Post Archive

Region: The Region That Has No Big Banks

History

Peoples Republic Of Peepeeland wrote:We are proud supporters of Bernie, aren't we? Go on YouTube, search "bernie fillibuster lofi" , and click on the first video.

I Think Just Copying A YouTube Video Wouldn’t Be A True Anthem

Wait A Minute In Authoritarianism I Have 600 MilliStalins Does That Mean I’m 60% Like Stalin?

Aya Democratic Republic wrote:Wait A Minute In Authoritarianism I Have 600 MilliStalins Does That Mean I’m 60% Like Stalin?

Nah I think that’s just a joke made by Max. A lot of rankings are like that, plus you’re only 49th in the region for authoritarianism. 60% Stalin would be a lot lower

Ardeyn wrote:Nah I think that’s just a joke made by Max. A lot of rankings are like that, plus you’re only 49th in the region for authoritarianism. 60% Stalin would be a lot lower

Oh Ok!

Aya Democratic Republic wrote:I Think Just Copying A YouTube Video Wouldn’t Be A True Anthem

In the tune of the Soviet anthem:

It's very stupid

to give tax breaks to the rich

that's why we're fighting

The top 1%!

We will help the working people

The rich will have a steep hill

Helping the poor

With a New York Accent!

Preservation of Welfare!

We will all have free healthcare!

No more tax breaks

to the top 1 %!

We will all feel the great Bern!

It's equality that we yearn!

I'm asking you

for financial support!!!!!!!!!

New United Common-Lands

Peoples Republic Of Peepeeland wrote:In the tune of the Soviet anthem:

It's very stupid

to give tax breaks to the rich

that's why we're fighting

The top 1%!

We will help the working people

The rich will have a steep hill

Helping the poor

With a New York Accent!

Preservation of Welfare!

We will all have free healthcare!

No more tax breaks

to the top 1 %!

We will all feel the great Bern!

It's equality that we yearn!

I'm asking you

for financial support!!!!!!!!!

It’s Almost Perfect Just There’s A Few Parts That Don’t Rhyme.

Peoples Republic Of Peepeeland

Aya Democratic Republic wrote:Wait A Minute In Authoritarianism I Have 600 MilliStalins Does That Mean I’m 60% Like Stalin?

It's okay, I have 1426.

Peoples Republic Of Peepeeland wrote:It's okay, I have 1426.

So Your 140% Stalin According To The Game Lol

Peoples Republic Of Peepeeland

Welcome Squiggly Isles! Would you like to join the Travis Scott Borger Party?

Peoples Republic Of Peepeeland wrote:Welcome Squiggly Isles! Would you like to join the Travis Scott Borger Party?

Is It Just Me Or Is It Funny When You Just Keep Asking For People To Join The TSB.

Peoples Republic Of Peepeeland

I just came up with an idea we could use when the rp comes back

I was thinking what if we allowed people to create their own rp factions? People could create their own versions of NATO, the EU, or the UN, and would be able to control almost every aspect of the faction as well as write a factbook describing the factions origins and purpose, and factions could start wars with other factions

I'd be pretty interesting to have colossal wars in rp like WW1 & WW2

Obviously none of this could be implemented just yet but I think it’d spice it up a ton

*Falls through ceiling.*

Greetings, comrades.

Aya Democratic Republic wrote:Is Spending Tax Dollars To Increase Cheese Sales Supporting Corporations And If It Is Am I Doing The Wrong Thing?

Depends on if they're corporations, or if they're coops/unions/local business. If the former, I'd say it's wrong, if the latter, I'd say it's ok.

Osem wrote:*Falls through ceiling.*

Greetings, comrades.

Hello Osem how’ve you been

Osem

Ardeyn wrote:Hello Osem how’ve you been

Listening to Bandiera Rossa.

Osem wrote:Listening to Bandiera Rossa.

I take it you’ve been grand then

Osem

Peoples Republic Of Peepeeland wrote:[spoiler=snip]In the tune of the Soviet anthem:

It's very stupid

to give tax breaks to the rich

that's why we're fighting

The top 1%!

We will help the working people

The rich will have a steep hill

Helping the poor

With a New York Accent!

Preservation of Welfare!

We will all have free healthcare!

No more tax breaks

to the top 1 %!

We will all feel the great Bern!

It's equality that we yearn!

I'm asking you

for financial support!!!!!!!!![/spoiler]

You claim to be an enthusiastic supporter of Sanders and Socialism, yet you're a TERF and an authoritarian, warloving NazBol.

Curious.

Peoples Republic Of Peepeeland

Ardeyn wrote:I take it you’ve been grand then

Ok, how does the name "Socialist Union League" sound? Maybe just "Socialist Union" or "Socialist League"?

Osem wrote:Ok, how does the name "Socialist Union League" sound? Maybe just "Socialist Union" or "Socialist League"?

I’d say the Socialist League but it really depends how much OCD you have. For example, the reason The Science Team is TST instead of ST is because all other parties have 3 letter acronyms and it triggers my OCD to only have 2 letters

Osem

Ardeyn wrote:I’d say the Socialist League but it really depends how much OCD you have. For example, the reason The Science Team is TST instead of ST is because all other parties have 3 letter acronyms and it triggers my OCD to only have 2 letters

Ah, FauxCD, an unpleasant experience indeed.

Oh! Socialist Union Rally!

Osem wrote:Ah, FauxCD, an unpleasant experience indeed.

Oh! Socialist Union Rally!

Or maybe just Union Rally or Union League, because calling yourself socialist in the socialist region would be redundant...

Osem wrote:Ah, FauxCD, an unpleasant experience indeed.

Oh! Socialist Union Rally!

If you’re going with a Union you might also like the Union of Socialist Republics

Osem

Ardeyn wrote:If you’re going with a Union you might also like the Union of Socialist Republics

That'd be country pretitle, I'm just thinking of political party names lol.

Osem wrote:That'd be country pretitle, I'm just thinking of political party names lol.

Fair fair

I’d say the best name for a luxemburgist and council communist party that also wants to appeal to the wider masses would be the Socialist Union Rally

Which would be the SUR or sir

Osem

Ardeyn wrote:Fair fair

I’d say the best name for a luxemburgist and council communist party that also wants to appeal to the wider masses would be the Socialist Union Rally

Which would be the SUR or sir

*and syndicalist party, too!

But yeah, I like the term Socialist Union Rally (Union Rally for short)!

I've made up my mind!

Osem wrote:*and syndicalist party, too!

But yeah, I like the term Socialist Union Rally (Union Rally for short)!

I've made up my mind!

Time to spend hours on the factbook

At least I did anyway and it’s still not complete

Osem, Lemona

Ardeyn wrote:Time to spend hours on the factbook

At least I did anyway and it’s still not complete

This will prolly be my experience lol

Lemona

Osem wrote:This will prolly be my experience lol

I wish you luck then *tips hat* I’d also say I’m praying for you but I know the communists have never really been a fan of the whole religion thing

Osem, Lemona

Ardeyn wrote:I wish you luck then *tips hat* I’d also say I’m praying for you but I know the communists have never really been a fan of the whole religion thing

Plus I’m an atheist myself but eh

Osem, Lemona

Ardeyn wrote:I wish you luck then *tips hat* I’d also say I’m praying for you but I know the communists have never really been a fan of the whole religion thing

Ardeyn wrote:Plus I’m an atheist myself but eh

Wait did I say something religious?

Lemona

Osem wrote:Wait did I say something religious?

Nono

I was just commenting on the fact that the USSR denounced religion

Historical banter

Osem, Lemona

Ardeyn wrote:Nono

I was just commenting on the fact that the USSR denounced religion

Historical banter

Ah, the USSR.

Or, as I like to say:

"You were supposed to destroy the bourgeois, not join them!"

Santu Surgo, Peoples Republic Of Peepeeland, Lemona

Osem wrote:Ah, the USSR.

Or, as I like to say:

"You were supposed to destroy the bourgeois, not join them!"

Ah I see you’re a man of great taste

And by man I mean human in case I get cancelled for assuming gender

Osem, Lemona

Ardeyn wrote:Ah I see you’re a man of great taste

And by man I mean human in case I get cancelled for assuming gender

#CancelArdeyn

/s

Lemona

Osem wrote:#CancelArdeyn

/s

Ardeyn wrote:Ah I see you’re a man of great taste

And by man I mean human in case I get cancelled for assuming gender

(Besides, I'll never tell anyone on NS my gender.)

Lemona

Osem wrote:(Besides, I'll never tell anyone on NS my gender.)

Gotta take your privacy seriously around here

FBI could be around any corner

Osem, Lemona

Ardeyn wrote:I just came up with an idea we could use when the rp comes back

I was thinking what if we allowed people to create their own rp factions? People could create their own versions of NATO, the EU, or the UN, and would be able to control almost every aspect of the faction as well as write a factbook describing the factions origins and purpose, and factions could start wars with other factions

I'd be pretty interesting to have colossal wars in rp like WW1 & WW2

Obviously none of this could be implemented just yet but I think it’d spice it up a ton

Definitely Gonna Try Implementing That!

Lemona

Ardeyn wrote:Gotta take your privacy seriously around here

FBI could be around any corner

😂

Lemona

Ardeyn wrote:Time to spend hours on the factbook

At least I did anyway and it’s still not complete

Yep It’s All The Experience Of Making A Political Party! Doing Hours Of Just Writing On A Page That Nobody Is Going To Read In The End!

New United Common-Lands, Lemona

Hello New United Common Lands

Lemona

Osem wrote:You claim to be an enthusiastic supporter of Sanders and Socialism, yet you're a TERF and an authoritarian, warloving NazBol.

Curious.

I'm not a TERF!

Lemona

Peoples Republic Of Peepeeland wrote:I'm not a TERF!

Wait What Ideology Are You Though?

Lemona

Aya Democratic Republic wrote:Wait What Ideology Are You Though?

We're commies, just not progressive as the rest of you.

Lemona

Peoples Republic Of Peepeeland wrote:We're commies, just not progressive as the rest of you.

I Mean Not All Communists Are Progressive

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2015/oct/22/jon-voight/actor-jon-voight-says-progressive-just-another-wor/

Lemona

Peoples Republic Of Peepeeland wrote:I'm not a TERF!

[spoiler=Official Policies of the TSBP, written by "Peepeeland" themselves]"The Travis Scott Borger Party supports gender roles (women can still work if they want to) and LGB (No trans rights) Equality. We are pro-life and will illegalize abortion."

"The Travis Scott Borger Party does not support BLM"

"Official foreign policy for the Travis Scott Borger Party consists of a militaristic approach with creating conflicts and killing our enemies in order to solve those conflicts. The objective of the party is to spread our region's influence across the world through buying property of other regions that have debt."

"Supporting the colonization of new and third world nations is also on the agenda"

" The Travis Scott Borger Party supports going to war to extend our influence. Any type of preemptive war or unprovoked war would be responded with NUKING 'EM! This party supports a more militaristic policy when it comes to foreign aggression and threats."

"We take a region in debt, make an offer to buy their land, and gradually, our region will have a colonial empire."[/spoiler]

You're not just a TERF, but you're a reactionary imperialist no better than Britain, and you support violence and Nuclear Armageddon as an alternative to peace.

People of the Region, The Socialist Union Rally supports a peaceful society where all forms of life, so long as you do not harm your fellow worker, will be accepted by society. The SUR promises a society that is For the Workers and By the Workers, not for generals and reactionaries! When Election Time arrives and the Party is officially formed, Vote SUR! Prevent Reactionaryism!

Ardeyn, Lemona

Osem wrote:[spoiler=Official Policies of the TSBP, written by "Peepeeland" themselves]"The Travis Scott Borger Party supports gender roles (women can still work if they want to) and LGB (No trans rights) Equality. We are pro-life and will illegalize abortion."

"The Travis Scott Borger Party does not support BLM"

"Official foreign policy for the Travis Scott Borger Party consists of a militaristic approach with creating conflicts and killing our enemies in order to solve those conflicts. The objective of the party is to spread our region's influence across the world through buying property of other regions that have debt."

"Supporting the colonization of new and third world nations is also on the agenda"

" The Travis Scott Borger Party supports going to war to extend our influence. Any type of preemptive war or unprovoked war would be responded with NUKING 'EM! This party supports a more militaristic policy when it comes to foreign aggression and threats."

"We take a region in debt, make an offer to buy their land, and gradually, our region will have a colonial empire."[/spoiler]

You're not just a TERF, but you're a reactionary imperialist no better than Britain, and you support violence and Nuclear Armageddon as an alternative to peace.

People of the Region, The Socialist Union Rally supports a peaceful society where all forms of life, so long as you do not harm your fellow worker, will be accepted by society. The SUR promises a society that is For the Workers and By the Workers, not for generals and reactionaries! When Election Time arrives and the Party is officially formed, Vote SUR! Prevent Reactionaryism!

I Hear A Political Debate Incoming!

Peoples Republic Of Peepeeland, Osem, Lemona

Osem, isn't your party the same as all the others? Nobody's gonna vote for you like that! You might as well join the DSP!

Lemona

Peoples Republic Of Peepeeland wrote:Osem, isn't your party the same as all the others? Nobody's gonna vote for you like that! You might as well join the DSP!

It’s Actually Because He Hasn’t Edited It Much To Alter It From The DSP He Only Made It 4 Days Ago

Osem, Lemona

Aya Democratic Republic wrote:It’s Actually Because He Hasn’t Edited It Much To Alter It From The DSP He Only Made It 4 Days Ago

Yes, but, aren't the DSP, SAP, and STP all the same? They're all just Bernie bots! Vote for the black sheep! Vote TSB! Join TSB!

Lemona

Peoples Republic Of Peepeeland wrote:Yes, but, aren't the DSP, SAP, and STP all the same? They're all just Bernie bots! Vote for the black sheep! Vote TSB! Join TSB!

Umm No The DSP Is Just Regular Bernie Supporting Leftists, The SAP Is Focused On Automation, While STP Prefers Basing Things On Science.

Osem, Lemona

Aya Democratic Republic wrote:Umm No The DSP Is Just Regular Bernie Supporting Leftists, The SAP Is Focused On Automation, While STP Prefers Basing Things On Science.

Yes, but don't they all support bernie? The SAP doesn't mention anything about robots in their dispatch.

Lemona

Peoples Republic Of Peepeeland wrote:Osem, isn't your party the same as all the others? Nobody's gonna vote for you like that! You might as well join the DSP!

Have you not noticed the numerous times when I've mentioned Syndicalism, Luxemburgism, and Council Communism, all ideolgies that actually quite different from the average Sanderist? The SUP's ideology simply does not meld with DSP ideology, as my ideals are much more radical in many respects. This is a straw man I shan't stand for!

Peoples Republic Of Peepeeland wrote:Yes, but, aren't the DSP, SAP, and STP all the same? They're all just Bernie bots! Vote for the black sheep! Vote TSB! Join TSB!

You claim to be an independent thinker, yet you're own factbook admits to mindlessly follow Sanders (even though you're not sanderist in the first place), and support authoritarian ideals that world inevitably build a cult of personality. Curious.

If you want a true, free thinking society, then strive for a society in which all leaders are not only held responsible by their peers in the working class, but are unable to abuse their power and be dismissed at the faintest whiff of incompetency or corruption!

Lemona

Aya Democratic Republic wrote:Umm No The DSP Is Just Regular Bernie Supporting Leftists, The SAP Is Focused On Automation, While STP Prefers Basing Things On Science.

And the SUR focuses on localized communes, workers' councils, labor unions, common ownership of the state by all people, and direct management of the workplace by those who work it.

Peoples Republic Of Peepeeland wrote:Yes, but don't they all support bernie? The SAP doesn't mention anything about robots in their dispatch.

1) Why are you surprised that people that are part of the Bernie Sanders Region support Bernie?

2) What exactly do you think automation means?

New United Common-Lands, Lemona

Osem wrote:Have you not noticed the numerous times when I've mentioned Syndicalism, Luxemburgism, and Council Communism, all ideolgies that actually quite different from the average Sanderist? The SUP's ideology simply does not meld with DSP ideology, as my ideals are much more radical in many respects. This is a straw man I shan't stand for!

You claim to be an independent thinker, yet you're own factbook admits to mindlessly follow Sanders (even though you're not sanderist in the first place), and support authoritarian ideals that world inevitably build a cult of personality. Curious.

If you want a true, free thinking society, then strive for a society in which all leaders are not only held responsible by their peers in the working class, but are unable to abuse their power and be dismissed at the faintest whiff of incompetency or corruption!

You're only saying this because you want to shun and censor my views! Vote against censorship! Vote TSB!

Lemona

Peoples Republic Of Peepeeland wrote:Yes, but don't they all support bernie? The SAP doesn't mention anything about robots in their dispatch.

The Socialist Automation Party, join the robot gang

The party would investigate and seek solutions to an automated economy

The Socialist Automation Party has the common aim of creating a society freed from the Workplace. The party would ensure a massive increase in public funding in the Automation Sector, AI technology sector and Genetic testing.

New United Common-Lands, Osem, Lemona

Aya Democratic Republic wrote:The Socialist Automation Party, join the robot gang

The party would investigate and seek solutions to an automated economy

The Socialist Automation Party has the common aim of creating a society freed from the Workplace. The party would ensure a massive increase in public funding in the Automation Sector, AI technology sector and Genetic testing.

Other than that they're basically the DSP.

Lemona

Peoples Republic Of Peepeeland wrote:You're only saying this because you want to shun and censor my views! Vote against censorship! Vote TSB!

This is ridiculous! You are a strawman factory if I've ever seen one! When did I mention anything at all about "censorship"? You're the one who wants the economy to be controlled by the state elite, and not by the workers directly!

He has completely avoided answering any of the concerns raised by me, showing incapability in basic debate! Democracy will wither under the reactionary rule of the TSBP! Citizens, vote whomever, be it DSP, SAP, ST or SUR, but vote against TSBP no matter what!

Lemona

Peoples Republic Of Peepeeland wrote:Other than that they're basically the DSP.

Not Exactly There Are More Differences On Education, Welfare & Poverty, & Tax Reform

Osem, Lemona

Osem wrote:This is ridiculous! You are a strawman factory if I've ever seen one! When did I mention anything at all about "censorship"? You're the one who wants the economy to be controlled by the state elite, and not by the workers directly!

He has completely avoided answering any of the concerns raised by me, showing incapability in basic debate! Democracy will wither under the reactionary rule of the TSBP! Citizens, vote whomever, be it DSP, SAP, ST or SUR, but vote against TSBP no matter what!

Wait What About The SLP, And The EPP

Osem, Lemona

Peoples Republic Of Peepeeland wrote:Other than that they're basically the DSP.

Just because a party shares some views with another party does not mean they're the exact same party, reactionary. From what I see, the DSP and the SAP would have radically different approaches to implementing socialism, with the DSP being more reformist and the SAP being more direct and semi-revolutionary, not to mention completely different focuses to begin with, with DSP focusing on welfare and the SAP specifically focusing on an anti-work, automated, egalitarian society.

Lemona

Osem wrote:This is ridiculous! You are a strawman factory if I've ever seen one! When did I mention anything at all about "censorship"? You're the one who wants the economy to be controlled by the state elite, and not by the workers directly!

He has completely avoided answering any of the concerns raised by me, showing incapability in basic debate! Democracy will wither under the reactionary rule of the TSBP! Citizens, vote whomever, be it DSP, SAP, ST or SUR, but vote against TSBP no matter what!

You are wrongly claiming that I don't support workers. Whlist you are socialist, i'm true communist!

Lemona

Aya Democratic Republic wrote:Wait What About The SLP, And The EPP

Vote them too for all I care! Democracy is a gift, so exercise it! But the TSBP is a direct threat to democratic ideals!

Lemona

Osem wrote:Vote them too for all I care! Democracy is a gift, so exercise it! But the TSBP is a direct threat to democratic ideals!

No, i'll keep democracy, but adjusting it to an electoral college so bigger countries have more of the voice they deserve!

Lemona

Peoples Republic Of Peepeeland wrote:You are wrongly claiming that I don't support workers. Whlist you are socialist, i'm true communist!

Bah, such a distinction is pointless! So long as they're not tankies, I'd also join ranks with communists! After all, Council Communism is a major influence on the SUR!

If you actually supported workers, then you'd trust them with direct management and planning over the economy, and not give all state planning over to bourgeoise state elite!

Lemona

Osem wrote:Bah, such a distinction is pointless! So long as they're not tankies, I'd also join ranks with communists! After all, Council Communism is a major influence on the SUR!

If you actually supported workers, then you'd trust them with direct management and planning over the economy, and not give all state planning over to bourgeoise state elite!

You completely denounce the state as a borgeoise organization. It is not. If you elect Osem, you will have anarchy!

Lemona

Peoples Republic Of Peepeeland wrote:No, i'll keep democracy, but adjusting it to an electoral college so bigger countries have more of the voice they deserve!

An electoral college?! As in, a system purposely designed so that unknown, unelected figures do the voting on the "behalf of the people", leading into situations where the elite purposely override popular opinion in favor of their own agendas?

I reaffirm my position: The TSBP is an agent of the bourgeoise, intending to assassinate true workers' democracy!

Lemona

Osem wrote:An electoral college?! As in, a system purposely designed so that unknown, unelected figures do the voting on the "behalf of the people", leading into situations where the elite purposely override popular opinion in favor of their own agendas?

I reaffirm my position: The TSBP is an agent of the bourgeoise, intending to assassinate true workers' democracy!

Under your democracy system, a nation of 5 million would get the same as one of 5 billion! That's unfair!

Lemona

Peoples Republic Of Peepeeland wrote:You completely denounce the state as a borgeoise organization. It is not. If you elect Osem, you will have anarchy!

I am not opposed to the very existence of the state. I believe the state has its uses, in matters such as funding and overseeing nuclear energies, healthcare, transportation, and just making sure all is well. I just believe that the workers' should take control of day-to-day economic activity for most industry in the form of localized governance and communes, not the national government!

The TSBP denounces any anti-authoritarian position as anarchic! This shows lack of nuance! How can we trust such a person to have the rationale and judgment to have the people's best interests in mind?

Lemona

Peoples Republic Of Peepeeland wrote:Under your democracy system, a nation of 5 million would get the same as one of 5 billion! That's unfair!

What the hell are you on about? I just don't think an electoral college of unelected officials have the nation's best interests in mind! I'm in extreme support for proportional representation, but creating an oligarchy will harm the entirety of the nation!

Lemona

Osem wrote:I am not opposed to the very existence of the state. I believe the state has its uses, in matters such as funding and overseeing nuclear energies, healthcare, transportation, and just making sure all is well. I just believe that the workers' should take control of day-to-day economic activity for most industry in the form of localized governance and communes, not the national government!

The TSBP denounces any anti-authoritarian position as anarchic! This shows lack of nuance! How can we trust such a person to have the rationale and judgment to have the people's best interests in mind?

You're basically assuming authoritarianism will kill the people. And what's so bad about the state owning business? The SUR denounces the government as bourgeoise! If you don't want society to collapse, vote TSB!

Lemona

Peoples Republic Of Peepeeland wrote:Under your democracy system, a nation of 5 million would get the same as one of 5 billion! That's unfair!

Besides, just how is "my democracy", democracy in which the legislature is directly held responsible to fulling the people's will and who can be recalled if their mandate is violated, be any worse than a system in which the state has full control over the economy and which would implement an unelected oligarchy?

Lemona

Yo Osem just ignore them.

Ardeyn, New United Common-Lands, The Green Environment, Osem, Lemona

Osem wrote:Besides, just how is "my democracy", democracy in which the legislature is directly held responsible to fulling the people's will and who can be recalled if their mandate is violated, be any worse than a system in which the state has full control over the economy and which would implement an unelected oligarchy?

You are assuming I will take away democracy even though I won't. You're also assuming the people won't like state owned business. Workers' Rights are simply human rights. You constantly assume I will implement a totalitarian government, even though I won't. You are a skeptic.

Lemona

Peoples Republic Of Peepeeland wrote:You're basically assuming authoritarianism will kill the people. And what's so bad about the state owning business? The SUR denounces the government as bourgeoise! If you don't want society to collapse, vote TSB!

I again state that I am not opposed to the existence of the state, and actually support nationalizing certain industries such as transportation and nuclear energy! But even in those cases, the nationalized industries would still be operated on a day-to-day basis by the workers whom work the workplace. I support extremely-decentralized planned economics with market-cohabitation, not anarchy!

Not to mention, did you just say that authoritarianism isn't bad? Go tell that to the victims of the Holocaust or Holodomor, or the Uighurs or the Tibetans, or the victims of Pinochet and Franco!

The TSBP does not trust the people, and lacks any nuance in political opinion! The SUR believes the people can live their own lives and manage their workplace without any bourgeoise authority telling them what to do!

Don't Vote TSBP! Vote literally Anyone Else!

Lemona

I Once Thought Debates Would Never Happen In This Region And I Was Wrong..... Very Wrong.

Peoples Republic Of Peepeeland, Osem, Lemona

Peoples Republic Of Peepeeland wrote:You are assuming I will take away democracy even though I won't. You're also assuming the people won't like state owned business. Workers' Rights are simply human rights. You constantly assume I will implement a totalitarian government, even though I won't. You are a skeptic.

Is it wrong to be skeptical of complete state-domination of the economy? Is it wrong to be skeptical of those who would seek to increase the power of the elite?

You're form of workers' rights is workers' subservience. My form of workers' rights is workers' freedom to operate.

Lemona

They literally instigated us into a civil war (which was stupid, to begin with). Ignore him your party seems nice and theirs is just hard to take seriously.

Ardeyn, Osem

Santu Surgo wrote:Yo Osem just ignore them.

Aya Democratic Republic wrote:I Once Thought Debates Would Never Happen In This Region And I Was Wrong..... Very Wrong.

Y'know what, y'all're right, I have more important things to do. Adios, and please be careful for whom you vote!

Santu Surgo

Santu Surgo wrote:They literally instigated us into a civil war (which was stupid, to begin with). Ignore him your party seems nice and theirs is just hard to take seriously.

Thank you for the kinds words!

Santu Surgo

Osem wrote:I again state that I am not opposed to the existence of the state, and actually support nationalizing certain industries such as transportation and nuclear energy! But even in those cases, the nationalized industries would still be operated on a day-to-day basis by the workers whom work the workplace. I support extremely-decentralized planned economics with market-cohabitation, not anarchy!

Not to mention, did you just say that authoritarianism isn't bad? Go tell that to the victims of the Holocaust or Holodomor, or the Uighurs or the Tibetans, or the victims of Pinochet and Franco!

The TSBP does not trust the people, and lacks any nuance in political opinion! The SUR believes the people can live their own lives and manage their workplace without any bourgeoise authority telling them what to do!

Don't Vote TSBP! Vote literally Anyone Else!

I never stated authoritarianism wasn't bad, and, you support a weak state by giving those industries to workers. We need a strong state to maintain a strong and stable nation.

No problem. I'm always here just reading you alls responses to each other and I'm just always laughing cause PeePeeland will say something and their beliefs are drastically different from mine and most of y'alls. (honestly, this entire region is different from my views)

Peoples Republic Of Peepeeland, Ardeyn

Santu Surgo wrote:No problem. I'm always here just reading you alls responses to each other and I'm just always laughing cause PeePeeland will say something and their beliefs are drastically different from mine and most of y'alls. (honestly, this entire region is different from my views)

I’m Wondering Why Do You Make A New Message Instead Of Quoting Someone

Aya Democratic Republic wrote:I’m Wondering Why Do You Make A New Message Instead Of Quoting Someone

Still works.

Santu Surgo

IDK just doing it that way.

Ardeyn

The first time Ive ever seen Santu Surgo do anything except liking messages

Santu Surgo, New United Common-Lands

Lol. I try to say stuff but Aya, PeePeeland, or Sidd would message 3 things right after.

Santu Surgo wrote:Lol. I try to say stuff but Aya, PeePeeland, or Sidd would message 3 things right after.

But Siddharristan Left TRTHNBB

Yeah, I mean back when I would speak. Now it's more just Aya and PeePeeland who will speak and then Ardeyn or Washington will come in to calm down the conversation.

Aya Democratic Republic wrote:But Siddharristan Left TRTHNBB

I didn't know that! Siddharstan did so much for this region!

Sidd started a civil war with Aya

Santu Surgo wrote:Sidd started a civil war with Aya

Let me guess, ADR won?

Peoples Republic Of Peepeeland wrote:I didn't know that! Siddharstan did so much for this region!

I Know I Actually Telegramed Him To Come Back Once But He Said He Has Problems With Someone Here But He Actually Said That It Wasn’t Me He Has Problems With.

Peoples Republic Of Peepeeland wrote:Let me guess, ADR won?

Umm Actually No It Was More Like A Stalemate And It Was Actually After The Civil War

Thank you Osem for the debate! You made some good arguments! Congratulations!

Now Guys Who Are You Gonna Vote For! The TSB Or The SLP Or The Other 5 Parties?

Peoples Republic Of Peepeeland wrote:Let me guess, ADR won?

Also I Didn’t Force Him To Leave He Chose To Leave Himself.

Nobody won. Our region plummeted cause everyone freaked out that Yodle might CTE. They were being reactionary instead of just believing in their leader.

Santu Surgo wrote:Nobody won. Our region plummeted cause everyone freaked out that Yodle might CTE. They were being reactionary instead of just believing in their leader.

Yeah Nobody Won

When will the EPP and SLP edit their dispatches? I'm curious to see their policy.

Post self-deleted by Aya Democratic Republic.

Assembled with Dot's Region Saver.
Written by Refuge Isle.