Post Archive

Region: Libertatem

History

Ankha wrote:Good idea ^ Thats what we're doing by electing MLP party candidates to the Board!

What does "MLP" mean exactly?

Post self-deleted by Muh Roads.

Post self-deleted by Lack There Of.

Lack There Of wrote:What does "MLP" mean exactly?

I don't know the acronym, but it is Anti-RLP.

Terentuem wrote:A vote to switch to direct democracy. To stop the RLP's tyranny by majority.
Seat 1: The New United States (RLP)

Seat 2: Humpheria (RLP) Lack there of (LP) (as of June 4th)

Seat 3: The Amarican Empire (PP)

Seat 4: Miencraft (RLP)

Seat 5: Ronald Reagan and Rick Grimes (I)

You keep using that word. I don't think it means, what you think it means.

Lack There Of wrote:What does "MLP" mean exactly?

if it has anything to do with the MPA.....I'll be ticked.

Terentuem wrote:If you are against the Honorable President's tyrannical rule, you're in. I will be no friend of a friend of his.

.....But said President isn't a tyrant.....

Terentuem wrote:I don't know the acronym, but it is Anti-RLP.

YEP

It's the MPA!

It was founded by me.

Terentuem wrote:I think I like you, sir. Are you considering a run for President?

Not currently. But, Im running for Seat 5 on the board tomorrow.

Lack There Of wrote:What does "MLP" mean exactly?

Thats what I meant: MPA Be ticked Albenia. I wasnt thinking.

Albenia wrote:YEP

It's the MPA!

It was founded by me.

And it's Anti-Majority. Not Anti-RLP

Muh Roads wrote:Seat 1: The New United States (RLP)

Seat 2: Humpheria (RLP) Lack there of (LP) (as of June 4th)

Seat 3: The Amarican Empire (PP)

Seat 4: Miencraft (RLP)

Seat 5: Ronald Reagan and Rick Grimes (I)

You keep using that word. I don't think it means, what you think it means.

You all live under the RLP umbrella. If you don't actively vote against the President and Vice President, you're voting for their tyranny.

Ankha wrote:Not currently. But, Im running for Seat 5 on the board tomorrow.Thats what I meant: MPA Be ticked Albenia. I wasnt thinking.

So Who runs the MPA

I Founded it

Then Told Hallo to continue it

Then told Hallo to end the Alliance

Who runs it now?

Ya...sorry. I was thinking about the RLP and the MPA at the same time.

Also Mr.T,

Your vote would also be unconstitutional, making you the tyrannical one, imo.

Albenia wrote:So Who runs the MPA

I Founded it

Then Told Hallo to continue it

Then told Hallo to end the Alliance

Who runs it now?

ME! (No, but I will if thats a thing I can do..)

Albenia wrote:And it's Anti-Majority. Not Anti-RLP

Unless the people stand up and do something it will be the same for a very long time.

Terentuem wrote:Unless the people stand up and do something it will be the same for a very long time.

Also true^ But notice that way too many people sit down. Im working on it.

Muh Roads wrote:Also Mr.T,

Your vote would also be unconstitutional, making you the tyrannical one, imo.

I haven't voted and won't until I meet the oppressive requirements set by this administration.

Terentuem wrote:Unless the people stand up and do something it will be the same for a very long time.

I know......But there's only two RLP seats at current

Ankha wrote:ME! (No, but I will if thats a thing I can do..)

Do you want to continue it?

Terentuem wrote:Unless the people stand up and do something it will be the same for a very long time.

So please, in your own words, tell me why the RLP has been tyrannical. If we're such monsters, surely you have a logical case against us.

Albenia wrote:I know......But there's only two RLP seats at currentDo you want to continue it?

I dont really know what exactly to do......but sure, if you tell me how to. (LOL, I have no idea.)

Ankha wrote:ME! (No, but I will if thats a thing I can do..)

I will follow you tell Hell and back, sir. Take up the good fight against the Administration.

Terentuem wrote:I will follow you tell Hell and back, sir. Take up the good fight against the Administration.

OK, I wish the people who vote would to. (JK)

Thanks. Seriously, thanks.

Ankha wrote:I dont really know what exactly to do......but sure, if you tell me how to. (LOL, I have no idea.)

Step 1: You need to realize the MPA is Anti-Majority and Not Anti-RLP

Step 2: Contact all Parties that don't hold the Majority and ask them to join together in a collective Alliance

Step 3: If you do get the RLP out of the Majority then the MPA's Original Mission is done and it may be closed until needed to stop another Long lasting Majority.

Terentuem wrote:I haven't voted and won't until I meet the oppressive requirements set by this administration.

Yes, we have a citizenship requirement for voting. Simply to prevent communists/fascist enemies from sending fake diplomats and ruining what everyone in the region has worked so hard for. Dreadful I know.

Muh Roads wrote:So please, in your own words, tell me why the RLP has been tyrannical. If we're such monsters, surely you have a logical case against us.

The FRAUD Act for example. It was created to ensure that the RLP could always ensure tht the people could not vote in time for the elections and if they didn't want someone to vote, they could call "puppet" and have their vote nullified.

Terentuem wrote:The FRAUD Act for example. It was created to ensure that the RLP could always ensure tht the people could not vote in time for the elections and if they didn't want someone to vote, they could call "puppet" and have their vote nullified.

Muh Roads wrote:Yes, we have a citizenship requirement for voting. Simply to prevent communists/fascist enemies from sending fake diplomats and ruining what everyone in the region has worked so hard for. Dreadful I know.

Terentuem wrote:The FRAUD Act for example. It was created to ensure that the RLP could always ensure tht the people could not vote in time for the elections and if they didn't want someone to vote, they could call "puppet" and have their vote nullified.

...Not exactly how that works......

That's why we have a citizenship registry.

Albenia wrote:...Not exactly how that works......

That's why we have a citizenship registry.

*highfive*

Albenia wrote:Step 1: You need to realize the MPA is Anti-Majority and Not Anti-RLP

Step 2: Contact all Parties that don't hold the Majority and ask them to join together in a collective Alliance

Step 3: If you do get the RLP out of the Majority then the MPA's Original Mission is done and it may be closed until needed to stop another Long lasting Majority.

You may have started it that way, but we need an anti-RLP PAC. Or else they will continue to lord over us. We all need to get behind Anhka to ensure that The President is nor re-elected.

Albenia wrote:Step 1: You need to realize the MPA is Anti-Majority and Not Anti-RLP

Step 2: Contact all Parties that don't hold the Majority and ask them to join together in a collective Alliance

Step 3: If you do get the RLP out of the Majority then the MPA's Original Mission is done and it may be closed until needed to stop another Long lasting Majority.

OK. I guess I might kinda be able to maybe do that.

1 is easy. 2 is easy. 3 is really not easy.

Muh Roads wrote:*highfive*

*highfives back*

Albenia wrote:...Not exactly how that works......

That's why we have a citizenship registry.

It is. I've done my research. I found a trial where you did just that to a candidate of the Board.

Terentuem wrote:You may have started it that way, but we need an anti-RLP PAC. Or else they will continue to lord over us. We all need to get behind Anhka to ensure that The President is nor re-elected.

THE DANG THING IS NOT ANTI-RLP.

IT IS ANTI-LONG LASTING MAJORITY.

I Will not have MY alliance's Traditions changed....because......ummmm....Let's not use the word Traditions.

Ankha wrote:OK. I guess I might kinda be able to maybe do that.

1 is easy. 2 is easy. 3 is really not easy.

I believe in you

Terentuem wrote:It is. I've done my research. I found a trial where you did just that to a candidate of the Board.

Because it was a puppet. Plain and simple.

Albenia wrote:THE DANG THING IS NOT ANTI-RLP.

IT IS ANTI-LONG LASTING MAJORITY.

I Will not have MY alliance's Traditions changed....because......ummmm....Let's not use the word Traditions.I believe in you

It's not your alliance anymore, it's Anhka's.

Terentuem wrote:It's not your alliance anymore, it's Anhka's.

.......But.....Hang.....

It still will uphold it's original principles.

Albenia wrote:.......But.....Hang.....

It still will uphold it's original principles.

Yes, it will Albenia. ALso, how do I get Hallos party in?

Albenia wrote:.......But.....Hang.....

It still will uphold it's original principles.

That's up to our new leader, not someone with no power.

Anything else besides the FRAUD act Mr.T?

Ankha wrote:Yes, it will Albenia. ALso, how do I get Hallos party in?

Who owns it.

Terentuem wrote:That's up to our new leader, not someone with no power.

...

Ankha wrote:Yes, it will Albenia. ALso, how do I get Hallos party in?

The LOP is pretty much disbanded, but I would think it would go to Alchandria? Not sure their call. Might wanna TG Hallo.

Hey my RMB got magically fixed to IE Version....

Oh I changed it to Liberal NS

See the great thing about our party system is that it's privatized... nothing says you have to be a citizen of Libertatem to run a party.

.......ACCCK

Muh Roads wrote:See the great thing about our party system is that it's privatized... nothing says you have to be a citizen of Libertatem to run a party.

Wait....Wait wait wait....

Woah woah woah...Hang on what?

Albenia wrote:.......ACCCKWait....Wait wait wait....

Woah woah woah...Hang on what?

Your welcome to search for a law.

The VETO Act gives the President the ability to stop what they don't agree with.

The VEEP Act gives the President an agreeable successor.

The ELECT Amendment takes power away from the Board.

My leader was persecuted in a Board election unfairly by the RLP machine and I will stand against their tyranny. I will not be a silent Yes Man.

Muh Roads wrote:Your welcome to search for a law.

So wait your telling me you...I mean I.....Can just.......Why did no one tell me this?

Muh Roads wrote:See the great thing about our party system is that it's privatized... nothing says you have to be a citizen of Libertatem to run a party.

I would like to start the Anti-RLP Party and join the MPA.

Albenia wrote:So wait your telling me you...I mean I.....Can just.......Why did no one tell me this?

Like me, you can start one but we still can't vote.

Albenia wrote:So wait your telling me you...I mean I.....Can just.......Why did no one tell me this?

Pleasant shock. So basically you could of refounded the Democratic Republican party months ago. Anyway, wanna join the MPA then?

Albenia wrote:So wait your telling me you...I mean I.....Can just.......Why did no one tell me this?

Hey man, it's all there.

Terentuem wrote:I would like to start the Anti-RLP Party and join the MPA.

*face-Palm to the max*

well if you don't have to be a citizen....Hmmmmm

Ankha wrote:Pleasant shock. So basically you could of refounded the Democratic Republican party months ago. Anyway, wanna join the MPA then?

.......Hell Yes.

Terentuem wrote:I would like to start the Anti-RLP Party and join the MPA.

TG Pev

Albenia wrote:*face-Palm to the max*

well if you don't have to be a citizen....Hmmmmm

Ha. Indeed. He has that right. If it is challanged, Ill back up Mr. T.

Albenia wrote:.......Hell Yes.

Ha. Indeed again.

Terentuem wrote:The VETO Act gives the President the ability to stop what they don't agree with.

The VEEP Act gives the President an agreeable successor.

The ELECT Amendment takes power away from the Board.

My leader was persecuted in a Board election unfairly by the RLP machine and I will stand against their tyranny. I will not be a silent Yes Man.

For these citations I ask that you provide specific examples from the text of these laws and explain exactly how they serve to enforce the "RLP tyranny".

The DRP Shall return....Once I fix it's Policies as I've been meaning to edit some of them.

Post self-deleted by Miencraft.

Miencraft wrote:For these citations I ask that you provide specific examples from the text of these laws and explain exactly how they serve to enforce the "RLP tyranny".

Terentuem wrote:The VETO Act gives the President the [B]ability to stop what they don't agree with.[/B]

The VEEP Act gives the President an[B] agreeable successor.[/B]

The ELECT Amendment takes [B]power away from the Board.[/B]

My leader was persecuted in a Board election unfairly by the RLP machine and I will stand against their tyranny. I will not be a silent Yes Man.

Terentuem wrote:

Miencraft wrote:specific examples from the text of these laws

It is common knowledge.

Terentuem wrote:The VETO Act gives the President the ability to stop what they don't agree with.

The VEEP Act gives the President an agreeable successor.

The ELECT Amendment takes power away from the Board.

My leader was persecuted in a Board election unfairly by the RLP machine and I will stand against their tyranny. I will not be a silent Yes Man.

VETO: OMG just like real life?(stereotypical blonde voice). Yeah brother, the president has some power to ask for a recount on legislature, not completely stop it.

VEEP: Hey, I can't argue with you here. I wasn't a fan of the act in the first place. *thumbs up* However, a presidential candidate will typically campaign WITH his choice of VP. So it's not like you don't know what your getting into.

ELECT: Don't see your point? You should read this too:http://www.nationstates.net/nation=the_law_of_libertatem/detail=factbook/id=212917

What leader?

Muh Roads wrote:

What leader?

Hallo

Terentuem wrote:It is common knowledge.

Well I want to see you pull examples directly from the texts of these laws so that I know how to respond to you and have an intelligent debate.

Albenia wrote:Hallo

Lol, well, he should play follow the leader and go to Tofuline I guess. But whatever, free-region right? 'Tatem.

Terentuem wrote:Anhka

The Time Alliance (Me)

Are we just naming past and current leader's of MY organization or what?

Terentuem wrote:Anhka

Miencraft wrote:Well I want to see you pull examples directly from the texts of these laws so that I know how to respond to you and have an intelligent debate.

Would be great if you could address a question asked to you instead of completely ignoring it.

Albenia wrote:The Time Alliance (Me)

Are we just naming past and current leader's of MY organization or what?

My leader.

Albenia wrote:The Time Alliance (Me)

Are we just naming past and current leader's of MY organization or what?

And the current leader of HIS organization.

Terentuem wrote:And the current leader of HIS organization.

...................

Ankha. Can I have executive power in the MPA as it's founder and Beni...Bieneci....Binneif.....Bi....What's that word for the guy not totally in a thing but has power in it due to their contributions?

It's quite the coincidence, Mr. T, that your nation was completely inactive for 27 days, and then you randomly came back to life and moved here, only an hour after your former leader left the region. Quite the coincidence.

The New United States wrote:It's quite the coincidence, Mr. T, that your nation was completely inactive for 27 days, and then you randomly came back to life and moved here, only an hour after your former leader left the region. Quite the coincidence.

TNUS I quite wish you start implying that my dear Hallo is doing anything of the sort.

What are you suggesting?

Albenia wrote:...................

Ankha. Can I have executive power in the MPA as it's founder and Beni...Bieneci....Binneif.....Bi....What's that word for the guy not totally in a thing but has power in it due to their contributions?

Benefactor.

Sure Albenia Also:

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=ankha/detail=factbook/id=272660

Ankha wrote:Sure Albenia Also:

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=ankha/detail=factbook/id=272660

I have joined the MPA, sir.

Your party name?

The New United States wrote:It's quite the coincidence, Mr. T, that your nation was completely inactive for 27 days, and then you randomly came back to life and moved here, only an hour after your former leader left the region. Quite the coincidence.

Lol, I vehemently agree. Very coincidental.

Miencraft wrote:Benefactor.

Yea!

Ankha wrote:Sure Albenia Also:

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=ankha/detail=factbook/id=272660

Also. I suggest above the list of Parties you put the chairman of the MPA (You)

Your vice chair (Whomever or However you pick him that's up to you)

And any Benefactors/Founder

Terentuem wrote:What are you suggesting?

Nothing. Only taking note of the strange activity.

The New United States wrote:Nothing. Only taking note of the strange activity.

Muh Roads wrote:Lol, I vehemently agree. Very coincidental.

...

Terentuem wrote:Anti-RLP Party

Pev has informed me non-citizens may not form parties.

Terentuem wrote:The VETO Act gives the President the ability to stop what they don't agree with.

The VEEP Act gives the President an agreeable successor.

The ELECT Amendment takes power away from the Board.

My leader was persecuted in a Board election unfairly by the RLP machine and I will stand against their tyranny. I will not be a silent Yes Man.

Terentuem wrote:Anhka

OMG you fanboy. Haha. "You're leader" was defeated by me, so it sounds like your pretty butthurt over a democratic and fair election. Also, I'm not even in the RLP, so you're just a fool.

Albenia wrote:Pev has informed me non-citizens may not form parties.

Really now? I can't find a law stating such?

What of Irish Rebels making sinn fein then?

Muh Roads wrote:Really now? I can't find a law stating such?

I'm not sure.

I asked if non-citizens could and he replied "I don't think so."

Ronald Reagan And Rick Grimes wrote:OMG you fanboy. Haha. "You're leader" was defeated by me, so it sounds like your pretty butthurt over a democratic and fair election. Also, I'm not even in the RLP, so you're just a fool.

I came in two days before elections from a communist region and almost beat you.

You, sir, Mr. T, have problems.

Anywho, Presidential Elections are either at the end of July or August, I don't remember which, but if you plan to run, your time grows near.

Ankha wrote:I came in two days before elections from a communist region and almost beat you.

Key word there: "almost"

Ankha wrote:I came in two days before elections from a communist region and almost beat you.

BURN!

Humpheria wrote:You, sir, Mr. T, have problems.

Anywho, Presidential Elections are either at the end of July or August, I don't remember which, but if you plan to run, your time grows near.

Anhka will be running.

Terentuem wrote:BURN!

Anhka will be running.

What are you even?

Albenia wrote:I'm not sure.

I asked if non-citizens could and he replied "I don't think so."

I've studied the laws pretty well. Don't see anywhere that says otherwise. Now if y'all want a law... lol

Humpheria wrote:What are you even?

A warrior of the people.

Muh Roads wrote:I've studied the laws pretty well. Don't see anywhere that says otherwise. Now if y'all want a law... lol

I don't.

My freedom.

Terentuem wrote:A warrior of the people.

NO

I am.

As stated in my region I am "The Hero of the Proletariat. "

Terentuem wrote:A warrior of the people.

Just... stop.

Assembled with Dot's Region Saver.
Written by Refuge Isle.