Post Archive

Region: The Mystical Council

History

Forestavia wrote:You could say that. There are several labels that fit. I believe the most precise diagnosis, however, is chaotic revolutionary multiple personality identity crisis disorder. The prognosis is not good to say the least. The people have ordered a prescription for Constitutional Monarchy but who knows what they'll actually get!

*Joins the Communist Nazi Fascist Party before jumping out of window*

"Tyrants Unite!"

Um...the Communist is right.

Get rid of the fascist flag, and the communist propaganda for invading a region with an active founder using innate spies.

Malcholm

Exotic Lemon wrote:Since I am already delegate and plugo is pm I think [nation=short]new bacon[/nation] deserves it

I'm still thinking about whether I should run or not.

Socialist Soviet Chechnya wrote:Is it just me or is the Mystical Council having a bit of split personality? The flag is definitely fascist, but the newspaper says Red Fleet.

The flag isn't fascist at all lmao.

Its a mix of 'don't tread on me' and 'come and take it'

New Bacon, Exotic Lemon

Jeve Du wrote:What do you want us to do? Ban nations coming from The Mystical Council?

You're making it worse for yourself right now. I suggest you cooperate.

Civilisunio, Exotic Lemon

Jeve Du wrote:Greetings from conglomeracy,

The allegations that we somehow are involved in interfering with your elections is untrue. We don't have any intentions to do that.

It's being investigated.

Plugo, Civilisunio, Exotic Lemon

New Bacon wrote:You're making it worse for yourself right now. I suggest you cooperate.

Exactly what i said.:)

New Bacon, Plugo, Exotic Lemon

Lampar wrote:Um...the Communist is right.

Get rid of the fascist flag, and the communist propaganda for invading a region with an active founder using innate spies.

Texas Revolution. Digital reproduction of the Come and Take It flag. ... As a symbol of defiance, the Texians had fashioned a flag containing the phrase "come and take it" along with a black star and an image of the cannon that they had received four years earlier from Mexican officials.

https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/10/Texas_Flag_Come_and_Take_It.svg/2000px-Texas_Flag_Come_and_Take_It.svg.png&imgrefurl=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Come_and_take_it&h=1333&w=2000&tbnid=0oIzSaQseMI8JM:&tbnh=160&tbnw=240&docid=NTH338L3glyDRM&usg=__XE2v6d1TbM0vSK4MFMBiL8GQ3Eg=&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjHkOLAiqvPAhVDWCYKHTDMBE8Q9QEISjAA

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gadsden_flag

Forestavia wrote:I agree. Candidates it is time to campaign! Good luck!

http://www.nationstates.net/page=poll/p=67808

I say this poll is outdated. We need new, individual candidacy announcement polls for each government position.

To streamline the process, we can have the candidacy announcement polls in MC, and the actual election polls in TMC. This way we can run them concurrently (example, having the election poll for defense minister here, and having candidacy announcement poll for foreign minister in MC)

Plugo, Parakka Northland, Exotic Lemon

we still never re did the poll for the k reich embassy

Exotic Lemon

Mugwop wrote:I say this poll is outdated. We need new, individual candidacy announcement polls for each government position.

To streamline the process, we can have the candidacy announcement polls in MC, and the actual election polls in TMC. This way we can run them concurrently (example, having the election poll for defense minister here, and having candidacy announcement poll for foreign minister in MC)

I agree. Telegram me and or forest if you want to add your name. I am thinking we start with foreign affairs, then defense hen the rest in order. We need foriegn affairs for this embassy trouble

Republic Of Greater Cuba, Plugo

Exotic Lemon wrote:I agree. Telegram me and or forest if you want to add your name. I am thinking we start with foreign affairs, then defense hen the rest in order. We need foriegn affairs for this embassy trouble

I would prefer you guys telegram me, forest has more important things to do and for once my inbox isn't full

Republic Of Greater Cuba, Plugo

Exotic Lemon wrote:I agree. Telegram me and or forest if you want to add your name. I am thinking we start with foreign affairs, then defense hen the rest in order. We need foriegn affairs for this embassy trouble

The point of candidacy polls is so that we do NOT have to telegram this and that and create a confusion. It's just a poll. Do you want to run for this position? yes/no.

You want to do the foreign minister first? Alright, let's do the candidacy poll for it right now in MC, and then link to it here on our WFE.

If you don't have access to MC polls, someone forgot and kept me as an officer there, so I can make use of that and create that poll if you don't have an officer nation there.

Republic Of Greater Cuba, Parakka Northland, Exotic Lemon

Mugwop wrote:The point of candidacy polls is so that we do NOT have to telegram this and that and create a confusion. It's just a poll. Do you want to run for this position? yes/no.

You want to do the foreign minister first? Alright, let's do the candidacy poll for it right now in MC, and then link to it here on our WFE.

If you don't have access to MC polls, someone forgot and kept me as an officer there, so I can make use of that and create that poll if you don't have an officer nation there.

Put up a poll if you want, I don't know if I can. I just figured the telegram thing would be fastest for democracies return. If not there is no trouble doing it your way

Republic Of Greater Cuba, Plugo

Exotic Lemon wrote:I agree. Telegram me and or forest if you want to add your name. I am thinking we start with foreign affairs, then defense hen the rest in order. We need foriegn affairs for this embassy trouble

I suggest we go ahead with the embassy poll. Ministers will come and go. But creation of new embassies cannot not wait for this.

Republic Of Greater Cuba, Exotic Lemon

Kazukame wrote:I suggest we go ahead with the embassy poll. Ministers will come and go. But creation of new embassies cannot not wait for this.

I think mugwop is right for this one, we need a government before we worry about external problems. Internal problems will crush a region much faster than any external region

Malcholm, Republic Of Greater Cuba

Kazukame wrote:I suggest we go ahead with the embassy poll. Ministers will come and go. But creation of new embassies cannot not wait for this.

Completely disagree, electing our officials is far more important than one measly embassy.

Malcholm, Exotic Lemon

Post self-deleted by Plugo.

Exotic Lemon wrote:I think mugwop is right for this one, we need a government before we worry about external problems. Internal problems will crush a region much faster than any external region

Mugwop wrote:Completely disagree, electing our officials is far more important than one measly embassy.

I agree

Malcholm, Plugo

Exotic Lemon wrote:I think mugwop is right for this one, we need a government before we worry about external problems. Internal problems will crush a region much faster than any external region

Poll is setup, please link it on our WFE and mass TG it.

https://www.nationstates.net/page=poll/p=68971

Malcholm, Exotic Lemon

Plugo wrote:I suggest you send a region wide TG immediately asking if any one else wants to throw their hat it for the seat, then throw up the election poll in 14 hours

Can you? I am on my phone. If not I can turn on my computer and do that

Plugo

I think it would be easier to send a region wide tg asking who wants to run, then putting up the election poll in 14-24 hours

Exotic Lemon

Exotic Lemon wrote:Can you? I am on my phone. If not I can turn on my computer and do that

which position am i asking about?

Exotic Lemon wrote:I would prefer you guys telegram me, forest has more important things to do and for once my inbox isn't full

Mugwop wrote:The point of candidacy polls is so that we do NOT have to telegram this and that and create a confusion. It's just a poll. Do you want to run for this position? yes/no.

You want to do the foreign minister first? Alright, let's do the candidacy poll for it right now in MC, and then link to it here on our WFE.

If you don't have access to MC polls, someone forgot and kept me as an officer there, so I can make use of that and create that poll if you don't have an officer nation there.

Also makes sure things stay transparent. That's one thing I don't like about this new voting system.

Plugo wrote:I think it would be easier to send a region wide tg asking who wants to run, then putting up the election poll in 14-24 hours

I think fastest would be telegraming, but more transparent would be a poll for candidates. How desperate are we for elections?

Plugo wrote:which position am i asking about?

All of them, set up one like the old one it is just updated

Plugo

Plugo wrote:I think it would be easier to send a region wide tg asking who wants to run, then putting up the election poll in 14-24 hours

I think it would need to be 24 hours to ensure that everyone gets a chance to vote. Even then I think it's on the short side

Plugo

I still don't see how its not transparent.

Exotic Lemon

Plugo wrote:I still don't see how its not transparent.

Same here. Normally I would agree with parakka and mugwop but I promised democracy back the 18th and it's the 25 and we still have only one election

Plugo

Exotic Lemon wrote:I think fastest would be telegraming, but more transparent would be a poll for candidates. How desperate are we for elections?

That's why I am suggesting to link this in the WFE https://www.nationstates.net/page=poll/p=68971 and mass telegram it. This way we can make sure everyone can see it. I set it for 3 days, but I think we should only wait 2 days. This gives ample and fair amount of time for anyone t announce their time.

Exotic Lemon wrote:All of them, set up one like the old one it is just updated

And [B]NO[/B], that poll was horrible. It did not allow some to try and run for more than one postion, should they fail in their first choice. That is why we need to have a candidacy announcement [B]for each[/B] postion and have it on MC, while the actual election poll for the postion would be in TMC.

Malcholm

Plugo wrote:I still don't see how its not transparent.

Because the none WA votes have to telegram their votes, meaning that everyone can't see who has voted for who. Kinda like half the region have a public vote whilst the rest get to take part in a secret ballot if that makes sense

Parakka Northland wrote:Because the none WA votes have to telegram their votes, meaning that everyone can't see who has voted for who. Kinda like half the region have a public vote whilst the rest get to take part in a secret ballot if that makes sense

We make factbooks that show their votes though

Mugwop wrote:That's why I am suggesting to link this in the WFE https://www.nationstates.net/page=poll/p=68971 and mass telegram it. This way we can make sure everyone can see it. I set it for 3 days, but I think we should only wait 2 days. This gives ample and fair amount of time for anyone t announce their time.

And [B]NO[/B], that poll was horrible. It did not allow some to try and run for more than one postion, should they fail in their first choice. That is why we need to have a candidacy announcement [B]for each[/B] postion and have it on MC, while the actual election poll for the postion would be in TMC.

Okay then let's not do that poll. I am trying to get democracy back fast but it seems no one is in a hurry.

Plugo wrote:We make factbooks that show their votes though

You need to make the prime minister one, just look at forestavia's data.

Exotic Lemon wrote:Okay then let's not do that poll. I am trying to get democracy back fast but it seems no one is in a hurry.

Everyone is complainging about not having elections

Exotic Lemon

Parakka Northland wrote:Because the none WA votes have to telegram their votes, meaning that everyone can't see who has voted for who. Kinda like half the region have a public vote whilst the rest get to take part in a secret ballot if that makes sense

I find that non wa should be able to vote in polls. Now that we have solved our mystery puppet votes it is no longer necessary

Mugwop wrote:That's why I am suggesting to link this in the WFE https://www.nationstates.net/page=poll/p=68971 and mass telegram it. This way we can make sure everyone can see it. I set it for 3 days, but I think we should only wait 2 days. This gives ample and fair amount of time for anyone t announce their time.

And [B]NO[/B], that poll was horrible. It did not allow some to try and run for more than one postion, should they fail in their first choice. That is why we need to have a candidacy announcement [B]for each[/B] postion and have it on MC, while the actual election poll for the postion would be in TMC.

No one said they wanted to run for more then one position, and putting your name in for every position isn't fair.

You should dedicate your campaign for one position, not just run for every position just hoping you will win one of them.

Exotic Lemon wrote:I find that non wa should be able to vote in polls. Now that we have solved our mystery puppet votes it is no longer necessary

Not really.

I still say that the non wa voters like the system, so why should you guys interfere in how they vote.

Plugo wrote:Everyone is complainging about not having elections

Ahhhhh!*slams head on keyboard* can we make a compromise?

Plugo

Exotic Lemon wrote:Ahhhhh!*slams head on keyboard* can we make a compromise?

No, because mugwop wants to take 12 days just to see who is running (3days for each poll, 4 more positions up for election)

Exotic Lemon wrote:Okay then let's not do that poll. I am trying to get democracy back fast but it seems no one is in a hurry.

There's getting democracy back fast and then theirs doing it properly. We can't afford to cut corners here like was done with the removal of the former government.

Plugo wrote:We make factbooks that show their votes though

Personally I don't think that's sufficient, in terms of keeping things transparent. However, if I'm the only one that feels that way I'll hold my peace.

Exotic Lemon wrote:I find that non wa should be able to vote in polls. Now that we have solved our mystery puppet votes it is no longer necessary

They should never have not been allowed to vote in polls, in my view because there was a list of voters.

Malcholm

Plugo wrote:No one said they wanted to run for more then one position, and putting your name in for every position isn't fair.

You should dedicate your campaign for one position, not just run for every position just hoping you will win one of them.

You forget the fact that when the ACTUAL ELECTION happen for any said position, it would be one postion at a time. So having one candidacy announcement poll for all positions at the same time, when elections for positions are held one at a time, is completely nonsensical.

A bunch of people have qualifications for more than one position. If we have only 1 candidate poll, we will actually get less qualified people running. I am not sure how you can't see this.

Plugo wrote:No, because mugwop wants to take 12 days just to see who is running (3days for each poll, 4 more positions up for election)

And for the billionth time, noooooooo, candidacy polls will NOT be held here and block time, only election polls are held in TMC. [B]Candacy polls are ONLY held in MC, and a link to the poll is Mass TG'd to everyone, just like this one https://www.nationstates.net/page=poll/p=68971[/B]

And I quote myself:

[B]"This way we can run them concurrently (example, having the election poll for defense minister here, and having candidacy announcement poll for foreign minister in MC)"[/B]

Malcholm, Parakka Northland

Plugo wrote:Texas Revolution. Digital reproduction of the Come and Take It flag. ... As a symbol of defiance, the Texians had fashioned a flag containing the phrase "come and take it" along with a black star and an image of the cannon that they had received four years earlier from Mexican officials.

https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/10/Texas_Flag_Come_and_Take_It.svg/2000px-Texas_Flag_Come_and_Take_It.svg.png&imgrefurl=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Come_and_take_it&h=1333&w=2000&tbnid=0oIzSaQseMI8JM:&tbnh=160&tbnw=240&docid=NTH338L3glyDRM&usg=__XE2v6d1TbM0vSK4MFMBiL8GQ3Eg=&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjHkOLAiqvPAhVDWCYKHTDMBE8Q9QEISjAA

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gadsden_flag

It appears to be the Gasden flag wrapped around a fascio. The namesake and well known symbol of fascism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascio

Mugwop wrote:You forget the fact that when the ACTUAL ELECTION happen for any said position, it would be one postion at a time. So having one candidacy announcement poll for all positions at the same time, when elections for positions are held one at a time, is completely nonsensical.

A bunch of people have qualifications for more than one position. If we have only 1 candidate poll, we will actually get less qualified people running. I am not sure how you can't see this.

And for the billionth time, noooooooo, candidacy polls will NOT be held here and block time, only election polls are held in TMC. [B]Candacy polls are ONLY held in MC, and a link to the poll is Mass TG'd to everyone, just like this one https://www.nationstates.net/page=poll/p=68971[/B]

And I quote myself:

[B]"This way we can run them concurrently (example, having the election poll for defense minister here, and having candidacy announcement poll for foreign minister in MC)"[/B]

That's still 6 days but whatever.

"A bunch of people have qualifications for more than one position. If we have only 1 candidate poll, we will actually get less qualified people running. I am not sure how you can't see this." you have given no explanation.

Socialist Soviet Chechnya wrote:It appears to be the Gasden flag wrapped around a fascio. The namesake and well known symbol of fascism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascio

No.

Look at the "come and take it" link i posted.

Its a cannon that was used in the texas revolution. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Come_and_take_it#/media/File:Texas_Flag_Come_and_Take_It.svg

Malcholm

Plugo wrote:No.

Look at the "come and take it" link i posted.

Its a cannon that was used in the texas revolution. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Come_and_take_it#/media/File:Texas_Flag_Come_and_Take_It.svg

Uh guys orca just fell

New Bacon, Malcholm

Oh no! ORCA is dying!

Exotic Lemon wrote:Uh guys orca just fell

New Bacon wrote:Oh no! ORCA is dying!

RIP.

Malcholm

Exotic Lemon wrote:Uh guys orca just fell

I just sent a nation there to sort out solar alliance membership..... talk about timing

Plugo, Exotic Lemon

I am officially withdrawing and deleting this proposal:

http://www.nationstates.net/nation=forestavia/detail=factbook/id=649812

Malcholm, Plugo, Parakka Northland, Exotic Lemon

Plugo wrote:That's still 6 days but whatever.

"A bunch of people have qualifications for more than one position. If we have only 1 candidate poll, we will actually get less qualified people running. I am not sure how you can't see this." you have given no explanation.

How is it 6 days?

I said "This way we can run them [B]concurrently [/B](example, having the election poll for defense minister here, and having candidacy announcement poll for foreign minister in MC)"

3 days election poll for position A in TMC, concurrently 2 day candidacy announcement poll for position B in MC. (This process takes 3 days max because it's [B]concurrent[/B])

followed by:

3 days election poll for position B in TMC, concurrently 2 day candidacy announcement poll for position C in MC. (This process takes 3 days max because it's [B]concurrent[/B])

As to why it's a bad idea to make a candicey poll for everything at 1 single time, let me break it down in simple terms as to why it's a bad idea:

In a singular candacey poll. Consider yourself as an example. Let say that [nation=short]Plugo[/nation] is someone with expertise to be either minister of defense, or minister of interior affairs. However, you decide to run as minister of defense. Alongside you, someone else, who is slightly more qualified than you (Let's call him WopMug) runs for minister of defense. Meanwhile, 2 nations (Bings and Dingus) announce that they are running as ministers of interior affairs.

Bingus and Dingus are both extremely less qualified than [nation=short]Plugo[/nation] to be ministers of interior affairs. Meanwhile, [nation=short]Plugo[/nation] looses his election for the postion of minister of defense against WopMug, and moreover, [nation=short]Plugo[/nation] can't run for interior affairs either, and one of Bingus or Dingus (who again, are much less qualified than [nation=short]Plugo[/nation]) will become the minister of interior affairs.

However, should we have a candacey poll for each position, when [nation=short]Plugo[/nation] sees that he's not gonna be the minister of defense, [nation=short]Plugo[/nation] can run as minister of interior affairs and save us from the stupidity of Bingus and Dingus.

Do you see the picture now?

Forestavia, Malcholm, Civilisunio, Parakka Northland

Mugwop wrote:How is it 6 days?

I said "This way we can run them [B]concurrently [/B](example, having the election poll for defense minister here, and having candidacy announcement poll for foreign minister in MC)"

3 days election poll for position A in TMC, concurrently 2 day candidacy announcement poll for position B in MC. (This process takes 3 days max because it's [B]concurrent[/B])

followed by:

3 days election poll for position B in TMC, concurrently 2 day candidacy announcement poll for position C in MC. (This process takes 3 days max because it's [B]concurrent[/B])

As to why it's a bad idea to make a candicey poll for everything at 1 single time, let me break it down in simple terms as to why it's a bad idea:

In a singular candacey poll. Consider yourself as an example. Let say that [nation=short]Plugo[/nation] is someone with expertise to be either minister of defense, or minister of interior affairs. However, you decide to run as minister of defense. Alongside you, someone else, who is slightly more qualified than you (Let's call him WopMug) runs for minister of defense. Meanwhile, 2 nations (Bings and Dingus) announce that they are running as ministers of interior affairs.

Bingus and Dingus are both extremely less qualified than [nation=short]Plugo[/nation] to be ministers of interior affairs. Meanwhile, [nation=short]Plugo[/nation] looses his election for the postion of minister of defense against WopMug, and moreover, [nation=short]Plugo[/nation] can't run for interior affairs either, and one of Bingus or Dingus (who again, are much less qualified than [nation=short]Plugo[/nation]) will become the minister of interior affairs.

However, should we have a candacey poll for each position, when [nation=short]Plugo[/nation] sees that he's not gonna be the minister of defense, [nation=short]Plugo[/nation] can run as minister of interior affairs and save us from the stupidity of Bingus and Dingus.

Do you see the picture now?

Another poll option that has something to the affect of 'run for multiple positions' could be added.

I can agree with your poll thing if each poll is two (2) days.

Plugo wrote:Another poll option that has something to the affect of 'run for multiple positions' could be added.

I can agree with your poll thing if each poll is two (2) days.

Yeah I made the current candidacy announcement poll 3 days but that was a mistake. The ones afterward would be 2 days, meanwhile the actual election over here would be 3 days, or whenever all registered voters have casted their vote, whichever is first.

Forestavia, Malcholm

Mugwop wrote:Yeah I made the current candidacy announcement poll 3 days but that was a mistake. The ones afterward would be 2 days, meanwhile the actual election over here would be 3 days, or whenever all registered voters have casted their vote, whichever is first.

why not just re make it to be 2 days?

Mugwop wrote:Yeah I made the current candidacy announcement poll 3 days but that was a mistake. The ones afterward would be 2 days, meanwhile the actual election over here would be 3 days, or whenever all registered voters have casted their vote, whichever is first.

Thanks for setting the poll up over there. That was a good call.

Malcholm

Mugwop wrote:How is it 6 days?

I said "This way we can run them [B]concurrently [/B](example, having the election poll for defense minister here, and having candidacy announcement poll for foreign minister in MC)"

3 days election poll for position A in TMC, concurrently 2 day candidacy announcement poll for position B in MC. (This process takes 3 days max because it's [B]concurrent[/B])

followed by:

3 days election poll for position B in TMC, concurrently 2 day candidacy announcement poll for position C in MC. (This process takes 3 days max because it's [B]concurrent[/B])

As to why it's a bad idea to make a candicey poll for everything at 1 single time, let me break it down in simple terms as to why it's a bad idea:

In a singular candacey poll. Consider yourself as an example. Let say that [nation=short]Plugo[/nation] is someone with expertise to be either minister of defense, or minister of interior affairs. However, you decide to run as minister of defense. Alongside you, someone else, who is slightly more qualified than you (Let's call him WopMug) runs for minister of defense. Meanwhile, 2 nations (Bings and Dingus) announce that they are running as ministers of interior affairs.

Bingus and Dingus are both extremely less qualified than [nation=short]Plugo[/nation] to be ministers of interior affairs. Meanwhile, [nation=short]Plugo[/nation] looses his election for the postion of minister of defense against WopMug, and moreover, [nation=short]Plugo[/nation] can't run for interior affairs either, and one of Bingus or Dingus (who again, are much less qualified than [nation=short]Plugo[/nation]) will become the minister of interior affairs.

However, should we have a candacey poll for each position, when [nation=short]Plugo[/nation] sees that he's not gonna be the minister of defense, [nation=short]Plugo[/nation] can run as minister of interior affairs and save us from the stupidity of Bingus and Dingus.

Do you see the picture now?

Thats a whole lot of Plugo

Malcholm, Plugo, Civilisunio, Parakka Northland, Exotic Lemon, New Bacon Special Operations Command

Plugo wrote:why not just re make it to be 2 days?

Alright, well since there's only no votes, here it is https://www.nationstates.net/page=poll/p=68978

Forestavia, Barishmacht

Well...ORCA's closing.

Malcholm, Barishmacht, Republic Of Greater Cuba, Plugo

I think I like the blue background better than the green background in the regional flag.

Plugo

Lampar wrote:Well...ORCA's closing.

I'm looking at this as an opportunity to unload some NS responsibility.

Malcholm, Republic Of Greater Cuba, Plugo, Parakka Northland

Can be remove the newspaper already?

Mugwop wrote:Can be remove the newspaper already?

you mean the picture on i?

I created a new political party to spice things up. Please welcome the Communist Fascist Party! Wahoo! This is mainly for RP purposes as our region is very freedom oriented. I was looking through the political parties and I realized it was all good guys, good guys, good guys. It's great to have a lot of good guys but sometimes we just need some bad guys to make things interesting. Just to be clear, I am not leaving the Minarchist Party or Spectrum.

Malcholm, Republic Of Greater Cuba, Lampar, Parakka Northland

Forestavia wrote:I created a new political party to spice things up. Please welcome the Communist Fascist Party! Wahoo! This is mainly for RP purposes as our region is very freedom oriented. I was looking through the political parties and I realized it was all good guys, good guys, good guys. It's great to have a lot of good guys but sometimes we just need some bad guys to make things interesting. Just to be clear, I am not leaving the Minarchist Party or Spectrum.

0-0

Forestavia, Malcholm, Parakka Northland

Republic Of Greater Cuba wrote:0-0

Scary, huh?

Malcholm, Republic Of Greater Cuba, Plugo, Parakka Northland

Forestavia wrote:Scary, huh?

I really hope bad people don't move in

Plugo, Parakka Northland

Forestavia wrote:I created a new political party to spice things up. Please welcome the Communist Fascist Party! Wahoo! This is mainly for RP purposes as our region is very freedom oriented. I was looking through the political parties and I realized it was all good guys, good guys, good guys. It's great to have a lot of good guys but sometimes we just need some bad guys to make things interesting. Just to be clear, I am not leaving the Minarchist Party or Spectrum.

Does that mean that I can create another bad guy party?

Malcholm, Civilisunio

Lampar wrote:Does that mean that I can create another bad guy party?

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Forestavia, Malcholm

Lampar wrote:Does that mean that I can create another bad guy party?

Of course! Why not? We've got to stop these libertarians before people become free, happy, and prosperous. :P

Malcholm, Lampar, Plugo, Parakka Northland

Republic Of Greater Cuba wrote:NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

I'm going to put in creation the National Communist Party of the Mystical Council.

Republic Of Greater Cuba, Parakka Northland

Forestavia wrote:Of course! Why not? We've got to stop these libertarians before people become free, happy, and prosperous. :P

Lampar wrote:I'm going to put in creation the National Communist Party of the Mystical Council.

Lampar wrote:I'm going to put in creation the National Communist Party of the Mystical Council.

Excellent.

*rubs hands together*

Malcholm, Lampar, Parakka Northland

Lampar wrote:I'm going to put in creation the National Communist Party of the Mystical Council.

Gonna be honest I have no idea if you are actually still rping out something or your actually going to move socialists in here

Lampar

Forestavia wrote:Excellent.

*rubs hands together*

Democracy is dead, lol.

Malcholm, Parakka Northland

Republic Of Greater Cuba wrote:Gonna be honest I have no idea if you are actually still rping out something or your actually going to move socialists in here

Most of this is severe RP.

I promise that I'm no commie.

Malcholm, Republic Of Greater Cuba, Parakka Northland

Lampar wrote:Most of this is severe RP.

I promise that I'm no commie.

I would not really care if you were a communist

Lampar, Parakka Northland

Republic Of Greater Cuba wrote:Gonna be honest I have no idea if you are actually still rping out something or your actually going to move socialists in here

Once we get a minister of defense we won't have to worry as much about people entering and causing trouble

Republic Of Greater Cuba, Plugo

hi guys

Civilisunio, Exotic Lemon

Republic Of Greater Cuba wrote:I would not really care if you were a communist

Good.

Maybe I am?!

O-o

Republic Of Greater Cuba

Exotic Lemon wrote:Hello

Hello how are you?

Malcholm, Lampar

Banfield Ii wrote:Hello how are you?

Quite well. There hasn't been a crisis for 30 minutes

Forestavia, Malcholm, Republic Of Greater Cuba, Plugo

Lampar wrote:Democracy is dead, lol.

Check out the very first post made on the RMB. I'm sure you'll get a kick out it.

Malcholm, Republic Of Greater Cuba, Lampar, Exotic Lemon

Forestavia wrote:Check out the very first post made on the RMB. I'm sure you'll get a kick out it.

Literally everyone in the region quotes that

Malcholm, Republic Of Greater Cuba

Forestavia wrote:Check out the very first post made on the RMB. I'm sure you'll get a kick out it.

I'm glad that we agree on that, lol.

Malcholm

Exotic Lemon wrote:Literally everyone in the region quotes that

Not me

Banfield Ii wrote:hi guys

Yay! New nation! Welcome to our crazy home. :)

Would you like some tea?

Malcholm, Parakka Northland

Exotic Lemon wrote:Quite well. There hasn't been a crisis for 30 minutes

awesome.Does this region have a high chance of being raided at the moment, because i checked and there was a high risk of terrorist attack

Forestavia, Malcholm, Republic Of Greater Cuba, Plugo, Exotic Lemon

Republic Of Greater Cuba wrote:Not me

Cuba's different.

Republic Of Greater Cuba

Forestavia wrote:Yay! New nation! Welcome to our crazy home. :)

Would you like some tea?

sure

Malcholm

Banfield Ii wrote:awesome.Does this region have a high chance of being raided at the moment, because i checked and there was a high risk of terrorist attack

We should drop the rating a little. [nation=short]plugo[/nation] has always been paranoid. Most of the raids are just rp though

Malcholm, Lampar, Plugo

Making a user manual for life

Forestavia

Exotic Lemon wrote:We should drop the rating a little. [nation=short]plugo[/nation] has always been paranoid. Most of the raids are just rp though

well thats good I hate getting raided

Republic Of Greater Cuba, Lampar, Plugo, Civilisunio

Republic Of Greater Cuba wrote:Making a user manual for life

just like one of bricks

Exotic Lemon wrote:We should drop the rating a little. [nation=short]plugo[/nation] has always been paranoid. Most of the raids are just rp though

I'm still not sure that Naumadal was kidding about that.

He hasn't been the most active after the "raid".

But that could just be me.

Malcholm, Republic Of Greater Cuba, Plugo

Banfield Ii wrote:well thats good I hate getting raided

Yeah I am not fond of it either, especially considering I would be the person overthrown in the raid

Forestavia, Republic Of Greater Cuba, Lampar, Plugo

Lampar wrote:I'm still not sure that Naumadal was kidding about that.

He hasn't been the most active after the "raid".

But that could just be me.

Even if he was lying I dont really care. He has no where near enough endorsements and we have an active founder

Lampar, Plugo

Exotic Lemon wrote:Yeah I am not fond of it either, especially considering I would be the person overthrown in the raid

It wasn't a raid.

The correct term is "uprising".

Malcholm, Plugo, Exotic Lemon

Exotic Lemon wrote:Even if he was lying I dont really care. He has no where near enough endorsements and we have an active founder

Somewhat...*coughs and looks at forestavia*

Forestavia, Malcholm

Banfield Ii wrote:awesome.Does this region have a high chance of being raided at the moment, because i checked and there was a high risk of terrorist attack

Judging by the fact that we have tons of influence, our Delegate and everyone else in the region have tons of endorsements, and the fact that I'm an active founder. I would say we're pretty safe. We could get tag raided, but it wouldn't be like a full occupation or anything like that.

Malcholm, Parakka Northland

Lampar wrote:It wasn't a raid.

The correct term is "uprising".

It was an uprising for you but an overthrow for me

Lampar

Assembled with Dot's Region Saver.
Written by Refuge Isle.