Post Archive
Region: Libertatem
Lets not forget the politburo as well.
Oh wait, those are the only people worth anything in North Korea, according to North Korea, I forget.
...Michelle...?
Question, why do we have the social liberal Beethoven playing, when we could have the quasi libertarian Tchaikovsky?
1812 overture: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VbxgYlcNxE8
Is that a fat joke?
Everything is if you want it to be.
Because it sounds good?
Because who cares?
Is TTA a traitor? I dunno.
Do his actions look suspicious? Certainly.
Does Libertatem allow people to talk to our enemies without legal consequences? Yes.
Should TTA openly act entirely independent as long as he is submitting to NK? Without a doubt.
Should we stop bickering so that we remain strong and united? Yes.
Any other questions?
Because you are a COMMUNIST SYMPATHIZER
... NO YOU
No, TTA
Who is Michelle ?
When's Humpy After Dark coming back?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelle_Obama
Michelle Obama
Only by executive order El Presidente.
And now for a copypasta!
"The HUD Act
Humpheria After Dark
Article 1
Section I
Every day at 9PM Eastern, the After Dark period will begin, and it will end at sunrise over New York City the next morning.
Section II
Should Humpheria be present, this time will be called Humpy After Dark
Section III
Sex with Humpheria will be distributed freely during this time.
Section IV
Humpheria must wear either nothing, or skintight clothing for the duration of After Dark.
Article II
Section I
Humpheria will be jailed for non-compliance."
Boom!
oooooh Ok. I though you were talking about a woman in office in Libertatem.
I knew this was nearly impossible.
Moochelle Obola.
That's one way to beat the Communists.
Whilst Tsarist Russia during 1812 was no libertarian paradise, the Russians saved Europe from the knawing evil of Napolien's French dictatorship
With sex?
1. Not last time I checked
2. I guess they might.
3. yeah!
4. Of course.
5. Agreed.
No with Humpheria's sex.
Go to 13:58 for the fun part. :D
As long as it is freely distributed evenly to all revolutionaries.
CHAAAARGE
2 bad things the French and a dictaorship. But the French part is the worst part.
I like the part where they all died in the Russian winter because they were dumb.
Hump's gonna kill you now, you know?
*whispering to self* 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. *deep breath*
HONHONHON
Shrink said I can't do that the francophobes anymore.
Non.... non..... non.....
This is goddamn Mien after dark.
I'm going to go to bed before I completely destroy all chances of conducting diplomacy from now to the end of time.
I can give y'all Time After Dark.
Oh god no.
Fun fact : a lot of French people still love Napoleon, even if he led more than one million french soldiers to their death, establish a dictatorship and bankrupted the country.
The only good Frenchman was Bastiat.
Come on Time after Dark.
I can tell you my most guarded secrets and some very strange relationships o' mien.
Come on. a big 0.001% of french people are good.
If you do it, I'll jump. I swear to God, I am not playing games with you.
Good night, everybody!
O hump.
Now it's time for the Roads after dark.... roadshow? Eh.. it's mostly infomercials and people begging to hear me speak.
http://youtu.be/JIGDL2Wl16w
I've seen that video before. Its hilarious, just like cs188s other videos.
I'm privatizing my millitary
And then the DWSM paid your armies off and took control.
Just got tricked into joining a workers' union. Ugh.
How did they trick you?
There was a paper stashed in a stack of paperwork I had to do. Admittedly, I could have paid more attention, but it was like the twentieth paper.
Been outta town for a day or two. What's going on?
Stay to meet chicks and argue with people. That's what I did when someone pushed me into joining a union one time.
Nice.
Before Rick Snyder, a lot of work places in MI required you to be in the union to work there.. The one I was in wasn't so bad.. paid union meeting time.. lol
Do you guys support Workers Unions?
I do as long as it's voluntarily joined and as long ad said Union actually works to protect the workers logically and rationality.
I support them historically when they where only there to help, but now they have grown corrupt and a killer of our economy.
The Super PAC (union) that I joined had a newspaper calling Mitch McConnell "a right-wing economic disaster" and hailing Alison Lundergan Grimes as a hero of the workers. The next section was a story about how the Union saved a worker who skipped 9 days of work to hang out with his girlfriend. They sued the company and made them pay 25,000.
Hello
How are ya?
8th most scientifically advanced in the region - and not a single dime of government spending going towards subsidies. Hell yeah.
I'm 83rd but that's cause we spend on the Military, Laws and Administration.
If you had to support a Party, but the Republican, Demicrats and Libertarian parties all were gone who would it be?
I'm going with the Modern Whigs.
The Constitution Party. I'm the 4th most scientifically advanced.
The Reaganist Libertarian Party.
Ick...
Is that a real party?
I'd support the Objectivist Party.
..Oh joy that one.
I do not believe america has a Party restoring the Monarchy to it, in as much I would support your rotten revolutionary constitutional party, because at least it shows true conservatism.
The Constitution Party is a paleoconservative party. Meh, I dislike the racism and populism that paleos seem to peddle.
Yep.
https://www.reaganistlibertarianparty.us
Sir that webpage is not available.
That's my sarcasm for ya.
I urge all members of the House, and all citizens, to vote [B]against[/B] the Attorney General's Act. The former President Humpheria has made many important legislative contributions to the region, but this is not one of them. It authorises a large expansion of government and is fundamentally unconstitutional. Article III of the Libertatem Constitution says that "The government of Libertatem shall have an Attorney General, appointed by the founder." It cannot become an elected position unless the Constitution is amended.
Pev supporting bureaucracy instead of democracy. That's strange.
I haven't been allowed to say this in a long time
#RLPTyranny.
It does support the creation of new government people though if I remember correctly. I simply voted Yes because it allowed the AG to be elected.
Actually, I'm opposing bureaucracy, which the act expands.
[B]Section II
Subsection II
The OAG shall be consist of the Attorney General, Deputy Prosecutor, and Deputy Policy Attorney[/B]
Elections are all well and good, Amarican, but this act is a violation of the Constitution, which explicitly gives the Founder/President power to appoint the Attorney-General.
The act expands the Amount and Power of the government by making an Office of the AG, while it does expand democracy it creates two newly appointed positions...Which really makes it a 1 election 2 new appointment deals instead of one Appointment.
We didn't have the Deputy prosecutor and Police attorney before this bill right Pev?
Then sue the government if it passes.
This is weird, but I find myself agreeing with Time. This is a good bill
Or I could just say no...
I shall follow The New Libertatem Party in opposition of this act.
It sets up 1 Elected to 2 appointed ratio.
it doesn't actually increase democracy. It looks like it does, but it doesn't.
So it's just another hump trick to increase the power of the government!
Yes indeed.
For once, I vehemently disagree with the good President Pevvania!
It goes without saying, as is always true, the constitution can be amended. The Attorney General is the final say on legal affairs and I feel that it is far too important to be employed at the leisure of the President. Not to mention a drastic decrease in executive power, which is always a good thing.
On the bureaucracy issue, the act explicitly states that these positions can be held by anyone else, and they're only purpose is to support the AG in their respective areas and to stand in for him when there is a conflict of interest. Just because two essentially powerless minute positions are created, it would be insufficient to cry bureaucracy and condemn an important innovation in the justice system.
It does not expand government by any means. The Attorney General office exists. I am not adding a whole new office, simply amending how that office is filled.
I urge the people of Libertatem, do not vote no simply because it is suddenly popular. This is an essential piece of legislation. Should the President choose to veto this at Pevvania's discretion, every legal form of recourse will be taken, I assure you.
Really?
The Office of the AG already exists. I'm in it. I said that it would be known as the OAG for the sake of typing OAG instead of Office of the Attorney General.
Yes, an elected official appoints two deputies. But, these deputies can hold any other office, they have no executive power, no legislative power, and very little judicial power. The Deputy Prosecutor would assist the AG in a trial by compiling evidence and standing in his place when he is not available or he is involved in a conflict of interest. The Policy Attorney would assist the AG in legislative constitutionality and defense cases by offering a second opinion on legislation in question. Period. He can stand in if there is a conflict of interest, but that is very rare. But to prove it's worth, in this case. If it passes and it's constitutionality comes into question (which it won't as I intend to amend) I would of course rule in it's favor. I wrote it. This would be an instance in which it is necessary. It does not create two military dictators, it creates two research assistants.
Will we get so caught up in semantics and wordplay that we refuse the region this essential expansion in democracy and decrease in executive discretion?
I apologize i didn't know exactly how much power these two new posistions would have.
So if the US Department of Defense reorganizes and employs more appointed officials. Its an unwarranted expansion of government. But if you expand your office its completly okay. Humpheria, I have agreed with you on many issues, but this looks as if you are trying to increase your influence within our government.
I would like to motion a vote to create the unofficial office of Chairman of the House and place Pevania on the seat.
Post self-deleted by Miencraft.
Can I just point out that when the elected President appoints five guys without anyone else's say nobody cares, but when someone tries to add another elected official that appoints less than half of that, people go nuts?
I agree, this isn't a expansion of governement
I'm with you guys.
Well its adding two new seats to the Office, therefore expanding the government
Nobody cared when the appointed IA, State, and War managers appointed deputies.
It is apart of the Attorney general's staff.
I actually did, but should everyone stand for more expansion?
Post self-deleted by Right-Winged Nation.
I say nay to this bill. The bill is unconstitutional in its own right and the mere fact that the Attorney General, who is charged with legal and constitutional matters of this region would even dare propose such a bill.
The meaning of this law went right over your head.
It makes the Attorney General an elected office, which it is currently appointed by the President, who also appoints four other people at his will without any balance. The Attorney General prosecutes crimes and rules on legislation, the President could use that to his advantage to influence legislation. Which is why it should be an elected office.
The two appointed officials have no executive or legislative powers. The most that they can do is rule on a trial or legislation in the absence of the elected Attorney General.
This is not simply because I am Attorney General. By making the Attorney General an elected official, I put myself at risk of getting voted out? If I was worried about myself, I would want it to stay appointed so that I could safely keep it. You can oppose legislation, but please do it for the right reasons.
I oppose this legislation more for its constitionality, rather than its content.
Assembled with Dot's Region Saver.
Written by Refuge Isle.