Post Archive

Region: Libertatem

History

The Amarican Empire wrote:I divorced humpy for hallo.

But Hallo is only a four-slice

The Amarican Empire wrote:I divorced humpy for hallo.

poly-gamy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2uEpcfonkt4

I bet on a Belgium victory, sorry Americans. And Switzerland has been so amazing today despite its defeat.

Anybody watching USA vs. Belgium?

Yrellian Confederacy wrote:I bet on a Belgium victory, sorry Americans. And Switzerland has been so amazing today despite its defeat.

I have faith in the American team.

Ronald Reagan And Rick Grimes wrote:I'm not saying it was NP, though I would expect it from a fascist. It was probably Hallo or Ankha, those dirty scumbags. Wow you guys are so cool

You just said that?! Wow. Yet you ask why you lost...

Pevvania wrote:His vote was not counted because he was not a citizen. You lost by one vote.

Exactly.

Humpheria wrote:Even I don't believe that.

RRRG, chill. I'm sorry you lost, but lashing out makes you no better than Hallo.

Hunph never liked me. :(

Hallo Island wrote:So you just instantly suspect that I rigged the elections because I don't like you? I didn't even vote for Northern Prussia, actually. Just because somebody is communist doesn't mean that I cannot be friends with them. Some of my best friends are communists, actually. And yes, I am obviously egotistical and crazy. Definitely. Honestly, I think you are just cranky because you didn't get a seat on the board.

I congratulate Chairman Lack on his victory today and wish him good fortune in the month ahead.

The New United States wrote:Anybody watching USA vs. Belgium?

I am, and I Believe.

Hallo Island wrote:So you just instantly suspect that I rigged the elections because I don't like you? I didn't even vote for Northern Prussia, actually. Just because somebody is communist doesn't mean that I cannot be friends with them. Some of my best friends are communists, actually. And yes, I am obviously egotistical and crazy. Definitely. Honestly, I think you are just cranky because you didn't get a seat on the board.

Wait! Im not communist. Wow.

Miencraft wrote:I congratulate Chairman Lack on his victory today and wish him good fortune in the month ahead.

I promise it'll be a neat one

Ankha wrote:Wait! Im not communist. Wow.

I know. I'm just sAying that even if you were, I wouldn't care.

Aww, thanks bud.

Lack There Of wrote:I promise it'll be a neat one

I believe in the mighty Lack.

Lack There Of wrote:I promise it'll be a neat one

Lack, you are the first non-RLP chairman in modern history. Can you still be tyrannous?

Ankha wrote:Wait! Im not communist. Wow.

I said I wouldn't be a part of this argument, but you're making it hard.

I was pondering it and I think I might have an idea. What do you guys think of combining the Foreign and Internal departments into one department and call it the Department of Regional Affairs. There would be one manager that was in charge of both, but two deputies that dealt in specifically those branches. Not a definite. Just an idea that I want your opinions on.

Any elections coming up soon?

Humpheria wrote:I was pondering it and I think I might have an idea. What do you guys think of combining the Foreign and Internal departments into one department and call it the Department of Regional Affairs. There would be one manager that was in charge of both, but two deputies that dealt in specifically those branches. Not a definite. Just an idea that I want your opinions on.

No, that gives one person too much power.

Humpheria wrote:I was pondering it and I think I might have an idea. What do you guys think of combining the Foreign and Internal departments into one department and call it the Department of Regional Affairs. There would be one manager that was in charge of both, but two deputies that dealt in specifically those branches. Not a definite. Just an idea that I want your opinions on.

I think it's a good idea.

Hallo Island wrote:No, that gives one person too much power.

It also cuts the government down substantially. Those two offices aren't very busy they have a very specific purpose, so we would need to make more, why not just bring it together. And think about the power. One person can grant citizenship and asks for embassies. That isn't a lot.

Ya no hallo. I already think that pev has too much power. Why would we merge positions?

I mean humpy. Sorry you both are almost equally awesome.

Humpheria wrote:It also cuts the government down substantially. Those two offices aren't very busy they have a very specific purpose, so we would need to make more, why not just bring it together. And think about the power. One person can grant citizenship and asks for embassies. That isn't a lot.

I like it, but I'd have to hear the opinion of CI and Miencraft, beforehand.

The Amarican Empire wrote:Ya no hallo. I already think that pev has too much power. Why would we merge positions?

It would both cut down on government size, help in the process of streamlining bureaucracy and it would get rid of unnecessary space in the already power government.

The New United States wrote:I like it, but I'd have to hear the opinion of CI and Miencraft, beforehand.

I'm not trying to make a law. Just spitballing.

You guys. It doesn't give one person too much power. As Humph said it limits the size of the government and simplifies it.

Humpheria wrote:I'm not trying to make a law. Just spitballing.

I realize. I was just wondering what their opinions would be.

No, it would give one person double the power and leave the other out of a job.

Also, can we get on with TTA's trial now?

The New United States wrote:I realize. I was just wondering what their opinions would be.

I think it's best left as is, the two departments require two completely different skill-sets.

Would it be better if elections were held for the deputies.

Hallo Island wrote:Also, can we get on with TTA's trial now?

You're in the Board now, you request a vote there now.

Post self-deleted by Right-Winged Nation.

Godisdead wrote:Would it be better if elections were held for the deputies.

That would defeat the purpose. The purpose being to limit government yet adding a two extra elections.

Godisdead wrote:Would it be better if elections were held for the deputies.

I agree with this.

Godisdead wrote:Would it be better if elections were held for the deputies.

That doesn't make any sense.

The deputies are meant to be trainees for a position that is itself appointed. Why would you elect people who are more than likely just going to end up in an appointed position anyways?

Honestly, I think the cabinet should be elected. If they are advising the president, shouldn't they be advising them with the word of the people?

Miencraft wrote:And as my first order of business, time to get Muh to make the citizenship page look bootifru.

Congrats Miencraft. I'm gonna send you all the factbook info so you can transfer it over to your factbook.

I've had a great run everybody. Life is just taking different directions for me and I would hate to leave everyone high and dry. I'll still be around of course, maybe not as often, and plan to continue to participate in military affairs. I may choose to run for office one day again, but it's definitely my time to exit stage left. Pev, I appreciate your kind words. Mien will make an excellent IA manager, and I highly commend your choice. Remember, the secret is in the sauce.

I LOVE YOU MUH ROADS

Hallo Island wrote:I LOVE YOU MUH ROADS
LOVE YOU TOO HALLO <3

I say we get rid of the board and do Direct Democracy.

TTA no the general people are not worried about the survival of the nation. They are only interested about taking from the hard working.

The Amarican Empire wrote:TTA no the general people are not worried about the survival of the nation. They are only interested about taking from the hard working.

...I mean in this region you fool.

Not America.

Albenia wrote:I say we get rid of the board and do Direct Democracy.

Why? What problem would that fix?

The New United States wrote:Why? What problem would that fix?

Power to the People.

It doesn't solve a problem it just gives all citizens equal power.

Albenia wrote:It doesn't solve a problem it just gives all citizens equal power.

This is true.

Yes including the inactive who have no idea what is happening. Plus it would be easier for a puppet if he were to trick the IA; for him to mess up the region.

The Amarican Empire wrote:Yes including the inactive who have no idea what is happening. Plus it would be easier for a puppet if he were to trick the IA; for him to mess up the region.

Then let only citizens vote.

Direct Democracy by the citizens

The Amarican Empire wrote:Yes including the inactive who have no idea what is happening. Plus it would be easier for a puppet if he were to trick the IA; for him to mess up the region.

And this is also true.

What if the IA were tricked by the puppet to give him citizenship. Plus Democracy does not mean equal power. it is Majority rule which means the majority can take rights from the Minority. Direct Democracy does not give equal power to the people. It only gives power to the Majority.

If the Majority wanted to kill all Gays it would happen under Direct Democracy. Under a Republic the gay persons life would be protected.

The Amarican Empire wrote:If the Majority wanted to kill all Gays it would happen under Direct Democracy. Under a Republic the gay persons life would be protected.

NOT in America

in this region.

Direct Democracy equals EVERYONE is represented.

Humpheria wrote:Conservative Idealism, will you marry me?

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:Not until polygamy is legal

Hallo Island wrote:I LOVE YOU MUH ROADS

Muh Roads wrote:LOVE YOU TOO HALLO <3

Just a few quotes, but why is it that we are all pretending to be best friends, especially in the wake of the debates lately, when clearly there are serious problems among us?

Pevvania wrote:I fear that the party system is creating some serious divisions within the region. Because of this, I request that each member of the Reaganist Libertarian Party henceforth vote not in line with the party, but in line with their conscience. The RLP was not created to become a political cartel, it was created as a group of like-minded thinkers who sought to mix elements of conservatism and republicanism in directing regional policy. Its power has grown to the point where smaller voices who want to make a name for themselves are drowned out by the RLP. I am not at all declaring the abolition of the party, or that its members should leave, but that members should vote how they see fit.

Hallo Island wrote:*hugs pev*

Sometimes I forget how much I love this guy. Also, HALLO FOR CHAIRMAN

Albenia wrote:Beautiful speech Pev. This is beautiful.

*Claps joyfully*

And why is it that people will only listen to Pevvania? Humph said basically the same thing last night and nobody batted an eye at it, except for me apparently.

Albenia wrote:NOT in America

in this region.

Direct Democracy equals EVERYONE is represented.

It was an example, its like if we moved to ban all Christians from the region.

The Amarican Empire wrote:It was an example, its like if we moved to ban all Christians from the region.

The majority in the region are Athiest, so if they got sick of us saying god is good then under a direct democracy the Majority could ban us.

The Amarican Empire wrote:The majority in the region are Athiest, so if they got sick of us saying god is good then under a direct democracy the Majority could ban us.

I wasn't aware that the majority of the people here were nonreligious.

I know there are at least three people, but the majority?

The Amarican Empire wrote:It was an example, its like if we moved to ban all Christians from the region.

....Well that's what the people voted....

Miencraft wrote:I wasn't aware that the majority of the people here were nonreligious.

I know there are at least three people, but the majority?

the majority of active people here yes are nonreligious.

The Amarican Empire wrote:the majority of active people here yes are nonreligious.

Huh.

That's interesting.

The Amarican Empire wrote:the majority of active people here yes are nonreligious.

No...

Ronald Reagan And Rick Grimes wrote:Just a few quotes, but why is it that we are all pretending to be best friends, especially in the wake of the debates lately, when clearly there are serious problems among us?

And why is it that people will only listen to Pevvania? Humph said basically the same thing last night and nobody batted an eye at it, except for me apparently.

Because some of us know how to let things go. Also, Muh and I have never really fought.

Albenia wrote:....Well that's what the people voted....

> Creates the Minority Party Alliance to rally against the majority

> Would be okay if the majority voted to ban a specific minority group, because "that's what the people voted"

name all people here that you know are religious TTA.

Me.....

....

....

point taken.

The New United States wrote:> Creates the Minority Party Alliance to rally against the majority

> Would be okay if the majority voted to ban a specific minority group, because "that's what the people voted"

I value Direct Democracy because everyone is represented.

I created the MPA so we could get more Minority Representation

The Amarican Empire wrote:It was an example, its like if we moved to ban all Christians from the region.

I'm not a fan of Christianity. At all. Like seriously. I hate religion.

The Amarican Empire wrote:name all people here that you know are religious TTA.

I think a better response would be to name the few who are not, because I know for sure it isn't the majority.

Hallo Island wrote:I'm not a fan of Christianity. At all. Like seriously. I hate religion.

Be a Mormon Hallo.

We got the girls.....and guys (Me)

Albenia wrote:Me.....

....

....

point taken.I value Direct Democracy because everyone is represented.

I created the MPA so we could get more Minority Representation

I am Catholic so you can add me, but people like reagan,hallo, humpy and Anakha are nonreligious. If there is a religious majority here then it is a silent majority.

Post by Hallo Island suppressed by a moderator.

The Amarican Empire wrote:reagan,hallo, humpy and Anakha are nonreligious.

Hi.

So, what, five people? That's just under half of our active nations. Not quite enough to be the majority.

Post self-deleted by The New United States.

Miencraft wrote:Hi.

So, what, five people? That's just under half of our active nations. Not quite enough to be the majority.

there is most likely more.

Hallo Island wrote:Eat a butthole

... yours?

Albenia wrote:Be a Mormon Hallo.

I'm actually a Laveyen Satanist, but that isn't really something I share.

Hallo Island wrote:I'm actually a Laveyen Satanist, but that isn't really something I share.

A what Satanist?

Albenia wrote:A what Satanist?

LaVeyan.

Hallo Island wrote:LaVeyan.

What's that?

Albenia wrote:What's that?

Modern Satanism. It is atheism, but a belief in a set of ideals which Satan represents.

So, since the RLP is scaling down, is the MPA going to be less militant?

Humpheria wrote:So, since the RLP is scaling down, is the MPA going to be less militant?

Not trying to start anything, it would just be easier if we all knew where each other stood.

is humpy going to stay sexy?

The Amarican Empire wrote:is humpy going to stay sexy?

Yes.

Humpheria wrote:So, since the RLP is scaling down, is the MPA going to be less militant?

We aren't militant.

We'll revolt if you spread that lie. (Not really)

Hallo Island wrote:Modern Satanism. It is atheism, but a belief in a set of ideals which Satan represents.

That's interesting

Hallo Island wrote:Modern Satanism. It is atheism, but a belief in a set of ideals which Satan represents.

Then it isn't Satanism at all if it's atheism.

It's just Satanic influence.

Northern Prussia wrote:MPA?

Minor Party Alliance

Miencraft wrote:Then it isn't Satanism at all if it's atheism.

It's just Satanic influence.

Go to the church of satan website

So there was another pro-Democracy protest in the People's Republic of China. if the Chinese Government puts down the people with force would you guys support western sanctions on The People's Republic of China?

I use the full title because i see the Government of the Republic of China aka Taiwan as the true Chinese Government.

The Amarican Empire wrote:So there was another pro-Democracy protest in the People's Republic of China. if the Chinese Government puts down the people with force would you guys support western sanctions on The People's Republic of China?

I use the full title because i see the Government of the Republic of China aka Taiwan as the true Chinese Government.

China is the real China. Taiwan is old China.

I don't support sanctions on it.

Hallo Island wrote:Go to the church of satan website

I find it cool your a Satanist actually. It's interesting.

The Republic of China is China.

Hallo Island wrote:Go to the church of satan website

But the point is it's impossible to be a Satanist and atheist at the same time, since believing in Satan negates being atheist.

The Amarican Empire wrote:The Republic of China is China.

The People's Republic is China.

Miencraft wrote:But the point is it's impossible to be a Satanist and atheist at the same time, since believing in Satan negates being atheist.

....So

Hallo do Satanists believe in a god or what?

Albenia wrote:Hallo do Satanists believe in a god or what?

Satanism is by definition the worship of Satan, so, yes.

TTA did you turn Communist?

The Amarican Empire wrote:TTA did you turn Communist?

No.

The Amarican Empire wrote:TTA did you turn Communist?

return to*

Assembled with Dot's Region Saver.
Written by Refuge Isle.