Post Archive

Region: Libertatem

History

Right-Winged Nation wrote:Did you exchange your walk on part in the war, for a lead role in a cage. *Looks at Ankha because he gets it*

I totally do...

Right-Winged Nation wrote:She's my dream girl Hump

Shes a good black widow anyway.....ya, shes attractive.

Humpheria wrote:Plurals work very similarly in French: perverts

We love the humpster...

I can't wait for the next Marvel movie, speaking of which.

Oh I know. Ultrom is going to be amazing, 5-1-15 12:00AM Im at Avengers teo.

Ankha wrote:Oh I know. Ultrom is going to be amazing, 5-1-15 12:00AM Im at Avengers teo.

I need to get my tickets.

Hello, everyone.

Looks like The Proletarian Coalition has gotten pwnt. I guess it's safe to say now that that region was brought up as a suitable candidate to be invaded, but was dismissed as it was not aligned with the R/D invaders of Antifa and TRF. Although I am sort of jealous.

The Neo-Confederate States Of America wrote:Aren't you the head of The Eternal Knights?

They've been trying to recruit us for weeks.

Humpheria wrote:They've been trying to recruit us for weeks.

We have? I was not aware of this.

The Neo-Confederate States Of America wrote:Aren't you the head of The Eternal Knights?

Indeed I am. TEK is taking a break for a little while to be reestablished later on this year, likely as a mostly Defender org. I am now wandering around and visiting different regions, and I figured I'd stop by here for a little while. That is, if I am welcome here. Seems like a nice and active place.

Nephmir wrote:We have? I was not aware of this.

Indeed I am. TEK is taking a break for a little while to be reestablished later on this year, likely as a mostly Defender org. I am now wandering around and visiting different regions, and I figured I'd stop by here for a little while. That is, if I am welcome here. Seems like a nice and active place.

A puppet named 'Cowboy Libertarian' came and asked me to have Libertatem join.

We are ideological raiders, first of all. I don't see why some people would be pushing for alliances or recruitment if they knew our stance. However, I wouldn't be opposed to joining a temporarily mutual alliance or raid, similar to the one where TNP, Antifa, NK, and mainstream raiders joined up in an unorthodox alliance to sack Nazi Europe, but regardless I am wary of what happens outside our boundaries for good reason.

These are the same guys that were trying to recruit from our region once... -_-

Sad music is sad.

Ya. Humpster is Humpster and Miley Cyrus is a druggie....

I think what made me want to assassinate her was when she did her cover of Lucy in the Sky With Diamonds.

Pop Quiz:

How does one respectfully retire a worn American flag?

Humpheria wrote:Pop Quiz:

How does one respectfully retire a worn American flag?

Isn't that burning it?

Miencraft wrote:Isn't that burning it?

NO. Burning is disrespect shown through enemy action or domestic protest. Retiring is the retiring of a flag by flame by either the United States military or the Boy Scouts of America.

Humpheria wrote:NO. Burning is disrespect shown through enemy action or domestic protest. Retiring is the retiring of a flag by flame by either the United States military or the Boy Scouts of America.

It's being destroyed in a fire, man. That's burning.

It's only not "burning" if you add a bit of magic to it.

Miencraft wrote:It's being destroyed in a fire, man. That's burning.

The vocabulary is key. Their is a difference between soaking a flag in kerosene and cheering as it is waved through the air with smoldering embers falling off of it; and stoically lowering a flag into a pit of flame as it is saluted and taps is played. There is a difference.

Humpheria wrote:The vocabulary is key. Their is a difference between soaking a flag in kerosene and cheering as it is waved through the air with smoldering embers falling off of it; and stoically lowering a flag into a pit of flame as it is saluted and taps is played. There is a difference.

Well, yeah, but technically in both ways it's being burned.

Just, one is disrespectful and the other isn't.

I mean, I'm pretty sure everyone gets what one would mean just with respectful (or other related adjective) burning and just burning.

Since you had mentioned retiring the flag, I didn't think it would be necessary to add the adjective and simply reply directly to the question, since the adjective would be implied.

Post self-deleted by Miencraft.

as opposed to just burning*

I can play taps and light a fire, does that count? And is there an exception for flags made in china?

Well its not truly an American Flag if its made in china

http://wdikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Flag_Code

Just some rules for the flag.

Humpheria wrote:Pop Quiz:

How does one respectfully retire a worn American flag?

Throw it away like you would any other piece of decorative cloth that has served it's purpose or is damaged

Lack There Of wrote:Throw it away like you would any other piece of decorative cloth that has served it's purpose or is damaged

._. No.

The Amarican Empire wrote:http://wdikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Flag_Code

"Wdikipedia"

Good job.

I'm on a mobile device I was getting rid of stuff in the link.

Lack There Of wrote:Throw it away like you would any other piece of decorative cloth that has served it's purpose or is damaged

):

The Amarican Empire wrote:I'm on a mobile device I was getting rid of stuff in the link.

But how did you end up putting a d into the link?

Miencraft wrote:But how did you end up putting a d into the link?

Well, when a daddy link and a mommy link love each other very much....

Humpheria wrote:Well, when a daddy link and a mommy link love each other very much....

Or they just want one night

I dont know how the d got in there. I was tired.

Let's play spot the sheeple

Right-Winged Nation wrote:):

Got one!

I kid, I kid, but I'm a much more real and literal sense I won the game

So Ferguson V Brown has now gone to Supreme Court, give me a break.

Lack There Of wrote:Let's play spot the sheeple

Got one!

I kid, I kid, but I'm a much more real and literal sense I won the game

Let's spot the disrespectful, "cultured", anti-nationalist, objectivist little twit.

I found him!

Right-Winged Nation wrote:So Ferguson V Brown has now gone to Supreme Court, give me a break.

That's it, I'm done with this planet.

Right-Winged Nation wrote:So Ferguson V Brown has now gone to Supreme Court, give me a break.

So how did it jump beyond the appeals courts so damn fast?

The Serbian Empire wrote:So how did it jump beyond the appeals courts so damn fast?

I don't know, but it ridiculous.

Right-Winged Nation wrote:I don't know, but it ridiculous.

I have to suspect Eric Holder's behind this.

The Serbian Empire wrote:I have to suspect Eric Holder's behind this.

He is

For a minute I thought that said "I have to suspect The Riddler's behind this." Either I've been watching too much Batman or my eyesight is failing me :P

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:For a minute I thought that said "I have to suspect The Riddler's behind this." Either I've been watching too much Batman or my eyesight is failing me :P

You know? Brown is like the joker. A madman who ended up causing violence and made people lash out against the police.

RWN? Where's your source on that? I can't find anything on Brown V. Ferguson (v. meaning Supreme Court)

Who needs sources? [/sarcasm]

Right-Winged Nation wrote:So Ferguson V Brown has now gone to Supreme Court, give me a break.

I think this has moved waaaay too fast. There's so much we don't know yet, but people have already taken sides without knowing the full context of the situation. But one thing's for sure: the police have WAY too much power.

Pevvania wrote:I think this has moved waaaay too fast. There's so much we don't know yet, but people have already taken sides without knowing the full context of the situation. But one thing's for sure: the police have WAY too much power.

I think a kid was an idiot...... and a cop was an idiot....... and now the world is being an idiot.

Humpheria wrote:I think a kid was an idiot...... and a cop was an idiot....... and now the world is being an idiot.

Yep. But I can't help but feel this was the wrong thing for the police brutality issue to explode over. This is not a case of good versus evil - Michael Brown was a thug. But Kelly Thomas was not a thug. The kid who got put in a coma by a SWAT team's flash bang grenade was not a thug. Most of the thousands of other people who've been unjustly assaulted, accosted and murdered by police officers in the past several years were not thugs. People should have waken up to this problem a long time ago.

I'm not saying all cops are murderers. My grandfather was a police officer (until he quit due to the enormous corruption). But if you concentrate such a large amount of power into one body, it's bound to attract bullies, psychos and the power-obsessed. There needs to be a way for the public to control this option, like the power to recall officers. And the state needs to stop protecting their own. But first and foremost, there needs to be far less laws, and therefore less power in the hands of the state.

Everyone here should be aware of this by now. I will defend the integrity of the police officer population majority to the death. While I concede that many of the bigger departments are corrupt and a few of them are bullies that got out of school and dropped the Letterman jacket and picked up a badge to keep his psycho-social position. But the majority of them are genuine guys who want to serve the community. I worked in local politics in my home town (your typical American small town), so I knew everyone in the Sheriff's department. All of them except the Sheriff himself are good guys. I talked to them quite often and any one of them would take a bullet for a stranger without a moments hesitation. They are not some evil faceless 'peacekeepers'. The department owns one armored vehicle and the majority of the officers are against having it. They say that things like that should be kept to the Indiana Nat'l Guard.

Unfortunately, it seems police brutality is being publicized in other ways.

Famous YouTubers, for example, whose addresses are known to the public have had SWAT teams break into their homes during live streams because someone called in a fake bomb threat. Instead of doing the right thing and tracking down the caller who sent the anonymous (and wrong) tip, they merely continued searching the homes for other examples of criminal activity. At least one person has been sent to jail for possession of marijuana, and is being detained for an unreasonable number of days before the matter will be brought to court, all because the cops were called in to interrupt a live stream.

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:Unfortunately, it seems police brutality is being publicized in other ways.

Famous YouTubers, for example, whose addresses are known to the public have had SWAT teams break into their homes during live streams because someone called in a fake bomb threat. Instead of doing the right thing and tracking down the caller who sent the anonymous (and wrong) tip, they merely continued searching the homes for other examples of criminal activity. At least one person has been sent to jail for possession of marijuana, and is being detained for an unreasonable number of days before the matter will be brought to court, all because the cops were called in to interrupt a live stream.

A few things.

1. How would the cops know that it was a fake call.

2. Would you prefer that they never responded to bomb threats?

3. If possession of marijuana is illegal, and the possessor is aware of that, then he should be punished within the law.

The only thing I see here that is wrong is his detainment.

Humpheria wrote:A few things.

1. How would the cops know that it was a fake call.

2. Would you prefer that they never responded to bomb threats?

3. If possession of marijuana is illegal, and the possessor is aware of that, then he should be punished within the law.

The only thing I see here that is wrong is his detainment.

You're correct in part; they could not have known upon receiving it that it was a fake call, nor should they not have investigated.

They did not, however, also investigate the source of the call, nor did they have authorization to search the premises for drugs when they suspected only bombs. Furthermore, they detained an individual for possession charges completely unrelated to the supposed crime they were sent to investigate. This was a clear defiance of procedure and protocol, and an indicator of laziness and unscrupulousness among law enforcement in that instance.

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:You're correct in part; they could not have known upon receiving it that it was a fake call, nor should they not have investigated.

They did not, however, also investigate the source of the call, nor did they have authorization to search the premises for drugs when they suspected only bombs. Furthermore, they detained an individual for possession charges completely unrelated to the supposed crime they were sent to investigate. This was a clear defiance of procedure and protocol, and an indicator of laziness and unscrupulousness among law enforcement in that instance.

Legal protocol in 39 states requires that when a bomb threat is made, the source of the call is investigated after response teams have been deployed simply because they do not have the resources or the ability to wait prior. Think about if they did a full scale investigation into an anonymous tipster before they dispatched such a serious threat. It would take them hours.

Common protocol also affirms that should a threat be investigated, the entire premises be thoroughly searched to ensure that there is no paraphernalia to carry out such an act, whether it was true or false. You make it sound like they got there and saw a guy filming, and the bastards thought 'Hey, no bombs here. But we don't like this kid. Let's check for drugs to get him on trumped up charges. Yeah!' Which was simply not the case.

Humpheria wrote:3. If possession of marijuana is illegal, and the possessor is aware of that, then he should be punished within the law.

WUT

"If possession of assault rifles is illegal, and the possessor is aware of that, then he should be punished within the law."

Pevvania wrote:WUT

"If possession of assault rifles is illegal, and the possessor is aware of that, then he should be punished within the law."

The way to protest an unjust law is to fight it legally and protest within your rights, not break the law that you, as a citizen, are sworn to uphold.

Humpheria wrote:Legal protocol in 39 states requires that when a bomb threat is made, the source of the call is investigated after response teams have been deployed simply because they do not have the resources or the ability to wait prior. Think about if they did a full scale investigation into an anonymous tipster before they dispatched such a serious threat. It would take them hours.

Common protocol also affirms that should a threat be investigated, the entire premises be thoroughly searched to ensure that there is no paraphernalia to carry out such an act, whether it was true or false. You make it sound like they got there and saw a guy filming, and the bastards thought 'Hey, no bombs here. But we don't like this kid. Let's check for drugs to get him on trumped up charges. Yeah!' Which was simply not the case.

Indeed.

They did not search for the anonymous tipster afterwards, and it's possible that they did not even trace the source of the call at all. Perhaps they just didn't care.

Probably not, but after discovering drugs on the premises, they should have followed proper protocol - in most cases, obtaining a search warrant (despite the redundancy) due to their newfound suspicion of drug possession - instead of confiscating the marijuana and detaining the person who had it for an indefinite period of time.

Though they did uphold the law in this case, they broke the law to do so, and now great portions of the Internet know this.

Humpheria wrote:The way to protest an unjust law is to fight it legally and protest within your rights, not break the law that you, as a citizen, are sworn to uphold.

I thought you were an anarchist? Tell that to the Founding Fathers, and Cliven Bundy. Pleading with the state to step on you a little bit less is just what they want you to do. The game is rigged against you. The avenues of justice are staffed with people who are, by definition, inclined to be against you. When Nazis in Connecticut ordered everyone to give up their assault weapons, people didn't just comply and then complain about it, they outright refused, exposing the toothlessness of the new law. As Thomas Jefferson once said, "When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty."

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:Indeed.

They did not search for the anonymous tipster afterwards, and it's possible that they did not even trace the source of the call at all. Perhaps they just didn't care.

Probably not, but after discovering drugs on the premises, they should have followed proper protocol - in most cases, obtaining a search warrant (despite the redundancy) due to their newfound suspicion of drug possession - instead of confiscating the marijuana and detaining the person who had it for an indefinite period of time.

Though they did uphold the law in this case, they broke the law to do so, and now great portions of the Internet know this.

If they did not investigate the caller, they broke the law.

If there was a bomb threat there at that moment, they can search the premises. Should nothing be found, the court is legally bound to issue a legal apology and pay an indulgence. Should something be found, the officers in question are released from any penalty under the law of most states. Obtaining warrants are only in practice if the issue is not of urgent danger.

Pevvania wrote:I thought you were an anarchist? Tell that to the Founding Fathers, and Cliven Bundy. Pleading with the state to step on you a little bit less is just what they want you to do. The game is rigged against you. The avenues of justice are staffed with people who are, by definition, inclined to be against you. When Nazis in Connecticut ordered everyone to give up their assault weapons, people didn't just comply and then complain about it, they outright refused, exposing the toothlessness of the new law. As Thomas Jefferson once said, "When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty."

I am a moderate anarchist. When it comes to the issue of possession laws, I believe that they are all evil and wish very much that anarchy could be pursued. However, realistically, this issue must be resolved legally.

Humpheria wrote:I am a moderate anarchist. When it comes to the issue of possession laws, I believe that they are all evil and wish very much that anarchy could be pursued. However, realistically, this issue must be resolved legally.

Also speaking realistically, the protocol breach is a more significant legal and moral issue than the drug possession, yet the police involved are highly unlikely to be indicted whereas the streamer will likely be found guilty.

Having researched further, he was released from jail a week ago, but the fact that this might still go to court is utterly ridiculous. Some foolish prankster may have ruined this guy's life.

On another topic now, Barack Obama: "We have no plan against ISIS".(Hand in palm)

My reaction: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5RtlpXsl8k

I give up, I'm done with this. Impeachment would be a proper action.

Do you know how many race riots there would be. Dem terrible racist republicans impeached the first black president. Racism!

The Amarican Empire wrote:Do you know how many race riots there would be. Dem terrible racist republicans impeached the first black president. Racism!

More like, "they thought about something other than how infinitely great the first black president is, therefore racism!"

Obama is a weak leader. His economic policies and foreign policies have weakend America. Racist

Right-Winged Nation wrote:Obama is a weak leader. His economic policies and foreign policies have weakend America. Racist

I think, therefore racist.

Right-Winged Nation wrote:Obama is a weak leader. His economic policies and foreign policies have weakend America. Racist

First part is true....anyway

The Amarican Empire wrote:Do you know how many race riots there would be. Dem terrible racist republicans impeached the first black president. Racism!

The riots that would emerge over the fact that Biden would become President would be far worse and far more numerous. Even the Dems don't seem to like him.

And he says hes a christian......Lets go corruption.

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-uowL00ZxwoM/UHhlycBDR0I/AAAAAAAAAOA/oNtxEjv9lsE/w426-h274/ryan.jpg

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-mhm8pjcwM6A/UODIlsk7p6I/AAAAAAAABxE/Ij5BgIdVBMA/w426-h333/photo.jpg

http://www.memes.com/meme/333651

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-ukdbvn4F1lQ/UHg5LU1UevI/AAAAAAAAAnU/9kGzcFUDXnI/s1600/Biden5.jpg

http://cdn.meme.li/instances/250x250/34151626.jpg

http://treasure.diylol.com/uploads/post/image/352103/resized_creepy-willy-wonka-meme-generator-oh-a-obama-biden-08-bumper-sticker-how-is-that-working-out-for-you-096340.jpg

http://www.radiofreedom.us/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Obama-FED-MEME-300x244.png

http://politicalmemes.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Screen-Shot-2013-11-26-at-2.17.07-PM.png

I have a folder full.....But this ones the best.....RWN and CI will like this:

https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/t1.0-9/1013824_10203524941748639_461995067423944935_n.jpg

Ankha wrote:http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-ukdbvn4F1lQ/UHg5LU1UevI/AAAAAAAAAnU/9kGzcFUDXnI/s1600/Biden5.jpg

http://cdn.meme.li/instances/250x250/34151626.jpg

http://treasure.diylol.com/uploads/post/image/352103/resized_creepy-willy-wonka-meme-generator-oh-a-obama-biden-08-bumper-sticker-how-is-that-working-out-for-you-096340.jpg

http://www.radiofreedom.us/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Obama-FED-MEME-300x244.png

http://politicalmemes.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Screen-Shot-2013-11-26-at-2.17.07-PM.png

I have a folder full.....But this ones the best.....RWN and CI will like this:

https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/t1.0-9/1013824_10203524941748639_461995067423944935_n.jpg

That last one though XD

Conservative Idealism In Libertatem wrote:That last one though XD

Oh...I know...its too good.

http://makeameme.org/media/created/yo-joe-biden.jpg

http://thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/obama-guns-union-e1357859050979.jpg

http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j186/DonaldDouglas/American/boo9_zpsa4e6f9a4.jpg

https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSjXh4NYhuI2SUdt8P3Qz9ZUu1a-hz8PSsMdqEafiHQo7vM1pFG

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-MxCh6-k0N5Y/T7eXI-M3sxI/AAAAAAAAF-A/tDjjy3W6RbI/s1600/joe+biden+vice+president+barack+obama+democrats+liberals+2012+election+idiot+goofball+dumb+stupid+motivational+posters.jpg

http://www.stpeterslist.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Joe-Biden-Catholicism-640x426.jpg

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS3iDYA3dWSrVrDO1BKnUVyFHMqvFBevAaRz4hZNdsteWxBHmla

I used to be...a collector.

And to say good night with the best one yet:

http://aliciarygarza.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/obama_you_didnt_build_that_legos-1.jpg

Morning/afternoon all.

It's been quite a dull and disappointing election season, which has unsurprisingly coincided with population loss. I could really use some help recruiting, y'all - it's very difficult doing it alone.

Post by Zeouria suppressed by a moderator.

Zeouria wrote:Anyone know the grade in which it's legal to drop out of highschool?

And congrats humphy.

Nope, but I'd imagine that it varies state-to-state.

Post by Zeouria suppressed by a moderator.

Zeouria wrote:Anyone know the grade in which it's legal to drop out of highschool?

And congrats humphy.

In Michigan it is either 17 or a Senior.

Humpheria wrote:In Michigan it is either 17 or a Senior.

17 w/ parental approval, 18 w/o.

Humpheria wrote:17 w/ parental approval, 18 w/o.

NY: 17 w/ or w/o parental approval.

16 in Illinois, but don't do it... With the economy in the tank and plenty of unemployed college graduates, nobody wants to hire a high school dropout. High school friggin' sucks, but stick it out for two (?) more years.

Fun fact: Bitcoin is fiat money. Checkmate, lolbertarians!!!!1

Not so fun fact: All money is fiat money. Stalemate, Pevvident!,!!!1

Ankha wrote:Not so fun fact: All money is fiat money. Stalemate, Pevvident!,!!!1

True, but it'd be nice if we had a cryptocurrency backed by gold :)

2 days til we have a new pev administration!

The Amarican Empire wrote:2 days til we have a new pev administration!

ha...........ha...ha.......................................................ha

Either that or hump can be this regions George H.W Bush. Sorry if I am calling pev Reagan.

Assembled with Dot's Region Saver.
Written by Refuge Isle.