Post Archive

Region: Libertatem

History

The Time Alliance wrote:I can be Libertatems ambassador to CFN haha

One person dealing with all the Ambassador work between two regions.

Like I said, that is up to Hallo. Though, I may be inaugurating a new Chief Diplomat.

Post self-deleted by Luxembourg Dynasty.

Luxembourg Dynasty wrote:I know your secrets, Libertatem.

And you are?

Luxembourg Dynasty wrote:I know your secrets, Libertatem.

Which ones?

Post self-deleted by Luxembourg Dynasty.

Luxembourg Dynasty wrote:Do you sit comfortably in your city of bones and rivers of blood? Do you sleep soundly listening to the souls of regions you have mercilessly crushed?

Why yes, yes we do.

Post self-deleted by Luxembourg Dynasty.

Luxembourg Dynasty wrote:You may be smug now, but the time comes when you will all face the justice of your past. The executioner of your historic transgressions.

Is that a threat? Because if it is the Libertatem will make a promise you may not end up liking.

Post self-deleted by Luxembourg Dynasty.

Luxembourg Dynasty wrote:It is not a threat. It is a fact.

Let me give you a fact, you attempt to threaten Libertatem, and we unleash the gates of hell

Post self-deleted by Luxembourg Dynasty.

Luxembourg Dynasty wrote:You may be smug now, but the time comes when you will all face the justice of your past. The executioner of your historic transgressions.

Well, thankfully we have an active founder that can be accessed by multiple nations. So it'll be pretty difficult.

Post self-deleted by Luxembourg Dynasty.

Pevvania wrote:Well, thankfully we have an active founder that can be accessed by multiple nations. So it'll be pretty difficult.
Luxembourg Dynasty wrote:Nothing I haven't experienced before, sir. I have seen Libertatem warfare. You don't scare me.

You want to try it, go for it. Just know it will be the biggest mistake of your life.

Post self-deleted by Luxembourg Dynasty.

Luxembourg Dynasty wrote:I am positively shaking in my shoes.

And we are suppose to fear you?

Post self-deleted by Luxembourg Dynasty.

Post self-deleted by Luxembourg Dynasty.

Who is this guy?

Nut job who is threatening libertatem

Right-Winged Nation wrote:Nut job who is threatening libertatem

Ha! Probably a jealous commie.

[nation=short]Luxembourg[/nation] dynasty: we can still link your factbook

We may need to look out, though this is not a major threat. Still, keep alert.

Republic Of Minerva wrote:[nation=short]Luxembourg[/nation] dynasty: we can still link your factbook

Might be the wrong one

Just another nation jealous of the greatness of Libertatem.

Is it possibly one of Einseiv's puppets? I remember from the trial that he has a flair for the... dramatic.

Funkytopia wrote:Is it possibly one of Einseiv's puppets? I remember from the trial that he has a flair for the... dramatic.

Whoever it is, we must be careful.

That wasn't the first time we've had someone trying to stir us up. If he tries something, we'll show him what's up. But, what can one guy do?

Humpheria wrote:That wasn't the first time we've had someone trying to stir us up. If he tries something, we'll show him what's up. But, what can one guy do?

Nothing, but he may have buddies.

Right-Winged Nation wrote:Nothing, but he may have buddies.

So do we.

Humpheria wrote:So do we.

True. I kinda of want to see him try this, just so we can laugh at his epic failure

Time a Yo momma joke.

Yo momma is so ugly, that the LGBT rights people had to come up with a new gender just for her.

Humpheria wrote:That wasn't the first time we've had someone trying to stir us up. If he tries something, we'll show him what's up. But, what can one guy do?

Become the hulk. Then we'd be screwed.

Luxembourg is definitely Einsiev

Guise, I need deputies and newspaper writers and stuff.

Sign up please.

Miencraft wrote:Guise, I need deputies and newspaper writers and stuff.

Sign up please.

Anyone can be a deputy.

Humpheria wrote:Anyone can be a deputy.

Yo, mayn, it's my gawd-diggity-dang office, mayn, I'll deputize who I want tuh.

Why is ein banned. We forgave tta for messing up two military operations. Is tta more loveable or something?

The General Of The American Empire wrote:Why is ein banned. We forgave tta for messing up two military operations. Is tta more loveable or something?

Dude, trials are a thing that we do for a reason.

Humpheria wrote:Anyone can be a deputy.

Miencraft wrote:Yo, mayn, it's my gawd-diggity-dang office, mayn, I'll deputize who I want tuh.

It's almost like we need a uniform methodology to establish a system for deputies *nudges president*

Lack There Of wrote:It's almost like we need a uniform methodology to establish a system for deputies *nudges president*

As the guy in charge of putting people on a list that says they can run for public office, I think that only citizens should be deputies.

The General Of The American Empire wrote:Why is ein banned. We forgave tta for messing up two military operations. Is tta more loveable or something?

We all know the answer to that is Yes.

The General Of The American Empire wrote:Why is ein banned. We forgave tta for messing up two military operations. Is tta more loveable or something?

TTA was allowed back in after several months of being banned and a long period of legal organising. Ein tried to sabotage a key military op, lied about it and then invented some lame excuse for not being able to procure evidence. He'll serve his time. But hopefully he won't come back. While TTA has probably made some decent contributions to this region, Einsiev has offered us nothing but annoyance, abuse and homophobia.

Pevvania wrote:TTA was allowed back in after several months of being banned and a long period of legal organising. Ein tried to sabotage a key military op, lied about it and then invented some lame excuse for not being able to procure evidence. He'll serve his time. But hopefully he won't come back. While TTA has probably made some decent contributions to this region, Einsiev has offered us nothing but annoyance, abuse and homophobia.

...

1. a long period is an understatement.

2. *Thinks* Umm MPA...Umm That's about it.

3. Now I have to defend EIn here. He's not a bad person. Despite his Homophobia (Which is very ironic considering things with me and him) and abuse of people (Which I have never seen, but I'll take your word for it) he is a great guy, very funny and very kind.

The Time Alliance wrote:...

1. a long period is an understatement.

2. *Thinks* Umm MPA...Umm That's about it.

3. Now I have to defend EIn here. He's not a bad person. Despite his Homophobia (Which is very ironic considering things with me and him) and abuse of people (Which I have never seen, but I'll take your word for it) he is a great guy, very funny and very kind.

Yeah, maybe you're right. Maybe I'm being a bit tough on him. I just find it hard to respect liars, especially in the face of irrefutable evidence, and considering his previous record I feel that he has to pay his debts.

Pevvania wrote:Yeah, maybe you're right. Maybe I'm being a bit tough on him. I just find it hard to respect liars, especially in the face of irrefutable evidence, and considering his previous record I feel that he has to pay his debts.

Can you please explain to me exactly what happened?

The Time Alliance wrote:Can you please explain to me exactly what happened?

Court Room A

Humpheria wrote:Court Room A

There's also a short summary of the case linked in the IA factbook.

Sorry I haven't logged on in a while. Some stuff came up

Ok....you must be banished!!!! (You know its ok...)

Ankha wrote:Ok....you must be banished!!!! (You know its ok...)

Lol

Banish him to the island of perpetual tickling.....

Hello Everyone. I am Tellus Risus.

A new nation that decided to come here based on your activity and embassy with CFN.

My IC nation represents my OOC beliefs which are that of an Environmentalist with Ecofascist/Green Politics and a mix of Eco-Communism. I support groups like Earth First! and am a strong believer in Malthusianism. It is my view humans have hurt the Earth a lot and while still having a place in the Earth should better cooperate with it.

I'm against people putting one species over another and am against any groups wanting extinction of any species including groups wanting human extinction.

Well, welcome to Libertatem, always nice to see a new face.

And a fresh argument, of course.

Miencraft wrote:Well, welcome to Libertatem, always nice to see a new face.

And a fresh argument, of course.

Of course As i just explained on CFN's RMB I am a Social Libertarian who leans far-Left. I support people having their freedoms unless it harms another person or the Environment.

Tellus Risus wrote:Of course As i just explained on CFN's RMB I am a Social Libertarian who leans far-Left. I support people having their freedoms unless it harms another person or the Environment.

Enchante.

Tellus Risus wrote:Of course As i just explained on CFN's RMB I am a Social Libertarian who leans far-Left. I support people having their freedoms unless it harms another person or the Environment.

does a person have a right to a burger? (not a soy burger, but an all american classic)

Lack There Of wrote:does a person have a right to a burger? (not a soy burger, but an all american classic)

Beasts eat other beasts in nature all the time. Why put us in a seperate boat? Nature is as ready to us as it is to any species.

Tellus Risus wrote:Beasts eat other beasts in nature all the time. Why put us in a seperate boat? Nature is as ready to us as it is to any species.

We'll get along just fine

Post self-deleted by Miencraft.

Tellus Risus wrote:Beasts eat other beasts in nature all the time. Why put us in a seperate boat?

I love you so much right now.

Miencraft wrote:I love you so much right now.

Why thank you.

Lack There Of wrote:We'll get along just fine

Hopefully.

Tellus Risus wrote:Hello Everyone. I am Tellus Risus.

A new nation that decided to come here based on your activity and embassy with CFN.

My IC nation represents my OOC beliefs which are that of an Environmentalist with Ecofascist/Green Politics and a mix of Eco-Communism. I support groups like Earth First! and am a strong believer in Malthusianism. It is my view humans have hurt the Earth a lot and while still having a place in the Earth should better cooperate with it.

I'm against people putting one species over another and am against any groups wanting extinction of any species including groups wanting human extinction.

I agree on the environment and everything, but I think people shouldn't be restricted from hunting.

But, eco fascism and eco communism? I'm interested to here how these two work.

In regards to hunting, I'm pissed.

I recently acquired a hunting licence but I must be accompanied by someone with a liscens in order to legally hunt. And, even after that, I need to take classes in 'safety' in order to acquire the actual licence.

Zeouria wrote:I agree on the environment and everything, but I think people shouldn't be restricted from hunting.

But, eco fascism and eco communism? I'm interested to here how these two work.

Hunting that's kind of a gray zone. I think hunting for food is fine, but not hunting for sport.

Eco-Fascism is not me in total. I just take from some aspects of it. In full it's a totalitarian system forcing people to put nature before them. I agree with government actions to do whatever ut needs to protect the environment but I don't agree it's the only thing governments should think about.

Eco-Communism which I am more so is sorta the same as regular communism. Nature is not a private thing but instead souls be open to all. While I advocate this I wouldn't consider myself completely communist as I'm fine with business so long as they have proper environmental restrictions as to protect the environment.

Zeouria wrote:In regards to hunting, I'm pissed.

I recently acquired a hunting licence but I must be accompanied by someone with a liscens in order to legally hunt. And, even after that, I need to take classes in 'safety' in order to acquire the actual licence.

Sounds like gun control, that's a very bad thing.

Right-Winged Nation wrote:Sounds like gun control, that's a very bad thing.

It gets worse (couldn't finish it, was dealing with something)

In Michigan, you're no longer allowed to hunt on your own land without a license! The DNR can walk right on to your land and make sure you're not hunting... I say screw it, I'm hunting all I want.

Tellus Risus wrote:Hunting that's kind of a gray zone. I think hunting for food is fine, but not hunting for sport.

Eco-Fascism is not me in total. I just take from some aspects of it. In full it's a totalitarian system forcing people to put nature before them. I agree with government actions to do whatever ut needs to protect the environment but I don't agree it's the only thing governments should think about.

Eco-Communism which I am more so is sorta the same as regular communism. Nature is not a private thing but instead souls be open to all. While I advocate this I wouldn't consider myself completely communist as I'm fine with business so long as they have proper environmental restrictions as to protect the environment.

Welcome to libertatem.

A totalitarian ideology demanding people put nature before man? And compatible with communism, a stateless and moneyless society? I'm having trouble realizing how these two are entirely compatible. And, it's foolish to restrict hunting and recourse mining and what not. It's virtually impossible, and will just create a black market.

Zeouria wrote:It gets worse (couldn't finish it, was dealing with something)

In Michigan, you're no longer allowed to hunt on your own land without a license! The DNR can walk right on to your land and make sure you're not hunting... I say screw it, I'm hunting all I want.

Welcome to libertatem.

A totalitarian ideology demanding people put nature before man? And compatible with communism, a stateless and moneyless society? I'm having trouble realizing how these two are entirely compatible. And, it's foolish to restrict hunting and recourse mining and what not. It's virtually impossible, and will just create a black market.

Like I said. I took aspects of Communism. I did say I'm neither of them but take aspects from both. I like my state, freedoms and money a lot.

Hunting should only be restricted if the animal killed is not eaten afterwords and if overhunting becomes a problem. If theres no over hunting and it's eaten well. Such is the course nature must take for anything to survive.

Mining is rather important and again so long as people don't disrupt larger ecosystems with mining I see no problem with digging down.

Zeouria wrote:It gets worse (couldn't finish it, was dealing with something)

In Michigan, you're no longer allowed to hunt on your own land without a license! The DNR can walk right on to your land and make sure you're not hunting... I say screw it, I'm hunting all I want.

Welcome to libertatem.

A totalitarian ideology demanding people put nature before man? And compatible with communism, a stateless and moneyless society? I'm having trouble realizing how these two are entirely compatible. And, it's foolish to restrict hunting and recourse mining and what not. It's virtually impossible, and will just create a black market.

Don't you just hate those government regulations? Your land your power. You should be able to do almost anything on your property.

Tellus Risus wrote:Like I said. I took aspects of Communism. I did say I'm neither of them but take aspects from both. I like my state, freedoms and money a lot.

Hunting should only be restricted if the animal killed is not eaten afterwords and if overhunting becomes a problem. If theres no over hunting and it's eaten well. Such is the course nature must take for anything to survive.

Mining is rather important and again so long as people don't disrupt larger ecosystems with mining I see no problem with digging down.

It's impossible to know if the animal is eaten. You'd spend billions on a worthless and unwinnabke war against something as stupid as forcing people to consume what they kill. That isn't even a problem in america or Canada. Rather, in Russia where endangered species are killed for pelts which make thousands when crossed into china.

Mining will always destroy environments.

Libertarian Hero wrote:Don't you just hate those government regulations? Your land your power. You should be able to do almost anything on your property.

It's just stupid... I'm going to hunt anyway, I don't care.

Pevvania wrote:Maybe I'm being a bit tough on him.

No, you're not.

Zeouria wrote:It gets worse (couldn't finish it, was dealing with something)

In Michigan, you're no longer allowed to hunt on your own land without a license! The DNR can walk right on to your land and make sure you're not hunting... I say screw it, I'm hunting all I want.

Welcome to right-wing libertarianism. Now you know why we hate gun control, government regulations, and private property infringements.

Libertarian Hero wrote:Don't you just hate those government regulations? Your land your power. You should be able to do almost anything on your property.

I like Government Restrictions on certain things.

When it comes to the basis of land I do support Private Property to an extent however I much prefer public property when it comes to housing.

Zeouria wrote:It's impossible to know if the animal is eaten. You'd spend billions on a worthless and unwinnabke war against something as stupid as forcing people to consume what they kill. That isn't even a problem in america or Canada. Rather, in Russia where endangered species are killed for pelts which make thousands when crossed into china.

Mining will always destroy environments.

Then so be it. It's better our money go to that then to say the military or welfare. If a human kills an animal and doesn't eat it then they've killed nature for no reason. That's not a good thing.

Mining doesn't always destroy it and if it does it can be in small amounts so that the area can fix itself.

I mean right-wing in a stereotypical sense, mind.

Tellus Risus wrote:I like Government Restrictions on certain things.

When it comes to the basis of land I do support Private Property to an extent however I much prefer public property when it comes to housing.Then so be it. It's better our money go to that then to say the military or welfare. If a human kills an animal and doesn't eat it then they've killed nature for no reason. That's not a good thing.

Mining doesn't always destroy it and if it does it can be in small amounts so that the area can fix itself.

You're failure, then.

Post self-deleted by Zeouria.

Tellus Risus wrote:I like Government Restrictions on certain things.

When it comes to the basis of land I do support Private Property to an extent however I much prefer public property when it comes to housing.Then so be it. It's better our money go to that then to say the military or welfare. If a human kills an animal and doesn't eat it then they've killed nature for no reason. That's not a good thing.

Mining doesn't always destroy it and if it does it can be in small amounts so that the area can fix itself.

I like some government regulations on some things also. I am a Minarchist however so I believe that a limit exists. I would not mind a paid vacation regulation like they have in Germany and I like the anti trust laws but I do not agree with Environmental and minimum wage laws.

Zeouria wrote:You're failure, then.

Explain. Please. Also. That sentence doesn't make since.

You are failure then?

The General Of The American Empire wrote:I like some government regulations on some things also. I am a Minarchist however so I believe that a limit exists. I would not mind a paid vacation regulation like they have in Germany and I like the anti trust laws but I do not agree with Environmental and minimum wage laws.

Environmental laws are some of the few things besides mw and business healthcare benefits the Government should enforce.

A paid vacation? Why? So someone can be paid for relaxing?

Tellus Risus wrote:Explain. Please. Also. That sentence doesn't make since.

You are failure then?

Excuse me. 'Your failure, then.'

Zeouria wrote:Excuse me. 'Your failure, then.'

Still really doesn't make much sense, but okay then.

Tellus Risus wrote:Environmental laws are some of the few things besides mw and business healthcare benefits the Government should enforce.

A paid vacation? Why? So someone can be paid for relaxing?

No for family, I feel that we need a more stable and connected family. Today we have kids who do stupid stuff because the parents are always at work. I also believe there is a reason why the german worker is more efficient then the American worker.

This is what happens when I get influenced by public school I start to go to the left on somethings!

Tellus Risus wrote:Still really doesn't make much sense, but okay then.

How can you not understand that?!

Plain English, will, more plain than it already was: 'it will be a failure'.

The General Of The American Empire wrote:No for family, I feel that we need a more stable and connected family. Today we have kids who do stupid stuff because the parents are always at work. I also believe there is a reason why the german worker is more efficient then the American worker.

Stupid stuff... like what?

Zeouria wrote:How can you not understand that?!

Plain English, will, more plain than it already was: 'it will be a failure'.

I don't see how

Zeouria wrote:Excuse me. 'Your failure, then.'

Applies to what I wrote and frankly I won't even try until you explain why.

The General Of The American Empire wrote:No for family, I feel that we need a more stable and connected family. Today we have kids who do stupid stuff because the parents are always at work. I also believe there is a reason why the german worker is more efficient then the American worker.

The heck?

Bringing guns too school, setting a dumpster on fire, and other stupid or ilegal acts that people do to get attention or do when they are not raised right.

Tellus Risus wrote:I don't see how Applies to what I wrote and frankly I won't even try until you explain why.The heck?

:

Zeouria wrote:It's impossible to know if the animal is eaten. You'd spend billions on a worthless and unwinnabke war against something as stupid as forcing people to consume what they kill. That isn't even a problem in america or Canada. Rather, in Russia where endangered species are killed for pelts which make thousands when crossed into china.

Mining will always destroy environments.

To which you responded with the oh so enlightening comment:

Tellus Risus wrote:I like Government Restrictions on certain things.

When it comes to the basis of land I do support Private Property to an extent however I much prefer public property when it comes to housing.Then so be it. It's better our money go to that then to say the military or welfare. If a human kills an animal and doesn't eat it then they've killed nature for no reason. That's not a good thing.

Mining doesn't always destroy it and if it does it can be in small amounts so that the area can fix itself.

Might as well replace that welfare and military with an equally stupid and even more pointless thing, right? You know, spending billions to arrest people for doing what the government doesn't want with an animal.

The General Of The American Empire wrote:Bringing guns too school, setting a dumpster on fire, and other stupid or ilegal acts that people do to get attention or do when they are not raised right.

'Raised right?' (Laughs)

Zeouria wrote:'Raised right?' (Laughs)

What do you think I mean by raised right tsar? Why is it soo funny.

The General Of The American Empire wrote:What do you think I mean by raised right tsar? Why is it soo funny.

Who are you to tell what's raising your chil 'right' and 'wrong?'

Post self-deleted by Tellus Risus.

Tellus Risus wrote:It's not what the Government doesn't want us doing. It's what hurts the environment wuthout reason. I guess you could advocate killing animals for fur, if not food, but beyond that there's no reason to kill an animal unless it attacked you first.

Is telling your child not to hate others for being different right or wrong? Other basic stuff like that.

The General Of The American Empire wrote:Is telling your child not to hate others for being different right or wrong? Other basic stuff like that.

Right. Unless it's wrong.

The General Of The American Empire wrote:Is telling your child not to hate others for being different right or wrong? Other basic stuff like that.

In my opinion, no. But it's exactly that, an opinion.

Entirely subjective.

Tellus Risus wrote:

Who exactly kills an animal to just kill an animal?

No, you're just leveling yourself out to what almost everyone else believes in. 'It's wrong to kill an animal for no reason.' Yeah, you're right. But, it's not the governments bussiness or anyone else's bussiness whether you do that or not.

Now more complex topics like religion and politics I believe should not be told as if they are fact. On those types of issues I believe the parent should give the many types of beliefs and explain them. Then let the child choose what he/she believes.

Assembled with Dot's Region Saver.
Written by Refuge Isle.