Post Archive

Region: The Region That Has No Big Banks

History

The Kaverian wrote:Bro I’ve been done since Friday

Lucky, I finished last Tuesday.

Also currently headed to Rockport!

Krayo29, Western Arba Fir

United States Of Alpha wrote:Lucky, I finished last Tuesday.

When is your first day of school?

Western Arba Fir wrote:When is your first day of school?

august 23rd

I end today

Western Arba Fir

Pyhdon wrote:august 23rd

I end today

Awesome. However, I begin something like August 12.

Western Arba Fir

Yay I passed up Western Arba Fir in Influence.

Western Arba Fir

Western Arba Fir wrote:nice!

I am at your exact influence

Western Arba Fir, United States Of Alpha

Western Arba Fir wrote:nice!

Just barely tho you’re right behind me.

Pyhdon wrote:I am at your exact influence

Whose? You’re 38th in this region for influence.

United States Of Alpha wrote:Whose? You’re 38th in this region for influence.

Pyhdon wrote:I am at your exact influence

sorry, I am at 9034 influence

Officially done with the academic part of high school

Western Arba Fir

Hey! I was a 6 in works of art and I have dropped to a 9. );

United States Of Alpha

Hi! I'm new to the region. How are we all today?

Mjau, Western Arba Fir, United States Of Alpha

The Community Pool wrote:Hi! I'm new to the region. How are we all today?

Welcome! If you have any questions please ask!

America The Greater, Mjau, United States Of Alpha

The Community Pool wrote:Hi! I'm new to the region. How are we all today?

I’m fine. Also WELCOME TO TRTHNBB!

America The Greater, The Community Pool

Western Arba Fir wrote:Welcome! If you have any questions please ask!

What he said.

The Community Pool

United States Of Alpha wrote:I’m fine. Also WELCOME TO TRTHNBB!

Thank you! I'm excited to be here. I know that my theme is "The Communist (Pool) Party" but nation's values more track with TRTHSNBB than TCB.

The Community Pool wrote:Thank you! I'm excited to be here. I know that my theme is "The Communist (Pool) Party" but nation's values more track with TRTHSNBB than TCB.

Ah, nice summer theme. Currently in Rockport celebrating the beginning of summer vacation.

Lkandria wrote:PhydonWestern Arba Fir I’ll get too you guys

New-Union you did what I’ve said not to do about uhhhh three times. You wrote the outcome of the battle. No. Don’t do that as I have said numerous times. Get rid of the outcome, let Pyhdon respond, and I’ll write the outcome

Ok, sorry

New-Union wrote:Ok, sorry

Oh, sorry, I did not notice you were offline. I just reported you to SB for godmodding the outcome of the battle and not giving me even 2 minutes to respond.

Pyhdon part 2 is acceptable because they were go off at the same time

I was going to send them in the same message but I didn't want to fill the forum every time you tagged

Lkandria wrote:PhydonWestern Arba Fir I’ll get too you guys

New-Union you did what I’ve said not to do about uhhhh three times. You wrote the outcome of the battle. No. Don’t do that as I have said numerous times. Get rid of the outcome, let Pyhdon respond, and I’ll write the outcome

I thought it was allowed because it was a surprised attack, And I didn't do any big battles other than taking some territories, since Pyhdon didn't have soldiers there

Pyhdon wrote:Oh, sorry, I did not notice you were offline. I just reported you to SB for godmodding the outcome of the battle and not giving me even 2 minutes to respond.

I only did it this time because you didn't have any real soldiers on our border, I still put some fictional soldiers there, theoretically I should be able to take many more territories counting the time your troops would take

Pyhdon wrote:Oh, sorry, I did not notice you were offline. I just reported you to SB for godmodding the outcome of the battle and not giving me even 2 minutes to respond.

I was at work, i have things to do besides NS

United States Of Alpha

New-Union wrote:I was at work, i have things to do besides NS

Not for me ;)

Pyhdon Lkandria

So I wanted to say that I'm going to withdraw the result, but I want Pyhdon to accept the loss of territories, it's a suprise attack and Pyhdon's troops weren't expecting that

Like the Soviet Union in 1941, pyhdon, it will take time for you to reestablish the front, accept that

New-Union wrote:Pyhdon Lkandria

So I wanted to say that I'm going to withdraw the result, but I want Pyhdon to accept the loss of territories, it's a supreme attack and Pyhdon's troops weren't expecting that

Like the Soviet Union in 1941, pyhdon, it will take time for you to reestablish the front, accept that

no, I won't. I will not, and I will gratefully withdraw mine if you do not put that condition

New-Union wrote:Pyhdon Lkandria

So I wanted to say that I'm going to withdraw the result, but I want Pyhdon to accept the loss of territories, it's a supreme attack and Pyhdon's troops weren't expecting that

Like the Soviet Union in 1941, pyhdon, it will take time for you to reestablish the front, accept that

but please keep it, but title it [null]

Pyhdon wrote:no, I won't. I will not, and I will gratefully withdraw mine if you do not put that condition

Could i know why?

It's basic strategy, it's totally possible that I can pull you out of Iran if my operation is complete and without many battles

You can't always win Pyhdon

I will wait for lkandria

*James Bond theme song.*

America The Greater, Western Arba Fir

New-Union wrote:Could i know why?

It's basic strategy, it's totally possible that I can pull you out of Iran if my operation is complete and without many battles

You can't always win Pyhdon

I will wait for lkandria

because you are giving me a headache at 11 pm at night. I do not wanna be up right now but I wanna solve this without you behaving like a total - and I mean this in the nicest way possible- freshie.

If you had at least given me proper warning, time and had not, possibly, godmodded, then I would have pulled out of Iran. but no

The Community Pool wrote:Hi! I'm new to the region. How are we all today?

Welcome to the region!

If you have any questions feel free to ask!

Western Arba Fir

Claibornia wrote:Welcome to the region!

If you have any questions feel free to ask!

Claibornia

could you talk to new union to not rp as if he always wins? I know that sb may, but as you are a frenemy, you can talk some... [I]rp sense?[/I]

and since you have access through me, then maybe, if you wanna, why not?

Pyhdon wrote:because you are giving me a headache at 11 pm at night. I do not wanna be up right now but I wanna solve this without you behaving like a total - and I mean this in the nicest way possible- freshie.

I don't act cool, I'm totally fine with doing good RP

I just get irritated when others try to disrupt my RP, or don't follow logic

Like claibornia, who had no interest in Talikan's revolution, but still intervened

I just want you to accept that you will lose territories, it is inevitable, you trying to avoid this just proves that you don't want to do something realistic

Idk about you, But I like my RP how i like my cappuccino, done right

New-Union wrote:I don't act cool, I'm totally fine with doing good RP

I just get irritated when others try to disrupt my RP, or don't follow logic

Like claibornia, who had no interest in Talikan's revolution, but still intervened

I just want you to accept that you will lose territories, it is inevitable, you trying to avoid this just proves that you don't want to do something realistic

Idk about you, But I like my RP how i like my cappuccino, done right

but the two things that stops me from doing this is:

1. You making up an outcome, when that is Lkandria's job.

2. You not giving me time to respond, how would you expect me to be on at 2:37 in the morning?

Seriously, I do not want another strike for calling another person something because I go nuclear (not in rp). I already did that to Vordo, and after that, he got 3 strikes within 2 months, after my rp ban

Pyhdon wrote:but the two things that stops me from doing this is:

1. You making up an outcome, when that is Lkandria's job.

2. You not giving me time to respond, how would you expect me to be on at 2:37 in the morning?

I will delete the outcome, if you accept you will lose some initial battles and territories

And also, what are you talking about?

I only made 1 post, But I divided it into 2 so as not to fill the forum, and you had all day to respond, Operations were launched at the same time

New-Union wrote:I will delete the outcome, if you accept you will lose some initial battles and territories

And also, what are you talking about?

I only made 1 post, But I divided it into 2 so as not to fill the forum, and you had all day to respond, Operations were launched at the same time

you should have launched one at a time, that is what I do. I dont accept but either way now there is a backup to my claim

New-Union wrote:I will delete the outcome, if you accept you will lose some initial battles and territories

And also, what are you talking about?

I only made 1 post, But I divided it into 2 so as not to fill the forum, and you had all day to respond, Operations were launched at the same time

also, if [I]i[/I] get some punishment for what seems like a [I]you[/I] problem, then, well

I may have to tell you to patten up and think about why I get punished for ur actions.

Pyhdon wrote:you should have launched one at a time, that is what I do. I dont accept but either way now there is a backup to my claim

It was 1 rp, I divided it into two parts, because it is so difficult to understand this

If the problem is that I divide them, I can combine them into one if that bothers you

New-Union wrote:It was 1 rp, I divided it into two parts, because it is so difficult to understand this

If the problem is that I divide them, I can combine them into one if that bothers you

Pyhdon wrote:also, if [I]i[/I] get some punishment for what seems like a [I]you[/I] problem, then, well

I may have to tell you to patten up and think about why I get punished for ur actions.

That's enough

(Stop arguing or I will take action)

Yodle, Western Arba Fir, United States Of Alpha, Maen

New-Union wrote:It was 1 rp, I divided it into two parts, because it is so difficult to understand this

If the problem is that I divide them, I can combine them into one if that bothers you

no, but you did 2 ops that got executed at the same time. it is actually usual that happens, but it actually seems unfair to just do that at the same time.

you are lucky I have the patience to actually hear what you are arguing and answer it. any other small player will leave the region, and we want to welcome everyone.

can you just stop trying to win all the time? you can't.

I asked chatgpt about this, and he said that I could even beat SB (for, I do not half believe it but it has reason). It said this:

The outcome of a conflict between someone using technology from the 2030s and someone using technology from the 1990s would depend on a variety of factors beyond just the technological disparity. While 2030s technology would presumably be far more advanced, several key elements could influence the outcome:

[spoiler=chatgpt blurt]

1. Skill and Experience

Tactical and Strategic Prowess: A highly skilled and experienced individual using 1990s tech might outperform a less experienced person with 2030s tech. Experience can compensate for technological disadvantages to some extent.

Training: Intensive training and familiarity with the available tools can provide a significant edge.

2. Environmental Factors

Terrain: In certain environments, advanced technology might not provide as much of an advantage. For instance, dense jungles or urban areas can mitigate the benefits of advanced weaponry or surveillance systems.

Weather: Harsh weather conditions can affect the functionality of advanced tech, leveling the playing field.

3. Resource Availability

Logistics and Supply Chains: The 2030s tech user might be reliant on complex supply chains that could be disrupted. In contrast, 1990s tech might be more robust and easier to maintain with locally available resources.

Ammunition and Maintenance: Availability of ammunition and the ability to maintain and repair equipment could influence the effectiveness of the technology.

4. Technological Robustness

Simplicity vs. Complexity: Sometimes, older technology is more robust and less prone to failure. Advanced systems might be more susceptible to hacking, electronic warfare, or simply more prone to malfunction due to their complexity.

EMP and Cyber Warfare: The 1990s tech might be less vulnerable to electromagnetic pulses (EMPs) or cyber attacks, which could neutralize more advanced tech.

5. Psychological Factors

Morale and Motivation: The determination and morale of the individuals involved can significantly impact the outcome. A highly motivated individual might overcome technological disadvantages.

Psychological Warfare: Effective use of psychological tactics can undermine an opponent's confidence, regardless of their technological superiority.

6. Strategic Objectives

Goals and Objectives: The specific objectives of the conflict can influence the effectiveness of the technology. For instance, guerilla tactics and asymmetrical warfare might allow the technologically inferior side to achieve strategic goals despite overall technological inferiority.

Historical Precedents

Historical Examples: Throughout history, there have been numerous instances where technologically inferior forces have defeated superior ones due to superior tactics, strategy, and other factors. The Vietnam War, for instance, saw Viet Cong forces using relatively primitive technology to great effect against technologically superior American forces.

Conclusion

While advanced technology provides significant advantages, it does not guarantee victory. The interplay of skill, strategy, environmental conditions, resource availability, and psychological factors can result in scenarios where someone with 1990s technology could potentially overcome an opponent with 2030s technology.

[/spoiler]

So, anyway

also, shall we private message on discord?

we have taken up too much rmb

Krayo29

The Washington Federation wrote:That's enough

(Stop arguing or I will take action)

oh ok, I will go to discord

The Washington Federation

Pyhdon wrote:oh ok, I will go to discord

Good

Krayo29 wrote:Sorry, the rush

Haha Spanish is my first language in understand

Western Arba Fir

Tea Island Systems wrote:*James Bond theme song.*

Who da heck is James Bond?

Maen wrote:Who da heck is James Bond?

spy

Pyhdon wrote:spy

Like in a movie?

Maen wrote:Like in a movie?

yh

Maen wrote:Who da heck is James Bond?

*Intense 007 music.*

Tea Island Systems wrote:*Intense 007 music.*

Huh?

Maen wrote:Who da heck is James Bond?

💀

Lemona wrote:💀

:skull:

How does anyone think that more money to the people makes their country better?

New-Union wrote:How does anyone think that more money to the people makes their country better?

it does

New-Union wrote:How does anyone think that more money to the people makes their country better?

Nope 🙂‍↔️

Does anyone else use AI to do RP? The truth is that it seems like a real waste of time to read something that has not been prepared by a person. It seems as if the players do not make their own strategies and the AI ​​tells them. It's like playing chess but asking the AI ​​for each move, instead of the person themselves thinking about it. Also the arguments are too long

Yodle, Dustraejan, Maen

Krayo29 wrote:Does anyone else use AI to do RP? The truth is that it seems like a real waste of time to read something that has not been prepared by a person. It seems as if the players do not make their own strategies and the AI ​​tells them. It's like playing chess but asking the AI ​​for each move, instead of the person themselves thinking about it. Also the arguments are too long

Yes I agree

Krayo29

Krayo29 wrote:Does anyone else use AI to do RP? The truth is that it seems like a real waste of time to read something that has not been prepared by a person. It seems as if the players do not make their own strategies and the AI ​​tells them. It's like playing chess but asking the AI ​​for each move, instead of the person themselves thinking about it. Also the arguments are too long

I write my arguments, the AI ​​just makes it more realistic and adds details

Dustraejan

Lkandria

I think pyhdon is experiencing gigantic inflation for 1 reason

https://www.nationstates.net/nation=pyhdon/detail=factbook/id=1954367

They are literally giving money to citizens increasing inflation

New-Union wrote:I write my arguments, the AI ​​just makes it more realistic and adds details

yh, I do same

I also have gram marly spellcheck

New-Union wrote:Lkandria

I think pyhdon is experiencing gigantic inflation for 1 reason

https://www.nationstates.net/nation=pyhdon/detail=factbook/id=1954367

They are literally giving money to citizens increasing inflation

actually, I destroyed the dollar

Krayo29 wrote:Does anyone else use AI to do RP? The truth is that it seems like a real waste of time to read something that has not been prepared by a person. It seems as if the players do not make their own strategies and the AI ​​tells them. It's like playing chess but asking the AI ​​for each move, instead of the person themselves thinking about it. Also the arguments are too long

Socialistic Britain, looks like the AI debate has been revived, should be interesting!

My take is that AI use in RP is such a grey area (and so easily abused) that it greatly disadvantages players who don’t use it out of principle. The amount of time and effort put into a thorough RP post made solely from one’s own head being just drowned out by endless AI generated pointless filler just seems very unfair.

America The Greater, Lemona, Dustraejan, Krayo29, Maen

Yodle wrote:My take is that AI use in RP is such a grey area (and so easily abused) that it greatly disadvantages players who don’t use it out of principle. The amount of time and effort put into a thorough RP post made solely from one’s own head being just drowned out by endless AI generated pointless filler just seems very unfair.

I agree with this, but I must say

I do think AI can be helpful, quickly writing RP when in a rush

And I don’t believe AI should be banned, but regulated. For example, attacks should be written out, and then the details of what is being used could be written in AI

Also banning AI wouldn’t do much, as most RP admins are going to go through the time to scan every RP post to make sure it’s not AI generated.

The main dislike I have about this kind of RP that has been happening is how most of the post is just listing out their troops

And it makes the post look more formal, but it’s still the same crappy and quick writings at the base

While this helps prevent godmodding, imo it also sucks out the life of the posts, turning a dramatic and interesting war into numbers and lists

Dustraejan

The Washington Federation wrote:That's enough

(Stop arguing or I will take action)

Bold.

Lemona wrote:I agree with this, but I must say

I do think AI can be helpful, quickly writing RP when in a rush

And I don’t believe AI should be banned, but regulated. For example, attacks should be written out, and then the details of what is being used could be written in AI

Also banning AI wouldn’t do much, as most RP admins are going to go through the time to scan every RP post to make sure it’s not AI generated.

The main dislike I have about this kind of RP that has been happening is how most of the post is just listing out their troops

And it makes the post look more formal, but it’s still the same crappy and quick writings at the base

While this helps prevent godmodding, imo it also sucks out the life of the posts, turning a dramatic and interesting war into numbers and lists

Agree. It should probably be random yet reasonable inputs, though, since the AI shouldn’t be used to do godmodding and stuff like that.

https://www.nationstates.net/nation=pyhdon/detail=factbook/id=1954367

Pyhdon, not only have you stolen work from one of my factbooks, but it is not even my own work. You should know to credit Chiho for this, as I have done (yes, I'm gonna @ them here cos they deserve to see you are using their work without permission). Either give appropriate credit, or take it down. This is the third time or so I've had to raise this.

Edit: Jesus, I thought it was just this factbook but I was wrong. You've not only stolen BBCode but little graphics I've made as part of my worldbuilding project. Not cool. I'm publicly declaring your removal from Commonwealth as a member, effective immediately. I don't have time for this stuff.

Yodle, America The Greater, Krayo29

Syrasia wrote:https://www.nationstates.net/nation=pyhdon/detail=factbook/id=1954367

Pyhdon, not only have you stolen work from one of my factbooks, but it is not even my own work. You should know to credit Chiho for this, as I have done (yes, I'm gonna @ them here cos they deserve to see you are using their work without permission. Either give appropriate credit, or take it down. This is the third time or so I've had to raise this.

Edit: Jesus, I thought it was just this factbook but I was wrong. You've not only stolen BBCode but little graphics I've made as part of my worldbuilding project. Not cool. I'm publicly declaring your removal from Commonwealth as a member, effective immediately. I don't have time for this stuff.

💀💀💀

Yodle

Syrasia wrote:

This is exactly why I thought we needed something to deter misuse of works :/

Yodle, America The Greater, Syrasia, Krayo29

The Kaverian wrote:This is exactly why I thought we needed something to deter misuse of works :/

POGGER

My nation reached 500 million today! So, I changed my nation type.

Pyhdon wrote:Claibornia

could you talk to new union to not rp as if he always wins? I know that sb may, but as you are a frenemy, you can talk some... [I]rp sense?[/I]

and since you have access through me, then maybe, if you wanna, why not?

Eh?

I’m not an rp admin

Claibornia wrote:Eh?

I’m not an rp admin

I just discovered that python doesn't know anything about inflation

And that he was mad because I split 1 rp into two

Speaking of admin

I wanna be rmb admin let me be rmb admin i wanna shush people

The Washington Federation wrote:That's enough

(Stop arguing or I will take action)

see i wanna do this

New-Union wrote:How does anyone think that more money to the people makes their country better?

Some socialists do this

Claibornia wrote:Speaking of admin

I wanna be rmb admin let me be rmb admin i wanna shush people

You’d be an admin for all the wrong reasons.

Krayo29

United States Of Alpha wrote:You’d be an admin for all the wrong reasons.

I was kidding

But I do like telling people to be quiet

Claibornia wrote:I was kidding

But I do like telling people to be quiet

“Shut your — up boy!”

Claibornia wrote:Speaking of admin

I wanna be rmb admin let me be rmb admin i wanna shush people

shush

Claibornia wrote:Some socialists do this

I agree with you, even though I'm a socialist, in reality I really don't know where I stand on the economic compass

I agree with socialism and capitalism

New-Union wrote:shush

I agree with you, even though I'm a socialist, in reality I really don't know where I stand on the economic compass

I agree with socialism and capitalism

I identify as a capitalist mostly but some socialism can be beneficial

New-Union wrote:I just discovered that python doesn't know anything about inflation

And that he was mad because I split 1 rp into two

Are you confusing "inflation" and "schizophrenia"?

Krayo29

New-Union wrote:I just discovered that python doesn't know anything about inflation

And that he was mad because I split 1 rp into two

how does he not know anything about inflation

Claibornia wrote:how does he not know anything about inflation

Apparently for him

Create more money (with higher denomination notes and give these notes to citizens)

It makes money more valuable, and he shouldn't know the basics of supply and demand

New-Union wrote:Apparently for him

Create more money (with higher denomination notes and give these notes to citizens)

It makes money more valuable, and he shouldn't know the basics of supply and demand

I asked him some questions, The answers can't be better described than "worrying"

New-Union, what promt did you write to the AI ​​to generate The Black Massacre?

Perhaps the only correct way to ensure which contributions the players make and what the AI ​​makes, will be to include the promt that the players give to the AI.

New-Union, what was the objective or purpose of introducing a massacre of that magnitude, which in real life would be considered crimes against humanity, once Maen had already surrendered?

This is for all players and RP moderators: Why are real-life arguments used for the rest of the issues, such as espionage, travel time, technology,... And yet not for a crime against humanity?

Achrom

Socialistic Britain wrote:as said, please do keep this discussion off the RMB

While I understand that it is logical not to saturate RMB, I think that for now it has been a respectful discussion on both sides. Keeping the discussion in RMB creates transparency and viewers to other members in the region. Having certain conversations in the private sphere, I believe, isolates and silences the most disadvantaged players. Could this be taken into consideration for future interventions?

I would like the opinion of someone from the government or to open some debate among government personnel. I think that several nations have been cornered and silenced in RP. The use of AI and being able to debate certain issues in RMB should be debated and legislated, always with respect of course.

Socialistic Britain

Has the RP always been so heated and debated so much, or was I just unlucky to join at such time? Maybe I was the spark even, considering the whole thing there has been peaceful for the week and a half while I was here but was not yet on the map, from my view at least.

I don't like it this way : (

It's too negative and serious and all shouting and arguments and all.

Achrom wrote:Has the RP always been so heated and debated so much, or was I just unlucky to join at such time? Maybe I was the spark even, considering the whole thing there has been peaceful for the week and a half while I was here but was not yet on the map, from my view at least.

I don't like it this way : (

It's too negative and serious and all shouting and arguments and all.

I think it's always been that way. In fact I think that in the previous RP, with the previous map there were already many discussions.

You have entered with good will, have you achieved anything positive in this RP game? You enjoyed it? Have you felt heard?

Achrom wrote:Has the RP always been so heated and debated so much, or was I just unlucky to join at such time? Maybe I was the spark even, considering the whole thing there has been peaceful for the week and a half while I was here but was not yet on the map, from my view at least.

I don't like it this way : (

It's too negative and serious and all shouting and arguments and all.

No, it hasn't been quite this heated in the past.

Also, not related to the above, but is there any constitutional precedent for the proposed referendum on InterLeft membership? I'm not personally seeing any when I look through the Constitution - in fact, there's no reference to referendums in the entire document that I can see.

Syrasia wrote:https://www.nationstates.net/nation=pyhdon/detail=factbook/id=1954367

Pyhdon, not only have you stolen work from one of my factbooks, but it is not even my own work. You should know to credit Chiho for this, as I have done (yes, I'm gonna @ them here cos they deserve to see you are using their work without permission). Either give appropriate credit, or take it down. This is the third time or so I've had to raise this.

Edit: Jesus, I thought it was just this factbook but I was wrong. You've not only stolen BBCode but little graphics I've made as part of my worldbuilding project. Not cool. I'm publicly declaring your removal from Commonwealth as a member, effective immediately. I don't have time for this stuff.

I put this big piece of code at the bottom. I just went to check where I got it from and it seemed to be Chiho directly, when I was scrolling through my history.

I now put this big disclaimer:

[pre][size=200]All of the Internet LTD headers in all of my facebooks and Dispatches, are to be accredited to Chiho[/size][/pre]

and the computer thing, well yes I got the image from somewhere, and it was not you. I dunno who it is, but I think he had been in the region before, like for a day.

Pyhdon wrote:and the computer thing, well yes I got the image from somewhere, and it was not you. I dunno who it is, but I think he had been in the region before, like for a day.

I can tell you it was me as I was the one who made that image. Lying is a horrible thing to do.

Syrasia wrote:I can tell you it was me as I was the one who made that image. Lying is a horrible thing to do.

you made the image? then someone must have copied it off you before[/I]...

Rlly, I dont know, but anyway I will accredit you for the image.

[sup]oh, that nation had been banned, and he copied it just before he recently got banned[/sup]

Pyhdon wrote:you made the image? then someone must have copied it off you before[/I]...

Rlly, I dont know, but anyway I will accredit you for the image.

[sup]oh, that nation had been banned, and he copied it just before he recently got banned[/sup]

I can tell you have taken it from me as in my BBCode I always use the British way to spell ‘colour’. As is found in the code of the header. I don’t want you using my image, and attempting to simply pass it off as “fine” because some mythical banned nation did it too is honestly just insulting.

Please remove it from every factbook. I will be pursuing regional moderation staff in order to see if any action can be taken, rather than arguing on the RMB.

America The Greater

[ahh crap, and the nation is homophobic. no worries, Pyhdon, you just ignore the fact that Vordo's puppets have been telegramming you randomly, and then you saw a factboof from 45 days ago, and thought it would be cool, but there were not referencing.]

Changed

[sup]sorry for the conundrum, can you forgive me?[/sup]

Syrasia wrote:I can tell you have taken it from me as in my BBCode I always use the British way to spell ‘colour’. As is found in the code of the header. I don’t want you using my image, and attempting to simply pass it off as “fine” because some mythical banned nation did it too is honestly just insulting.

Please remove it from every factbook. I will be pursuing regional moderation staff in order to see if any action can be taken, rather than arguing on the RMB.

it is only in 1.

Assembled with Dot's Region Saver.
Written by Refuge Isle.