Post Archive
Region: Libertatem
What are you on? I want some.
Miencraft, Republic Of Minerva, Rateria, Condealism
No name calling! Not towards anyone in particular, at least.
A nationstate isn't "private property."
*rollseyes*
You don't want it. It'll turn you into a statist.
Rateria, Condealism
So in order to please you, Gary Johnson needs to lie like Trump and promise the moon? That is some sorry standard, Pev. I expect better.
Rateria
Reality.
You guys need to understand that massively importing immigrants with socialist values and encouraging acts of perversion (which dumbs down the population to become even more socialist) are literally incompatible with libertarian ideals.
Homosexuality, casual sex, and porn have absolutely nothing to do with communism though.
Rateria, Condealism
Sounds boring.
Easy divorce is a necessary to a civil society. Anything less is the equivalent of slavery. Check the domestic violence rates and spousal murder rates in the Philippines where the Catholic Church's influence made divorce all but impossible.
Making divorce harder simply discourages marriage. encourages abusive relationships and sets people up for being trapped.
Miencraft, Rateria, Condealism
What are you talking about? I said nothing of the sort and you know it. I just detest the way in which he campaigned, and as a Libertarian concerned about the future of the party, you'd be wise to stop defending Johnson and admit that his campaign was at best a wasted opportunity and at worst a disaster.
"Well I'm an idiot, you know... really I'm the dumbest guy you've ever met in your whole life." - Gary Johnson on himself (actual quote)
Condealism
I think he did well. He's not the most media savvy person (unlike Dr. Paul) but I consider tripling the record set to be a success. He gained more media coverage than perhaps all the last libertarian candidates combined, got onto important late hour shows such as CNN and really managed to expand the coverage of the party. If it were McAfee or Petersen, they'd be ignored and laughed off. Now could have it been better? Possibly, I admit. But I don't blame Johnson as he tried the best he could and yet in the last few months the media went from adoring him and giving him coverage (as they thought he would take from Trump) to viciously attacking him.
A third party should be grateful that such a high ranking person like a governor would even consider them. But most of the time they tend to draw in loons like Jill Stein because those are the type of people that would consider running since they'd never get far in the Democrats or Republicans.
Rateria
Kek
Pevvania, Muh Roads
FULLY. AUTOMATED. LUXURY. GAY. SPACE. COMMUNISM.
*jumps on the meme train*
Miencraft, Rateria
To all the obese 'women' who hold signs saying "you won't grab MY p---y": don't worry, there was no danger of that ever happening anyway.
Miencraft, Muh Roads, The Ambassador To The Clfr, Condealism, The United States Of Patriots, Hoppean Snake
https://tinyurl.com/jtxwnd3
Miencraft, Shirayuki Mizore
Gay space communism you say?
Rev up those helicopters INNNN SPAAAACCCEEE
Pevvania, The Ambassador To The Clfr, Rateria, Condealism, Hoppean Snake
You guys are starting to sound like my school.
Pevvania, The Ambassador To The Clfr, Condealism, The United States Of Patriots
http://i2.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/003/101/Rev.png
Muh Roads
What is this 'helicopters' thing...? I'm lost.
A frequently used execution method by Pinochet's Chile was skydiving without a parachute.
Ah. Thank you.
Poll: what would you rather your child have, feminism or cancer?
Cancer, because at least it's recognized as a disease and has treatment options.
Pevvania, The United States Of Patriots, Hoppean Snake
What a curious question. Surely you don't mean to equate feminism with what I like to call feminazism?
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CXaatT4WEAA7bny.jpg
Miencraft
What's the difference between egalitarianism and misandry? You jest.
There's a big difference, I agree. But that's the problem. Feminism is not egalitarianism. In its current form, feminism is a culturally Marxist, SJW, anti-white, anti-male, segregationist ideology that has completely corrupted the name of the noble feminist movements of the 60s and before. If you support egalitarianism you're an egalitarian. But if you support feminism you're a feminist. End of story. And before we jump to "but not all feminists", please name me a single mainstream feminist website that doesn't espouse the type of views that you and I despise.
Miencraft, Rateria
http://www.alf.org/about.php
Condealism
please name me a single [B]mainstream[/B] feminist website that doesn't espouse the type of views that you and I despise.
just had to add that word in eh. Certainly the existence of non-mainstream feminists groups shouldn't taint the meaning of the word. I'd be fine calling myself a liberal feminist if both words weren't used in the exact opposite manner they originally suggest.
Condealism
#notanargument
>adopts medieval religious-based worldviews
>says "you just aren't keeping up with the times"
So, yeah. Kek is right.
Condealism
Milo already did that poll
Pevvania
#notanargument
No, actually, it is. Your worldview is antiquated and medieval and you say other people have to keep up with the times.
If anyone needs to modernize here, it's you.
Condealism
#notanargument
Think of it as a ceiling fan that does not need to be bolted to a ceiling.
Miencraft, Rateria, The United States Of Patriots
Pevvania, The United States Of Patriots
#NotMyArgument
Pevvania, Rateria, Condealism
#AlternativeFact
Rateria, Condealism, The United States Of Patriots
#NotAllArguments
Republic Of Minerva, Rateria, Teuberland, The United States Of Patriots
(Reposted from the Libertarian Discussion Thread):
As a libertarian, it Is hard not to be optimistic about the future.
Trumps cabinet picks aren't horrible from a libertarian perspective, actually, they are pretty good. Betsy Devos is a good pick for people who wish to see more competition in education which had been falling apart due to disasters caused by the ailing public school system and the teachers unions which back them. School choice will give more power back to parents to decide their children's education instead of the state. James Mattis as Defense Secretary is a no brainer for a more rational military policy. At least, I hope it will be more rational than the Obama administration.
The collapse of the Euro I see as a new opportunity to experiment with truly denationalized currencies such as Bitcoin, Regios and others. Although not ideal, Brexit gives nations a chance again to set their own policies that reflect better their people's and the individual's wishes, as opposed to a bigger body which does not reflect the wishes of anyone but the multinationals.
Meanwhile, ride sharing and room sharing services like Uber and AirBnB continue to inject new competition into old, monopoly stricken markets (or the lack of them, in these cases).
Gun rights in the US are more secure than ever, while both gay marriage and drug legalization continue to pick up steam in the United States and abroad, like in Ireland.
Edit: OH, and I forgot to add that the recent win from the Libertarian and Green parties to force the National Debate Commission to actually create a logical reason to disinclude them is great news. In addition to Ranked Choice being adopted in Maine and being discussed in several states, I believe that as time goes on the two party system will come to an end.
Miencraft, Pevvania, Kumquat Cove, Condealism, Shirayuki Mizore
Shower thought: If Common Core was enacted under Obama, the left would be defending it.
Condealism, The United States Of Patriots, Shirayuki Mizore
You may find this surprising, but I have a liberal friend who actually hates Common Core. I remember he said something like,
"I wouldn't want a friend that's more intelligent than me to be held back just because I may not be as smart as him."
Condealism
Feminism, you can't beat cancer out of a child.
Pevvania, The Ambassador To The Clfr, The United States Of Patriots
Post self-deleted by Pevvania.
mhomen hasn't logged on in 24 days
someone send a search party
Rateria
Who the hell do do we search for?
Miencraft, Pevvania, Muh Roads, Kumquat Cove, Rateria, Condealism, The United States Of Patriots
In a covenant...among proprietor and community tenants for the purpose of protecting their private property, no such thing as a right to free (unlimited) speech exists, not even to unlimited speech on ones own tenant-property. One may say innumerable things and promote almost any idea under the sun, but naturally no one is permitted to advocate ideas contrary to the very covenant of preserving and protecting private property, such as democracy and communism. There can be no tolerance toward democrats and communists in a libertarian social order. They will have to be physically separated and removed from society. [/B]
Taken from [I]Democracy: The God that Failed[/I] by Hans-Hermann Hoppe
Go on...
...aaand you lost me.
Why is advocacy for a cause - even in such innocuous form as idle chatter - so reprehensible as to warrant a flagrant violation of our natural right to speech? Even if you intend to sway us with an "ends justify the means" approach, when, at any point in this discussion, have you provided such an ends-based justification? What is it about your (tragically warped) view of libertarianism that makes it worth silencing your opposition? So far, you've declined to say!
Miencraft, Pevvania, Rateria, The United States Of Patriots
Doesn't Christopher Cantwell also have that whole "I'm a libertarian but everyone who disagrees with me should be silenced" thing?
Republic Of Minerva
https://ethanglover.biz/images/cantwell-gaaah.jpg
Rateria
https://christophercantwell.com/product/radical-agenda-helicopter-t-shirt-short-sleeves/
Yes.
Leftists and low IQ people are never going to "peacefully coexist" alongside your ultra cucktarian utopia. They'll just keep voting in an authoritarian government to control every aspect of your life, to give lazy people free garbage, and to massively import mexicans, Islamists, and other low IQ crimminals into the nation. And when low IQ lefties fail to get they commie goverment that they want, they resort to violent measures such as killing right wing groups and violently rioting and causing civil disturbances, such as thq one at uc berkley.
Like it or not, these people are dangerous and will never coexist with us right wingers. In order to have any politial relevance whatsoever, you need to grow up and join the rest of the right wing. A right wing social order is required before Libertarianism can ever work as an ideology.
So you believe in being aggressive against others? How Libertarian of you.
Miencraft, Kumquat Cove, Rateria, Condealism
Therefore, we should oppress them so that they don't get to do such things, and we should take away their rights so that they can't do anything.
Is that what I'm supposed to be getting from your argument? Because if that's the case, then your argument is the exact opposite of libertarianism.
Kumquat Cove, Rateria, Condealism
Still, helicopter jokes are funny af.
Miencraft, Pevvania, Rateria
"Who will build the roads?" jokes don't get old either.
Muh Roads, Condealism
I did grow up; that's why I'm no longer part of the right wing.
Having once been one myself, I can certainly understand the appeal of being a conservative. It feels like common sense; conservatives recognize poverty - specifically, those who are in it - as a problem, and big government as its enabler, and their ideals reflect what they feel is necessary to eliminate the problem. There's no need to hide it behind words like "leftist" or "low IQ" when it's evident that you recognize these descriptions as symptoms of a larger problem: poor people. To a conservative, it could not be more clear that rich people make good decisions, as evidenced by their continued prosperity, whereas poor people make bad decisions that keep them in poverty, drag others into poverty, are subsidized by the government, and cost taxpayers a great deal - is this not what you believe?
Is it not true that conservative politicians endeavor to criminalize abortion, restrict maternity leave, and obfuscate sex-related topics in order to dissuade the poor from having sex - thus preventing them from wasting obscene amounts of taxpayer money on medical procedures and/or children?
Is it not true that conservative politicians seek to remove the safety nets surrounding the economy - welfare, public healthcare, consumer protections, etc. - in the hopes that taxpayers will no longer have to pay for other people's laziness, all while the issues of Social Security, military spending, and subsidies for corporations are justified as being for hard-working folk?
Is it not true that conservative politicians seek to impose harsher sentences for victimless crimes, ban currently-legal forms of recreational risk-taking, and restrict immigration in order to mitigate the political influence of the poor so that they can remain in office long enough to make the government less liberal?
When I was a conservative, I believed that I knew what was best for the world. I thought that the lower class was beneath me, and that they could be just like me if they just tried harder. I meant well when I argued with liberals, socialists, communists, and even libertarians about this, but the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
In time, I realized I didn't know as much as I thought I did - not only that, but I realized that nobody else does, either. There is no silver bullet for poverty. There's no cure for crime. The best that we can hope for is to continue associating with those we wish to associate with by our own volition, conscientiously respecting the rights of those who recognize ours - and rationally defending ourselves from those who do not - so that, despite not knowing what's best for the world, we may at least determine what's best for ourselves.
It was when I heard conservatives like you claim otherwise that I realized how hypocritical you all were.
The evangelical right pretends to praise a loving God while seething with hatred at the mere thought of same-sex marriages. The fiscally conservative right raises a big fuss over those who regularly get a check from the government, unless it's their elderly parents or grandparents, in which case it's magically okay. The moderate right swells with pride at the Republican values of honor and tradition, until it's time to vote, at which point they incessantly ask politicians the question "what have you done for me lately?" And the socially conservative right? You and your ilk pretend that you're so much better than the left, that any one of you has more common sense than all of them put together, but at the end of the day, you're ready to meet their authoritarian communism with your reactionary fascism, their attempted seizure of "the means of production" with your indubitable "exploitation of labor", and their delusions of a "dictatorship of the proletariat" with your fully realized "bourgeois" empire. (What's doubly embarrassing is that I, like you, once made the fatally idiotic mistake of aggressively engaging with them on their level.)
I don't think the left is going to achieve their dreams of utopia anytime soon, especially here in the states. Right now, the GOP has a level of control over our nation's governments (particularly the federal government) that is almost unprecedented; if any side turns out to be truly dangerous, it'll no doubt be the right.
I've grown out of my self-righteous phase. I merely desire to be who I am, love whom I wish, and live my life in peace - the tragedy is that, though this dream may appear to be very close to the present reality, it is also very possible that I will never achieve even something so simple as this in my lifetime. Libertarianism has already proven to bear fruit, and it has naturally done so without the "guiding hand" of its antithesis - we don't need a utopia, because the ideals of life and liberty become ever stronger with every decision to discard the double-bladed swords of force and coercion in favor of the shining beacons of tolerance, understanding, mutual respect, and voluntary association.
You're welcome to let go of your unhealthy desire for control and join us.
Miencraft, Rateria, Jadentopian Order
Anyway, you've stated that you feel it's necessary. You've even reasoned that it's superior to what the left has to offer. That's nice, but it's not what I asked.
What I mean to ask is, why are your views the correct ones? How do you know what's best for the world? What makes the world you seek to create so great that it's worth using authoritarianism to get there? (Even leftists can come up with vaguely satisfying answers to questions like these. Surely you don't intend to let Marxist doctrines upstage you?)
Miencraft, Rateria
*you* get a helicopter ride
*you* get a helicopter ride
Everyone gets a helicopter ride!
Muh Roads, Rateria, Hoppean Snake
My objection isn't with NAP, but NAP by way of bad epistemology. You brought up NAP in the context of KCI, and Nietzsche is the inescapable conclusion to crossing that Kantian divide. NAP as an existential exercise is doomed to failure merely by might makes right. Might makes right is a weak argument, but a valid argument in such context nonetheless. NAP as a proposition of objective reality deduced as a self-evident truth necessary to liberty and equality stands objectively and in reality on its own outside of and in contradistinction to any existential prerogative. Life, liberty and property in accords with principles of Natural Law (before polluted by Romanticism) are complimentary, integral, coherent, and cogent. NAP as a subset to the Golden Rule of itself is tantamount to Justice, and without which there can be no moral certitude for any adjudication of Law.
Republic Of Minerva
Helicopters do not fly. They beat the air into submission.
Muh Roads, Rateria
2017 Grammys were a sham! Adele did a boring tribute to the late, great George Michael, then threw her award away for the phony cow Beyoncé! Sad!
I'll never understand the appeal in such programs.
Pevvania, Condealism
https://www.facebook.com/notes/maxime-bernier/two-threats-to-freedom-of-speech-c-16/10154843654082420
Refreshing! A Canadian politician that isn't a C U C K
Pevvania
Honestly, the declining state of awards ceremonies reflects the wholesale decay of the entertainment industry over the last 20-25 years, particularly in music. Vapid, lifeless trash is celebrated as 'art', morons who don't have a clue are given a platform to influence the young, and it's now trendier to employ massive teams of writers and marketers to do everything for you rather than creating your own work. This has gone hand in hand with the breakdown of the family (there's nothing "cool" about having kids out of wedlock and doing drugs!), the collapse of basic standards of morality, the propagation of collectivist propaganda on our TV screens, the rise of so-called modern art, the left-wing acceptance of radical Islam, and PC culture.
Cultural Marxism is the cancer that has infected music, feminism, the media, the education system, and Lord knows what else. It's time for conservatives, libertarians and the old free speech left to unite against this monstrosity. Hopefully President Trump represents the turning point and he can truly Make Western Civilization Great Again!
Miencraft
Did you see Grand Master Cuck's meeting with Trump? Like all the other Trump-bashers who ended up meeting him, he couldn't square up to him and just kissed his ass instead! No backbone whatsoever!
You really do make me wonder sometimes, Pev.
Republic Of Minerva, Condealism
It's true. Watch some Paul Joseph Watson videos and you'll get what I mean.
Post self-deleted by Rateria.
I'm personally fine with people identifying as non-binary genders, but when SJWs identify as attack helicopters and such, it seems to actually undermine the LGBT movement.
Miencraft, Republic Of Minerva, Condealism, The United States Of Patriots
LGB, It really doesn't make sense to me to link transgenderism with sexual orientations
If you don't say LGBTQXRSAJH123@£&!(8&+&9(:3"0;)+¥
you're a globaphobic bigot
The Ambassador To The Clfr, Hyderbourg, The United States Of Patriots, Hoppean Snake
you forgot the silent F
Also is this the party were I cry for penitence for my sin of being white?
Right - sexual orientation and gender identity are two very different subjects. Nonetheless, minorities in both groups tend to be ostracized (and often for the same reasons, at least insofar as the evangelical right is concerned), so it stands to reason that there would exist a non-exclusionary base of support.
Rateria
Don't forget if you're a man your a monster
The Ambassador To The Clfr, Rateria, The United States Of Patriots
Yeah, that whole bash the straight white male thing is getting a little boring.
Rateria, Condealism, Hyderbourg
There is no free speech left.
The left hates free thinkers, and anyone that questions the globalist order
Then you are not a libeytarian, since transgenderisn is a mental disease.
Are you for real?
Rateria
Post self-deleted by Miencraft.
Transgenderism in itself isn't, but the dysphoria that causes it is.
Secondly, I could say just the same about you; you're not a libertarian, because you're against people's rights to self-determination regarding their own bodies.
Condealism, The United States Of Patriots
I beg to differ. I have many friends in the LGBT movement. I even know a few transgender people. None of them seem to be mentally ill. Also, how is supporting transgender rights unlibertarian?
Miencraft, Condealism
Oooooh the trans debate has come to Libertatem. I love it!
Being transgender is fine because you can physically have your sex changed, but anything else - pansexual, Two-Spirit, non-binary, otherkin - is pure mental retardation.
Miencraft
Well there was, Snake. The New Left of the 60s pioneered free expression in media and art and even on college campuses. Noam Chomsky was once a part of this movement.
Black Lives Matter is a racist terrorist organisation.
Hoppean Snake
Uhhh... are you going to have any room for supper when you're finished with that foot in your mouth?
Muh Roads, Rateria
You're not seriously into any of that, are you?
I prefer the term "agender" myself, but if by "into that" you mean devoid of a gender identity that directly corresponds to "male" or "female" (or, in my case, any at all), then, uh, yeah.
Republic Of Minerva, Muh Roads, Rateria
A little slightly off topic rant here:
Transgendered people do not have more or less rights than anyone else.
If you were born with say, a cleft palate, it is you (or more likely your parents) who should foot the bill. But it doesn't entitle you to someone elses money.
It also goes for the millions of other things that may "cost" you money or otherwise burden you...like if you are too short, or too bald, or whatever. It is known that being tall is correlated with higher wages on average, and having hair is a boon to interviewers, but you would never get compensated in life for these deficiencies on another's dime.
So if you believe you were born the wrong gender and need a sex change, that should be on your dollar, not other peoples. I've always identified as male, but at the same time I couldn't care about doing ultra masculine things, neither was I insecure about my masculinity. It just didn't matter to me.
The Ambassador To The Clfr, Rateria, Condealism
I mean, I don't go and wave flags for individuals who identify as "other" or criticize them for doing so. Live and let live.
Condealism
No one can have there sex changed. It is completely imposable. Thats not to say people can't have the surgery, they can do what ever they want. But this mainstream ignorance of basic biology is really annoying.
I think you are confusing gender with gender roles. Because being agender would by definition be being without gender. Which is imposable. Unless you're an amoeba.
I personally am not a big fan of changing definitions of existing words to fit modern political thought.
Gender is (Biologically) the same as sex. So (biologically) you have to (with the very, very, rare cases of hermaphrodites) belong to one of the genders (sexes).
Gender itself is an intrinsic characteristic of our species. Gender roles are, rather than a characteristic, a behavior. And thus not fixed or immutable. So if by "agender" you mean you don't act according to the traditional view of gender ROLES than I suggest that a new phrase comes to represent that rather than a biological misnomer.
Miencraft, Pevvania, The Ambassador To The Clfr
I agree with that.
Exactly. The LGBT community do not want equal rights, they want special rights.
Hey y'all its Ankha (Its been a while) anyway Im back and better. I figured Id jump in and say something other than hello, so here's my take. I 100% agree with Min and its interesting to see b/c my city just took a crap on negotiations with the teachers union where they just dumped gender reassignment surgeries, as well as plastic surgery, out of the contract and it caused a huge ruckus. I think all people, regardless of almost anything (with the exception of people like felons who had these rights as citizens and people but forfeited some of them by committing a serious crime), should be treated equally but it's becoming obvious that this isnt what they're after. A lot of people in what I guess we're calling "protected minorities" are looking for dollars and privileges afforded to no one, not even the straight white male who they so often claim gets everything. I don't like making sweeping generalizations, and I will say that obviously this does not describe everyone in these groups or maybe not even the majority but it's common if not almost expected among the folks who speak out about it and end up leading the protests and "movements".
This brings me to address the next thing I saw that prompted a response which was this quote by Pevv (Hey buddy it's been a while),
I can't agree with this more. I was in Dallas when the sniper shooting happened a few months ago and both myself and everyone around me was scared out of their mind and then just so angry. These are terrorist attacks, they solve nothing except for killing innocent police officers. Notice how the officers killed in Dallas weren't the ones accused or convicted of any of these racial hate crimes or brutality- of course. Its like if youre a cook at one restaurant and I got bad food at a totally different restaurant 100 miles away and I come complain to you about it. (I notice the glaring flaw in that analogy where bad food=/=police brutality ending in death and complaining=/=killing cops.) I think the Baltimore riots over the summer made this clear. Dallas just made things a lot more real for me personally and also cemented the preposition for me myself that they are in fact not accomplishing anything but are, in fact, a terrorist group and should be recognized as such.Overall America is in some troubling times right now, from my viewpoint anyway. You guys have always been cool to talk to so its nice to see real conversation about politics again that isnt riddled with ad hominem attacks. Now just to see if I can figure out bbcode again....
This "ignorance" of basic biology is merely the consequence of taking more advanced biology to heart.
There are, of course, two biological sexes - only that isn't quite right, seeing as some individuals can be born with both types (or neither type) of reproductive organs, or have chromosomes contrary to the genitalia they possess, as the result of a birth defect or the like: such individuals are intersex (the term "hermaphrodite" is outdated). Anyway, I digress: the point I was getting to is that while it is ostensibly not possible to change the biological sex an individual was assigned at birth, it is possible for individuals to undergo transition so that their bodies can resemble (and, in many ways, function roughly equivalently to) the sex opposite that which they were assigned at birth. (Actually, resemble is an understatement when HRT is involved; transition isn't just SRS.)
Well, you're half right - there is indeed a distinction between gender identity (psychological) and gender roles/expression (social), which are both distinct from biological sex (physiological).
Cisgender individuals are people whose biological sex and gender identity overlap completely. (To simplify: IF sex == gender, RETURN cisgender) Notably, some of these individuals may choose to ignore (or rebel against) the arbitrary gender roles their respective societies impose, despite the congruent relationship between their sexes and genders.
Transgender individuals are people whose biological sex and gender identity do not overlap completely. (To simplify: IF sex != gender, RETURN transgender) The most common of these - those whose gender identities are the opposite of the biological sex they were assigned at birth - are often referred to as transsexual; due to being MTF/FTM, though, they still technically conform to the gender binary. There are, however, individuals who do not (and the blanket term non-binary is used for these); bigender folks identify with both binary genders, agender folks (like yours truly) identify with none, genderfluid folks do not have a consistent gender identity (instead, it varies), and despite there existing a myriad of other terms (most of which originate from Tumblr, and are thus dubious at best, in my opinion) to describe more esoteric permutations, some people who don't like any of the other labels prefer instead to simply call themselves queer.
Actually, I do act according to the traditional view of gender roles (well, for the most part, anyway), though I do so for the sake of convenience/necessity rather than out of genuine desire.
My biological sex is male, and with my neighborhood being as socially conservative as it is, I'd probably be lynched (or at least disowned) if I didn't express myself in a manner similar to that of a typical male. I do not, however, possess a gender identity; everything I know about being "male" specifically, I learned through observation and mimicry, rather than instinct or an innate sense of self as seems to be the case with most folks.
And then there's sexual orientation, which is another can of worms entirely...
Rateria
The Foreign Minister's Office
Government House | Emperor City
Allies and Friends:
I am writing to inform you that a new government has just been elected here in the Central Pacific Empire. Our new Prime Minister is [nation=short]Cylthropia[/nation]. Our new leadership is ready to get to work, and that includes our commitment to our allies and friends. If you have any comments or questions, please contact me.
Another newsworthy update is that I have been nominated by our Prime Minister and confirmed by our Imperial Council as a Silver Knight, as an award for my steadfast leadership as Prime Minister. I served our community between September 2015 and January 2017, with the exception of the March through April (2015) term.
We are open for business.
Keep Strong,
[nation=short]New Nationale Einheit[/nation]
Foreign Minister
Rateria, Condealism
Post self-deleted by Evil Genius Land.
The only living thing with more the two genders is fungus which makes in regards to sjw views on basic hygiene
Very plausible
Assembled with Dot's Region Saver.
Written by Refuge Isle.