Post Archive

Region: The Confederacy of Free Nations

History

The West Country wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1epEtB0lVo

dis me

My sister is adamant that Scotland will vote Yes next time. Much as I'd like to believe that, in my heart and soul, I don't think enough will.

Nuremgard wrote:My sister is adamant that Scotland will vote Yes next time. Much as I'd like to believe that, in my heart and soul, I don't think enough will.

I'm gonnae rig tae elecshun

Nuremgard, Lex Caledonia

Jaslandia wrote:At least Mike Pence is mentally stable, and HE has some respect for decency and the rule of law. I'd rather take a theocrat who plays by the rules, than a nutjob who makes it a personal goal to break every rule and norm he can find.

Aww.

Nuremgard wrote:My sister is adamant that Scotland will vote Yes next time. Much as I'd like to believe that, in my heart and soul, I don't think enough will.

Paradoxically, I think the farce that is Brexit will dissuade many Scots from going along with independence out of fear of similar uncertainty.

The West Country

Sulania wrote:And I'd rather not have a Theocrat. Period. End of Story.

The nutjob that gets half his stuff shut down because either congress or the courts say it's not good is better than the nutjob who knows how to get his crazy ideology into mainstream policy.

Besides, Trump has been great PR in ways I don't think Pence is.

Trump has a lot of power with just executive orders. And he doesn't need Congress or the courts to break down the rule of law and turn the Department of Justice into a weaponized tool against his enemies, or to weaken decades-old alliances with NATO and Europe, or to use his office to enrich himself and his family.

Unfallious wrote:Paradoxically, I think the farce that is Brexit will dissuade many Scots from going with along with indepdence out of fear of similar uncertainty.

You never know. Enough Scots might be sold the Union comfort blanket. "Stick with Westminster/England, you wont survive out there in the big bad Brexit world on your own. The EU wont want you." That sort of thing. Some Scots might vote to stay in the UK for a modicum of stability, especially after Brexit.

It could go either way to be honest. Anecdotally, I've heard of many pro-EU, soft No voters turning to Yes because of Brexit and Westminster's broken promises over more devolution. The fact that May is taking the Scottish Gov to court in order to override devolution is an ominous warning of what Scotland's place in a post-Brexit UK will be. If Scots vote to maintain that, they deserve all they get.

I don't want to break the UK up out of spite. I know you and Yuk care very much about the UK and believe in it but I genuinely believe that Scottish independence will revitalise English democracy and identity. Independence for Scotland will result in a more equal relationship being forged between the ancient nations of these islands.

Jaslandia wrote:Trump has a lot of power with just executive orders. And he doesn't need Congress or the courts to break down the rule of law and turn the Department of Justice into a weaponized tool against his enemies, or to weaken decades-old alliances with NATO and Europe, or to use his office to enrich himself and his family.

The people using that office to enrich themselves and their families aren't the people who hold it.

Nuremgard, Gualimole

The current UK government is too authoritarian and needs to step back several pegs, be it muzzling the press over the Tommy Robinson case a few days ago or various other civil based problems going on that agitate me from across the pond.

1984 is a work of fiction, not a guidebook.

Mercunova wrote:The people using that office to enrich themselves and their families aren't the people who hold it.

It's the nameless, invisible lobbyists, 1 per centers and elitists at the very top of society who benefit and wield the true power. The politicians are puppets, there to create the illusion of choice and democracy. The billionaire class are the new aristocracy.

Mercunova, Gualimole

Jaslandia wrote:Trump has a lot of power with just executive orders. And he doesn't need Congress or the courts to break down the rule of law and turn the Department of Justice into a weaponized tool against his enemies, or to weaken decades-old alliances with NATO and Europe, or to use his office to enrich himself and his family.

Checks and balances are a wonderful thing. I think you're really overhyping just how much damage Trump can or will or has done compared to the damage that someone who knows how to work the system can.

And again, Trump's great for pr.

Mercunova

Jaslandia wrote:Trump has a lot of power with just executive orders. And he doesn't need Congress or the courts to break down the rule of law and turn the Department of Justice into a weaponized tool against his enemies, or to weaken decades-old alliances with NATO and Europe, or to use his office to enrich himself and his family.

Mercunova wrote:The people using that office to enrich themselves and their families aren't the people who hold it.

Pence having these powers would be much more scary if you were a gay person, I suppose.

Also, you have Obama to thank for setting the pen-and-phone precedent. And others for expanding the power of the office (namely Lincoln, the Roosevelts and Wilson.)

Democrats and Republicans love to violate the constitution except when the other party's doing it.

Gualimole

The West Country wrote:I'm gonnae rig tae elecshun

ur under arest

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QE9tN-mmDYw

Nuremgard, Jaslandia, The West Country

Lex Caledonia wrote:ur under arest

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QE9tN-mmDYw

what are ya gonnae dew aboot it? fone the polis?

Lex Caledonia

The West Country wrote:what are ya gonnae dew aboot it? fone the polis?

m8, we ar the polis

The West Country

Deimosan wrote:The current UK government is too authoritarian and needs to step back several pegs, be it muzzling the press over the Tommy Robinson case a few days ago or various other civil based problems going on that agitate me from across the pond.

1984 is a work of fiction, not a guidebook.

Welp, you’ve had a good run.

*turfs into a memory hole*

Mercunova wrote:The people using that office to enrich themselves and their families aren't the people who hold it.

I'm not so sure about that.

https://medium.com/shanghaiist/trump-linked-project-in-indonesia-to-receive-500-million-in-funding-from-china-ca99ac995ae5

http://www.newsweek.com/trump-inauguration-mar-lago-golf-786141

Jaslandia wrote:Trump has a lot of power with just executive orders. And he doesn't need Congress or the courts to break down the rule of law and turn the Department of Justice into a weaponized tool against his enemies, or to weaken decades-old alliances with NATO and Europe, or to use his office to enrich himself and his family.

NATO has been weakened for decades. Ostensibly, the last time it was in full power was at the latest 2000 before people forgot why it was formed in favour of further "Yes my country is ultra-important screw the coalition there will never be a need for it again". The hyper-focus on our differences in the west isn't new IMO.

Deimosan wrote:The current UK government is too authoritarian and needs to step back several pegs, be it muzzling the press over the Tommy Robinson case a few days ago or various other civil based problems going on that agitate me from across the pond.

1984 is a work of fiction, not a guidebook.

I don't know about that Robinson case, but I do agree that the Government is showing a great set of examples why speech policing is an extremely negative thing what with that girl who got slapped with fines, community service and a tracking bracelet.

The one who asked a question about Muslims having more/less rights? Yeah, that BS boils my blood. Let's not forget about the meanie police online too, that is going too far.

Maybe if the cop just answered the question like a normal American cop would have and not knee-jerk reaction British cop behavior..

Jaslandia wrote:At least Mike Pence is mentally stable, and HE has some respect for decency and the rule of law. I'd rather take a theocrat who plays by the rules, than a nutjob who makes it a personal goal to break every rule and norm he can find.

As someone who would be the kind of person that'd get systematically discriminated against even moreso under a Pence presidency, no thanks, let trump remain. Rather we have a buffon that can't do anything properly (both good and bad) rather than someone who can do awful things excellently.

Sulania

Like Pence wants to electrocute homosexuals, imagine what he wants to do to trans people.

Deimosan wrote:The current UK government is too authoritarian and needs to step back several pegs, be it muzzling the press over the Tommy Robinson case a few days ago or various other civil based problems going on that agitate me from across the pond.

1984 is a work of fiction, not a guidebook.

Tommy Robinson's case was about contempt for court, not censorship. He done it last year in a separate court case, and was warned he would go to jail if he breached it again. He did not respect the court or the judge.

Kalaron wrote:NATO has been weakened for decades. Ostensibly, the last time it was in full power was at the latest 2000 before people forgot why it was formed in favour of further "Yes my country is ultra-important screw the coalition there will never be a need for it again". The hyper-focus on our differences in the west isn't new IMO.

I don't know about that Robinson case, but I do agree that the Government is showing a great set of examples why speech policing is an extremely negative thing what with that girl who got slapped with fines, community service and a tracking bracelet.

Tommy Robinson is a far-right activist in the UK and former leader and spokesperson for the English Defence League - which is the typical bald headed football hooligan "get the muslamics out the contrey" kind of people. Although he's left the EDL, he's incredibly controversial and not at all well-liked in the UK, bar from an indiscernible amount of inbred pub drongos.

Edit: in reference to the last bit, you're going to have to be more specific - many people in the UK are given community service and/or fines and/or tracking bracelets as part of the correctional system.

Nuremgard, Jaslandia, Lex Caledonia

Axeldonia wrote:Like Pence wants to electrocute homosexuals, imagine what he wants to do to trans people.

Axel, I do agree with what you said before, but that part is untrue.

Pence never endorsed electroshock therapy for homosexuality, but he did support federal funds to support conversion therapy. Conversion therapy is a broad spectrum of "treatments," some of which do not take the approach of electroshock. So ambiguity in this measure saves him a little bit.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/mike-pence-supported-gay-conversion-therapy/

Don't get me wrong, conversion therapy is still horribly wrong. But he doesn't necessarily want to "electrocute homosexuals"

Jaslandia

Conversion therapy should be banned, period.

Nuremgard, Jaslandia

Sulania wrote:Axel, I do agree with what you said before, but that part is untrue.

Pence never endorsed electroshock therapy for homosexuality, but he did support federal funds to support conversion therapy. Conversion therapy is a broad spectrum of "treatments," some of which do not take the approach of electroshock. So ambiguity in this measure saves him a little bit.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/mike-pence-supported-gay-conversion-therapy/

Don't get me wrong, conversion therapy is still horribly wrong. But he doesn't necessarily want to "electrocute homosexuals"

Ah, I see. I've just heard that about him.

Axeldonia wrote:Ah, I see. I've just heard that about him.

Yeah, he might, but he never said he does.

But he *does* support using taxpayer funds to support "treatments" that are completely pseudoscientific, are at this point proven to have long lasting ill effects on those who participate (depression and anxiety disorders among the most prominent), and are largely unsuccessful.

So while he may not be an absolute sadist, he's still pretty bad in this area.

Jaslandia, Axeldonia

Deimosan wrote:Conversion therapy should be banned, period.

There is a show over here in the UK called Embarrassing Bodies. It's about people going on TV to show their various health issues and having them treated by doctors. One of the doctors is gay and he willingly underwent so-called conversion therapy just for the experience. It did work in the sense that whenever he looked at gay porn or gay images, he would vomit but it did not eradicate his gay desires.

What gay conversion therapy does is create a Pavlovian response to certain stimuli through conditioning. It does not and cannot change sexual orientation.

Jaslandia

Jaslandia wrote:I'm not so sure about that.

https://medium.com/shanghaiist/trump-linked-project-in-indonesia-to-receive-500-million-in-funding-from-china-ca99ac995ae5

http://www.newsweek.com/trump-inauguration-mar-lago-golf-786141

500 million is chump change compared to the benefits of the people who are really running what happens on this earth.

Nuremgard wrote:There is a show over here in the UK called Embarrassing Bodies. It's about people going on TV to show their various health issues and having them treated by doctors. One of the doctors is gay and he willingly underwent so-called conversion therapy just for the experience. It did work in the sense that whenever he looked at gay porn or gay images, he would vomit but it did not eradicate his gay desires.

What gay conversion therapy does is create a Pavlovian response to certain stimuli through conditioning. It does not and cannot change sexual orientation.

Have an embarrassing penile medical condition? Get your wang out infront of the nation.

Nuremgard, Jaslandia

Mercunova wrote:500 million is chump change compared to the benefits of the people who are really running what happens on this earth.

That $500 million is nothing more or less than compensation to Trump for the burden of being the controllers' figurehead.

The West Country wrote:Have an embarrassing penile medical condition? Get your wang out infront of the nation.

Never did understand that. They're so embarrassed about their bodies they show them off in front of millions. Even their scabby cocks and fannies. Gives me the boke lol

Mercunova, The West Country

Nuremgard wrote:Never did understand that. They're so embarrassed about their bodies they show them off in front of millions. Even their scabby cocks and fannies. Gives me the boke lol

Oh come on. You're only fooling yourself if you think we believe you when you're telling us seeing a cock out in public in any condition would make you sick.

Bearlong

The West Country wrote:Tommy Robinson's case was about contempt for court, not censorship. He done it last year in a separate court case, and was warned he would go to jail if he breached it again. He did not respect the court or the judge.

Tommy Robinson is a far-right activist in the UK and former leader and spokesperson for the English Defence League - which is the typical bald headed football hooligan "get the muslamics out the contrey" kind of people. Although he's left the EDL, he's incredibly controversial and not at all well-liked in the UK, bar from an indiscernible amount of inbred pub drongos.

Edit: in reference to the last bit, you're going to have to be more specific - many people in the UK are given community service and/or fines and/or tracking bracelets as part of the correctional system.

She said a naughty word by quoting a black american rapper and as a result got punished.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/amp/uk-england-merseyside-43816921

(And I'm not arguing that she isn't a dick, but being a dick and deserving a massive fine plus community service for using a word (and it was the word rather than the context that got her here) are two very different things.)

The West Country

Mercunova wrote:500 million is chump change compared to the benefits of the people who are really running what happens on this earth.

Corruption isn't excusable just because the gains are "chump change." Plus, that's just what we know about. It could be just the tip of the iceberg.

Mercunova wrote:Oh come on. You're only fooling yourself if you think we believe you when you're telling us seeing a cock out in public in any condition would make you sick.

It does make me sick when it's covered in warts or is black with some disease lol

Bearlong, Mercunova

Nuremgard wrote:It does make me sick when it's covered in warts or is black with some disease lol

Not something I ever needed in my head.

Mercunova

Sulania wrote:Not something I ever needed in my head.

Try watching it. It's worse than any image you currently have in your head.

Mercunova

Stupid timezones keeping me from participating in most CFN discussion.

Nuremgard

Gualimole wrote:Stupid timezones keeping me from participating in most CFN discussion.

You can still add your piece after the fact.

Nuremgard wrote:You can still add your piece after the fact.

The only thing that I can really add right now is that Merc, like most right-wing libertarians, is pretty conspiracyish.

Bearlong

Gualimole wrote:The only thing that I can really add right now is that Merc, like most right-wing libertarians, is pretty conspiracyish.

It's not a conspiracy. It's reality. It's not the politicians in charge, it's their paymasters.

Mercunova

Gualimole wrote:The only thing that I can really add right now is that Merc, like most right-wing libertarians, is pretty conspiracyish.

Most of my thoughts on the owners of the country come from George Carlin's work, not fellow libertarians.

And I'm not really conspiracyish otherwise. I believe Lee Harvey Oswald was at least one of the perpetrators in the assassination of JFK and I believe al-Qaeda carried out 9/11.

Jaslandia

Nuremgard wrote:It's not a conspiracy. It's reality. It's not the politicians in charge, it's their paymasters.

But the way that he describes it is like it's a conspiracy, which it isn't. The influence that money has over our political system is mostly an open secret and is the result of converging interests, not some kind of conspiracy.

Mercunova wrote:Most of my thoughts on the owners of the country come from George Carlin's work, not fellow libertarians.

And I'm not really conspiracyish otherwise. I believe Lee Harvey Oswald was at least one of the perpetrators in the assassination of JFK and I believe al-Qaeda carried out 9/11.

Why do comedians influence so many people's political views?

Gualimole wrote:But the way that he describes it is like it's a conspiracy, which it isn't. The influence that money has over our political system is mostly an open secret and is the result of converging interests, not some kind of conspiracy.

Perhaps but that doesn't make it any less true.

Gualimole wrote:Why do comedians influence so many people's political views?

Because comedians use humour to make true or insightful observations about the real world. George Carlin is great. He was the most cynical bastard walking and that's what was great about him. He knew how the world worked. He didn't sugarcoat anything.

Jaslandia, Gualimole

Nuremgard wrote:Perhaps but that doesn't make it any less true.

What?

Gualimole wrote:What?

I mean, it doesn't matter how Merc says it, he is right in saying that politicians aren't the true rulers.

Nuremgard wrote:Because comedians use humour to make true or insightful observations about the real world. George Carlin is great. He was the most cynical bastard walking and that's what was great about him. He knew how the world worked. He didn't sugarcoat anything.

https://youtu.be/2Iwvu-j7BuY

Nuremgard

Nuremgard wrote:I mean, it doesn't matter how Merc says it, he is right in saying that politicians aren't the true rulers.

The nuance of it still matters.

Gualimole wrote:The nuance of it still matters.

They need to put restrictions on how much a person can donate to a politician or party.

Nuremgard wrote:They need to put restrictions on how much a person can donate to a politician or party.

The people in positions to do that aren't going to.

I wonder why?

Nuremgard wrote:They need to put restrictions on how much a person can donate to a politician or party.

We need to ban all private donations and publically fund elections. BTW, there are restrictions in the US on how much a person can donate to a politician or political party.

Nuremgard

Mercunova wrote:The people in positions to do that aren't going to.

I wonder why?

Yup. That's the beauty of being your own boss. As a politician, you can set your own wages, set your own rules and laws, choose not to hold yourselves accountable.

Gualimole wrote:We need to ban all private donations and publically fund elections. BTW, there are restrictions in the US on how much a person can donate to a politician or political party.

Don't see how when presidential candidates amass millions for their campaigns.

Nuremgard wrote:Yup. That's the beauty of being your own boss. As a politician, you can set your own wages, set your own rules and laws, choose not to hold yourselves accountable.

Well, and they're paid to not do stuff like that as well.

Nuremgard wrote:Don't see how when presidential candidates amass millions for their campaigns.

Well, actually, I was half wrong. There are restrictions on the amount that an organization or individual can make for a politician, but that doesn't apply for SuperPACs.

Mercunova wrote:Well, and they're paid to not do stuff like that as well.

Paid by us, the biggest mugs on the planet. The public purse is one that'll never run dry.

Gualimole wrote:Well, actually, I was half wrong. There are restrictions on the amount that an organization or individual can make for a politician, but that doesn't apply for SuperPACs.

I agree about publicly funding elections. Give them all the same amount of cash each cycle and leave them to their own devices.

Gualimole

And Vermont is on trending on facebook. That's new

Mercunova, The West Country

https://www.strawpoll.me/15808848/r

I find it odd that Liberal Socialism is beating Social Democrat. I thought there were more

Midasia, The West Country

How are you guys feeling about Fallout 76?

Russkov Soviet

The West Country wrote:How are you guys feeling about Fallout 76?

Fallout 76? Their making a new one? Huh. I'll have to look into this, but I'm all for it.

The West Country

The West Country wrote:How are you guys feeling about Fallout 76?

I guess you could say I'm excited, but since we know literally no hard facts about it I'm holding off on judging it or riding any hype trains. If it is set in West Virginia like the song eludes to I would be quite happy though.

Russkov Soviet, The West Country

The West Country wrote:How are you guys feeling about Fallout 76?

My hope for the new game seriously is at rock bottom and I refuse to raise it until I see Bethesda abandon 90% of what they did in F-4. It doesn't help that it's supposedly being made by a new department, the act of which being mostly negative for games cough Andromeda cough

The West Country

Au Minbo wrote:I guess you could say I'm excited, but since we know literally no hard facts about it I'm holding off on judging it or riding any hype trains. If it is set in West Virginia like the song eludes to I would be quite happy though.

References to the Vault in the previous Fallouts, mainly Fallout 3, say it’s in the Greater DC area or WV

https://www.strawpoll.me/15817396

Gualimole wrote:https://www.strawpoll.me/15817396

What are all those other sexualities and how are they different

The West Country wrote:What are all those other sexualities and how are they different

A heterosexual is someone who is attracted to the opposite sex.

A bisexual is someone who is attracted to both males and females.

A polysexual is someone who is attracted to males, females, and individuals outside of the binary.

A pansexual is someone who is attracted to all individuals regardless of their sex or gender identity.

A homosexual is someone who is attracted to the same sex.

An asexual is someone who is attracted to nobody.

The West Country

Gualimole wrote:A heterosexual is someone who is attracted to the opposite sex.

A bisexual is someone who is attracted to both males and females.

A polysexual is someone who is attracted to males, females, and individuals outside of the binary.

A pansexual is someone who is attracted to all individuals regardless of their sex or gender identity.

A homosexual is someone who is attracted to the same sex.

An asexual is someone who is attracted to nobody.

So. Many. Labels.

The West Country

Nuremgard wrote:So. Many. Labels.

Human sexuality is complicated.

Gualimole wrote:Human sexuality is complicated.

It is. I don't care who people f*ck or how they identify. People should just f*ck whoever they want (as long as it's within the law.)

The West Country

Nuremgard wrote:It is. I don't care who people f*ck or how they identify. People should just f*ck whoever they want (as long as it's within the law.)

Nobody was arguing against that.

Gualimole wrote:Nobody was arguing against that.

I know nobody was arguing against that. I was putting forth my own thoughts. Is that allowed, mein Fuhrer?

Mercunova

Nuremgard wrote:I know nobody was arguing against that. I was putting forth my own thoughts. Is that allowed, mein Fuhrer?

Nobody was arguing that you don't have the right to put forth your own thoughts. Also, Godwin's Law.

Gualimole wrote:Nobody was arguing that you don't have the right to put forth your own thoughts. Also, Godwin's Law.

You misunderstand Godwin's law like mostly everyone else.

Nuremgard wrote:You misunderstand Godwin's law like mostly everyone else.

Elaborate.

Gualimole wrote:Elaborate.

People often believe that someone who mentions the Nazis or compares their opponent's argument to the Nazis has instantly lost the debate by default. In fact, Godwin's law simply means that the longer a discussion goes on, the more likely it is that Nazi comparisons will be made or the Nazis will be mentioned.

Nuremgard wrote:People often believe that someone who mentions the Nazis or compares their opponent's argument to the Nazis has instantly lost the debate by default. In fact, Godwin's law simply means that the longer a discussion goes on, the more likely it is that Nazi comparisons will be made or the Nazis will be mentioned.

But I never said you lost the argument. I just pointed out that you compared me to the Fuhrer in a discussion that we were having, which is what Godwin's Law is. After the discussion went on for long enough, you compared me to the Fuhrer.

Gualimole wrote:But I never said you lost the argument. I just pointed out that you compared me to the Fuhrer in a discussion that we were having, which is what Godwin's Law is. After the discussion went on for long enough, you compared me to the Fuhrer.

There you go then.

Gualimole

Gualimole wrote:A bisexual is someone who is attracted to both males and females.

A polysexual is someone who is attracted to males, females, and individuals outside of the binary.

Ah, the age old debate

Midasia

Gualimole wrote:A bisexual is someone who is attracted to both males and females.

A bisexual person is someone attracted to two sexual groups. Bisexuality is not exclusively male and female, it may involve two of any sex group. For example, XY & XX or XXY & XX or XYY XX or any other combination.

Midasia wrote:A bisexual person is someone attracted to two sexual groups. Bisexuality is not exclusively male and female, it may involve two of any sex group. For example, XY & XX or XXY & XX or XYY XX or any other combination.

I chose sex group as opposed to gender because gender is an identity.

Question: Should Westminster MPs legislate for abortion and gay marriage in Northern Ireland or should both issues be decided by referendum?

Midasia

Nuremgard wrote:Question: Should Westminster MPs legislate for abortion and gay marriage in Northern Ireland or should both issues be decided by referendum?

As a pro-choice gay male who wants a relationship, I say the government should take over. The people should still be heard. If government fails, let the people vote.

Axeldonia

Midasia wrote:As a pro-choice gay male who wants a relationship, I say the government should take over. The people should still be heard. If government fails, let the people vote.

The government does have the legal authority to do it but the current Prime Minister is being held by the short and curlies by the DUP, a Northern Irish party full of fundamentalist Protestants who are dead-set against abortion and gay marriage. If she did legislate, she'd lose their support so her government would fall. And since she is a spineless, power-hungry bitch, she wont upset the bigots propping up her shambles of an administration.

Midasia

Kalaron wrote:My hope for the new game seriously is at rock bottom and I refuse to raise it until I see Bethesda abandon 90% of what they did in F-4. It doesn't help that it's supposedly being made by a new department, the act of which being mostly negative for games cough Andromeda cough

I liked aspects of Fallout 4, my biggest complaint would be that the story was terrible/didnt feel real. I loved Far Harbor and base building, they just need to do a better job with base building. And less of it than 4 had. Also VATS was useless in 4 and should be brought back to NV style.

The West Country

Midasia wrote:A bisexual person is someone attracted to two sexual groups. Bisexuality is not exclusively male and female, it may involve two of any sex group. For example, XY & XX or XXY & XX or XYY XX or any other combination.

Bisexuality isn't exclusive to just two; bisexuality is an attraction to two or more.

Midasia

Vista Major wrote:Bisexuality isn't exclusive to just two; bisexuality is an attraction to two or more.

That's polysexuality. Bisexuality is exclusive to just two. That's why "bi" is in its name.

Mercunova

Vista Major wrote:Bisexuality isn't exclusive to just two; bisexuality is an attraction to two or more.

For the purposes of the poll, bisexuality is best defined as attraction within the two sexes of male and female.

Mercunova

https://www.strawpoll.me/15817396/r

Wow, one of the only times being straight makes you a minority.

Nuremgard, Jaslandia

Midasia wrote:https://www.strawpoll.me/15817396/r

Wow, one of the only times being straight makes you a minority.

That's what you get for being in this region

The West Country

I am playing a dnd campaign with friends. I have decided to adopt the title of 'Super Minority'. I am the only black one, the only gay one, one of the only non-mormons, one of the only without glasses and the only liberal.

Jaslandia

Midasia wrote:I am playing a dnd campaign with friends. I have decided to adopt the title of 'Super Minority'. I am the only black one, the only gay one, one of the only non-mormons, one of the only without glasses and the only liberal.

Do you live in Utah?

Gualimole wrote:Do you live in Utah?

No, I live in Minnesota. The DM is Mormon and he invited people from his church.

Midasia wrote:No, I live in Minnesota. The DM is Mormon and he invited people from his church.

Oh. I live in California.

Midasia

Au Minbo wrote:That's what you get for being in this region

-looks at self- Double minority, then.

Jaslandia

Chernarus State wrote:-looks at self- Double minority, then.

How so?

Midasia wrote:How so?

He is straight and Latino.

Gualimole wrote:He is straight and Latino.

ooohhhhhhhhh

Midasia wrote:ooohhhhhhhhh

And you're from the state of Minnesota.

Midasia

Assembled with Dot's Region Saver.
Written by Refuge Isle.