Post Archive

Region: The Region That Has No Big Banks

History

The Washington Federation wrote:BFL Season V Playoffs!

Wild Card Series - 2nd Leg

Al-Adhan FC (Pyhdon) vs. Greater Drussi FC (Greater Drussi)

1st Half: 3-0

2nd Half: 0-1

Full Time: 3-1

Pyhdon advances! (Wins 8-2 on aggregate)

Flomonga FC (Flomonga) vs. Yodle FC (Yodle)

1st Half: 3-0

2nd Half: 3-0

Full Time: 6-0

Flomonga advances! (Wins 11-2 on aggregate)

Ard. Nat. FC (Ardeyn) vs. FC Santo Mardozana (San Jorentino)

1st Half: 0-0

2nd Half: 0-0

Extra Time: 2-2

Full Time: 2-2

Ardeyn advances! (Wins 5-3 on aggregate)

Kaverian Royals FC (The Kaverian) vs. Socialist Brits FC (Socialistic Britain)

1st Half: 0-3

2nd Half: 3-1

Full Time: 3-4

Socialistic Britain advances! (Wins 7-5 on aggregate)

And to think I nearly fired my coach last year.

Yodle, San Jorentino, Mjau

Pyhdon wrote:I believe my club is called "Al-Adhan Cherkhyre FC", not "Al-Adhan FC", which would abbreviate to AACFC, not AAFC

Shortened it for brevity

Mjau

The Washington Federation wrote:Shorted it for brevity

oh

Fun Fact: Cherkhyre is pronounced Thiareakeyarea and means Capital

Fun Fact: Kreantrael is pronounced Crayontrial and means Central

Fun Fact: Al-Adhan is pronounced Al-Athawn and means "the loud call to prayer"

This first Confirmation Committee and Rules Committee are done! While it was quite learning experience for me, I promise to figure out a few issues I found with the lead-up to this VS. That said, we did have a constructive debate. Most of the debate this VS centered around the Abuse of Power Criminalization Act and the Establishment of the Parliamentary Affiliate region. While it was put into question whether the definitions of the Abuse of Power Criminalization Act were specific enough, others said that giving the regional court the power to determine what terms such as "harming the region" mean was sufficient, as it is their job to determine the law. The larger debate, surrounding the Establishment of the Parliamentary Affiliate Region, contested whether an affiliate region would be a better solution than discord to include more MPs that weren't on discord, with some suggesting using forums. Most argued taking the official parliamentary debates off of discord was a big step in the right direction regardless if it is the best solution or not.

All that said, let's start this voting session!

Vote here: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfDXKFZ2Xuj3--0IyhSeEwIeflWcmanXXT_l740TXpZgw7Ufw/viewform

Yodle, Western Arba Fir

Flomonga wrote:And to think I nearly fired my coach last year.

Sounds like I gotta fire my coach 💀

Socialistic Britain, Flomonga

Yodle wrote:Sounds like I gotta fire my coach 💀

Imagine needing a coach to make players do good, we have….other means (in my nations character ofc)

We should have a baseball league, ngl :D (the idea only came to me because I accidentally opened up my overtly specific baseball sim)

Yodle

The Kaverian wrote:We should have a baseball league, ngl :D (the idea only came to me because I accidentally opened up my overtly specific baseball sim)

Western Arba Fir would love this

The Kaverian wrote:We should have a baseball league, ngl :D (the idea only came to me because I accidentally opened up my overtly specific baseball sim)

washington made a form about baseball league sign-ups way back when but it never got put into place

The Kaverian wrote:We should have a baseball league, ngl :D (the idea only came to me because I accidentally opened up my overtly specific baseball sim)

Yodle wrote:Western Arba Fir would love this

Oh yeah!

The Kaverian

Yodle wrote:Western Arba Fir would love this

Ikr, I could actually do a full-length baseball season on the sim too...hmmmmmmm

Western Arba Fir

Ardeyn wrote:washington made a form about baseball league sign-ups way back when but it never got put into place

I saw that, I could probably run one if people were interested lmao

Western Arba Fir

The Kaverian wrote:I saw that, I could probably run one if people were interested lmao

ME ME

ME BASEBALL

ME ME

The Kaverian wrote:I saw that, I could probably run one if people were interested lmao

YES

Hello there, how's it going?

Yodle, Western Arba Fir

Potatopelago wrote:Hello there, how's it going?

good how are you?

Potatopelago

Western Arba Fir wrote:good how are you?

Good!

Also goodbye :)

Western Arba Fir

Potatopelago wrote:Good!

Also goodbye :)

goodbye!

Yodle, Potatopelago

Remember to vote in this trimester’s first VS!

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfDXKFZ2Xuj3--0IyhSeEwIeflWcmanXXT_l740TXpZgw7Ufw/viewform

New United Common-Lands, Western Arba Fir

The Kaverian wrote:Remember to vote in this trimester’s first VS!

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfDXKFZ2Xuj3--0IyhSeEwIeflWcmanXXT_l740TXpZgw7Ufw/viewform

How do you vote on The Abuse of Power Criminalization Act?

Please vote against the abuse of power bill, as under this legislation the PM can abuse power then choose their own punishment

New United Common-Lands wrote:How do you vote on The Abuse of Power Criminalization Act?

Please vote against the abuse of power bill, as under this legislation the PM can abuse power then choose their own punishment

“3. The Regional Court may determine the punishment for different abuses of power.

4. This act shall be enforced by the Regional Court.

5. One may report abuse of power to the Regional Court to open an investigation.”

All it says about the PM is that they may remove an officer who has abused their power, how you read the act like that with these three lines is beyond me.

Would you be interesting in joining a TRTHNBB baseball league?

https://www.nationstates.net/page=poll/p=301367

We should have a bankless football league but it’s American football (superior)

Western Arba Fir

Western Arba Fir wrote:Would you be interesting in joining a TRTHNBB baseball league?

https://www.nationstates.net/page=poll/p=301367

COUNT ME IN[/I]

Western Arba Fir

Sup’ Pyhdon how ya liking it in gud ol’ Addison County

Maen wrote:Sup’ Pyhdon how ya liking it in gud ol’ Addison County

well, my sister is there, I was in hospital. I'm coming soon

Pyhdon wrote:well, my sister is there, I was in hospital. I'm coming soon

getting on a plane

Maitei karaikuéra! Mba'éichapa reime? Opavave pehecha porãve che aranduka pyahu hecho rehegua... Kunjamakitix, jumatix kuna arunaks parlaskta sasin jiskt’asisksta ukhax, ¡jan tukuskir jakhüwinak jaqukipiri tuqikiw t’ijt’ayañama! Jikisñaniwa!

Pyhdon wrote:well, my sister is there, I was in hospital. I'm coming soon

OMG how’re you!?!

Pyhdon wrote:getting on a plane

Be aware of jet lag! Have a good flight!

Maen wrote:OMG how’re you!?!

good now

Maen

Maen wrote:Be aware of jet lag! Have a good flight!

ok

Maen

Pyhdon wrote:ok

See ya :3

Maen wrote:See ya :3

im gonna fly into your home

and give you a big ol hug and a present!

Brocklandia

Claibornia wrote:im gonna fly into your home

and give you a big ol hug and a present!

Careful, [nation=noflag]Maen[/nation]. You're going to need several penicillin shots to get rid of Claibornia's "present."

Yodle, Socialistic Britain

Remember to vote in this trimester’s first VS!

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfDXKFZ2Xuj3--0IyhSeEwIeflWcmanXXT_l740TXpZgw7Ufw/viewform

Yodle, Western Arba Fir

Stop stealing my sexuality Socialistic Britain!!!!

Socialistic Britain

Honestly I could never understand the difference between being pan or being bi until someone just told me to pick the one that had the nicest flag and then I was like 'oh this is easy'

But I just refer to myself interchangeably as bi, pan, or gay

Ardeyn wrote:Stop stealing my sexuality Socialistic Britain!!!!

I saw you mentioned me and I knew it was either washfeds sports post or "you stole my flag!!!!!"

close enough

Claibornia wrote:We should have a bankless football league but it’s American football (superior)

no

i should use the straight pride flag as a base for my june flag

(not as a jab at the community just to exhibit who i am personally cause that's what the core of it is)

Claibornia wrote:i should use the straight pride flag as a base for my june flag

(not as a jab at the community just to exhibit who i am personally cause that's what the core of it is)

i still probably wont change it though i like my current flag

Ardeyn wrote:Honestly I could never understand the difference between being pan or being bi until someone just told me to pick the one that had the nicest flag and then I was like 'oh this is easy'

"Pick the nicest one" also works for choosing romantic partners.

[sub]Of course, everyone has a different criterion for what "nicest" means.[/sub]

Yodle

Ardeyn wrote:But I just refer to myself interchangeably as bi, pan, or gay

My girlfriend calls me gay (even though I’m a guy). She’s not completely wrong, but still lmao.

Ardeyn wrote:Honestly I could never understand the difference between being pan or being bi until someone just told me to pick the one that had the nicest flag and then I was like 'oh this is easy'

I know the difference if you wanna know

Socialistic Britain wrote:I saw you mentioned me and I knew it was either washfeds sports post or "you stole my flag!!!!!"

close enough

You also stole my flag

Now i gonna stole it back

Ardeyn wrote:Honestly I could never understand the difference between being pan or being bi until someone just told me to pick the one that had the nicest flag and then I was like 'oh this is easy'

Personally I like the term pan better. In my opinion it is more inclusive and moves away from binarism. I do not consider one term to be better than another. But with the term pan, I get the feeling that I think of people regardless of their gender.

Krayo29 wrote:Personally I like the term pan better. In my opinion it is more inclusive and moves away from binarism. I do not consider one term to be better than another. But with the term pan, I get the feeling that I think of people regardless of their gender.

The difference is something that kind of surprised me when I discovered it

The difference between bisexual and pansexual is the person's gender.

A bisexual likes people of the male and female gender, but not people of the trans aspect of these genders (that includes non binaries and etc)

Pansexual like all genders including the trans aspect

Krayo29

New-Union wrote:I know the difference if you wanna know

In reality, it is essentially the same, although you can theorize about it. Finally, each person is the one who chooses the term with which they feel most comfortable or with which they identify most. Other people must respect that and that's it.

Inperio Burito

Krayo29 wrote:In reality, it is essentially the same, although you can theorize about it. Finally, each person is the one who chooses the term with which they feel most comfortable or with which they identify most. Other people must respect that and that's it.

I studied a little about my sexuality and how it came about and discovered that of bisexuality too because they are very interconnected and that was the reason, I was surprised when I found out because I thought bi also included that, but originally, it didn't

Thats why the pansexual was created, for people who liked all genders, And pansexual sexuality was created from people who were bisexual

Krayo29

New-Union wrote:The difference is something that kind of surprised me when I discovered it

The difference between bisexual and pansexual is the person's gender.

A bisexual likes people of the male and female gender, but not people of the trans aspect of these genders (that includes non binaries and etc)

Pansexual like all genders including the trans aspect

I love that we get to debate this without fear and exposing our points of view without being questioned I'm going to continue debating a little before going to school. I think the difference was perhaps more pronounced before. Not now, at least within the group. Finally, it is like the rest of the terms, in a couple made up of a cis woman and a trans woman, both women are lesbians.

Inperio Burito

I have to go or I'll be late.

Hasta después gente linda 🖤🤎🩵🩷🤍❤️🧡💛💚💙💜

Inperio Burito

Krayo29 wrote:I love that we get to debate this without fear and exposing our points of view without being questioned I'm going to continue debating a little before going to school. I think the difference was perhaps more pronounced before. Not now, at least within the group. Finally, it is like the rest of the terms, in a couple made up of a cis woman and a trans woman, both women are lesbians.

This is the exact reason why I am surprised, nowadays the difference that bisexuality and pansexuality made does not exist, They are the same on paper, but they are very different by the individual, But bisexuality still has parts of its origin that come from the person, Many bisexual people still follow the difference by free will

Krayo29

I'm seeing lovely flags

Krayo29, Mjau

Gine Caruttiva wrote:I'm seeing lovely flags

my flag soon!

Krayo29

June flag UP

Gine Caruttiva, Mjau, Western Arba Fir

super Paul mullin

I voted against the zero tolerance policy

For one reason, because it goes against what the CoC was made for.

In 2022 Claibornia and I defended the nation FaveNova against his ban, the ban reasoning was apparent fascist remarks, which he disagreed with that they are fascist.

This allowed FaveNova to return, and have a second chance to hide his thoughts and come into region life (He spoiled that not to long after)

A zero tolerance policy gets rid of the second chance to assimilate in the culture of TRTHNBB

While I would understand having 2 strikes before your banned for bigotry, I believe a zero tolerance policy is not what this region needs. Claibornia himself was given multiple chances, and why it took a while, did return assimilated to TRTHNBB thoughts and ways, a possibility which could never happen with a zero tolerance policy.

Lemona wrote:Snippy snip snip

The Amendment states that any immediate ban can be overturned by a simple majority of moderators - so your idea that “people won’t get a second chance” is a fairly null argument to make, in all honesty.

In that same vein, why should be give time for people who do not wish to give an ounce of tolerance for others? If there are people are are intolerant of certain creeds or communities which are welcome and celebrated in the region, what gives them the right for us to be lenient and tolerant towards them?

It’s not about “cultural assimilation”, it’s about being a decent human being. Homophobia, transphobia, racism and all those I fail to list right now are not simply easy to wash away - they run deep in someone’s psyche. Of course, we can attempt to educate and inform, but if remarks are made by an individual which threaten the safety of our region’s members, that’s a different story.

Inperio Burito, Krayo29

Syrasia wrote:The Amendment states that any immediate ban can be overturned by a simple majority of moderators - so your idea that “people won’t get a second chance” is a fairly null argument to make, in all honesty.

In all honesty, why go through the effort of overturning when theyll have one strike, and one more they are gone

In all honesty, if a strike for it wouldn’t be overturned then neither would a ban, so in all honesty that whole overturning thing won’t really do anything

Syrasia wrote: Of course, we can attempt to educate and inform, but if remarks are made by an individual which threaten the safety of our region’s members, that’s a different story.

How is a remark on an online site affect the safety of a member of such online site if it is not exposing personal detail

This next part doesn’t have to do with the quote

I know most of this region doesn’t believe in god nor the Bible, but god tells us to forgive. And while many “Christian’s” takes gods word and creates their own false beliefs which promote hatred, it doesn’t mean you shouldn’t try to forgive

I understand not wanting to on the belief that they offended you in some way, which I have had to myself before, but imo forgiveness is important

Now if they take your forgiveness and throw it down the drain then they get banned, no questions asked

Lemona wrote:In all honesty, why go through the effort of overturning when theyll have one strike, and one more they are gone

In all honesty, if a strike for it wouldn’t be overturned then neither would a ban, so in all honesty that whole overturning thing won’t really do anythingHow is a remark on an online site affect the safety of a member of such online site if it is not exposing personal detail

This next part doesn’t have to do with the quote

I know most of this region doesn’t believe in god nor the Bible, but god tells us to forgive. And while many “Christian’s” takes gods word and creates their own false beliefs which promote hatred, it doesn’t mean you shouldn’t try to forgive

I understand not wanting to on the belief that they offended you in some way, which I have had to myself before, but imo forgiveness is important

Now if they take your forgiveness and throw it down the drain then they get banned, no questions asked

it only is about transphobia

Pyhdon wrote:it only is about transphobia

What is bro yapping about

I'm alive, if anything.

Lemona wrote:In all honesty, why go through the effort of overturning when theyll have one strike, and one more they are gone

In all honesty, if a strike for it wouldn’t be overturned then neither would a ban, so in all honesty that whole overturning thing won’t really do anything

It’s not really about overturning, if someone breaks rule 2 prior to making the decision to ban there must be a vote by moderators if it is worthy to ban them for the specific comment. If it is obvious rule break then it’s going to be a ban, if it’s less clear moderators may vote against fully banning, and therefore it would just be recorded at one strike.

Hello!

Please read this. Or skim through it.

https://www.nationstates.net/nation=ammmericaaaa/detail=factbook/id=2511326

America The Greater

Lemona wrote:In all honesty, why go through the effort of overturning when theyll have one strike, and one more they are gone

In all honesty, if a strike for it wouldn’t be overturned then neither would a ban, so in all honesty that whole overturning thing won’t really do anythingHow is a remark on an online site affect the safety of a member of such online site if it is not exposing personal detail

This next part doesn’t have to do with the quote

I know most of this region doesn’t believe in god nor the Bible, but god tells us to forgive. And while many “Christian’s” takes gods word and creates their own false beliefs which promote hatred, it doesn’t mean you shouldn’t try to forgive

I understand not wanting to on the belief that they offended you in some way, which I have had to myself before, but imo forgiveness is important

Now if they take your forgiveness and throw it down the drain then they get banned, no questions asked

I believe that according to their religion, for there to be forgiveness, there must be a confession and repentance, events that if they occurred in this region surely the action would not reach a strike. That is, the first forgiveness must come from the aggressor. However, this is not usually the case, rather their behavior becomes stubborn in wanting to be right, breaking rules 4 and 7. This tends to be the modus operandi.

"How does a comment on an online site affect the safety of a member of that online site if it does not expose personal details?" I answer this question with another question, so as long as we don't say personal data, we can say about others whatever we want? Don't you think that would lead to free will? And the moral damage we can cause?

New United Common-Lands wrote:It’s not really about overturning, if someone breaks rule 2 prior to making the decision to ban there must be a vote by moderators if it is worthy to ban them for the specific comment. If it is obvious rule break then it’s going to be a ban, if it’s less clear moderators may vote against fully banning, and therefore it would just be recorded at one strike.

Ah

I understand now, thank you

Lemona wrote:Ah

I understand now, thank you

I do think the bill should clarify that more

As the “level” of bigotry can change case by case

Well that’s not a good way to say it but each matter is different

Pags. 7493 and 7494

Lemona wrote:I do think the bill should clarify that more

As the “level” of bigotry can change case by case

Well that’s not a good way to say it but each matter is different

You can’t make a metric for what is or isn’t bigoted. It is intersectional and subjective; that’s why we have a team of moderators to review these cases on an ad hoc basis.

New United Common-Lands

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iu8P_vplUiM

Leruytpo wrote:I'm alive, if anything.

always a good thing

Post self-deleted by Claibornia.

Lemona wrote:I do think the bill should clarify that more

As the “level” of bigotry can change case by case

Well that’s not a good way to say it but each matter is different

Sorry I've been gone recently; been on extended mental vacation post-semester. Apparently people tried to invade me and there was a proxy war in my absence? Thanks again for that, Lemona and Lkandria.

Adreabhal wrote:Sorry I've been gone recently; been on extended mental vacation post-semester. Apparently people tried to invade me and there was a proxy war in my absence? Thanks again for that, Lemona and Lkandria.

there was also the ruling out of nearly all of page 23

Pyhdon wrote:there was also the ruling out of nearly all of page 23

Page 23?

Adreabhal wrote:Page 23?

rp page 23, unto the beginning of the proxy war, and the founding of Sodium

Pyhdon wrote:rp page 23, unto the beginning of the proxy war, and the founding of Sodium

also, reply to me incurring on the sinai peninsula and southern Egypt pls

Pyhdon wrote:also, reply to me incurring on the sinai peninsula and southern Egypt pls

Hahaha no. Mine

Adreabhal wrote:Hahaha no. Mine

you need to go to forum

Syrasia wrote:You can’t make a metric for what is or isn’t bigoted. It is intersectional and subjective; that’s why we have a team of moderators to review these cases on an ad hoc basis.

Exactly that’s the point, we already do review each case subjectively. I can say with confidence there is always good challenge and debate. It’s the best thing that came from our first court case, this system is a lot fairer.

New United Common-Lands wrote:It’s not really about overturning, if someone breaks rule 2 prior to making the decision to ban there must be a vote by moderators if it is worthy to ban them for the specific comment. If it is obvious rule break then it’s going to be a ban, if it’s less clear moderators may vote against fully banning, and therefore it would just be recorded at one strike.

Gine Caruttiva - am I interpreting this correctly?

Adreabhal wrote:Hahaha no. Mine

Just to inform you, Cairo has been left to dust

Pretty much eradicated

PyhdonLemona

Well, I know I'm not an administrator anymore but

Pyhdon, Sodium and water react to produce hydrogen, sodium hydroxide (lye), and heat; the heat ignites the hydrogen when it comes into contact with oxygen in the air.

So this question is equivalent to "Would hydrogen be an effective explosive?" The answer is, for the most part, no. Sodium in water produces a bang and some fire, but it isn't a detonation; I suppose you could use it as an incendiary weapon, but there are far more economical ways of doing that

And When sodium (Na) and chlorine gas (Cl₂) are mixed together, they undergo a chemical reaction to form sodium chloride (NaCl), which is common table salt. The reaction is highly exothermic, The reaction releases a large amount of energy in the form of heat and light. If the reaction occurs in a sufficient quantity, it can be explosive

And in the quantities that lemona must have thrown into the cities, it was probably enough to be explosive

Lemona

Lemona did the bombs you used were nukes?

Because you cant use they without a motive

New-Union wrote:Lemona did the bombs you used were nukes?

Because you cant use they without a motive

pretty sure he said they werent

New United Common-Lands wrote:Exactly that’s the point, we already do review each case subjectively. I can say with confidence there is always good challenge and debate. It’s the best thing that came from our first court case, this system is a lot fairer.

similar to the favenova issue

god that was a while ago

although fave did end up actually being a fascist but were not gonna mention that

New-Union wrote:PyhdonLemona

Well, I know I'm not an administrator anymore but

Pyhdon, Sodium and water react to produce hydrogen, sodium hydroxide (lye), and heat; the heat ignites the hydrogen when it comes into contact with oxygen in the air.

So this question is equivalent to "Would hydrogen be an effective explosive?" The answer is, for the most part, no. Sodium in water produces a bang and some fire, but it isn't a detonation; I suppose you could use it as an incendiary weapon, but there are far more economical ways of doing that

And When sodium (Na) and chlorine gas (Cl₂) are mixed together, they undergo a chemical reaction to form sodium chloride (NaCl), which is common table salt. The reaction is highly exothermic, The reaction releases a large amount of energy in the form of heat and light. If the reaction occurs in a sufficient quantity, it can be explosive

And in the quantities that lemona must have thrown into the cities, it was probably enough to be explosive

There was also a lot of sodium.

Pyhdon wrote:There was also a lot of sodium.

So its makes it more explosive

Claibornia wrote:pretty sure he said they werent

Then Pyhdon dont have a reason for using nukes

New-Union wrote:So its makes it more explosive

Then Pyhdon dont have a reason for using nukes

I did not use them yet

Pyhdon wrote:I did not use them yet

Get the nukes ready!" says all the generals, as they come under fire, "Get. Them. Ready!"

The nukes are readied, each hoisting 100000 kilotons.

They will be hit in these places, we will only if we lose the battle

If you lose the battle, you still won't have a valid argument, you have all your territory and you're going to fire bombs because of a battle?

Sound like a no to me

Pyhdon wrote:I did not use them yet

Please, if someone wants to correct me, feel free, but the largest nuclear warhead is the Tsar Bomba of approx. 50,000 kt. Doing basic research finds that all nuclear testing as of 1996 equated to about 500,000 kilotons. If you are going to use nuclear weapons, at least do your research properly. I refuse to believe that you can have multiple devices which each equate to a fifth of the entire cumulative kt of testing.

New-Union wrote:Get the nukes ready!" says all the generals, as they come under fire, "Get. Them. Ready!"

The nukes are readied, each hoisting 100000 kilotons.

They will be hit in these places, we will only if we lose the battle

If you lose the battle, you still won't have a valid argument, you have all your territory and you're going to fire bombs because of a battle?

Sound like a no to me

I will lose 77% of my Earth army if I lose

Syrasia wrote:Please, if someone wants to correct me, feel free, but the largest nuclear warhead is the Tsar Bomba of approx. 50,000 kt. Doing basic research finds that all nuclear testing as of 1996 equated to about 500,000 kilotons. If you are going to use nuclear weapons, at least do your research properly. I refuse to believe that you can have multiple devices which each equate to a fifth of the entire cumulative kt of testing.

no, the highest kt was about 100,000 kt, and I will send most

Pyhdon wrote:no, the highest kt was about 100,000 kt, and I will send most

All it takes is a Google of "largest ever nuclear bomb in kilotons" to realise you are incorrect.

Syrasia wrote:Please, if someone wants to correct me, feel free, but the largest nuclear warhead is the Tsar Bomba of approx. 50,000 kt. Doing basic research finds that all nuclear testing as of 1996 equated to about 500,000 kilotons. If you are going to use nuclear weapons, at least do your research properly. I refuse to believe that you can have multiple devices which each equate to a fifth of the entire cumulative kt of testing.

Pyhdon wrote:no, the highest kt was about 100,000 kt, and I will send most

I also think that should be invalid

The Soviets themselves did not build more than 2 Tsars because they were impossible to handle, and very unstable, and only 1 waa exploded

Pyhdon having more then 10 of then is just too unrealistic

It does not have the technology resources to make the bombs usable, and even today not even Russia can do it.

Pyhdon wrote:I will lose 77% of my Earth army if I lose

Well, you can use your gaian army

Syrasia wrote:All it takes is a Google of "largest ever nuclear bomb in kilotons" to realise you are incorrect.

That i must say

The Tsar Bomb was originally designed with 100 kilotons, but it was simply impossible to use it, so they cut the number of kilotons in half.

With 100 kilotons they couldn't even put it on planes because it was so unstable

Assembled with Dot's Region Saver.
Written by Refuge Isle.