cracks knuckles*

Good

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:Which seats do you guys want?

I think I'll take Seat 1.

Funkytopia wrote:I'd like to run for a Board seat. Who else is running? I want to run against someone un-electable this time- that way I'll have a chance!

I thought you were the new State? If you win that puts CI at a pickle. I'd just be content with State if I were you.

Humpheria wrote:I thought you were the new State? If you win that puts CI at a pickle. I'd just be content with State if I were you.

I can just appoint someone else to State if Funky wins. Besides, ACOP could use some Board representation ;)

Miencraft wrote:Also, guys, you were supposed to announce yourself for the Board before this stuff started, but I guess nobody thought that was a good idea, so now we've got to hurry up and get everything done:

Who is running for Board?

Me ! For seat one as usual.

Pev vs Yr - an exciting matchup already!

I would like to run as well. However, Humph has still not granted me citizenship.

Weird.

Dour months ago CI administered the Oath to me. 13 days from now, I will administer it to him.

Yrellian Confederacy wrote:Me ! For seat one as usual.

Don't mean to start flexing my muscles already, but if it wasn't for me, we wouldn't have any elections at all! ^_^

Pevvania wrote:I think I'll take Seat 1.

He Pevv, would you mind checking your telegrams?

Humpheria wrote:Weird.

Dour months ago CI administered the Oath to me. 13 days from now, I will administer it to him.

It's funny how things work out.

Pevvania wrote:I think I'll take Seat 1.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nL0fgFOG7sA

Yrellian Confederacy wrote:Me ! For seat one as usual.

Pevv still hasn't put our party up sadly.

Actum wrote:Pevv still hasn't put our party up sadly.

I'm really sorry about that. I'll get to it now.

Pevvania wrote:I'm really sorry about that. I'll get to it now.

No problem.

I'll be running for Seat 2.

Actum wrote:I would like to run as well. However, Humph has still not granted me citizenship.

The Board granted you Citizenship, you got it.

What the heck, I'll run.

Funkytopia wrote:I'll be running for Seat 2.

Thanks fort considering me unelectable. I really appreciate it bud.

Alak-Kazanistahn wrote:What the heck, I'll run.

But you haven't even applied for citizenship, nor do we have any confirmation of where your WA nation is.

Humpheria wrote:The Board granted you Citizenship, you got it.

Sure, I'll run then.

So what seat should I run for guys?

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:But you haven't even applied for citizenship, nor do we have any confirmation of where your WA nation is.

I actually applied last night. I have no WA nation.

Actum wrote:So what seat should I run for guys?

Preferably one that only has one candidate

Actum wrote:So what seat should I run for guys?

It's up to you.

Humpheria wrote:Thanks fort considering me unelectable. I really appreciate it bud.

Nah, I figured I'll just take another beating! I thought you're serving as AG anyway?

I announce my candidacy for seat 2.

Alak-Kazanistahn wrote:I actually applied last night. I have no WA nation.

No you haven't. I don't have your application, Roads isn't around to take it, so don't go around expecting people to know you did when you didn't tell anyone.

Wait no seat 3.

Seat 1: Yrellian Confederacy vs. Pevvania

Seat 2: Funkytopia

Seat 3: Actum

Seat 4: ???

Seat 5: ???

Actum wrote:I announce my candidacy for seat 2.

Greeeaaaat... Another three-way... :-\

Funkytopia wrote:Greeeaaaat... Another three-way... :-\

I changed it.

Wait, I think Humph expressed that he's seeking re-election.

Ok.

So we have :

Seat 1 : Yrellian Conf VS Pevvania

Seat 2 : Humpheria VS Funkytopia

Seat 3 : Actum VS ( Rotgeheim ? )

Seat 4 : ( Right-winged nation ? )

Seat 5 : ( NCSA ? )

So how is everyone?

Melemiere wrote:So how is everyone?

Excellent. *Ominously steeples fingers*

If RWN doesn't run again, I might go for Seat 4...

Seat 1: [B]Yrellian Confederacy[/B] v Pevvania

Seat 2: [B]Humpheria[/B] v Funkytopia

Seat 3: [B]Rotgeheim ?[/B] v Actum

Seat 4: [B]Right-winged nation ?[/B]

Seat 5: [B]The Neo-Confederate States of America ?[/B] v Alak-Kazanistahn ?

? - denotes uncertain ability or desire to seek election

I wanted to know if there was anyway to learn more about how NS and Raiding works. Im new to NS and the region and I would like to become active but I am unsure how.

Alak-Kazanistahn wrote:I'll run for seat 5.

You have not been accepted. You will have to wait for Feb.

Melemiere wrote:I wanted to know if there was anyway to learn more about how NS and Raiding works. Im new to NS and the region and I would like to become active but I am unsure how.

I recommend reading this: https://www.nationstates.net/page=dispatch/id=246464

Humpheria wrote:You have not been accepted. You will have to wait for Feb.

How can I be accepted? Am I required to have a WA nation?

Alak-Kazanistahn wrote:How can I be accepted? Am I required to have a WA nation?

In order to seek an office, yes. It also helps not to be a spy.

Why would I be a spy? I've resided here for quite some time now.

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:In order to seek an office, yes. It also helps not to be a spy.

Is that a law that you must have a WA nation?

Alak-Kazanistahn wrote:Why would I be a spy? I've resided here for quite some time now.

Well, you are top 10% of the world for most authoritarian.

Actum wrote:Is that a law that you must have a WA nation?

Yep. Read this: http://www.nationstates.net/nation=muh_roads/detail=factbook/id=310951

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:Yep. Read this: http://www.nationstates.net/nation=muh_roads/detail=factbook/id=310951

Rather, sort of. It's complicated.

Alak-Kazanistahn wrote:Why would I be a spy? I've resided here for quite some time now.

Firstly, I didn't say you were a spy - I was just giving advice.

Secondly, the fact that you've resided here for so long without saying much does not give you an alibi. In fact, that's actually rather worrisome.

Alak-Kazanistahn wrote:How can I be accepted? Am I required to have a WA nation?

First step: Try sending the application to someone who's actually active and from whom the IA office extends.

Like the incumbent President.

Which is me.

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:Rather, sort of. It's complicated.

I am in the WA, but I think that should be done away with.

Actum wrote:I am in the WA, but I think that should be done away with.

Actually, it's for security measures.

Actum wrote:I am in the WA, but I think that should be done away with.

I'm not a fan of the WA either, but it's a useful identification tool nonetheless.

Miencraft wrote:First step: Try sending the application to someone who's actually active and from whom the IA office extends.

Like the incumbent President.

Which is me.

Alrighty then.

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/1000-gathered-largest-felony-civil-disobedience-rally-history/

This really touched me. I didn't know who Gav Swim is, but he is a true American hero and patriot! God bless him!

The Neo-Confederate States Of America wrote:Are you Einsiev?

...So that's how I recognized the name. *facepalms*

The Neo-Confederate States Of America wrote:Are you Einsiev?

Hey! Are you running for reelection?

What do you mean? I haven't held office here at all yet.

Yep, that's definitely him. I can't believe I didn't remember until now - I'm so stupid. He used that same puppet back when he created his own region for whatever reason. Man, how long ago was that? :P

The Neo-Confederate States Of America wrote:Are you Einsiev?

OH. MY. GOD.

NO.... PLEASE GOD NO! NOT AGAIN!!!!

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:Yep, that's definitely him. I can't believe I didn't remember until now - I'm so stupid. He used that same puppet back when he created his own region for whatever reason. Man, how long ago was that? :P

Are you 100% sure? I can get onto Lib's account now and banject him if it is Einsiev.

Oooh! Do we get to try him again?

*gets popcorn*

Actum

I have no freaking idea whats going on......

Pevvania wrote:Are you 100% sure? I can get onto Lib's account now and banject him if it is Einsiev.

I'm positive - Alak-Kazanistahn was a resident of Imperial Democratic States.

Pevvania wrote:Are you 100% sure? I can get onto Lib's account now and banject him if it is Einsiev.

What happened to Lib?

Pevvania wrote:Are you 100% sure? I can get onto Lib's account now and banject him if it is Einsiev.

I'm right here, mate, but thanks for letting me not do that.

Actum wrote:What happened to Lib?

Nothing, he just doesn't do much out in the open. He generally lets the President get into his account for the sole purpose of using RC, though.

I see that we have great secret services !

Miencraft wrote:Nothing, he just doesn't do much out in the open. He generally lets the President get into his account for the sole purpose of using RC, though.

Oh ok, I just remembered talking to him a lot before.

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:I'm positive - Alak-Kazanistahn was a resident of Imperial Democratic States.

I do remember residing there but I didn't know him to well. That's when I needed a temporary home.

Yrellian Confederacy wrote:I see that we have great secret services !

Oh, hush. :P

Ugh, and the guy telegrammed me last night, too. I completely failed that spot check before NCSA said anything.

What in the world is going on here!?

Actum wrote:Oh ok, I just remembered talking to him a lot before.

Yeah, don't be surprised if he doesn't respond; he tends to just answer issues and occasionally post here, but I can see from my periodic entrances that he does check his telegrams from time to time.

Conversation might be a bit harder to have, but I bet he's got more pressing real-world issues to deal with.

Alak-Kazanistahn wrote:I do remember residing there but I didn't know him to well. That's when I needed a temporary home.

So I take it it's only coincidence that the times you've been on in the past two days closely match those of Einsiev?

This isn't the first time you've tried this, and frankly, I'm pissed that you've chosen to start that again.

Leitnam wrote:What in the world is going on here!?

Magic.

Miencraft wrote:I'm right here, mate, but thanks for letting me not do that.

Cool it, dude, it's not a tug of war! ^_^ You can do it if you want. Also, I find the concept of an American saying "mate" extremely strange and difficult to imagine.

Funkytopia wrote:Oooh! Do we get to try him again?

*gets popcorn*

He is still banned permanently unless he successfully appeals. But since he continues to deny his crimes in the face of overwhelming evidence that he eventually conceded was legitimate (he blamed it on being hacked), I doubt that any appeal he files will be taken seriously.

I just got scarred for life...

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:So I take it it's only coincidence that the times you've been on in the past two days closely match those of Einsiev?

This isn't the first time you've tried this, and frankly, I'm pissed that you've chosen to start that again.

I guess it's a coincidence. I barely know the fellow.

Pevvania wrote:Cool it, dude, it's not a tug of war! ^_^ You can do it if you want. Also, I find the concept of an American saying "mate" extremely strange and difficult to imagine

That was a legitimate "thanks for letting me not do that".

As in, I have to leave in 10 minutes and won't be back for a few hours so I won't be able to do it anyways.

Also, it's weird, I never say "mate" in a vocal conversation, but I type it way more often that I should.

The State Of Deseret wrote:I just got scarred for life...

Horses?

Alak-Kazanistahn wrote:I guess it's a coincidence. I barely know the fellow.

Really? A few minutes ago, you didn't know him at all. :P

Miencraft wrote:That was a legitimate "thanks for letting me not do that".

As in, I have to leave in 10 minutes and won't be back for a few hours so I won't be able to do it anyways.

Also, it's weird, I never say "mate" in a vocal conversation, but I type it way more often that I should.

Oh. Sorry for the miscommunication.

When you brought up the IDS, it reminded me that he was the founder/president I think.

The State Of Deseret wrote:I just got scarred for life...

What happened ?

(Dips Kung pao chicken is soy sauce) Anyone care for a nibble?

Miencraft wrote:Horses?

F*CK YOU!

Yrellian Confederacy wrote:What happened ?

I saw a link to a Youtube video..or a set of videos...that involved girls crushing small animals like Cats, Puppies and Rats under high heels...I also got linked to videos involving how the hell we kill animals to get to our dinner plate...

It is disgusting...

Miencraft wrote:Horses?

Although there was one video I saw a while ago...that..."Bucked" that thought out of my mind.

Miencraft wrote:Horses?

The State Of Deseret wrote:F*CK YOU!

Dat banter

The State Of Deseret wrote:I saw a link to a Youtube video..or a set of videos...that involved girls crushing small animals like Cats, Puppies and Rats under high heels...I also got linked to videos involving how the hell we kill animals to get to our dinner plate...

It is disgusting...

D:

That's horrible!

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:Seat 1: [B]Yrellian Confederacy[/B] v Pevvania

Seat 2: [B]Humpheria[/B] v Funkytopia

Seat 3: [B]Rotgeheim ?[/B] v Actum

Seat 4: [B]Right-winged nation ?[/B]

Seat 5: [B]The Neo-Confederate States of America ?[/B] v Alak-Kazanistahn ?

? - denotes uncertain ability or desire to seek election

I'm running

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:Dat banter

D:

That's horrible!

And Snails, and Fish..alive

Assembled with Dot's Region Saver.
Written by Refuge Isle.