Post Archive

Region: The Confederacy of Free Nations

History

Kalaron wrote:That's fine, but the alternative is Assad gassing kids and terrorizing his subjects while Russia and China put a powerful authoritarian boot down on the world and terror organizations continue to build in strength and number across the globe. Disconnecting from conflicts is a bad way to deal with it if you really want to end the problem. To fix the situation? No, I guess we should just get used to terror attacks and the fall of nations because "Job was done, they left the nation". Ah the glory of letting it be someone else's problem until it comes back again because we decided to think three seconds ahead.

Who are we going to support in Syria to prevent a power vacuum from developing in the country while terrorist organizations attack us? Around 60 percent of rebels against Assad are Islamic fundamentalists and many rebels we have trained have surrendered their arms to either an Al Qaeda affiliate of even ISIS, and the Kurds are currently cooperating with Assad's regime to fight against Turkish-backed rebels. And if we decide to support Turkey and the rebels they're supporting, then we'd be supporting an authoritarian regime, but I guess that's okay because Turkey is a NATO member.

Kalaron wrote:Ah yes, that NATO expanded into willing countries that neighbor Russia is so bad that they should invade Ukraine. What's next? Georgia 2: electric boogaloo?

I wont even bother trying to explain it to you though, it's clear that from our past conversations that you just get overly emotional to the point of being outright insulting, so it's pretty moot to even try. Congrats, explaining my points to you is actually beyond me by this point since I'm honestly P-tired of going over the same thing with you endlessly.

We promised to the Soviets in the 1990s that NATO wouldn't expand in return for them supporting German unification. And Russia essentially is the successor state to the Soviet Union due of the Alma-Ata Protocol, which means that we made a promise to what is now the Russian Federation for NATO to not expand and that promise was then broken in the 2000s. We were the aggressors in that case and I'm tired of you acting as those the US and its NATO allies are simply defending the free world from the Russian bear.

Kalaron wrote:Israel is a complex situation, yes. That's why most neutral answers don't ride the "Down with Israel" train, Nur. The situation only gets more complex when you don't view them as an abnormal monolith but rather as a nation shaped by it's events, bud. No one credible is saying "Israel did nothing wrong" bruv, but that "Israel is literally the worst country ever because they overreact to things because of prior events that shape their political viewpoints". It's neither realistic, fair or actually reasonable to to boil the situation down to "Israel bombed kids because Israel is the worst" just like how it's not reasonable to say "Palestine did nothing wrong/Palestine are all wide-eyed bambis" I've been down that road and it leads to an inevitable informed neutrality on the situation since you gradually become aware of the fact that the Israeli people have a completely different lexicon for the world than a westerner. But hey, what do I know; I only talk to an Israeli who lives close enough to the boarder to have nearly been killed by missiles >.>

Of course, regardless, when Israel kills some people it's not them going specifically out of their way to kill innocent folks because they said "I mildly dislike the choices made by the establishment" tbh so y'know.

There is no justification to kill civilians. When Hamas kills Israeli civilians, its morally wrong. When Israel kills Palestinian civilians, which their rockets do more effectively, it's morally wrong. The political context doesn't matter when it comes to the lives of innocent people. There is no justification for the killing of civilians. I also like how you justify Israel killing civilians while talking about how horrible it is for Assad to kill civilians.

Kalaron wrote:Assad totally does have a reason? It's the same as Russia as well.

The United States and the West itself -as I've pointed out a million times before- is becoming more insular with age. Putin knows that all it really takes to dishearten the rebels is a sign that true support that isn't in a broken and piecemeal fashion isn't coming. Each time he uses chemical weapons and gets away with literally nothing more than a slap on the wrist is a reason to use the weapon, and the US doesn't even have a good track record for responding since the first time he crossed the Red-Line we literally did nothing whatsoever against him.

How do you know what Putin knows? How can you read his mind? Now you're just making an argument based on speculation.

Kalaron wrote:Sorry if the above sounded annoyed, I'm just exasperated by the bait that Const clearly can't help but lay down.

Everything that you disagree with is bait to you. I am not trying to bait you. I was not trying to elicit a response from you. I was simply making some light fun of what you do on Discord. Is that too much for you to handle?

Nuremgard, Axeldonia

Axeldonia wrote:🤔

All I see is a box. What emoji are you showing?

Axeldonia

Gualimole wrote:Who are we going to support in Syria to prevent a power vacuum from developing in the country while terrorist organizations attack us? Around 60 percent of rebels against Assad are Islamic fundamentalists and many rebels we have trained have surrendered their arms to either an Al Qaeda affiliate of even ISIS, and the Kurds are currently cooperating with Assad's regime to fight against Turkish-backed rebels. And if we decide to support Turkey and the rebels they're supporting, then we'd be supporting an authoritarian regime, but I guess that's okay because Turkey is a NATO member.

We promised to the Soviets in the 1990s that NATO wouldn't expand in return for them supporting German unification. And Russia essentially is the successor state to the Soviet Union due of the Alma-Ata Protocol, which means that we made a promise to what is now the Russian Federation for NATO to not expand and that promise was then broken in the 2000s. We were the aggressors in that case and I'm tired of you acting as those the US and its NATO allies are simply defending the free world from the Russian bear.

There is no justification to kill civilians. When Hamas kills Israeli civilians, its morally wrong. When Israel kills Palestinian civilians, which their rockets do more effectively, it's morally wrong. The political context doesn't matter when it comes to the lives of innocent people. There is no justification for the killing of civilians. I also like how you justify Israel killing civilians while talking about how horrible it is for Assad to kill civilians.

How do you know what Putin knows? How can you read his mind? Now you're just making an argument based on speculation.

Everything that you disagree with is bait to you. I am not trying to bait you. I was not trying to elicit a response from you. I was simply making some light fun of what you do on Discord. Is that too much for you to handle?

Your first point is a very important one. Who will take over if Asaad is removed? How can ISIS be our enemies in Iraq but when they cross the border into Syria to fight Asaad, they magically become "moderate rebels?" (Whatever the hell that means.)

Asaad is an arsehole like all Arab dictators but he is preferable to the alternative. And quite frankly, whether a country is a dictatorship or not is none of our business. If people in Syria want regime change, they'll need to do it by themselves in their own revolution. You cant liberate people or force democracy on a culture which has no experience or inclination towards it.

Axeldonia

Nuremgard wrote:Your first point is a very important one. Who will take over if Asaad is removed? How can ISIS be our enemies in Iraq but when they cross the border into Syria to fight Asaad, they magically become "moderate rebels?" (Whatever the hell that means.)

Asaad is an arsehole like all Arab dictators but he is preferable to the alternative. And quite frankly, whether a country is a dictatorship or not is none of our business. If people in Syria want regime change, they'll need to do it by themselves in their own revolution. You cant liberate people or force democracy on a culture which has no experience or inclination towards it.

But don't you realize that only the white man can liberate people?

Axeldonia

Nuremgard wrote:So since you're for intervention in Syria, Kal, when you going over there?

That's not a valid criticism. It's akin to saying "You're in favor of feeding the poor, when are you going to open your doors to them and feed them out of your own pocket?".

Frankly speaking, I aim to become a police officer in my future, but you'll notice that I've strived to understand the military and support higher taxes to support them as well.

Gualimole wrote:

Everything that you disagree with is bait to you. I am not trying to bait you. I was not trying to elicit a response from you. I was simply making some light fun of what you do on Discord. Is that too much for you to handle?

Gualimole wrote:Get ready to have Kal write three paragraphs about why military intervention in Syria is needed and about how the US and its NATO allies need to stay in the country indefinitely.

Right, it's stuff I disagree with because you've never posted bait before at all. That's all I'll say on this.

---------

The rest of you're post has been answered time and time again before, so I'll save my breath as always.

Gualimole wrote:But don't you realize that only the white man can liberate people?

Save us from this secular fascist and replace him with an Islamic one! Freedom!

Kalaron wrote:That's not a valid criticism. It's akin to saying "You're in favor of feeding the poor, when are you going to open your doors to them and feed them out of your own pocket?".

Frankly speaking, I aim to become a police officer in my future, but you'll notice that I've strived to understand the military and support higher taxes to support them as well.

Right, it's stuff I disagree with because you've never posted bait before at all. That's all I'll say on this.

---------

The rest of you're post has been answered time and time again before, so I'll save my breath as always.

Ah. So you're fine with intervention, so long as you don't personally need to do the intervening.

Gualimole wrote:All I see is a box. What emoji are you showing?

The hmm one

Kalaron wrote:

Right, it's stuff I disagree with because you've never posted bait before at all. That's all I'll say on this.

---------

The rest of you're post has been answered time and time again before, so I'll save my breath as always.

Look, you don't have to respond to everything I say, even if it is bait, which I don't intend it to be.

Axeldonia

Axeldonia wrote:The hmm one

I turned out to be right, so there's no need to "hmm".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1r20kewSOQA

Axeldonia

How about we take a step away from the RMB for a hot second, it seems like some things are getting a little fired up and some should take a second to cool down.

Watch a cat video or something.

Jaslandia, Percyton

Sulania wrote:How about we take a step away from the RMB for a hot second, it seems like some things are getting a little fired up and some should take a second to cool down.

Watch a cat video or something.

No, we should watch this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1r20kewSOQA

Gualimole wrote:No, we should watch this.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1r20kewSOQA

Your country is commie and it has a lower tax rate than Nurem. Yikes.

Nuremgard wrote:Your country is commie and it has a lower tax rate than Nurem. Yikes.

Gualimole is not commie. It is a demarchy.

Nuremgard wrote:Save us from this secular fascist and replace him with an Islamic one! Freedom!

Ah. So you're fine with intervention, so long as you don't personally need to do the intervening.

No? If my country really needed me to join up then I suppose I would. That said, I don't plan to drop every other segment of my life for a relatively small portion of it. If we really wish to devolve the conversation to "Well you support X but don't want to drop everything for it" levels, there are a billion things to throw up there though that affect us all.

Gualimole wrote:Look, you don't have to respond to everything I say, even if it is bait, which I don't intend it to be.

Yup, that's why I'm not going to correct you from now on.

Sulania wrote:How about we take a step away from the RMB for a hot second, it seems like some things are getting a little fired up and some should take a second to cool down.

Watch a cat video or something.

I'll watch a cat vid with you. :3

Gualimole wrote:Gualimole is not commie. It is a demarchy.

A what? I assumed it was since your economy is planned.

who constables when the constables need constabling

Jaslandia, Axeldonia, Continental Commonwealths, Penguania And Antarctica, Lex Caledonia, Yukona

Nuremgard wrote:A what? I assumed it was since your economy is planned.

My lore does not necessarily align itself with my stats on NS. And having a planned economy doesn't make me a commie. It makes me a state capitalist.

Unfallious wrote:who constables when the constables need constabling

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

Gualimole wrote:My lore does not necessarily align itself with my stats on NS. And having a planned economy doesn't make me a commie. It makes me a state capitalist.

True.

Penguania And Antarctica

Unfallious wrote:who constables when the constables need constabling

We don't need any constabling with the current batch of constables considering what they've done on Discord, thank you very much.

Penguania And Antarctica

Nuremgard wrote:A what? I assumed it was since your economy is planned.

Government is formed by selecting random samples of officials, or more laconic, a government formed by a lottery

Percyton

Chernarus State wrote:Government is formed by selecting random samples of officials, or more laconic, a government formed by a lottery

What a terrible, terrible system.

Chernarus State wrote:Government is formed by selecting random samples of officials, or more laconic, a government formed by a lottery

I wonder if there have been any other demarchies in the COFN.

Nuremgard wrote:What a terrible, terrible system.

Would you rather have Parliament made up of 650 wealthy Tories or 650 random people from southern England?

Gualimole wrote:Would you rather have Parliament made up of 650 wealthy Tories or 650 random people from southern England?

Neither as I'm not keen on being ruled by a bunch of English people regardless of their socioeconomic status.

Nuremgard wrote:What a terrible, terrible system.

It's based on the idea "power corrupts" and aims to lessen the impact of corruption by continuously cycling candidates through the offices (nice unintended alliteration there)

Gualimole wrote:I wonder if there have been any other demarchies in the COFN.

Probably not, but for the site as a whole, more than likely yes.

Nuremgard, Axeldonia, Gualimole

Chernarus State wrote:It's based on the idea "power corrupts" and aims to lessen the impact of corruption by continuously cycling candidates through the offices (nice unintended alliteration there)

Probably not, but for the site as a whole, more than likely yes.

So the choice is have a bunch of morons from the upper class or a bunch of morons from the masses.

Nuremgard wrote:Neither as I'm not keen on being ruled by a bunch of English people regardless of their socioeconomic status.

You can't choose neither in scenarios like this one.

Nuremgard wrote:So the choice is have a bunch of morons from the upper class or a bunch of morons from the masses.

Keep in mind the selection pools are formed from political officials, not necessarily just the populace, similar to Athenian democracy

Nuremgard wrote:So the choice is have a bunch of morons from the upper class or a bunch of morons from the masses.

You're both a populist and an elitist at the same time. How do you do it?

Nuremgard, Axeldonia, Yukona

Gualimole wrote:You can't choose neither in scenarios like this one.

650 randomers then.

Chernarus State wrote:Keep in mind the selection pools are formed from political officials, not necessarily just the populace, similar to Athenian democracy

Career politicians then. Just as bad.

Gualimole wrote:You're both a populist and an elitist at the same time. How do you do it?

By being Scottish.

Yukona

Chernarus State wrote:Keep in mind the selection pools are formed from political officials, not necessarily just the populace, similar to Athenian democracy

Gualimole actually goes farther and has it that the selection pool is any willing person from the general adult population.

Nuremgard wrote:By being Scottish.

Elaborate.

Axeldonia

Gualimole wrote:Elaborate.

It was just a joke. I'm curious though. How am I a populist? I get why I am an elitist since I constantly denigrate the electorate of my state but how am I a populist?

Yukona

Nuremgard wrote:It was just a joke. I'm curious though. How am I a populist? I get why I am an elitist since I constantly denigrate the electorate of my state but how am I a populist?

You really do despise the elite, especially if they're English.

Axeldonia, Yukona

Gualimole wrote:You really do despise the elite, especially if they're English.

I despise all elites, including Scottish ones, especially since most of the Scottish elite are unionist arseholes. I don't hate the English. I love English people. I just don't want to be ruled by them or have their country dominate mine in a faux union. What's wrong with that?

Axeldonia

I hate London's mayor but I am from America and hate seeing the bullshit going on that is affecting the everyday lives of normal people there. lol knife ban

Nuremgard wrote:I despise all elites, including Scottish ones, especially since most of the Scottish elite are unionist arseholes. I don't hate the English. I love English people. I just don't want to be ruled by them or have their country dominate mine in a faux union. What's wrong with that?

Didn't you once like a post about killing Englishmen?

Yukona

Gualimole wrote:Didn't you once like a post about killing Englishmen?

Oh aye, because that means I'm calling for English genocide. *eye roll* And for the record, I apologised for that. Didn't you used to go on about how it was good that ME nations executed homosexuals?

Nuremgard wrote:Oh aye, because that means I'm calling for English genocide. *eye roll* And for the record, I apologised for that. Didn't you used to go on about how it was good that ME nations executed homosexuals?

No, but it did imply that you really hate the English.

Yukona

Gualimole wrote:No, but it did imply that you really hate the English.

I'm pretty certain there was a time when you were posting some pretty nasty sh!t on the RMB about gay people. And no, I don't hate the English. If I do, I better tell my mate from Leeds.

Nuremgard wrote:I'm pretty certain there was a time when you were posting some pretty nasty sh!t on the RMB about gay people. And no, I don't hate the English. If I do, I better tell my mate from Leeds.

That was two years ago. What you did happened around a month ago.

Gualimole wrote:That was two years ago. What you did happened around a month ago.

Does a timescale matter? And what exactly do you want me to do to prove that I don't hate English people? Film myself sucking off an Englishman and upload it?

Bearlong

Nuremgard wrote:Does a timescale matter? And what exactly do you want me to do to prove that I don't hate English people? Film myself sucking off an Englishman and upload it?

Time really does make a difference. And while your suggestion is interesting, finding someone to suck off would be difficult.

Gualimole wrote:Time really does make a difference. And while your suggestion is interesting, finding someone to suck off would be difficult.

No it wouldn't as I'll most likely be doing just that this summer.

Nuremgard wrote:No it wouldn't as I'll most likely be doing just that this summer.

Doing what? Sucking off an Englishman?

Gualimole wrote:Doing what? Sucking off an Englishman?

Yes. I've been talking to a guy from down south and he wants to meet up with me.

Percyton

Nuremgard wrote:Yes. I've been talking to a guy from down south and he wants to meet up with me.

Do you know him personally or did you just meet him off of the internet?

Gualimole wrote:Do you know him personally or did you just meet him off of the internet?

Met him online. Spoke for a while there. Then we moved onto talking over the phone.

Percyton

Nuremgard wrote:Met him online. Spoke for a while there. Then we moved onto talking over the phone.

How far down south is he?

Gualimole wrote:How far down south is he?

He's from Birmingham.

Percyton

Nuremgard wrote:He's from Birmingham.

It's worse than we thought

Jaslandia, Axeldonia, Continental Commonwealths, Lex Caledonia

Unfallious wrote:It's worse than we thought

I believe he's from Brixton to be specific. Whether that makes it better or even worse is unknown to me. Not unless I misheard him and he just works in Brixton or something. I dunno. He mentioned it at some point I think.

Jaslandia, Percyton

Nuremgard wrote:He's from Birmingham.

Birmingham?

MOVE THE TUC

Unfallious wrote:It's worse than we thought

Why?

Gualimole wrote:Birmingham?

MOVE THE TUC

https://youtu.be/NbfZJyGChEk?t=6

Nuremgard wrote:https://youtu.be/NbfZJyGChEk?t=6

It's a Kaiserreich reference, specifically relating to how the Union of Britain can move the capital of the Trade Union Council to Birmingham through a focus decision.

Axeldonia

Gualimole wrote:It's a Kaiserreich reference, specifically relating to how the Union of Britain can move the capital of the Trade Union Council to Birmingham through a focus decision.

That's why I didn't understand that reference. I know sweet FA about the Kaiserreich.

Nuremgard wrote:That's why I didn't understand that reference. I know sweet FA about the Kaiserreich.

You probably shouldn't play a game where an authoritarian socialist Oswald Mosley can come into power and institute direct rule from London.

Gualimole wrote:You probably shouldn't play a game where an authoritarian socialist Oswald Mosley can come into power and institute direct rule from London.

Sounds like my nightmare but a hardcore Yoon's wet dream.

Nuremgard wrote:Sounds like my nightmare but a hardcore Yoon's wet dream.

Yoon?

Gualimole wrote:Yoon?

It's a term some ScotNats use to describe particularly zealous unionists.

Nuremgard wrote:Yes. I've been talking to a guy from down south and he wants to meet up with me.

Ooooh, you met a guy, Nur?

Percyton

Unfallious wrote:It's worse than we thought

Given the whiplash that conversation was giving me, this was a perfectly timed and executed interjection.

Ten out of ten. Would trust with looking after my pet hermit crab for a long weekend.

Jaslandia, Axeldonia, Percyton

Kalaron wrote:Ooooh, you met a guy, Nur?

Yes I did. We've been chatting for a few months now.

Jaslandia, Percyton

Nuremgard wrote:Yes I did. We've been chatting for a few months now.

And? What's he like

Percyton

Sulania wrote:And? What's he like

He's very nice. When we first spoke by phone, we spoke for over two hours. He works for a publishing house which is pretty neat considering I'm a writer.

Percyton

Nuremgard wrote:He's very nice. When we first spoke by phone, we spoke for over two hours. He works for a publishing house which is pretty neat considering I'm a writer.

Writer? What do you write?

Percyton

Nuremgard wrote:He's very nice. When we first spoke by phone, we spoke for over two hours. He works for a publishing house which is pretty neat considering I'm a writer.

But what is he interested in? What does he look like?

Percyton

Gualimole wrote:Writer? What do you write?

Wrote a lot of poetry when I was younger. I want to write fantasy novels.

Sulania wrote:But what is he interested in? What does he look like?

Well he's older. Nice looking with a beard. Bit on the tubby side. He is generally into the same TV shows I am (Marvel, Game of Thrones.) He's also well travelled and is left leaning.

Jaslandia, Percyton

Nuremgard wrote:Well he's older. Nice looking with a beard. A bit on the tubby side. He is generally into the same TV shows I am (Marvel, Game of Thrones.) He's also well traveled and is left-leaning.

Are you dominant or are you submissive?

Nuremgard wrote:Wrote a lot of poetry when I was younger. I want to write fantasy novels.

Well he's older. Nice looking with a beard. Bit on the tubby side. He is generally into the same TV shows I am (Marvel, Game of Thrones.) He's also well travelled and is left leaning.

I'm glad you found someone that you're interested in.

Jaslandia

Gualimole wrote:Are you dominant or are you submissive?

0.o

Jaslandia

Gualimole wrote:Are you dominant or are you submissive?

What is this, Fifty Shades of Grey? I'm submissive by nature.

Sulania wrote:I'm glad you found someone that you're interested in.

Thank you.

Axeldonia

Nuremgard wrote:A what? I assumed it was since your economy is planned.

Planned economies in reality would have lower tax rates.

Alruniea wrote:Planned economies in reality would have lower tax rates.

Lower tax rates are what I need. I'm a lefty but even my tax rate makes me want to weep.

Alruniea wrote:Planned economies in reality would have lower tax rates.

Who needs taxes when you own the entirety of the economy anyway?

Sulania wrote:0.o

What? I thought dom/sub was normal.

Vista Major

Gualimole wrote:Who needs taxes when you own the entirety of the economy anyway?

Exactly.

Gualimole wrote:Who needs taxes when you own the entirety of the economy anyway?

What? I thought dom/sub was normal.

I think what you're really asking is "are you a top or bottom?" It's not always a binary answer. Most gay couples are versatile but some do have a strict top/bottom or "dom/sub" dynamic.

Vista Major, Axeldonia

Gualimole wrote:Who needs taxes when you own the entirety of the economy anyway?

What? I thought dom/sub was normal.

Just didn't expect it on the RMB.

Jaslandia

Gualimole wrote:What? I thought dom/sub was normal.

It the topic I often use to break the ice during working lunch conversations.

Nuremgard

Nuremgard wrote:I think what you're really asking is "are you a top or bottom?" It's not always a binary answer. Most gay couples are versatile but some do have a strict top/bottom or "dom/sub" dynamic.

top/bottom =/= dom/sub

Vista Major

Continental Commonwealths wrote:It the topic I often use to break the ice during working lunch conversations.

BTW, I'm a sub.

Sulania wrote:Just didn't expect it on the RMB.

Why?

Sulania wrote:top/bottom =/= dom/sub

True.

Vista Major

Continental Commonwealths wrote:It the topic I often use to break the ice during working lunch conversations.

Mmm, ye, tis what I ask my ultra fundamentalist boss. "So, do you like to dominate or be dominated?"

Nuremgard wrote:True.

What's the difference?

Sulania wrote:Mmm, ye, tis what I ask my ultra fundamentalist boss. "So, do you like to dominate or be dominated?"

We’re about three more lines of dialogue away from a Johnny Rapid video here.

Jaslandia

Gualimole wrote:What's the difference?

It's complicated. Sexuality always is.

Vista Major

Nuremgard wrote:It's complicated. Sexuality always is.

Everything is complicated. Can you just summarize it?

Gualimole wrote:What's the difference?

I mean technically you could still be dominative while being a bottom, like for instance "ordering" your partner to do it or do things in it.

Vista Major

Gualimole wrote:Everything is complicated. Can you just summarize it?

One defines the penetrative partner, the other defines the roles one generally assumes within the relationship dynamic. (For de gays, at least)

Where these roles come out- sexually, romantically, generally, etc.- is further a definition of the relationship.

Alruniea

Gualimole wrote:Everything is complicated. Can you just summarize it?

For example, someone who is very dominant and in control in real life may crave to be dominated in the bedroom in order to escape their own dominant personality. Likewise, a very submissive person may seek to dominate in the bedroom to make up for their lack of pro-active life choices.

Being dominant or submissive doesn't affect your sexual preferences, however.

Gualimole

Alruniea wrote:I mean technically you could still be dominative while being a bottom, like for instance "ordering" your partner to do it or do things in it.

That's what we in the gay world call being a power bottom.

Alruniea

Nuremgard wrote:That's what we in the gay world call being a power bottom.

I'm guessing you're not a power bottom, right?

Nuremgard

0.o

Jaslandia, Vista Major

Gualimole wrote:I'm guessing you're not a power bottom, right?

Ha. No. I'm submissive in most ways. To be crude, I'd be the "girl" in a relationship.

Nuremgard wrote:Ha. No. I'm submissive in most ways. To be crude, I'd be the "girl" in a relationship.

You clearly have never heard of femdom.

Nuremgard wrote:That's what we in the gay world call being a power bottom.

I mean it could be in any sexuality's relationship but yeah.

While a bi male, I'm not too into the dom/sub dynamic but that's just me, though I guess I'd be somewhere in the middle of that spectrum.

Nuremgard

We are slowly slipping into the old-CFN RMB.

Jaslandia, Axeldonia

Gualimole wrote:You clearly have never heard of femdom.

I have heard of it.

Alruniea wrote:I mean it could be in any sexuality's relationship but yeah.

While a bi male, I'm not too into the dom/sub dynamic but that's just me, though I guess I'd be somewhere in the middle of that spectrum.

I personally like the dom/sub dynamic but not to extreme extents. I have a philosophy: in all aspects of the relationship, we are equals. But in the bedroom, he's in charge.

Alruniea wrote:We are slowly slipping into the old-CFN RMB.

Which can be a good or bad thing depending on what you're into until we get into the real messy stuff.

Nuremgard, Jaslandia

Assembled with Dot's Region Saver.
Written by Refuge Isle.