Post Archive

Region: Libertatem

History

Zeouria wrote:TTA? BTDubs?

The Time Alliance, Albenia

By the way

Post by Zeouria suppressed by a moderator.

Zeouria wrote:Oh, yeah. I though TTA was banned forever for his clopping and left-leanings?

He was appealed on "Good Behavior". As a student of law, I can tell you with the utmost of rage and annoyance that "Good Behavior" in-game and in real life, is a bigger mockery to the justice system than Judge Judy. The court was not meant to determine if you were a well behaved criminal. It was meant to determine your guilt. Period. Ugh.

Guys I love my dog so much

Baphometus wrote:Guys I love my dog so much

That's why dogs are called man's best friend.

Post by Zeouria suppressed by a moderator.

The Amarican Empire wrote:That's why dogs are called man's best friend.

Ooh, I'm considered a man?

Post by Zeouria suppressed by a moderator.

Baphometus wrote:Ooh, I'm considered a man?

Of course that's what you are aren't you?

Zeouria wrote:Meh, I like cats better.

That opinion is the wrong opinion.

Post by Zeouria suppressed by a moderator.

Baphometus wrote:That opinion is the wrong opinion.

I agree cats are demons.

Post by Zeouria suppressed by a moderator.

My dog is snoring....

Zeouria wrote:What....

I believe I heard somewhere that cats are psychopaths. Whether or not this is a positive or a negative is open to debate, but I would say it is inconsequential.

Comfortably Numb just came on Pandora UNGH YES

OH MY GOD COME ON EILEEN IS ON HEKSKSJFJAKDKFKASDFGASDFG

Post by Zeouria suppressed by a moderator.

Pandora is on point tonight,

Yerfilag nearly closed embassies with us based on "anti-Christian comments." There's no harm in having an opinion, but try to keep it all respectful.

Pevvania wrote:Yerfilag nearly closed embassies with us based on "anti-Christian comments." There's no harm in having an opinion, but try to keep it all respectful.

If they are that concerned about it, maybe we shouldn't have an embassy with them.

We must care what other people think to an extent. How would the world survive if no one cared about another.

So it seems the us House of Representatives has passed a immigration bill that gives money to the Nat guard and border security. It also makes deportations quicker. Then Obama vowed he would veto it and act on his own.

Can't 2016 come any sooner?

Why should we be deporting people who are trying to seek a better life?

Cut welfare and make an easier path to citizenship. There. Immigration problem solved.

Baphometus wrote:If they are that concerned about it, maybe we shouldn't have an embassy with them.

Or maybe we can stop typing up intentionally offensive comments that are making us look bad.

The Amarican Empire wrote:Can't 2016 come any sooner?

Hopefully the GOP will take the Senate and marginalise the President for the rest of his term in office.

Republic Of Minerva wrote:Why should we be deporting people who are trying to seek a better life?

Cut welfare and make an easier path to citizenship. There. Immigration problem solved.

This. No immigrant to the United States should be given welfare at any point their lives. Period. That way, there'd be the economic benefits of free immigration without the drawbacks of having new people draining the welfare system.

The Amarican Empire wrote:Can't 2016 come any sooner?

Yeah, I'm getting pumped for a second Clinton presidency

Pevvania wrote:Or maybe we can stop typing up intentionally offensive comments that are making us look bad.

Yep.

Lack There Of wrote:Yeah, I'm getting pumped for a second Clinton presidency

Not necessarily, Clinton will have multiple opportunity to put a foot in her mouth.

The Amarican Empire wrote:Not necessarily, Clinton will have multiple opportunity to put a foot in her mouth.

I believe the phrase is "lol"

I'm no political scientist, but my money is on maintaing the Clinton dynasty

But who do you think would do a better job Hillary Clinton or obama?

What is CILeaks?

The Amarican Empire wrote:But who do you think would do a better job Hillary Clinton or obama?

It's not what I think, it's what the unwashed masses think

Considering America elected Barack Obama twice, it is more than likely that Hilary will be elected again.

Woo, new board term. Let's get rolling.

I have advice, do not go into Environmental Science as a profession. I have to take it as a college course, don't do it.

Right-Winged Nation wrote:I have advice, do not go into Environmental Science as a profession. I have to take it as a college course, don't do it.

Is it full of granola eating hippies?

Right-Winged Nation wrote:Considering America elected Barack Obama twice, it is more than likely that Hilary will be elected again.

I doubt it. First of all, it's a historical unlikelihood for a Democrat to be elected President after a two-termer of the same party has left office. This has only ever happened twice, I believe. Also consider recent electoral history - Reagan had a very successful presidency, so the voters naturally picked his VP to succeed him. Hillary does not have a successful presidency to follow. Even in the 2000 Presidential Election the Democrats lost to a Republican, even after eight prosperous years in office. So we may have reason to believe that the recent trend of two-term Democrat-two-term Republican-repeat may continue. Also, Hillary, so far, has done a very good job at sabotaging herself. On top of her widely-politicised screw-up in Benghazi, she is prone to making statements that make her look uptight, arrogant and disconnected from the public, such as her recent "We were broke" comment. Not to mention, there's a shed's-worth of baggage that she has to contend with. Whitewater, Lewinskygate and the recent revelation that she defended a child and laughed about it. Recent polls have shown that all of these have tightened the gap between her and Rand Paul, who looks like the current Republican frontrunner. And she's something of a political gimmick. Senator Obama was a black candidate for President, but his speeches evoked Martin Luther King and had a campaign that inspired hope in people. All Hillary has is her gender, and the fact that she was once First Lady. Considering bad candidates usually get beaten by good candidates in the general election, I expect Rand Paul to win, if he is nominated.

And the fact that Obama is probably getting Liz Warren to run in the primaries throws a spanner in the works.

The Amarican Empire wrote:But who do you think would do a better job Hillary Clinton or obama?

Clinton, probably. She's more experienced politically and isn't as left-wing as Obama.

The Serbian Empire wrote:Is it full of granola eating hippies?

Correct

Pevvania wrote:I doubt it. First of all, it's a historical unlikelihood for a Democrat to be elected President after a two-termer of the same party has left office. This has only ever happened twice, I believe. Also consider recent electoral history - Reagan had a very successful presidency, so the voters naturally picked his VP to succeed him. Hillary does not have a successful presidency to follow. Even in the 2000 Presidential Election the Democrats lost to a Republican, even after eight prosperous years in office. So we may have reason to believe that the recent trend of two-term Democrat-two-term Republican-repeat may continue. Also, Hillary, so far, has done a very good job at sabotaging herself. On top of her widely-politicised screw-up in Benghazi, she is prone to making statements that make her look uptight, arrogant and disconnected from the public, such as her recent "We were broke" comment. Not to mention, there's a shed's-worth of baggage that she has to contend with. Whitewater, Lewinskygate and the recent revelation that she defended a child and laughed about it. Recent polls have shown that all of these have tightened the gap between her and Rand Paul, who looks like the current Republican frontrunner. And she's something of a political gimmick. Senator Obama was a black candidate for President, but his speeches evoked Martin Luther King and had a campaign that inspired hope in people. All Hillary has is her gender, and the fact that she was once First Lady. Considering bad candidates usually get beaten by good candidates in the general election, I expect Rand Paul to win, if he is nominated.

And the fact that Obama is probably getting Liz Warren to run in the primaries throws a spanner in the works.

Pev, history supports your claim. However, with an uneducated youth, I fear that it will happen again Pev. The youth is easily persuaded and very uneducated.

Right-Winged Nation wrote:Pev, history supports your claim. However, with an uneducated youth, I fear that it will happen again Pev. The youth is easily persuaded and very uneducated.

Perhaps, but from what I gather Millenials have become disillusioned with President Obama. Rand Paul has been actively seeking the youth vote lately; he even got a standing ovation at the University of Berkeley, nothing less than a liberal indoctrination institution.

Pevvania wrote:Perhaps, but from what I gather Millenials have become disillusioned with President Obama. Rand Paul has been actively seeking the youth vote lately; he even got a standing ovation at the University of Berkeley, nothing less than a liberal indoctrination institution.

Fingers crossed, hopefully America has learned. I am supporting Rand Paul throughout the election.

Humpheria wrote:What is CILeaks?

An organization I roleplayed in Yerfilag. It's just for a game, it isn't real.

On an unrelated note, I saw Guardians of the Galaxy last night. Probably one of Marvel's best movies of all time. The only thing that pissed me off was the after credit scene.

Right-Winged Nation wrote:On an unrelated note, I saw Guardians of the Galaxy last night. Probably one of Marvel's best movies of all time. The only thing that pissed me off was the after credit scene.

I have yet to see it, but I wouldn't miss it for the world.

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:I have yet to see it, but I wouldn't miss it for the world.

It is an excellent film, but the after credits scene will anger you.

Do any of you guys play Assassins creed?

Right-Winged Nation wrote:Correct

I wonder if they like Trader Joes?

What a strange flag you have.

The Serbian Empire wrote:I wonder if they like Trader Joes?

No clue, but they are obnoxiously liberal and they worship Al Gore's film. Kill me now please.

Yrellian Confederacy wrote:What a strange flag you have.

Who has a strange flag?

And this assignment I have to do, ridiculous. Do not take Environmental

Right-Winged Nation wrote:And this assignment I have to do, ridiculous. Do not take Environmental

Lol "go pet a tree"

Baphometus wrote:Lol "go pet a tree"

It's actually take physical pictures and write a ten page paper on why trees affect human beings.

So with tta gone who will run against the hump?

I nominate hallo. He is Experienced and he is usually well liked in the region.

TTA left? Man I am gone for one day doing stuff and this happens.

The Amarican Empire wrote:So with tta gone who will run against the hump?

I nominate hallo. He is Experienced and he is usually well liked in the region.

Lol I nominate you to eat a dick

Baphometus wrote:Lol I nominate you to eat a dick

Is that an insult or an offer?

The Amarican Empire wrote:So with tta gone who will run against the hump?

I nominate hallo. He is Experienced and he is usually well liked in the region.

Yeah, but is he experienced enough?

I mean, you don't really need anyone for Humpy and I to run against. It just makes it interesting.

Yes but it feels like hump is just being handed the office of President. He needs someone who has a chance of beating him.

The Amarican Empire wrote:Yes but it feels like hump is just being handed the office of President. He needs someone who has a chance of beating him.

Well, who has a chance?

I would run but it would be as a joke really

Right-Winged Nation wrote:Well, who has a chance?

I know I have no chance.

Right-Winged Nation wrote:Well, who has a chance?

Maybe hallo

Humpheria wrote:I love Sweet Caroline by Neil Diamond. If I'm out on the town with muh friends and that comes on, we sing it so loudly, I'm sure Hallo could hear it in whatever Yankee state he's in.

SWEET CAROLINE!

BAH BAH BUH!!!

Implying that your not in a Yankee state? :P

The Serbian Empire wrote:Is it full of granola eating hippies?

Lots of hemp too :D

Muh Roads wrote:Implying that your not in a Yankee state? :P

Lots of hemp too :D

There is a lot hemp also. It sucks, and every time you tell them An inconvenient truth is wrong, they look like they want to commit murder.

Right-Winged Nation wrote:There is a lot hemp also. It sucks, and every time you tell them An inconvenient truth is wrong, they look like they want to commit murder.

I think that means you should murder them before they get to do the same to you.

Miencraft wrote:I think that means you should murder them before they get to do the same to you.

I may end killing all of them, bunch of pot smoking tree hugging liberal bastards!

Muh Roads wrote:Implying that your not in a Yankee state? :P

Lots of hemp too :D

Well, up nath (North) they think we're a Yankee state. But, down here in the heartland, we're red, white, and blue through and through.

The Amarican Empire wrote:Yes but it feels like hump is just being handed the office of President. He needs someone who has a chance of beating him.

Why does there have to be a competition. There should not be forced elections. If no one is running against me, it must mean that no one is in disagreement with my policies on more than one issue. It sounds like you are doing everything in your power to ensure that I won't win. You ran, asked TTA to run, and are now publicly pleading for someone to run against me. Why?

Do you really want to run unopposed?

The Amarican Empire wrote:Do you really want to run unopposed?

It'd be nice not to have to do anything else with the campaign, but if someone does run, I'm just going to keep on it. Why are you trying to make people run?

Let's see Muh Roads. That would be interesting to see.

Right-Winged Nation wrote:Let's see Muh Roads. That would be interesting to see.

Muh said he doesn't want any office (that's why he resigned IA) because he has more real life stuff.

Humpheria wrote:It'd be nice not to have to do anything else with the campaign, but if someone does run, I'm just going to keep on it. Why are you trying to make people run?

Because I don't think it's right to have someone just inherit the Presidency.

Just remember, guys - George Washington ran unopposed.

Let's not compare hump to the father of the United States.

The Amarican Empire wrote:Because I don't think it's right to have someone just inherit the Presidency.

Oh, really?

Well, following that logic, the election of the Presidency is the selection of the best choice for the job. So, in theory, if the people are satisfied with their option, would it not be frivolous to force another candidate.

The Amarican Empire wrote:Let's not compare hump to the father of the United States.

Yeah, I don't want to be insulted like that.

Your comparing The Hero of the Revolution to a Celebrity Statesman.

The Amarican Empire wrote:Your comparing The Hero of the Revolution to a Celebrity Statesman.

It's okay you can just call me Humpy.

But seriously, Pev, never put me in the category with the likes of that thing.

What's wrong with George Washington Humpy?

Right-Winged Nation wrote:Let's see Muh Roads. That would be interesting to see.

I'm rather flattered, really.

Humpheria wrote:Well, up nath (North) they think we're a Yankee state. But, down here in the heartland, we're red, white, and blue through and through.

Nath? Is that how you pronounce it? I want to hear your voice now Humpy.. :p

I guess your close enough to Kentucky... but a lot of self proclaimed "true southerners" back in Tennessee didn't consider Kentucky a southern state because of its role in the war. Not saying I agree with them, just thought it was an interesting point of view. I'm with my friend Terry, born and bred Tennessean, he said we're Yankees to every other damn country in the world, so us Americans are all f@&*!in Yankees then I guess. Let's take a shot of SoCo".

Humpheria wrote:It's okay you can just call me Humpy.

But seriously, Pev, never put me in the category with the likes of that thing.

Humpheria wrote:It's okay you can just call me Humpy.

But seriously, Pev, never put me in the category with the likes of that thing.

Don't be bashing on Washington.

Right-Winged Nation wrote:Don't be bashing on Washington.

The man not the city. You can bash Washington dc all you want.

The Amarican Empire wrote:The man not the city. You can bash Washington dc all you want.

And the state. Just sayin.

The Amarican Empire wrote:What's wrong with George Washington Humpy?

Let me count the ways.

He supported the national bank.

He was a very dishonest general.

He lied to almost all of his officers.

He spent funds exorbitantly.

He spent more money than any President on parties and balls.

He butchered states' rights.

And worst of all, you are villianized for disagreeing with him because he was elected the first president, though had little to do with the actual foundation of the government.

Oh lord..the national bank.....the whiskey rebellion.......mostly the whiskey rebellion...and that he actually brought guns to kill citizens during the whiskey rebellion...and he did some bad stuff during the whiskey rebellion. Just so you know.

Ankha wrote:Oh lord..the national bank.....the whiskey rebellion.......mostly the whiskey rebellion...and that he actually brought guns to kill citizens during the whiskey rebellion...and he did some bad stuff during the whiskey rebellion. Just so you know.

I love you, Ankha.

1 all this nation ever knew before it's making was the brits system. There are brit influences all over america.

2 we were in a harsh war with the top power of that time there could have been spys anywhere.

3 I do support states rights but at the time we wanted to establish the thought of all people in the new nation as Americans not as Virginians, Georgians, or otherwise.

Ankha wrote:Oh lord..the national bank.....the whiskey rebellion.......mostly the whiskey rebellion...and that he actually brought guns to kill citizens during the whiskey rebellion...and he did some bad stuff during the whiskey rebellion. Just so you know.

Without this man, there is no America. I know he blundered with the Whiskey Rebellion and I know the National Bank wasn't that great either(Even though it bought us Louisiana which was a great thing.) He lead us to victory over the British, and he set the two four year term to make sure there would never be a dictatorship or monarchy. Washington did have his faults, but without him there is no America, so stahp it.

Right-Winged Nation wrote:Without this man, there is no America. I know he blundered with the Whiskey Rebellion and I know the National Bank wasn't that great either(Even though it bought us Louisiana which was a great thing.) He lead us to victory over the British, and he set the two four year term to make sure there would never be a dictatorship or monarchy. Washington did have his faults, but without him there is no America, so stahp it.

plus when people wanted to push him into being a king he denied. Most revolutionary leaders would want absolute power.

Humpheria wrote:I love you, Ankha.

Oh, who could resist....and I totally love you Humpy.

Right-Winged Nation wrote:Without this man, there is no America. I know he blundered with the Whiskey Rebellion and I know the National Bank wasn't that great either(Even though it bought us Louisiana which was a great thing.) He lead us to victory over the British, and he set the two four year term to make sure there would never be a dictatorship or monarchy. Washington did have his faults, but without him there is no America, so stahp it.

*Thomas Jefferson lies awake in his grave trying to justify the constitutionality of buying the Louisiana purchase.......*

Lol!

We would of gotten the land from the purchase eventually. France would have still been crushed and we could have just taken it.

Ankha wrote:Oh, who could resist....and I totally love you Humpy.*Thomas Jefferson lies awake in his grave trying to justify the constitutionality of buying the Louisiana purchase.......*

Lol!

I know, Jefferson had to use what he swore to destroy to buy Louisiana. However, the expansion of land was necessary in order to continue to build America.

The Amarican Empire wrote:1 all this nation ever knew before it's making was the brits system. There are brit influences all over america.

2 we were in a harsh war with the top power of that time there could have been spys anywhere.

3 I do support states rights but at the time we wanted to establish the thought of all people in the new nation as Americans not as Virginians, Georgians, or otherwise.

That is such a weak argument, no offense.

1. Really? That is like defending Obamacare because Canada has universal healthcare.

2. That is absolutely no excuse.

3. So you support something. But, you don't. Okay.

Then Thomas Jefferson wouldnt lie awake in his grave....way to take the fun out of it,

Go Anti Federalism!

Assembled with Dot's Region Saver.
Written by Refuge Isle.