Post Archive

Region: The Confederacy of Free Nations

History

Nuremgard wrote:You'll be sank by the mighty Scottish navy!

Pff

we'll just get the norwegians and danes in on this

about time we reestablish the danelaw while we're at it

Nuremgard, Jaslandia

Nuremgard wrote:The best nations in Europe, in my opinion, are Norway, Denmark, the Netherlands, Sweden and Finland. The last one is an exception to the rule since it doesn't have a monarchy.

I'll give you Denmark as well.

Axeldonia wrote:Pff

we'll just get the norwegians and danes in on this

about time we reestablish the danelaw while we're at it

Hey, I wouldn't mind being ruled by the Scandinavians. They're doing pretty well for themselves.

Axeldonia

Alruniea wrote:I'll give you Denmark as well.

I will give you Iceland. I don't know much about Switzerland or Estonia though so cant comment on them.

Nuremgard wrote:Hey, I wouldn't mind being ruled by the Scandinavians. They're doing pretty well for themselves.

Ayyyy

Scandinavian protectorate of britain when

Nuremgard

Axeldonia wrote:Ayyyy

Scandinavian protectorate of britain when

Nah, just Scotland. England likes the Tories too much. I mean, they think Corbyn is a Marxist. They probably think the Scandi countries are full blown commie hellholes. All that equality and fairness. The horror!

Nuremgard wrote:Why?

Germany is a great country too. But if I had to move elsewhere in Europe, I'd move to a Scandinavian nation.

It's always the same. "I like Germany but ...."

Mercunova

Penguania And Antarctica wrote:It's always the same. "I like Germany but ...."

Not me. If I had to move to Europe I'd go to Germany. Or Switzerland. But probably germany.

Russkov Soviet, Nuremgard

Mercunova wrote:Not me. If I had to move to Europe I'd go to Germany. Or Switzerland. But probably germany.

Considering my families ancestors were British... I'd move to Scotland/Ireland or perhaps Germany. Maybe Russia.

Nuremgard, Penguania And Antarctica

Russkov Soviet wrote:Considering my families ancestors were British... I'd move to Scotland/Ireland or perhaps Germany. Maybe Russia.

If you move to Scotland before our next ref, make sure you vote Yes!

Russkov Soviet

Russkov Soviet wrote:Considering my families ancestors were British... I'd move to Scotland/Ireland or perhaps Germany. Maybe Russia.

I wouldn't move to Great Britain.

Russkov Soviet, Nuremgard

Mercunova wrote:I wouldn't move to Great Britain.

If I was an outsider, neither would I.

Mercunova

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNHamTwxJ6Q

Mercunova wrote:I wouldn't move to Great Britain.

Not ever going to. Met too many c*nts and t*at s from England.

Nuremgard

Russkov Soviet wrote:Not ever going to. Met too many c*nts and t*at s from England.

Scotland has c*nts and twats too but not as many as England. And I don't say that just because I think Scots are less c*nty than the English, it's a fact because England has a bigger population. Therefore, it will numerically have more c*nts and twats in it than Scotland. One only needs to look at the Tory vote down there to see what I mean.

Russkov Soviet

Nuremgard wrote:Nah, just Scotland. England likes the Tories too much. I mean, they think Corbyn is a Marxist. They probably think the Scandi countries are full blown commie hellholes. All that equality and fairness. The horror!

Were not America thank you

The West Country wrote:Were not America thank you

Many English have become Americanised via politics. There are people down there who actually believe Corbyn is a raving Marxist-Leninist-Stalinist-Socialist-Communist madman who will put them into gulags when he gets into power.

Nuremgard wrote:Many English have become Americanised via politics. There are people down there who actually believe Corbyn is a raving Marxist-Leninist-Stalinist-Socialist-Communist madman who will put them into gulags when he gets into power.

They do do they?

The West Country wrote:They do do they?

Aye. It's why, even after a disastrous campaign at the snap election, that old cow May is still in office.

Nuremgard wrote:Many English have become Americanised via politics. There are people down there who actually believe Corbyn is a raving Marxist-Leninist-Stalinist-Socialist-Communist madman who will put them into gulags when he gets into power.

if only

Axeldonia wrote:if only

Less Tories, the better.

Axeldonia

Axeldonia wrote:if only

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sxAnejb9bs

Nuremgard wrote:Less Tories, the better.

And the less Blairites, the better.

Nuremgard

Gualimole wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sxAnejb9bs

And the less Blairites, the better.

England will need a genuine left-wing Labour Party once/if Scotland leaves.

Nuremgard wrote:England will need a genuine left-wing Labour Party once/if Scotland leaves.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independent_Labour_Publications

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Momentum_(organisation)

Gualimole wrote:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independent_Labour_Publications

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Momentum_(organisation)

But would the English vote for such a party in great enough numbers? I suspect not.

Nuremgard wrote:But would the English vote for such a party in great enough numbers? I suspect not.

Why?

Gualimole wrote:Why?

Tory policies are too popular down there. And Blair had to effectively Toryfy the Labour Party in order to make it electable down south.

Nuremgard wrote:Tory policies are too popular down there. And Blair had to effectively Toryfy the Labour Party in order to make it electable down south.

I think the younger generation is going to change that. By your logic, Corbyn would've been unelectable.

Gualimole wrote:I think the younger generation is going to change that. By your logic, Corbyn would've been unelectable.

If he was so electable, he'd have kicked May out on her arse at the snap election. Especially since her campaign was hopelessly and ridiculously incompetent. If Corbyn cant win against perhaps the worst government in living memory, what will it take for the English to finally boot the Tories out?

Nuremgard wrote:If he was so electable, he'd have kicked May out on her arse at the snap election. Especially since her campaign was hopelessly and ridiculously incompetent. If Corbyn cant win against perhaps the worst government in living memory, what will it take for the English to finally boot the Tories out?

He was still able to make it so that the Tories lost their majority. That's a miracle when you consider how the UK has been under the Tories for close a decade now.

Nuremgard wrote:Tory policies are too popular down there. And Blair had to effectively Toryfy the Labour Party in order to make it electable down south.

This is simply not true. A lot of the people who vote Conservatives are not “Tories”. My parents have been mainly Labour, but have occasionally voted Conservative if the previous Labour one was terrible as well as a protest against certain things - and this worked vice versa. There are many of people in varying socioeconomic groups that operate like this. Please remember that England, as well as the rest of the UK, has had very left wing governments in the not at all too distant past.

Gualimole wrote:He was still able to make it so that the Tories lost their majority. That's a miracle when you consider how the UK has been under the Tories for close a decade now.

Fair point. It forced May to crawl to the DUP. Not even John Major did that.

The West Country wrote:This is simply not true. A lot of the people who vote Conservatives are not “Tories”. My parents have been mainly Labour, but have occasionally voted Conservative if the previous Labour one was terrible as well as a protest against certain things - and this worked vice versa. There are many of people in varying socioeconomic groups that operate like this. Please remember that England, as well as the rest of the UK, has had very left wing governments in the not at all too distant past.

I would never under any circumstances vote Conservative so I don't understand the mindset that convinces people to do that. I do not see a left-wing government in Britain or England's future any time soon. That's what scares me about being shackled to the UK.

Gualimole

Nuremgard wrote:I would never under any circumstances vote Conservative so I don't understand the mindset that convinces people to do that. I do not see a left-wing government in Britain or England's future any time soon. That's what scares me about being shackled to the UK.

You keep ignoring the effect that the younger generation is going to have on British politics. Around 20 percent of the UK's population is made up of people between the ages of 18 to 29. Those votes matter and they're going to Labour, especially to the left-wing of the party.

Gualimole wrote:You keep ignoring the effect that the younger generation is going to have on British politics. Around 20 percent of the UK's population is made up of people between the ages of 18 to 29. Those votes matter and they're going to Labour, especially to the left-wing of the party.

Well let's hope so. I'm a pessimist by nature, hence my postings.

Nuremgard wrote:Well let's hope so. I'm a pessimist by nature, hence my postings.

I tend to be an optimist. Within our lifetimes, I think we're going to see unfathomable innovations that are going to bring forth utopia if managed correctly.

The West Country

Gualimole wrote:I tend to be an optimist. Within our lifetimes, I think we're going to see unfathomable innovations that are going to bring forth utopia if managed correctly.

That's extremely optimistic. Too optimistic. But that's your prerogative to think that.

Nuremgard wrote:That's extremely optimistic. Too optimistic. But that's your prerogative to think that.

We're already beginning to enter the Fourth Industrial Revolution, with AI and automation playing a large part in this revolution. In just a few decades, most likely by the 2040s, it has been predicted that superintelligent AI will come into existence in what is known as the Singularity. If we manage to overcome the challenges of ensuring that a superintelligent AI will be safe, then this superintelligent AI will be able to solve all of our problems in an instant because it will be billions of times more intelligent than we are.

Gualimole wrote:We're already beginning to enter the Fourth Industrial Revolution, with AI and automation playing a large part in this revolution. In just a few decades, most likely by the 2040s, it has been predicted that superintelligent AI will come into existence in what is known as the Singularity. If we manage to overcome the challenges of ensuring that a superintelligent AI will be safe, then this superintelligent AI will be able to solve all of our problems in an instant because it will be billions of times more intelligent than we are.

Or destroy/enslave us all lol

Nuremgard wrote:Or destroy/enslave us all lol

We either all die instantly or gain immortality. I'm willing to take that risk.

Gualimole wrote:We either all die instantly or gain immortality. I'm willing to take that risk.

What is a Demarchy?

Nuremgard wrote:What is a Demarchy?

A form of government without elections in which our leaders are chosen randomly from the wider adult population.

Gualimole wrote:A form of government without elections in which our leaders are chosen randomly from the wider adult population.

So like ancient Greece?

Gualimole wrote:We're already beginning to enter the Fourth Industrial Revolution, with AI and automation playing a large part in this revolution. In just a few decades, most likely by the 2040s, it has been predicted that superintelligent AI will come into existence in what is known as the Singularity. If we manage to overcome the challenges of ensuring that a superintelligent AI will be safe, then this superintelligent AI will be able to solve all of our problems in an instant because it will be billions of times more intelligent than we are.

Having seen the wealth of problems that exist with current AI and their incapability to do very much legitimate thought, I'd say it'll probably be further than 22 years away. Neural networks aren't particularly advanced, and they have distinct issues understanding things ranging from simple letters to complex concepts.

Nuremgard wrote:So like ancient Greece?

Yes.

Kalaron wrote:Having seen the wealth of problems that exist with current AI and their incapability to do very much legitimate thought, I'd say it'll probably be further than 22 years away. Neural networks aren't particularly advanced, and they have distinct issues understanding things ranging from simple letters to complex concepts.

As technology advances forward, technological progress happens at a faster and faster rate. I don't think that's going to change any time soon.

Gualimole wrote:As technology advances forward, technological progress happens at a faster and faster rate. I don't think that's going to change any time soon.

Sure, but this is a component of neural networks that hasn't really been changed at any point and is hardly predicted to, honestly. They have issues recognizing letters and numbers, for instance. And the difference between "Semantics" and "Syntax" for an AI is primarily software based, and it's going to only get harder and harder when you attempt to integrate it into wider and wider roles. AI are complex neural networks, and any meant to tackle true sentience will invariably be computationally massive, past the wildest nightmares of programmers the world 'round. I simply don't see the software catching up to that degree while still using conventional NNs honestly.

Nuremgard wrote:Fair point. It forced May to crawl to the DUP. Not even John Major did that.

I would never under any circumstances vote Conservative so I don't understand the mindset that convinces people to do that. I do not see a left-wing government in Britain or England's future any time soon. That's what scares me about being shackled to the UK.

Then you will forever hold your ignorance. If you can’t empathise with the other side then you just subject yourself to an echo chamber and get stuck in your preconceptions. I would say less partisanship is actually better.

The West Country wrote:Then you will forever hold your ignorance. If you can’t empathise with the other side then you just subject yourself to an echo chamber and get stuck in your preconceptions. I would say less partisanship is actually better.

I always believe that its the institutions, not the people who are to blame for this sort of stuff. Don't hate the people, try to convince them and have them come to an understanding against the institution that pulls the wool over their eyes and gets them voting conservative.

Axeldonia, The British Islands Confederacy, The West Country

Congratulations to Prince Harry and now Princess Meghan :D

Bearlong, Jaslandia, Vista Major, Penguania And Antarctica, The West Country

Audiastan wrote:Congratulations to Prince Harry and now Princess Meghan :D

Meghan and Kate are both looking good today tbf

Bearlong, Audiastan, Penguania And Antarctica

The West Country wrote:Then you will forever hold your ignorance. If you can’t empathise with the other side then you just subject yourself to an echo chamber and get stuck in your preconceptions. I would say less partisanship is actually better.

Lex Caledonia wrote:I always believe that its the institutions, not the people who are to blame for this sort of stuff. Don't hate the people, try to convince them and have them come to an understanding against the institution that pulls the wool over their eyes and gets them voting conservative.

Right. So I've to hate the "institutions" and not the people who vote to take away my mum's benefit money? I've to "empathise" with people who voted for a government that forces her to endure humiliating assessment interviews for money she is entitled to and has worked all her life paying taxes to? I am "ignorant" because I don't "understand" why someone voted for policies which resulted in me having my disability money reduced, and made me break down in tears in front of a welfare rights officer who told me I'd need to get a lawyer and face down a tribunal but risk losing the lot if I did?

Well forgive me for not being so understanding to the so called other side. Me and my family have had very bitter experiences of the policies they endorsed.

Axeldonia, Lex Caledonia

Nuremgard wrote:Right. So I've to hate the "institutions" and not the people who vote to tske away my mum's benefit money? I've to "empatbise" with people who voted for a gov that forces her to endure humiliating assessment interviews for money she is entitled to and has worked all her lifr for, paying taxes to? I am "ignorant" brcause I dont "understand" why someone voted for policies which resulted in me having my disability money reduced, and made me break down in tears in front of a housing officrr who told me I'd need to get a lawyer and face dowm a tribunal but risk loaing the lot?

Well forgive me for not being so understanding to the so called other side. Mr and my family have had very bitter experiences of the policies they endorsed.

I know what its like to be on benefits, I was on benefits/job seekers allowance for about half a year due to my ex breaking up with me and my London stuff breaking down, I'm lucky that I managed to pull through it and land myself a job recently. The institutions are the ones who make the laws like the rape clause and make benefits a living hell for poeple, the people don't vote for that, as previously stated the institutions turn them away and disguise it; instead getting them to vote for them for more money/less taxes and the usual guff. I used to hate people who voted in a certain way but after a while it brings you down and exhausts you, filling you with venom. Hating people won't change their opinion and only embolden them, this isn't to say you can't criticise them, its just that hate begets hate. Be better than that.

Jaslandia, Anglia Imperium

Here they go again...

Jaslandia, Penguania And Antarctica, The West Country

Lex Caledonia wrote:I know what its like to be on benefits, I was on benefits/job seekers allowance for about half a year due to my ex breaking up with me and my London stuff breaking down, I'm lucky that I managed to pull through it and land myself a job recently. The institutions are the ones who make the laws like the rape clause and make benefits a living hell for poeple, the people don't vote for that, as previously stated the institutions turn them away and disguise it; instead getting them to vote for them for more money/less taxes and the usual guff. I used to hate people who voted in a certain way but after a while it brings you down and exhausts you, filling you with venom. Hating people won't change their opinion and only embolden them, this isn't to say you can't criticise them, its just that hate begets hate. Be better than that.

I'm sorry but I don't buy this at all. People vote Tory but you're seriously trying to persuade me the people voting for them don't know they're going to come up with these nasty policies? Well riddle me this. If people wouldn't vote for them with these policies stated openly, why do they continue to vote for them when the government puts them into practice and it's out in the open for all to see? There are people who actively support the rape clause, actively support assessments and cutting/sanctioning people's benefits because they "deserve it" and "are scroungers" in their eyes. And you want me to stop hating people like that? You want me to just shrug it off and go, "meh, that's their political opinion."

What really gets me is these Tories then have the absolute f*cking brass neck to clutch their pearls and have their lips tremble when we call them mean names. "Oh, this is why the left always loses. I vote for policies that actively harm and kill people but you called me a mean name! That's WORSE!"

Yet Tories whine that the left say they're evil. Er, how about you stop voting for these vile policies and we'll stop calling you evil?

Axeldonia

Nuremgard wrote:I'm sorry but I don't buy this at all. People vote Tory but you're seriously trying to persuade me the people voting for them don't know they're going to come up with these nasty policies? Well riddle me this. If people wouldn't vote for them with these policies stated openly, why do they continue to vote for them when the government puts them into practice and it's out in the open for all to see? There are people who actively support the rape clause, actively support assessments and cutting/sanctioning people's benefits because they "deserve it" and "are scroungers" in their eyes. And you want me to stop hating people like that? You want me to just shrug it off and go, "meh, that's their political opinion."

What really gets me is these Tories then have the absolute f*cking brass neck to clutch their pearls and have their lips tremble when we call them mean names. "Oh, this is why the left always loses. I vote for policies that actively harm and kill people but you called me a mean name! That's WORSE!"

Yet Tories whine that the left say they're evil. Er, how about you stop voting for these vile policies and we'll stop calling you evil?

You know what I mean, not every single one of them votes for them because they approve these policies and want to see people suffer, I'd argue a large amount are swayed into voting for the Tories because they're lied to and buy into the crap about improving their taxes etc. Gammon and their hateful minority are terrible people yes but you can't cast them all under the same umbrella with misled people and hate all of them.

I hate the Tories as an institution and would gladly like to see it crumble into the dirt. To do that though and to combat them, you have to win people over. Chap on doors, get involved with parties and student groups. Be politically constructive. Its all well and good to vent on the people who deserve it, especially the gammon imo but saying everyone who votes Tory deserves hate only puts you down on their level. You need to be better than them.

...

I wanted to write something. But after reading all the previous posts I refrain from speaking.

Bearlong, Mercunova

Lex Caledonia wrote:You know what I mean, not every single one of them votes for them because they approve these policies and want to see people suffer, I'd argue a large amount are swayed into voting for the Tories because they're lied to and buy into the crap about improving their taxes etc. Gammon and their hateful minority are terrible people yes but you can't cast them all under the same umbrella with misled people and hate all of them.

I hate the Tories as an institution and would gladly like to see it crumble into the dirt. To do that though and to combat them, you have to win people over. Chap on doors, get involved with parties and student groups. Be politically constructive. Its all well and good to vent on the people who deserve it, especially the gammon imo but saying everyone who votes Tory deserves hate only puts you down on their level. You need to be better than them.

It's pretty damn hard to sympathise with them when they vote for the f*ckers in the millions.

Nuremgard wrote:It's pretty damn hard to sympathise with them when they vote for the f*ckers in the millions.

I'm not telling you what you can and can't do my duder and I understand if you believe that. Sympathy can be hard to give when the person you're trying to do so with goes against what you believe in. The best thing to do is confront them with compassion and move on from those who don't want it, do this with enough people and you'll find that one person who'll change their ways.

Penguania And Antarctica wrote:...

I wanted to write something. But after reading all the previous posts I refrain from speaking.

I think I'll do the same.

Bearlong, Penguania And Antarctica

Lex Caledonia wrote:I'm not telling you what you can and can't do my duder and I understand if you believe that. Sympathy can be hard to give when the person you're trying to do so with goes against what you believe in. The best thing to do is confront them with compassion and move on from those who don't want it, do this with enough people and you'll find that one person who'll change their ways.

You're way more optimistic about people than I am. I'll show them compassion when they show people like my mum compassion.

Penguania And Antarctica wrote:...

I wanted to write something. But after reading all the previous posts I refrain from speaking.

Mercunova wrote:I think I'll do the same.

My apologies for using the Regional Message Board to post messages to other posters.

Gualimole

Nuremgard wrote:You're way more optimistic about people than I am. I'll show them compassion when they show people like my mum compassion.

Understandable. I just like to believe that most people are inherently good and that they're all worth a shot.

Lex Caledonia wrote:Understandable. I just like to believe that most people are inherently good and that they're all worth a shot.

Whereas I take the Hobbesian view that people are inherently sh!tty and self-interested.

Nuremgard wrote:My apologies for using the Regional Message Board to post messages to other posters.

That's not what I meant.

Penguania And Antarctica wrote:That's not what I meant.

Nothing was stopping you posting.

The West Country

Nuremgard wrote:My apologies for using the Regional Message Board to post messages to other posters.

Someone's defensive.

Bearlong wrote:Someone's defensive.

Yeah I am. So what?

Nuremgard wrote:Yeah I am. So what?

Just making an observation. My apologies for using the Regional Message Board to post messages to other posters.

Axeldonia, Mercunova, The West Country

Bearlong wrote:Just making an observation. My apologies for using the Regional Message Board to post messages to other posters.

Touche.

Bearlong, Mercunova, The West Country

Bearlong wrote:Just making an observation. My apologies for using the Regional Message Board to post messages to other posters.

Regional message board messages post to other posters, apologies my.

Bearlong, Nuremgard, Jaslandia

The West Country wrote:Regional message board messages post to other posters, apologies my.

Is this a new meme?

Bearlong, Nuremgard, Jaslandia

Nuremgard wrote:Nothing was stopping you posting.

Yes, there is always. There are so many times I want to post my opinion/stance but I refrain from doing so because of the reaction of the others. I silence and censor myself to make people's lifes here as pleasant as possible.

Bearlong

Nuremgard's gay imperial wedding will be better than today's straight royal wedding.

Mercunova

Penguania And Antarctica wrote:Yes, there is always. There are so many times I want to post my opinion/stance but I refrain from doing so because of the reaction of the others. I silence and censor myself to make people's lifes here as pleasant as possible.

Well don't censor yourself.

Bearlong

Nuremgard wrote:Well don't censor yourself.

You would hate me. So no.

Bearlong

Penguania And Antarctica wrote:You would hate me. So no.

I highly doubt that.

Penguania And Antarctica

Penguania And Antarctica wrote:You would hate me. So no.

I already hate you for not having the vague self-respect required to make yourself heard.

Penguania And Antarctica

Bearlong wrote:I already hate you for not having the vague self-respect required to make yourself heard.

Thanks. /s

Bearlong

Bearlong wrote:I already hate you for not having the vague self-respect required to make yourself heard.

Oh and I tried to make myself heard but it always fell on deaf ears. So I gave up.

Bearlong

Gualimole wrote:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independent_Labour_Publications

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Momentum_(organisation)

Momentum works within the Labour party, it's not an independent organisation.

The West Country

Unfallious wrote:Momentum works within the Labour party, it's not an independent organisation.

and the ILP smells

Unfallious wrote:Momentum works within the Labour party, it's not an independent organisation.

"England will need a genuine left-wing Labour Party once/if Scotland leaves."

This is the post that I responded to. I was responding with organizations that operate within the left-wing of the Labour Party.

Unfallious wrote:and the ILP smells

Why?

Gualimole wrote:"England will need a genuine left-wing Labour Party once/if Scotland leaves."

This is the post that I responded to. I was responding with organizations that operate within the left-wing of the Labour Party.

To be honest, I don't care what happens to Labour. I don't vote for them and never will. So their fate doesn't concern me.

Nuremgard wrote:To be honest, I don't care what happens to Labour. I don't vote for them and never will. So their fate doesn't concern me.

Even if you don't vote for them, their fate matters because it will change the fundamentals of Scottish politics and British politics in general.

Gualimole wrote:Why?

It's just the mouldy remnants of the 1890s edition of the labour party. They don't really do too much, and have been fairly irrelevant since the LRC was formed in 1900. But they still persisted in actually existing until the '70s when they folded into Labour.

Gualimole

And to think that we had managed to derail this conversation.

Gualimole wrote:Even if you don't vote for them, their fate matters because it will change the fundamentals of Scottish politics and British politics in general.

True. The Tories are ripping up the devolution settlement with no effective opposition.

Gualimole

Bearlong wrote:And to think that we had managed to derail this conversation.

How dare we discuss politics on a political simulation game!

The West Country

Shazria has finally developed its own WMDs.

Russkov Soviet

Nuremgard wrote:How dare we discuss politics on a political simulation game!

How dare we derail and disrupt conversations on a political simulation game!

So, any idea what I could talk about?

Penguania And Antarctica wrote:So, any idea what I could talk about?

What's going on in Germany politically?

Penguania And Antarctica

Penguania And Antarctica wrote:So, any idea what I could talk about?

Anything, as long as it isn't trains.

Jaslandia, Penguania And Antarctica, Preussen-Brandenburg

Bearlong wrote:Anything, as long as it isn't trains.

Jas is offended.

Bearlong, Nuremgard, Jaslandia, Penguania And Antarctica, Preussen-Brandenburg

Gualimole wrote:Jas is offended.

Good.

Penguania And Antarctica, Preussen-Brandenburg

Bearlong wrote:Good.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MnQ_mp9TzZY

post Regional apologies other messages to posters, my.message board

Nuremgard, Jaslandia, Penguania And Antarctica, The West Country

Axeldonia wrote:post Regional apologies other messages to posters, my.message board

Grammar is dead. Long live grammar!

Nuremgard, Jaslandia, Penguania And Antarctica

Nuremgard wrote:What's going on in Germany politically?

I would say not much. At least that's how I see it.

Nuremgard

Assembled with Dot's Region Saver.
Written by Refuge Isle.