Post Archive

Region: The Confederacy of Free Nations

History

Nuremgard wrote:Exactly. One of the left's main weaknesses is that it's prone to factionalism. It loves to splinter off into various parties and groups and likes to accuse each other of not being left enough. The right, however, is very good at remaining united (even grudgingly or superficially) because they realise that staying in power (or gaining power) is more important than ideological purity or difference.

There are many communist parties in the UK. Too many.

Communist Party of Britain

New Communist Party of Britain

Communist Party of Great Britain (Marxist-Leninist)

Revolutionary Communist Party of Great Britain (Marxist-Leninist)

https://st2.depositphotos.com/1158045/5433/i/950/depositphotos_54338891-stock-photo-man-talking-to-clone-of.jpg

Jaslandia

Gualimole wrote:There are many communist parties in the UK. Too many.

Communist Party of Britain

New Communist Party of Britain

Communist Party of Great Britain (Marxist-Leninist)

Revolutionary Communist Party of Great Britain (Marxist-Leninist)

https://st2.depositphotos.com/1158045/5433/i/950/depositphotos_54338891-stock-photo-man-talking-to-clone-of.jpg

While this is true, communism is a dead ideology and poses no threat to western democracy. Fascism, Nazism and the alt-right definitely does though.

Nuremgard wrote:While this is true, communism is a dead ideology and poses no threat to western democracy. Fascism, Nazism and the alt-right definitely does though.

I was pointing out how sectarian the left is.

Nuremgard

Gualimole wrote:I was pointing out how sectarian the left is.

The left needs to get its act together. Europe's shift to rightist nationalism is unnerving to me.

Gualimole, Midasia

Nuremgard wrote:The left needs to get its act together. Europe's shift to rightist nationalism is unnerving to me.

Aren't you a nationalist? What makes your nationalism superior to the nationalism of the right?

Gualimole wrote:Aren't you a nationalist? What makes your nationalism superior to the nationalism of the right?

I'm a civic nationalist. I believe that if you live and work in Scotland then you are a Scot, regardless of your nationality, ethnicity, religious affiliation etc. I am not opposed to those of other countries and cultures coming to make Scotland their home. Right wing nationalism tends to be ethnic, in the sense that it wants to exclude those from other countries and cultures.

Jaslandia, Midasia

We have human rights, but why not have human lefts?

Yukona

Nuremgard wrote:The left needs to get its act together. Europe's shift to rightist nationalism is unnerving to me.

eeeh, the thing is when you look at leftist factionalism compared to right wing 'unity' you've also got to keep in mind that leftism is always going to be like this and can never be as unified as the right. This is because, at its core, all right wing ideologies favour the status quo so they can all work together at maintaining this status quo. The right looks 'unified' because they can all agree on this base. The left looks divided because there is no comparable base for them to rally around since they all agree that the status quo is bad, but cannot agree on where to shift the status quo to. Do you remove capitalism? Do you reform capitalism? Do you keep the state? Do you remove the state? That's even before you go into the real nitty gritty of identity politics. Do you pursue the immediate aims of the POC groups? Do you pursue the immediate aims of the trans groups? What about class inequalities? The left is so infightey because all these groups are all pursuing their own aims, as well as pursuing their own economic aims (reform v. revolution, capitalism v. socialism).

There is no way for the left to get its act together because there isn't really a single unified 'left' and there never really can be.

Nuremgard, Jaslandia, Axeldonia

Unfallious wrote:eeeh, the thing is when you look at leftist factionalism compared to right wing 'unity' you've also got to keep in mind that leftism is always going to be like this and can never be as unified as the right. This is because, at its core, all right wing ideologies favour the status quo so they can all work together at maintaining this status quo. The right looks 'unified' because they can all agree on this base. The left looks divided because there is no comparable base for them to rally around since they all agree that the status quo is bad, but cannot agree on where to shift the status quo to. Do you remove capitalism? Do you reform capitalism? Do you keep the state? Do you remove the state? That's even before you go into the real nitty gritty of identity politics. Do you pursue the immediate aims of the POC groups? Do you pursue the immediate aims of the trans groups? What about class inequalities? The left is so infightey because all these groups are all pursuing their own aims, as well as pursuing their own economic aims (reform v. revolution, capitalism v. socialism).

There is no way for the left to get its act together because there isn't really a single unified 'left' and there never really can be.

So we're f*cked then?

Nuremgard wrote:So we're f*cked then?

Not entirely. The liberal left has been historically pretty good at working together, they just also have a knack for collaborating with some centre-right elements which discredit them in the eyes of further left groups. But, for bringing us over to the left we either have to entrust in the liberal-left parties to bring us over to the point where the further left groups have an easier time working together or hope that one of the further left group grows enough that it can operate without having to enlist the help of other leftist groups.

Axeldonia

Unfallious wrote:Not entirely. The liberal left has been historically pretty good at working together, they just also have a knack for collaborating with some centre-right elements which discredit them in the eyes of further left groups. But, for bringing us over to the left we either have to entrust in the liberal-left parties to bring us over to the point where the further left groups have an easier time working together or hope that one of the further left group grows enough that it can operate without having to enlist the help of other leftist groups.

I don't see the left gaining power in Britain for a very long time. Even then, if Labour does get back in, it'll be when it's led by a Blairite who appeals to the conservative middle class.

Axeldonia

Nuremgard wrote:I don't see the left gaining power in Britain for a very long time. Even then, if Labour does get back in, it'll be when it's led by a Blairite who appeals to the conservative middle class.

I dunno, I think the last election had some very promising results, and as time goes on Labour can only strengthen whereas Conservative can only splinter. This is one of the rare times where the Conservative side is afflicted with factionalism whereas the left in Labour are more or less unified, and I wish Labour would more aggressively exploit it.

Axeldonia

Gualimole But Worse

Aww Christ, like we needed this

Yukona

Unfallious wrote:I dunno, I think the last election had some very promising results, and as time goes on Labour can only strengthen whereas Conservative can only splinter. This is one of the rare times where the Conservative side is afflicted with factionalism whereas the left in Labour are more or less unified, and I wish Labour would more aggressively exploit it.

I don't see this unity in Labour. I don't even know where they or Corbyn stand on Brexit. The Opposition should be miles ahead in the polls right now. They should be tearing this shambolic government to pieces but they aren't and it's extremely infuriating. I mean, what do the Tories actually have to do before people start turning against them? Does May need to slaughter a newborn infant live in the telly before the Tories lose votes?

Then again, depending on the socioeconomic status of said newborn, that might actually gain them votes. I'm sure she'd be complimented on her "strong and stable" wielding of the blade.

Unfallious wrote:I dunno, I think the last election had some very promising results, and as time goes on Labour can only strengthen whereas Conservative can only splinter. This is one of the rare times where the Conservative side is afflicted with factionalism whereas the left in Labour are more or less unified, and I wish Labour would more aggressively exploit it.

I think Nurem will beat me to this but then why has May consistently been trouncing Corbyn in polls for months now? Sure, she did before last general election too but Corbyn also came up only to 265 seats or so. This suggests a repeat of that performance if another snap election is held.

Nuremgard

Mercunova wrote:I think Nurem will beat me to this but then why has May consistently been trouncing Corbyn in polls for months now? Sure, she did before last general election too but Corbyn also came up only to 265 seats or so. This suggests a repeat of that performance if another snap election is held.

She might even obtain a workable majority next time instead of needing to rely on the DUP.

Nuremgard wrote:She might even obtain a workable majority next time instead of needing to rely on the DUP.

I think it'd be very funny if the results of the next election turned out exactly the same as the last one.

Nuremgard

Mercunova wrote:I think it'd be very funny if the results of the next election turned out exactly the same as the last one.

The sheer embarrassment of May and the Tories at the last general election was a sight to behold. Me and my sister stayed up all night cheering on Corbyn.

Jaslandia, Mercunova

Nuremgard wrote:The sheer embarrassment of May and the Tories at the last general election was a sight to behold. Me and my sister stayed up all night cheering on Corbyn.

Sister?

Mercunova

Nuremgard wrote:The sheer embarrassment of May and the Tories at the last general election was a sight to behold. Me and my sister stayed up all night cheering on Corbyn.

He still lost the election.

Mercunova wrote:He still lost the election.

Everyone was expecting the Tories to succeed in a landslide. Corbyn lost, but he was able to make gains while the Tories lost their majority.

Nuremgard, Mercunova

Gualimole wrote:Everyone was expecting the Tories to succeed in a landslide. Corbyn lost, but he was able to make gains while the Tories lost their majority.

He still lost the election.

Mercunova wrote:He still lost the election.

Losing an election can mean different things in a presidential democracy and in a parliamentary democracy. You are approaching this entirely from the perspective of someone living in a presidential democracy.

Nuremgard, Axeldonia

Gualimole wrote:Losing an election can mean different things in a presidential democracy and in a parliamentary democracy. You are approaching this entirely from the perspective of someone living in a presidential democracy.

No, I'm approaching this as someone who can count.

317 is greater than 262.

Those numbers might be closer together than the last set, but he still lost the election. Not that May or anyone else won, but he still lost the election.

Gualimole wrote:Losing an election can mean different things in a presidential democracy and in a parliamentary democracy. You are approaching this entirely from the perspective of someone living in a presidential democracy.

I know full well how parliaments work. If he is what he says he is, then he should have had a majority last year. He didn't. Therefore he lost, as did every party.

!!!GERMANY!!!

Jaslandia, Axeldonia, Mercunova, Yukona, Midasia

I came home from work one day to a horrendous smell. Following my nose to the kids' bathroom, I saw my daughter, then maybe 9, with a Barbie doll. Barbie was naked, and her hair had been chopped off. My daughter was holding Barbie by her little neck over the sink, and had a lighter at Barbie's foot.

"Talk," my daughter screamed, as Barbie's foot melted into the sink. "I told you to talk!"

My first thought was that my daughter should not have had access to a lighter, so I asked her where she got it. "Oh, it was with daddy's cigarettes," she told me, sweet as could be.

"What are you doing with Barbie?" I asked her, trying to keep my voice calm. My little daughter's eyes hardened and she nearly snarled "She won't give up enemy secrets, so I have to torture her!"

This was out of character for my daughter, and we were not a household that condoned torture, under any circumstances, so that really took me by surprise.

"OK, Honey, can you maybe find a way to torture Barbie that won't release toxic fumes?"

My daughter thought about it for a moment. "Sure," she cheerfully told me. "And Honey, please give me the lighter." She handed it right over.

Mercunova

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Terminal_Event_Management_Policy

I enjoy this emergency policy.

Jaslandia

Midasia wrote:I don't think free speech should be extended to Nazis, fascists, or the alt-right. Their views are based on hate, discimination, and inequality. The left tend to treat others equally and promote equality. This leads to my strong disliking of capitalism, which is an economic system that thrives on inequality. In today's day and age, we need to unite against those who would bring us destruction. Nazis and fascists are those who bring destruction.

Jesus f*cking Christ, this is the most leftist thing I've read today

Midasia

Midasia wrote:I don't think free speech should be extended to Nazis, fascists, or the alt-right. Their views are based on hate, discimination, and inequality. The left tend to treat others equally and promote equality. This leads to my strong disliking of capitalism, which is an economic system that thrives on inequality. In today's day and age, we need to unite against those who would bring us destruction. Nazis and fascists are those who bring destruction.

Yeah no, thought crime is bad even if the one doing it is a Nazi.

The best case, IMO, is to debate them and bring them down rather than outlawing a viewpoint since that only radicalizes the issue. You won't get everyone, but you also manage to avoid setting a precedent for how "some people just don't deserve free speech" later on.

Midasia

Kalaron wrote:Yeah no, thought crime is bad even if the one doing it is a Nazi.

The best case, IMO, is to debate them and bring them down rather than outlawing a viewpoint since that only radicalizes the issue. You won't get everyone, but you also manage to avoid setting a precedent for how "some people just don't deserve free speech" later on.

Gonna have to agree with Kal on this: obviously, Fascists and neo-Nazis shouldn't be advocating for their free speech when the regimes their ideologies associated with were repressive af, along with the fact that they advocate the general idea of inequality and supremacy of the state for the former, and outdated racial policies that dehumanize individuals for the latter. Despite that, advocating for the removal of their right to speech is just as abhorrent as it sets the slippery slope on who has access to free speech, they generally don't get too violent to the point of murder (I say generally given riots and assaults are common, plus the Greensboro Massacre showed they were willing to kill, despite it being a CWP rally), and everybody knows that they're weak as hell and tend to go for lawsuits rather than backing themselves up.

Kalaron

Gualimole wrote:There are many communist parties in the UK. Too many.

Communist Party of Britain

New Communist Party of Britain

Communist Party of Great Britain (Marxist-Leninist)

Revolutionary Communist Party of Great Britain (Marxist-Leninist)

https://st2.depositphotos.com/1158045/5433/i/950/depositphotos_54338891-stock-photo-man-talking-to-clone-of.jpg

Ah, the wonderful world of stock photos.

https://youtu.be/C0MeKIecXDc

Also, my take on the whole 'Nazis free speech thing': Provided they aren't inciting violence, groups like Nazis and fascists should be allowed to say their piece. That said, I don't think such speech should be encouraged, and I think people are fully within their rights to protest such speech.

Mercunova wrote:I think it'd be very funny if the results of the next election turned out exactly the same as the last one.

It’s part and parcel to FPtP as well

Jaslandia, Mercunova

Mercunova wrote:No, I'm approaching this as someone who can count.

317 is greater than 262.

Those numbers might be closer together than the last set, but he still lost the election. Not that May or anyone else won, but he still lost the election.

She lost enough votes that it forced her to bribe a bunch of bigots with a billion quid just to ensure her political survival. She may be in office but she's not in power. Tories use the "but she still won" line to mask the humiliating fact that their party is controlled by terrorist sympathisers.

Gualimole wrote:Sister?

I have an older sister.

Yukona wrote:It’s part and parcel to FPtP as well

*Hisses at the mention of FPTP*

Jaslandia

Nuremgard wrote:*Hisses at the mention of FPTP*

https://youtu.be/s7tWHJfhiyo

Nuremgard

Nuremgard wrote:She lost enough votes that it forced her to bribe a bunch of bigots with a billion quid just to ensure her political survival. She may be in office but she's not in power. Tories use the "but she still won" line to mask the humiliating fact that their party is controlled by terrorist sympathisers.

She didn't win. But neither did Corbyn. No one did.

Mercunova wrote:She didn't win. But neither did Corbyn. No one did.

The whole political system here just sucks.

Mercunova

Ok..... That's strange. I logged into NS and my flag was replaced by the default one you get when you first make a nation. I tried to re-upload the Imperial Standard, but it's not working. Uh... I guess I'll fly something else?

Penguania And Antarctica

Post self-deleted by Russkov Soviet.

Nuremgard wrote:*Hisses at the mention of FPTP*

Voting systems? Is someone finally talking about voting systems? I am willing to speak about voting systems right now!

Jaslandia wrote:Also, my take on the whole 'Nazis free speech thing': Provided they aren't inciting violence, groups like Nazis and fascists should be allowed to say their piece. That said, I don't think such speech should be encouraged, and I think people are fully within their rights to protest such speech.

Their ideology is inherently violent and intolerant. Tolerating the intolerant allows them to destroy all tolerance.

Nuremgard, Midasia

Gualimole wrote:Voting systems? Is someone finally talking about voting systems? I am willing to speak about voting systems right now!

Their ideology is inherently violent and intolerant. Tolerating the intolerant allows them to destroy all tolerance.

Voting systems are complicated and technical. I wrote an essay on them and doing research on them was soul-destroying.

Mercunova

Nuremgard wrote:Voting systems are complicated and technical. I wrote an essay on them and doing research on them was soul-destroying.

They are. That's what I like about them.

Nuremgard, Mercunova

Society: "Robots are dangerous because an AI might be crazy and kill us all just because we're organics and it's creators we need to stop AI before they start treating us poorly"

Also Society: "Wow haha stupid robot you got in my way so I kicked you as hard as I could that teaches you ya dumb food delivery drone if you cross my path I'll do it again!"

https://m.sfgate.com/technology/businessinsider/article/People-kicking-these-food-delivery-robots-is-an-12980712.php

Kalaron wrote:Society: "Robots are dangerous because an AI might be crazy and kill us all just because we're organics and it's creators we need to stop AI before they start treating us poorly"

Also Society: "Wow haha stupid robot you got in my way so I kicked you as hard as I could that teaches you ya dumb food delivery drone if you cross my path I'll do it again!"

https://m.sfgate.com/technology/businessinsider/article/People-kicking-these-food-delivery-robots-is-an-12980712.php

If androids look like this in the future then I welcome our robotic overlords.

https://inhdw.com/4k-connor-detroit-become-human-video-game-1120/

Axeldonia

Nuremgard wrote:If androids look like this in the future then I welcome our robotic overlords.

https://inhdw.com/4k-connor-detroit-become-human-video-game-1120/

>.>

<.<

Unfortunately, it's as likely that we'll have Jupiter Brains and their larger matrioshka brain brothers as we are to having android AI.

Kalaron wrote:>.>

<.<

Unfortunately, it's as likely that we'll have Jupiter Brains and their larger matrioshka brain brothers as we are to having android AI.

Having intelligent androids like the one in the picture I showed would be awesome.

Jaslandia, Axeldonia

Nuremgard wrote:Having intelligent androids like the one in the picture I showed would be awesome.

It would be, but to be honest the world we'd live in would be pretty much perfect anyway with some of what would go into that android. Having a computer capable of hosting an AI that is as small as a human brain would be a massive achievement for mankind and would represent a real leap in our processing power. Having power systems that could keep that computer running at brain speeds with out needing to be plugged in would mean we have massively efficient, massively powerful batteries or power generation systems that need only scaling up to make practically any solution to the energy crisis totally valid. The servo-motors or synthetic muscles would represent a whole new world of solutions to the typical prosthesis and would make everything so much simpler to build in all conditions including maybe even space.

Super computers would become practically outdated over night and Fusion power might finally see a solution to it's field problems if the AI could simulate the complex field geometry of holding it.

Ultimately, we'd already be in as close to Utopia as possible.

Kalaron wrote:It would be, but to be honest the world we'd live in would be pretty much perfect anyway with some of what would go into that android. Having a computer capable of hosting an AI that is as small as a human brain would be a massive achievement for mankind and would represent a real leap in our processing power. Having power systems that could keep that computer running at brain speeds with out needing to be plugged in would mean we have massively efficient, massively powerful batteries or power generation systems that need only scaling up to make practically any solution to the energy crisis totally valid. The servo-motors or synthetic muscles would represent a whole new world of solutions to the typical prosthesis and would make everything so much simpler to build in all conditions including maybe even space.

Super computers would become practically outdated over night and Fusion power might finally see a solution to it's field problems if the AI could simulate the complex field geometry of holding it.

Ultimately, we'd already be in as close to Utopia as possible.

To be honest, I just want a smexy android pal like Connor.

https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/q2sSMnmbbkv326cCBSn8gX-480-80.png

Axeldonia

Nuremgard wrote:To be honest, I just want a smexy android pal like Connor.

https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/q2sSMnmbbkv326cCBSn8gX-480-80.png

If I had to choose one, it'd be the girl andriod with the white hair option. I saw Criken playing and she looked pretty nice.

Kalaron wrote:If I had to choose one, it'd be the girl andriod with the white hair option. I saw Criken playing and she looked pretty nice.

Don't lie Kal. We're all gay for Connor here.

Nuremgard, Jaslandia, Mercunova

Axeldonia wrote:Don't lie Kal. We're all gay for Connor here.

Connor/Bryan Dechart is gorgeous.

Axeldonia, Mercunova

supercalifragilisticexpialidocious

Nuremgard, Jaslandia

Penguania And Antarctica wrote:supercalifragilisticexpialidocious

https://youtu.be/gUgop8B_Mw0?t=3m55s

Penguania And Antarctica

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/england-fan-told-to-take-down-lgbt-england-flag-in-russian-stadium/ar-AAz6wfS?li=BBoPWjQ&ocid=mailsignout

F*ck Russia.

Jaslandia, Axeldonia

Nuremgard wrote:https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/england-fan-told-to-take-down-lgbt-england-flag-in-russian-stadium/ar-AAz6wfS?li=BBoPWjQ&ocid=mailsignout

F*ck Russia.

C'mon, you know Russians don't like rainbows on their flags, it's not like they put them on the flags of their constituent Oblasts or someth-

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_the_Jewish_Autonomous_Oblast

Nuremgard, Jaslandia

Jaslandia wrote:https://youtu.be/gUgop8B_Mw0?t=3m55s

That whole video made my day. Thanks for that, buddy. :D

Jaslandia

Penguania And Antarctica wrote:That whole video made my day. Thanks for that, buddy. :D

You're quite welcome!

Penguania And Antarctica

Axeldonia wrote:C'mon, you know Russians don't like rainbows on their flags, it's not like they put them on the flags of their constituent Oblasts or someth-

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_the_Jewish_Autonomous_Oblast

An oblast just for the Jews eh? How segregationist.

Axeldonia

Nuremgard wrote:An oblast just for the Jews eh? How segregationist.

Giving an oblast just for one ethno-religious group? What's next, giving them an ethnostate and displacing the natives?

Oh.

Nuremgard, Axeldonia, Penguania And Antarctica

Unfallious wrote:Giving an oblast just for one ethno-religious group? What's next, giving them an ethnostate and displacing the natives?

Oh.

Ssshhh. You cant criticise Israel. That makes you anti-Semitic.

Axeldonia, Penguania And Antarctica, Mercunova

Nuremgard wrote:An oblast just for the Jews eh? How segregationist.

It's not majority Jewish anymore, though.

"By 2010, according to data provided by the Russian Census Bureau, there were only 1,628 Jews remaining in the JAO (less than 1% of the population), while ethnic Russians made up 92.7% of the JAO population."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Autonomous_Oblast

Jaslandia wrote:It's not majority Jewish anymore, though.

"By 2010, according to data provided by the Russian Census Bureau, there were only 1,628 Jews remaining in the JAO (less than 1% of the population), while ethnic Russians made up 92.7% of the JAO population."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Autonomous_Oblast

Fair enough.

The Elections Dispatch Has Been Updated

https://www.nationstates.net/page=dispatch/id=841402

Bearlong, Nuremgard, Penguania And Antarctica, Lex Caledonia, Marristaria

Nuremgard wrote:Ssshhh. You cant criticise Israel. That makes you anti-Semitic.

Either that, or it makes you "emotively biased" to criticize Israel for killing Palestinian protestors.

Nuremgard, Axeldonia, Mercunova

Gualimole wrote:Either that, or it makes you "emotively biased" to criticize Israel for killing Palestinian protestors.

You don't get it. Every single Palestinian they shot was part of Hamas. That includes the baby that died from the gas they deployed.

Axeldonia, Mercunova

Nuremgard wrote:You don't get it. Every single Palestinian they shot was part of Hamas. That includes the baby that died from the gas they deployed.

Hey there! Are you talking about dead babies? Stop being so emotively biased and look at the facts, just not the fact that Israel's occupation of Palestine violates international law. It's okay if our allies break international law because we're the good guys fighting against dictators who oppose the liberal world order freedom and democracy.

Nuremgard, Axeldonia, Mercunova

Gualimole wrote:Hey there! Are you talking about dead babies?

BABY KILLER BABY KILLER BABY KILLER ABOWRSHUN MUST BE BANNED!!!!!!!!

Jaslandia

Mercunova wrote:BABY KILLER BABY KILLER BABY KILLER ABOWRSHUN MUST BE BANNED!!!!!!!!

That would be an accurate comparison if fetuses were actually babies and had the capacity to feel pain.

Mercunova

Gualimole wrote:Hey there! Are you talking about dead babies? Stop being so emotively biased and look at the facts, just not the fact that Israel's occupation of Palestine violates international law. It's okay if our allies break international law because we're the good guys fighting against dictators who oppose the liberal world order freedom and democracy.

Israel cant commit war crimes or crimes against humanity. To suggest otherwise makes you an anti-Semitic scumbag.

Axeldonia, Gualimole

Gualimole wrote:That would be an accurate comparison if fetuses were actually babies and had the capacity to feel pain.

Please tell me you didn't think that that's my actual opinion

Axeldonia wrote:Don't lie Kal. We're all gay for Connor here.

Conner is actually sorta ugly IMO.

Penguania And Antarctica

Mercunova wrote:Please tell me you didn't think that that's my actual opinion

I didn't. I thought you made that post to prove how absurd my position on Israel is by making a comparison to pro-lifers.

Mercunova

Kalaron wrote:Conner is actually sorta ugly IMO.

That's one thing you're right on.

Gualimole wrote:I didn't. I thought you made that post to prove how absurd my position on Israel is by making a comparison to pro-lifers.

No, I was partaking in the mockery of neocon nutjobs.

Gualimole

Mercunova wrote:No, I was partaking in the mockery of neocon nutjobs.

By making fun of how they ignore Israel killing babies while they are supposedly against killing babies?

Axeldonia, Mercunova

Gualimole wrote:By making fun of how they ignore Israel killing babies while they are supposedly against killing babies?

That's right!

Yukona

*sees recent posts*

F*ck that, I'm not touching it

Russkov Soviet, Jaslandia, Kalaron, Penguania And Antarctica, Yukona

Mercunova wrote:That's right!

How's your day been, Merc?

Jaslandia, Penguania And Antarctica, Mercunova

Kalaron wrote:How's your day been, Merc?

I've been to the desert on a horse with no name.

Jaslandia, Penguania And Antarctica, Yukona

Kalaron wrote:Conner is actually sorta ugly IMO.

Okay, you did not just say that. How is he ugly?

Gualimole wrote:That's one thing you're right on.

Explain yourself.

Jaslandia, Axeldonia, Lex Caledonia, Mercunova

Nuremgard wrote:Explain yourself.

Did you mean Elaborate. ?

Nuremgard, Axeldonia, Lex Caledonia

Mercunova wrote:Did you mean Elaborate. ?

I was gonna' say that lol

Lex Caledonia, Mercunova

Kalaron wrote:How's your day been, Merc?
Mercunova wrote:I've been to the desert on a horse with no name.

What's new, pussycat?

Kalaron wrote:Conner is actually sorta ugly IMO.

Gualimole wrote:That's one thing you're right on.

Excuse me

how dare you

i will fight you on this

connor is a cutie and an adorable cinnamon roll that is probably a bottom but he pretends like he's a top but he also has no idea what he's doing and takes everything too literally

Nuremgard, Jaslandia, Lex Caledonia

Nuremgard wrote:Okay, you did not just say that. How is he ugly?

Explain yourself.

We're declaring war on these heathens, right?

Nuremgard

Axeldonia wrote:We're declaring war on these heathens, right?

You used the same word as me. Heathens.

Connor is completely adorable both physically and personality-wise. And I can totally see him being a bottom who pretends to be a top. :P

Axeldonia

Axeldonia wrote:Excuse me

how dare you

i will fight you on this

connor is a cutie and an adorable cinnamon roll that is probably a bottom but he pretends like he's a top but he also has no idea what he's doing and takes everything too literally

Conner does look ugly, not gonna lie

Penguania And Antarctica

Chernarus State wrote:Conner does look ugly, not gonna lie

You have no taste. This is his voice actor.

https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMjc1MjIxNjgtZWFlZC00YjY1LTg2MGQtYzNiYTU0YjlhNWEzXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMjQwMDg0Ng@@._V1_SY1000_CR0,0,625,1000_AL_.jpg

Axeldonia

Nuremgard wrote:You have no taste. This is his voice actor.

https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMjc1MjIxNjgtZWFlZC00YjY1LTg2MGQtYzNiYTU0YjlhNWEzXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMjQwMDg0Ng@@._V1_SY1000_CR0,0,625,1000_AL_.jpg

Straight, remember?

Chernarus State wrote:Straight, remember?

That didn't stop you commenting on the male video game character's looks.

Axeldonia

Nuremgard wrote:That didn't stop you commenting on the male video game character's looks.

His face looks like dough

Chernarus State wrote:His face looks like dough

Well you're wrong. He's lovely.

Axeldonia

Nuremgard wrote:Well you're wrong. He's lovely.

I prefer my androids to be tanky killing machines

Chernarus State wrote:I prefer my androids to be tanky killing machines

You like killer androids, I like sexy police androids.

Axeldonia

Nuremgard wrote:Well you're wrong. He's lovely.

Nuremgard wrote:You like killer androids, I like sexy police androids.

Tutti Frutti.

Jaslandia

Mercunova wrote:Tutti Frutti.

Who Do You Think You Are?

Nuremgard wrote:Who Do You Think You Are?

I am the walrus.

Jaslandia, Penguania And Antarctica

Mercunova wrote:I am the walrus.

YOU ARE NOT THE WALRUS

I AM THE WALRUS

Jaslandia, Penguania And Antarctica, Yukona

Assembled with Dot's Region Saver.
Written by Refuge Isle.